Preoperative Veterans Rand-12 Mental Composite Score of < 40 Leads to Increased Healthcare Utilization and Diminished Improvement After Primary Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Adverse outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have been associated with preoperative psychological disorders and poor mental health. We aimed to investigate and quantify the association between preoperative mental health and 1) postoperative 90-day health care utilization; and 2) 1-year patient-reported outcomes after primary TKA. METHODS: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data of patients who underwent primary elective TKA (n = 7,476) was performed. Preoperative mental health was evaluated using Veterans Rand-12 Mental Composite Scores (VR-12 MCS). Outcomes included prolonged length of stay (>2-days), nonhome discharge, 90-day readmissions, emergency department visits, and reoperation. Improvement in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) achievement were evaluated at 1-year. Multivariable regression was implemented to explore associations between preoperative VR-12 MCS and outcomes of interest. RESULTS: A total of 5,402 (72.3%) completed 1-year follow-up. Lower preoperative VR-12 MCS was associated with higher odds of prolonged length of stay (MCS 20-39: odds ratio (OR): 1.46;P < .001), and nonhome discharge disposition (MCS 20-39: OR: 1.92;P < .001), but not 90-day readmission or reoperation (MCS20-39; P = .12 and P = .64). At 1-year, patients with a lower MCS were less likely to attain a substantial clinical benefit in KOOS-pain (MCS 0-19; OR: 0.25; P < .001) and less likely to achieve PASS (MCS20-39; OR: 0.74; P = .002). Patients with an MCS >60 were more likely to be discharged home (OR: 1.42; P = .008), achieve substantial clinical benefit in their KOOS-JR (OR: 1.16; P = .027),-Pain (OR: 1.220; P = .007) and PASS at 1-year (OR: 1.28; P = .008). CONCLUSIONS: Lower VR-12 MCS is associated with increased postoperative health care utilization and worse patient-reported outcome measures at 1-year post-TKA. These findings suggest that a VR-12 MCS ≤40 could be used to designate increased risk, guide the preoperative discussion and potential interventions.

Dual-Energy CT to Diagnose Occult Femoral Neck Fracture in MRI-Contraindicated Patient: A Case Report.

CASE: A 79-year-old woman presented after a ground level fall with the inability to bear weight on her right hip. Radiographs and computed tomography (CT) imaging were negative for a femoral neck fracture. Her medical comorbidities precluded magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), so dual-energy CT with focused evaluation for bone edema was performed, identifying a femoral neck fracture that was stabilized surgically. CONCLUSION: Dual-energy CT with processing for edema can successfully identify nondisplaced femoral neck fractures in MRI-contraindicated patients. This imaging modality could be useful for diagnosing femoral neck stress fractures and ipsilateral femoral neck fractures in patients sustaining high-energy femoral shaft fractures.

Pathologic Femur Fracture through Osteoid Osteoma after Radiofrequency Ablation: Case Report and Review of the Literature.

This is a case report of a 4-year-old girl who sustained a femoral shaft fracture 2 weeks after radiofrequency ablation of an osteoid osteoma. The fracture occurred after a relatively low-energy impact, jumping off the second to last step of a staircase. The pathologic fracture was successfully treated with closed reduction and spica casting, with full return to activities. Cases have been reported in the literature of femoral shaft fractures in older patients after radiofrequency ablation, but all are farther out than 2 weeks and none in patients as young as 4 years.

Implementation of a novel MRI protocol for diagnosing femoral neck fractures in high energy femoral shaft fractures: One year results.

INTRODUCTION: Preliminary results using a novel rapid-sequence MRI to diagnose ipsilateral femoral neck fractures in patients sustaining high-energy femoral shaft fractures have been favorable compared to radiographic and CT imaging alone. To evaluate and optimize this new institutional imaging protocol further, we reviewed our results one year after implementation. METHODS: Rapid-sequence MRI was added to the imaging evaluation of patients with high-energy femoral shaft fractures without femoral neck fractures identified on radiographs or CT imaging. Data was retrospectively reviewed from a consecutive series of patients who met inclusion criteria. RESULTS: From September 2018 through September 2019, 114 patients sustained 121 high-energy femoral shaft fractures. The average patient age was 29.9 years, 73.7% (84/114) of patients were male, and 16.5% (20/121) were open fractures. Of patients indicated for a rapid-sequence MRI, 86% (92/107) underwent MR imaging. 5% (6/121) of patients had an ipsilateral femoral neck fracture identified on radiographs alone. Three additional femoral neck fractures were identified with CT imaging for an initial incidence of 7.4% (9/121). MRI identified 10 additional non-displaced femoral neck fractures, three complete and seven incomplete fractures, for an incidence of 15.7% (19/121). All identified femoral neck fractures were stabilized. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: The addition of rapid-sequence MRI of the pelvis in patients with high-energy femoral shaft fractures reliably increases the diagnosis of ipsilateral femoral neck fractures not identified with standard imaging. There were no cases of missed/delayed femoral neck fractures in patients with a negative MRI. This new imaging protocol effectively and safely improves the diagnosis of this injury pattern.

