Rotator cuff repair in patients with inflammatory arthritis: satisfactory midterm outcomes.

Background: We aimed to evaluate midterm patient-reported outcomes and reoperation rates following rotator cuff repair in patients with either rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or other inflammatory arthritis (nonRA-IA) diagnoses. Methods: We identified all patients with either RA or nonRA-IA who underwent a rotator cuff repair at our institution between 2008 and 2018. IA diagnoses included RA, systemic lupus erythematosus, psoriatic arthritis, and other unspecified inflammatory arthritis. We compiled a cohort of 51 shoulders, with an average follow-up time of 7.0 years. The average age was 60 years (range 39-81), and 55% of patients were female. Patients were contacted via phone to obtain patient-reported outcomes surveys. Univariate linear regression was used to evaluate associations between patient characteristics and outcomes. Results: A review of preoperative radiographs demonstrated that 50% of patients presented with some degree of glenohumeral joint inflammatory degeneration. At the final follow-up, the mean visual analog score for pain was 2 (range 0-8), and the mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (ASES) was 77 (standard deviation [SD] = 19). The mean subjective shoulder value was 75% (SD = 22%), and the average satisfaction was 9 (SD 1.9). The mean Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System upper extremity score was 41 (SD = 10.6). Female sex and a complete tear (vs. partial) were both associated with lower ASES scores, whereas no other characteristics were associated with postoperative ASES scores. The 5-year Kaplan-Meier survival estimate free of reoperation was 91.8% (95% confidence interval 83.0-99.8). Conclusions: Rotator cuff repair in patients with RA or other inflammatory arthritis diagnoses resulted in satisfactory patient-reported outcomes that seem comparable to rotator cuff repair when performed in the general population. Furthermore, reoperations were rare, with a 5-year survival rate free of reoperation for any reason of over 90%. Altogether, an inflammatory arthritis diagnosis should not preclude by itself attempted rotator cuff repair surgery in these patients.

Long-Term Patient-Reported Outcomes After Arthroscopic Debridement of Grade 3 or 4 Capitellar Osteochondritis Dissecans Lesions.

BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic debridement for osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) lesions of the capitellum is a relatively common and straightforward surgical option for failure of nonoperative management. However, the long-term outcomes of this procedure remain unknown. HYPOTHESIS: Arthroscopic debridement of capitellar OCD would provide satisfactory long-term improvement in patient-reported outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: Patients aged ≤18 years who underwent arthroscopic debridement procedures for OCD lesions (International Cartilage Repair Society grades 3 and 4) were identified. Procedures included loose body removal when needed and direct debridement of the lesion; marrow stimulation with drilling or microfracture was added at the discretion of each surgeon. The cohort consisted of 53 elbows. Patient evaluation included visual analog scale for pain; motion; subjective satisfaction; Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) scores; reoperation; and rate of return to sports. RESULTS: At a mean 11 years of follow-up (range, 5-23 years), the median visual analog scale score for pain was 0, and 96% of patients reported being improved as compared with how they were before surgery. The mean ± SD QuickDASH score was 4 ± 9 points (range, 0-52 points), and 80% of patients returned to their sports of interest. The arc of motion significantly improved from 115°± 28° preoperatively to 130°± 17° at latest follow-up (P = .026). Seven elbows (13%) required revision surgery for OCD lesions, resulting in high rates of overall survivorship free of revision surgery: 90% (95% CI, 80%-96%) at 5 years and 88% (95% CI, 76%-94%) at 10 years. At final follow-up, 7 all-cause reoperations were performed without revision surgery on the OCD lesion. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic debridement of grade 3 or 4 OCD lesions of the capitellum produced satisfactory patient-reported outcomes in a majority of elbows, although a subset of patients experienced residual symptoms. The inherent selection bias of our cohort should be considered when applying these results to the overall population with OCD lesions, as we do not recommend this procedure for all patients.

Acute versus delayed radial head arthroplasty for the treatment of radial head fractures.

