Pediatric Patients of Outreach Specialist Queensland Clinics Have Lung Function Improvement Comparable to That of Tertiary Pediatric Patients.

BACKGROUND: Inequitable access to quality health care contributes to the known poorer outcomes of people living in regional/remote areas (compared with urban-based), especially for First Nations people. Integration of specialist outreach services within primary care is one strategy that can reduce the inequity when modeled to the needs and available resources of target communities. RESEARCH QUESTION: To evaluate whether respiratory outreach clinics in regional and remote Queensland are as effective as tertiary respiratory services at improving the lung function of children. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: From existing databases, we obtained spirometry data of children (aged 3-18 years) seen at Indigenous-focused outreach clinics in regional and remote Queensland and Brisbane-based pediatric tertiary hospitals over the same contemporary period (October 2010 to July 2019). We compared the change in spirometry z scores (Δz) at follow-up for both groups of children. RESULTS: Lung function significantly improved in both groups: Tertiary hospital (n = 2,249; ΔzFEV1 = 0.22, 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.27; ΔzFVC = 0.23, 95% CI, 0.18 to 0.28); outreach (n = 252; ΔzFEV1 = 0.35, 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.48; ΔzFVC = 0.36, 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.50). No significant intergroup differences were found in ΔzFEV1 (0.13; 95%CI, -0.02 to 0.28; P = .10) or ΔzFVC (0.14; 95% CI, -0.02 to 0.29; P = .08) improvement from baseline. In both groups, the proportion of children with zFEV1 > 0 at follow-up (hospital = 31.7%; outreach = 46.8%) significantly increased (hospital P = .001; outreach P = .009) from baseline (hospital = 27.2%; outreach = 35.3%). Numbers of children with zFEV1 > 0 significantly increased for asthma and bronchiectasis outreach subgroups, and for children with asthma in the hospital-based group. INTERPRETATION: Comparable significant lung function improvement of children was seen in Indigenous-focused outreach remote/regional clinics and paediatric tertiary hospitals. This suggests that effective clinical care is achievable within the outreach setting.

Culturally Appropriate Outreach Specialist Respiratory Medical Care Improves the Lung Function of Children in Regional and Remote Queensland.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Indigenous Respiratory Outreach Care (IROC) is a culturally appropriate specialist respiratory service established to deliver multidisciplinary respiratory care to regional and remote Queensland communities. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of an outreach specialist respiratory service on the spirometry of children attending IROC clinics, particularly Indigenous children with asthma and bronchiectasis. METHODS: Retrospective single-arm cohort study of 189 children who performed spirometry at twelve sites across regional and remote Queensland between October 2010 and December 2017. Each child's baseline spirometry was compared to their best spirometry at follow-up visit occurring within (1) 12 months of their most recent visit with at least 12 months of specialist care and; (2) each year of their first 3 years of care. RESULTS: Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) z-scores improved significantly across the whole group from baseline to follow-up (change in z-scores (Δz) of FEV1 = 0.38, 95% CI 0.22, 0.53; ΔzFVC = 0.36, 95% CI 0.21, 0.51). In subgroup analyses, lung function significantly improved in Indigenous children (n = 141, ΔzFEV1 = 0.37, 95% CI 0.17, 0.57; ΔzFVC = 0.36, 95% CI 0.17, 0.55) including those with asthma (n = 117, ΔzFEV1 = 0.41, 95% CI 0.19, 0.64; ΔzFVC = 0.46, 95% CI 0.24, 0.68) and bronchiectasis (n = 38, ΔzFEV1 = 0.33, 95% CI 0.07, 0.59; ΔzFVC = 0.26, 95% CI - 0.03, 0.53). Significant improvements in FEV1 and FVC were observed within the first and second year of follow-up for Indigenous children, but not for non-Indigenous children. CONCLUSION: The IROC model of care in regional and remote settings leads to significant lung function improvement in Indigenous children with asthma and bronchiectasis.

Spirometry training courses: Content, delivery and assessment - a position statement from the Australian and New Zealand Society of Respiratory Science.

Spirometry training courses are provided by health services and training organizations to enable widespread use of spirometry testing for patient care or for monitoring health. The primary outcome of spirometry training courses should be to enable participants to perform spirometry to international best practice, including testing of subjects, quality assurance and interpretation of results. Where valid results are not achieved or quality assurance programmes identify errors in devices, participants need to be able to adequately manage these issues in accordance with best practice. It is important that potential participants are confident in the integrity of the course they attend and that the course meets their expectations in terms of training. This position statement lists the content that the Australian and New Zealand Society of Respiratory Science (ANZSRS) has identified as required in a spirometry training course to adequately meet the primary outcomes mentioned above. The content requirements outlined in this position statement are based on the current international spirometry standards set out by the American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society. Furthermore, recommendations around course delivery for theoretical and practical elements of spirometry testing and post-course assessment are outlined in this statement.

Does Ethnicity Influence Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide in Healthy Individuals?: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (Feno) is used clinically as a biomarker of eosinophilic airway inflammation. Awareness of the factors influencing Feno values is important for valid clinical interpretation. METHODS: We undertook a systematic review of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science databases and reference lists of included articles to evaluate whether ethnicity influences Feno values, and to determine if this influence affects clinical interpretation according to current guidelines. We included all studies that performed online Feno measurements on at least 25 healthy, non-Caucasian individuals, and examined the effect of ethnicity on Feno. RESULTS: From 62 potential studies, 12 studies were included. One study recruited only children (< 12 years of age), six studies recruited children and/or adolescents, four studies recruited adults only, and a single study involved children, adolescents, and adults. In total, 16 different ethnic populations representing 11 ethnicities were studied. Ethnicity was considered a significant influencing factor in 10 of the included studies. We found the geometric mean Feno to be above the normal healthy range in two studies. We also identified five studies in which at least 5% of participants had Feno results above the age-specific inflammatory ranges. CONCLUSIONS: Ethnicity influences Feno values, and for some ethnic groups this influence likely affects clinical interpretation according to current guidelines. There is a need to establish healthy Feno reference ranges for specific ethnic groups to improve clinical application.

