Economic Value of Peer Support Program in German Hospitals.

Objectives: Acknowledging peer support as the cornerstone in mitigating the psychosocial burden arising from the second victim phenomenon, this study assesses the economic benefits of a Peer Support Program (PSP), compared to data of the Resilience In Stressful Events (RISE) program in the US, within the acute inpatient care sector in Germany. Methods: Employing a Markov model, this economic evaluation analyzes the cost benefits, including sick day and dropout costs, over a 1-year period, comparing scenarios with and without the Peer Support Program from a hospital perspective. The costs were calculated as an example based on a hospital with 1,000 employees. The estimations are considered conservative. Results: The anticipated outcomes demonstrate an average cost saving of €6,672 per healthcare worker participating in the Peer Support Program, leading to an annual budgetary impact of approximately €6,67 Mio. for the studied hospital. Conclusion: The integration of a PSP proves economically advantageous for German hospitals, not only preserving financial resources but also reducing absenteeism, and mitigating turnover, thereby enhancing overall patient care.

Development and validation of a short clinical risk management implementation (Short CRiMI) questionnaire.

Clinical Risk Management (CRM) is an important instrument to continuously improve safety of health care delivery. In Germany, hospitals are required by law to implement CRM and incidence reporting systems. Since 2010, nation-wide surveys have been conducted periodically to evaluate implementation of CRM in hospitals. The instrument used in these surveys is constantly being updated to reflect previous experiences, as well as to adapt to ongoing trends and developments in CRM practices. The survey instrument used in 2022 consisted of up to 200 items and took up to an hour to complete. In this study, we aimed to develop a short instrument to measure the level of CRM implementation in hospitals, evaluate its psychometric properties, and to offer benchmarking data for health care facilities of different sizes. We used data collected in 2022 as part of KHaSiMiR study, employing a cross-sectional self-reported online survey. The hospital administrations were invited to designate one CRM manager to participate in the study. Out of 1,411 general hospitals invited, 401 responses were collected (response rate of 28%). After removing the cases with excessive missings, we imputed remaining missing values using multiple imputation, and split the resulting sample (n=362) in two halves (i.e., exploratory and testing subsamples). A principal component analysis was applied on the first subsample. We validated the resulting model using confirmatory factor analysis in the testing subsample. We evaluated internal consistency, and tested external validity of the established instrument using correlation analysis with two single-item measures: subjective evaluation of CRM implementation compared to similar organizations and compared to own ideal level. The principal component analysis included 45 items from the full instrument. The analysis resulted in a three-factor model with 26 items. In the confirmatory factor analysis, the model demonstrated acceptable fit with the data according to the commonly used fit indices: Chi2/df=1.36, CFI=0.941, TLI=0.930, RMSEA=0.045 (90% CI=0.032-0.056), SRMR=0.049. Cronbach's alpha of all three factors was good (>0.70). All three factors had statistically significant positive correlations with each other (0.359-0.497) and with the two single items (0.282-0.532). None of the correlations were high enough (>0.7) to indicate multicollinearity. The proposed short clinical risk management implementation (Short CRiMI) questionnaire is psychometrically valid and can be used to rapidly evaluate CRM implementation in hospitals. Further research can provide evidence of its external validity and association with quality and safety outcomes. Benchmarking data can be used to compare the results with the data from the most recent Germany-wide survey.

Second Victims among Austrian Pediatricians (SeViD-A1 Study).

(1) Background: The second victim phenomenon (SVP) plays a critical role in workplace and patient safety. So far, there are limited epidemiological data on the SVP in German-speaking countries. Some studies have been carried out in Germany, but so far, no quantitative studies have been carried out in Austria examining the prevalence, symptom load and preferred support measures for second victims (SVs). This study therefore examines the SVP among Austrian pediatricians. (2) Methods: A nationwide, cross-sectional and anonymous online study was conducted using the SeViD questionnaire (Second Victims in Deutschland) including the Big Five Inventory-10 (BFI-10). Statistical analysis included binary-logistic and multiple linear regression with the bootstrapping, bias-corrected and accelerated (BCa) method based on 1000 bootstrap samples. (3) Results: Of 414 Austrian pediatricians, 89% self-identified as SVs. The main cause of becoming an SV was the unexpected death or suicide of a patient. High neuroticism and extraversion values as well as working in outpatient care positively correlated with having experienced the SVP. A preferred support strategy was access to legal counseling. (4) Conclusions: Austrian pediatricians have the highest SVP prevalence measured with the SeViD questionnaire. Further research should focus on prevention strategies and intervention programs.

Second Victims among German Emergency Medical Services Physicians (SeViD-III-Study).

BACKGROUND: Patient care in the prehospital emergency setting is error-prone. Wu's publications on the second victim syndrome made very clear that medical errors may lead to severe emotional injury on the caregiver's part. So far, little is known about the extent of the problem within the field of prehospital emergency care. Our study aimed at identifying the prevalence of the Second Victim Phenomenon among Emergency Medical Services (EMS) physicians in Germany. METHODS: Web-based distribution of the SeViD questionnaire among n = 12.000 members of the German Prehospital Emergency Physician Association (BAND) to assess general experience, symptoms and support strategies associated with the Second Victim Phenomenon. RESULTS: In total, 401 participants fully completed the survey, 69.1% were male and the majority (91.2%) were board-certified in prehospital emergency medicine. The median length of experience in this field of medicine was 11 years. Out of 401 participants, 213 (53.1%) had experienced at least one second victim incident. Self-perceived time to full recovery was up to one month according to 57.7% (123) and more than one month to 31.0% (66) of the participants. A total of 11.3% (24) had not fully recovered by the time of the survey. Overall, 12-month prevalence was 13.7% (55/401). The COVID-19 pandemic had little effect on SVP prevalence within this specific sample. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that the Second Victim Phenomenon is very frequent among prehospital emergency physicians in Germany. However, four out of ten caregivers affected did not seek or receive any assistance in coping with this stressful situation. One out of nine respondents had not yet fully recovered by the time of the survey. Effective support networks, e.g., easy access to psychological and legal counseling as well as the opportunity to discuss ethical issues, are urgently required in order to prevent employees from further harm, to keep healthcare professionals from leaving this field of medical care and to maintain a high level of system safety and well-being of subsequent patients.

Prevalence of Second Victims, Risk Factors, and Support Strategies among German Nurses (SeViD-II Survey).

BACKGROUND: Second victim phenomena (SVP) are critical to workplace and patient safety, and epidemiological data are limited to investigate the causes and impact on German health care. We investigated SVP in German nurses regarding prevalence, causes, and predisposition compared to a preceding study on German physicians (Second Victims in Deutschland/SeViD-I). METHODS: We conducted a nationwide anonymous cross-sectional online study in 2020 using a modified SeViD questionnaire including the BFI-10 (personality traits). Statistical analysis was conducted using chi² tests and binary logistic regression models. RESULTS: Of 332 nurses, 60% reported to experience SVP at least once a working lifetime, with a 12-month prevalence among SVP of 49%. Of the nurses, 24% reported recovery times of more than 1 year. In contrast to physicians from SeViD-I, a main cause for becoming a second victim was aggressive behavior by patients. High neuroticism values, higher age, and medium work life experience, but neither gender nor workplace position, were predisposing for SVP. Like SeViD-I, nurses reported demand for an institutional response in cases of SVP. CONCLUSIONS: SVP is common among German nurses and comprises other causes and a different course than in physicians. Further research should concentrate on specific prevention strategies, e.g., profession- and workplace-based educational programs.