BACKGROUND: Radial head arthroplasty (RHA) is an important tool in the acute treatment of comminuted radial head and neck fractures. RHA is also performed in a delayed manner after failed open reduction and internal fixation, for fracture malunion or nonunion, and other chronic post-traumatic elbow disorders where restoration of the lateral column of the elbow is considered necessary. The relative efficacy and longevity of acute vs. delayed RHA is unknown. We sought to compare clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes between these groups. METHODS: We identified patients ≥18 years old who underwent an RHA between 2000 and 2018 and then extracted 135 total elbows with a mean follow-up of 2.3 years that sustained isolated radial head fractures (30%), terrible triad injuries (66%), or Essex-Lopresti injuries (4%). The acute cohort (RHA: <12 weeks) contained 101 elbows that underwent surgery at a mean of 0.6 weeks (range, 0 days to 7 weeks, 96% <2 weeks) from injury, whereas the delayed cohort (RHA: 12 weeks to 2 years) contained 34 elbows that underwent surgery at a mean of 36 weeks (range, 14-82 weeks) from injury. Patients in the acute group had a higher percentage of terrible triad injuries (75% vs. 40%, P < .001) and Mason 3 fractures (98% vs. 45%, P < .001). RESULTS: At the final follow-up, 13 of 101 patients in the acute cohort (13%) and 7 of 34 patients in the delayed cohort (21%) required implant revision or resection. A total of 25 patients (25%) in the acute cohort and 12 patients (35%) in the delayed cohort required a reoperation. Kaplan-Meier 2-year survival estimates free of implant resection or revision (90% acute, 86% delayed) and reoperation (76% acute, 70% delayed) were similar between groups. In patients with 5-year follow-up, there was an increased rate of revision or resection in the delayed group (30% vs. 13%). Two-year survival estimates free of radiographic loosening were 80% in the acute cohort vs. 57% in the delayed cohort (P = .04). Mayo Elbow Performance Score at 2 years demonstrated mean scores of 83 and 79 in the acute and delayed groups, respectively, with 71% of the acute cohort and 64% of the delayed cohort achieving good or excellent scores. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrated that although 2-year Kaplan-Meier survival free of revision or resection estimates and reoperation rates was equivalent between the groups, the delayed group experienced worse Mayo Elbow Performance Score outcomes, a higher revision or resection rate at 5 years, and an increased rate of radiographic loosening.

Perioperative clopidogrel (Plavix) continuation in shoulder arthroplasty: approach cautiously.

Background: While the effect of clopidogrel on outcomes in elective hip and knee arthroplasty has been well described, there is a paucity of data regarding elective shoulder arthroplasty. Methods: Fifty-eight patients were identified who underwent primary anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) or reverse shoulder arthroplasty while prescribed clopidogrel. There were 33 (57%) reverse shoulder arthroplasties and 25 (43%) TSAs performed. Patients were separated into two groups based upon their use of clopidogrel in the preoperative period. Twenty patients (35%; group 1) continued clopidogrel through surgery, and 38 patients (65%; group 2) did not. The mean age was 74 years, and the mean follow-up was 42 months. Results: Both groups demonstrated substantial improvements in pain and motion: visual analog scale pain improved by 7 points (P < .001), elevation by 71° (P < .001), external rotation by 29° (P < .001), and internal rotation by 1.7 points (P < .001), with no significant difference between groups. At the final follow-up, the mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was 77 in group 1 and 86 in group 2 (P = .067, minimum clinically important difference = 9). Estimated blood loss was 176 mL in group 1 and 127 in group 2 (P = .02). There was one transfusion in group 1 (5%) and 0 in group 2 (P = .16). The 90-day complication rates were 3/20 (15%) in group 1 and 0/37 in group 2 (hazard ratio = 13, P = .14). There was no statistically significant difference between groups for 30-day adverse cardiac events (2.6% and 0%, respectively, P = .46). Conclusion: For the patients who continued clopidogrel preoperatively, estimated blood loss was significantly higher and trended toward a lower American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (with differences meeting the minimum clinically important difference) and a higher 90-day complication rate. Perioperative continuation of clopidogrel in shoulder arthroplasty should be approached cautiously.

Does proximal versus distal injury location of the medial ulnar collateral ligament of the elbow differentially impact elbow stability? An ultrasound-guided and robot-assisted biomechanical study.