Spirometry reference values in Indigenous Australians: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate published spirometry data for Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (Indigenous) peoples to determine (i) whether their ethnicity influenced spirometry results; and (ii) if any reliable spirometry reference values exist for Indigenous Australians. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review of published and grey literature. DATA SOURCES: PubMed and Cochrane Library databases, references of included articles and appropriate grey literature. Last searches were conducted in April 2016. STUDY SELECTION: We included any study that performed spirometry on healthy Indigenous Australians and compared their results with those from people of European ancestry. Two authors independently screened titles and abstracts and then reviewed potentially relevant full-text articles for possible inclusion. We used PRISMA systematic review reporting methods to collate data. DATA SYNTHESIS: Of a possible 125 studies, 18 full-text articles were reviewed, but only nine fulfilled the inclusion criteria. None specified Torres Strait Islander inclusion. All studies reported lower spirometry values (as much as 30% lower) for Aboriginal people compared with non-Indigenous people. Five studies developed spirometry reference values for Indigenous Australians; however, none adhered to all participant inclusion and exclusion criteria outlined by the American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society. Hence, reported results and subsequent reference values may not be a true representation of spirometry values in healthy Indigenous people. CONCLUSIONS: The lower spirometry values reported for Indigenous Australians may be due to study limitations. Furthermore, there are currently no reliable spirometry reference values for Indigenous Australians that adhere to current guidelines. Developing a set of Indigenous Australian reference values will improve the accuracy of test interpretation and aid in the diagnosis of respiratory disease in this population.

Abdominal binder improves lung volumes and voice in people with tetraplegic spinal cord injury.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of an elasticated abdominal binder on respiratory, voice, and blood pressure outcomes for people with a motor complete acute tetraplegia during the first year after injury. DESIGN: Randomized crossover study. SETTING: Large university-affiliated referral hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Consenting participants (N=14, 13 men and 1 woman) with recent, motor complete, C3-T1 spinal cord injury. INTERVENTIONS: Abdominal binder on/off with participant seated in upright wheelchair, with 3 repeated measures at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after commencing daily use of an upright wheelchair. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in 1 second, peak expiratory flow, maximal inspiratory pressure, and maximal expiratory pressure were measured. Mean arterial pressure, maximum sustained vowel time, and sound pressure level were also measured. RESULTS: Overall, an abdominal binder resulted in a statistically significant improvement in forced vital capacity (weighted mean difference .34 L [95% confidence interval (CI) .10-.58], P=.005), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (.25 L [95% CI -.01 to .51], P=.05), peak expiratory flow (.81 L/s [95% CI .13-1.48], P=.02), maximal inspiratory pressure (7.40 cm H(2)O [95% CI 1.64-13.14], P=.01), and maximum sustained vowel time (3.75 s [95% CI .90-6.60], P=.01). There was no statistically significant improvement in maximal expiratory pressure (5.37 cm H(2)O [95% CI -1.15 to 11.90], P=.11), mean arterial pressure (4.41 mmHg [95% CI -6.15 to 14.97], P=.41), or sound pressure level (1.14 dB [95% CI -1.31 to 3.58], P=.36). CONCLUSIONS: An individually fitted abdominal binder significantly improved forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in 1 second, peak expiratory flow, maximal inspiratory pressure, and maximum sustained vowel time in people with newly acquired tetraplegia. Further study is needed into the effect of the long-term use of the abdominal binder on breathing mechanics, functional residual capacity, total lung capacity, and respiratory health.

Questionnaire responses that predict airway response to hypertonic saline.

BACKGROUND: Airway hyperresponsiveness to hypertonic saline (HS) is associated with airway inflammation. We investigated if responsiveness to HS was predicted by asthma symptoms in the last 3 months. OBJECTIVES: To investigate if responsiveness to HS can be estimated by questionnaire items investigating asthma symptoms of the last 3 months. METHODS: Six hundred and four patients with physician-diagnosed asthma being assessed for asthma severity were studied. Bronchial provocation with 4.5% saline was performed, and a questionnaire was administered. The response to 4.5% saline was reported as the provoking dose to cause a 15% fall in the forced expiratory volume in 1 s FEV(1) (PD(15)) and the response-dose ratio (RDR). RESULTS: Based on the GINA guidelines, asthma severity was intermittent in 497 patients, mild in 107 patients, moderate in 3 patients and severe in 1 patient. A PD(15) to 4.5% saline was recorded in 234 of the 604. Questions on self-recognition of asthma, dust as a trigger, food as a trigger, and frequency of bronchodilator use were significant predictors for a PD(15), and currently taking steroids decreased the likelihood of a positive response to 4.5% saline. Using a multiple-linear regression model, a difference in the RDR could be calculated between those who answered positively compared with the reference group, who answered negatively. This difference could be used as a guide for predicting abnormal reactivity. An increase in RDR in response to 4.5% saline, compared with the reference group, was demonstrated in the presence of self-recognition of asthma severity, dust and cats as a trigger or use of bronchodilator during sleep hours. CONCLUSIONS: Because of the high positive predictive value of HS for identifying patients with asthma it might be that the need for bronchodilator use at night not only predicts airway hyperresponsiveness to HS, it also could reflect the severity of asthma.