Improving the Diagnosis of Ipsilateral Femoral Neck and Shaft Fractures: A New Imaging Protocol.

BACKGROUND: Despite increased awareness of ipsilateral femoral neck fractures in patients with high-energy femoral shaft fractures and advanced imaging with thin-cut high-resolution computed tomography (CT), failure of diagnosis remains problematic. The purpose of the present study was to determine if the preoperative diagnosis of ipsilateral femoral neck fractures in patients with high-energy femoral shaft fractures can be improved with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compared with radiographic and CT imaging. METHODS: In response to delayed diagnoses of femoral neck fractures despite thin-cut high-resolution CT, our institutional imaging protocol for acute, high-energy femoral shaft fractures was altered to include rapid limited-sequence MRI to evaluate for occult femoral neck fractures. All patients received standard radiographic imaging as well as thin-cut high-resolution pelvic CT imaging upon presentation. Rapid limited-sequence MRI of the pelvis was obtained to evaluate for an occult femoral neck fracture. RESULTS: Thirty-seven consecutive patients with 39 acute, high-energy femoral shaft fractures resulting from blunt trauma were included. The average age of the patients was 29.1 years (range, 14 to 82 years). Ten (25.6%) of the 39 femoral shaft fractures were open. Two femoral shaft fractures (5.1%) were associated with ipsilateral femoral neck fractures that were detected on radiographs, and no MRI was performed. None of the remaining 37 femoral shaft fractures were associated with a femoral neck fracture that was identified on CT imaging. Thirty-three (89.2%) of 37 patients underwent pelvic MRI to evaluate the ipsilateral femoral neck. Four (12.1%) of those 33 patients were diagnosed with a femoral neck fracture (2 complete, 2 incomplete) that was not identified on thin-cut high-resolution CT or radiographic imaging. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid limited-sequence MRI of the pelvis for patients with femoral shaft fractures identified femoral neck fractures that were not diagnosed on thin-cut high-resolution CT in 12% of our patients. Our results suggest that the frequency of femoral neck fractures may be underrepresented on CT imaging; rapid limited-sequence MRI was feasible without delaying definitive treatment even in polytraumatized patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Adherence to surgical antibiotic prophylaxis remains a challenge despite multifaceted interventions.

BACKGROUND: Adherence to prophylactic antibiotics guidelines is challenging and poorly documented. We hypothesized that a multiphase, multifaceted quality improvement initiative would engage relevant stakeholders, address known barriers to adoption, and improve overall adherence. METHODS: From 2011 to 2014, a series of interventions were introduced in the pediatric operating rooms. After each interventional period, prospective assessments were performed to record the antibiotic type, dose, timing, and redosing according to the guidelines. Perioperative factors that may influence guideline adherence were analyzed. Spearman's rank correlation, analysis of variance, and χ(2) tests were performed. RESULTS: A total of 1,052 operations were observed, and 629 (60%) required prophylactic antibiotics. Adherence to all 4 guideline components remained unchanged (54-55%, P = .38). Redosing significantly improved (7-53%, P = .02), but correct type decreased (98-70%, P < .01). The percentage of cases in which only one antibiotic guideline component was missed remained unchanged (35-34%, P = .46). Adherence to guidelines was not significantly associated with American Society of Anesthesiologists class, surgical specialty, patient weight, anesthesia provider, or surgical wound class. CONCLUSION: Despite multiple interventions to improve antibiotic prophylaxis, overall adherence did not improve. Most interventions were directed at the point of administration in the operating room; future implementation strategies should focus on the perioperative setting.

Multifaceted interventions improve adherence to the surgical checklist.

INTRODUCTION: Adherence to surgical safety checklists remains challenging. Our institution demonstrated acceptable rates of checklist utilization but poor adherence to all checkpoints. We hypothesized that stepwise, multifaceted interventions would improve checklist adherence. METHODS: From 2011 to 2013, adherence to the 14-point, pre-incision checklist was assessed directly by trained observers during three, 1-year periods (baseline, observation #1, and observation #2) during which interventions were implemented. Interventions included safety workshops, customization of a stakeholder-derived checklist, and implementation of a report card system. Chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis tests were utilized. RESULTS: Checklist performance was assessed for 873 cases (baseline, n = 144; observation #1, n = 373; observation #2, n = 356). Total checkpoint adherence increased (from 30% to 78% to 96%; P < .001), as did cases with correct completion of all checkpoints (from 0% to 19% to 61%; P < .001). The median (interquartile range) number of checkpoints completed per case improved from 4 (3-5) to 11 (10-12) to 14 (13-14; P < .001). CONCLUSION: A strategic, multifaceted approach to perioperative safety significantly improved checklist adherence over 2 years. Checklist content and process need to reflect local interests and operative flow to achieve high adherence rates. Successful checklist implementation requires efforts to change the safety culture, stakeholder buy-in, and sustained efforts over time.