BACKGROUND: The location (proximal vs. distal) of elbow medial ulnar collateral ligament (MUCL) tears impacts clinical outcomes of nonoperative treatment. The purposes of our study were to (1) determine whether selective releases of the MUCL could be performed under ultrasound (US) guidance without disrupting overlying soft tissues, (2) assess the difference in medial elbow stability for proximal and distal releases of the MUCL using stress US and a robotic testing device, and (3) elucidate the flexion angle that resulted in the greatest amount of medial elbow laxity after MUCL injury. METHODS: Sixteen paired, fresh-frozen elbow specimens were used. Valgus laxity was evaluated with both US and robotic-assisted measurements before and after selective MUCL releases. A percutaneous US-guided technique was used to perform proximal MUCL releases in 8 elbows and to perform distal MUCL releases in their matched pairs. The robot was used to determine the elbow flexion angle at which the maximum valgus displacement occurred for both proximally and distally released specimens. Open dissection was then performed to assess the accuracy of the percutaneous releases. RESULTS: Percutaneous US-guided releases were successfully performed in 15 of 16 specimens. The proximal release resulted in greater valgus angle displacement (11° ± 2°) than the distal release (8° ± 2°) between flexion angles of 30° and 70° (P < .0001 at 30°, P < .0001 at 40°, P = .001 at 50°, P = .005 at 60°, and P = .020 at 70°). Valgus displacement between release locations did not reach the level of statistical significance between 80° and 120° (P = .051 at 80°, P = .131 at 90°, P = .245 at 100°, P = .400 at 110°, and P = .532 at 120°). When we compared the values for the mean increase in US delta gap (stressed - supported state) from before to after MUCL release, the proximally released elbows had larger increases than the distally released elbows (5.0 mm proximal vs. 3.7 mm distal, P = .032). After MUCL release, maximum mean valgus displacement occurred at 49° of flexion. CONCLUSIONS: US-guided selective releases of the MUCL can be performed reliably without violating the overlying musculature. Valgus instability is not of greater magnitude for distal releases when compared with proximal releases. This findings suggests there must be alternative factors to explain the difference in clinical prognosis between distal and proximal tears. The observed flexion angle for maximum valgus laxity could have important implications for elbow positioning during US or fluoroscopic stress examination, as well as surgical repair or reconstruction of the MUCL.

Shoulder Periprosthetic Joint Infection and All-Cause Mortality: A Worrisome Association.

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) can be a devastating complication following shoulder arthroplasty. PJI following hip and knee arthroplasties has been found to increase mortality. However, anatomical and bacteriologic differences could potentially result in a different trend after shoulder arthroplasties. Thus, the purpose of the present study was to determine whether there is an association between shoulder PJI and all-cause mortality. METHODS: Our institutional Total Joint Registry Database was queried to identify patients who underwent revision shoulder arthroplasty procedures between 2000 and 2018. A total of 1,160 procedures were then classified as either septic (21.8%) or aseptic (78.2%). Septic revisions were further subdivided into (1) debridement, antibiotics, irrigation, and implant retention (9.1%); (2) 2-stage reimplantation for deep infection (61.3%); (3) implant resection without reimplantation (3.6%); and (4) unexpected positive cultures at revision surgery (26.1%). The most common bacterium isolated was Cutibacterium acnes (64.4%). All-cause patient mortality was determined with use of our registry and confirmed with use of a nationwide mortality database. All-cause crude and adjusted mortality rates were then compared between groups. RESULTS: The 1-year crude mortality rate was 1.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.9% to 2.6%) for the aseptic group and 2.8% (95% CI, 0.7% to 4.8%) for the septic group (p = 0.31). Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated an elevated but statistically similar adjusted hazard ratio for 1-year all-cause mortality of 1.9 (95% CI, 0.8 to 4.6) when comparing the septic to the aseptic group (p = 0.17). The risk of 2-year all-cause mortality was significantly higher in the septic group, with a hazard ratio of 2.2 (95% CI, 1.1 to 4.5; p = 0.029). In univariate analyses, increased 5-year mortality in the septic revision group was associated with age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection, whereas C. acnes infection was associated with lower mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Shoulder PJI is associated with an adjusted 2-year all-cause mortality rate that is double that of aseptic patients. The results of the present study should be utilized to appropriately counsel patients who are considered to be at risk for infection following shoulder arthroplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.