Asia-Inclusive Clinical Research and Development Enabled by Translational Science and Quantitative Clinical Pharmacology: Toward a Culture That Challenges the Status Quo.

Access lag to innovative therapies in Asian populations continues to present a challenge to global health. Recent progressive changes in the global regulatory landscape, including newer guidelines, are enabling simultaneous global drug development and near-simultaneous global drug registration. The International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) E17 guideline outlines general principles for the design and analysis of multiregional clinical trials (MRCTs). We posit that translational research and quantitative clinical pharmacology tools are core enablers for Asia-inclusive global drug development aligned with ICH E17 principles. Assessment of ethnic sensitivity should be initiated early in the development lifecycle to inform the need for, and extent of, Asian phase I ethno-bridging data. Relevant ethno-bridging data may be generated as standalone Asian phase I trials, as part of Western First-In-Human trials, or under accelerated development settings as a lead-in phase in an MRCT. Quantitative understanding of human clearance mechanisms and pharmacogenetic factors is vital to forecasting ethnic sensitivity in drug exposure using physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models. Stratification factors to control heterogeneity in MRCTs can be identified by reverse translational research incorporating pharmacometric disease models and model-based meta-analyses. Because epidemiological variations can extend to the molecular level, quantitative systems pharmacology models may be useful in forecasting how molecular variation in therapeutic targets or pathway proteins across populations might impact treatment outcomes. Through prospective evaluation of conservation in drug- and disease-related intrinsic and extrinsic factors, a pooled East Asian region can be implemented in Asia-inclusive MRCTs to maximize efficiency in substantiating evidence of benefit-risk for the region at-large with a Totality of Evidence approach.

Applications of Quantitative System Pharmacology Modeling to Model-Informed Drug Development.

Significant advances in analytical technologies have dramatically improved our ability to deconvolute disease biology at molecular, cellular, and tissue levels. Quantitative system pharmacology (QSP) modeling is a computational framework to systematically integrate pharmaceutical properties of a drug candidate with scientific understanding of that deeper disease etiology, target expression, genetic variability, and human physiological processes, thus enabling more insightful drug development decisions related to efficacy and safety. In this chapter, we discuss the key attributes of QSP models in comparison to traditional models. We discuss a recommended four-step process to construct a QSP model to support drug development decisions. A number of illustrative QSP examples related to high-value drug development questions and decisions impacting target identification, lead generation and optimization, first in human studies, and clinical dose and schedule optimization are covered in the chapter. The future perspectives of QSP in the context of potential regulatory acceptance are also discussed.

FDA-Industry Scientific Exchange on assessing quantitative systems pharmacology models in clinical drug development: a meeting report, summary of challenges/gaps, and future perspective.

The pharmaceutical industry is actively applying quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) to make internal decisions and guide drug development. To facilitate the eventual development of a common framework for assessing the credibility of QSP models for clinical drug development, scientists from US Food and Drug Administration and the pharmaceutical industry organized a full-day virtual Scientific Exchange on July 1, 2020. An assessment form was used to ensure consistency in the evaluation process. Among the cases presented, QSP was applied to various therapeutic areas. Applications mostly focused on phase 2 dose selection. Model transparency, including details on expert knowledge and data used for model development, was identified as a major factor for robust model assessment. The case studies demonstrated some commonalities in the workflow of QSP model development, calibration, and validation but differ in the size, scope, and complexity of QSP models, in the acceptance criteria for model calibration and validation, and in the algorithms/approaches used for creating virtual patient populations. Though efforts are being made to build the credibility of QSP models and the confidence is increasing in applying QSP for internal decisions at the clinical stages of drug development, there are still many challenges facing QSP application to late stage drug development. The QSP community needs a strategic plan that includes the ability and flexibility to Adapt, to establish Common expectations for model Credibility needed to inform drug Labeling and patient care, and to AIM to achieve the goal (ACCLAIM).

Strategies and Recommendations for Using a Data-Driven and Risk-Based Approach in the Selection of First-in-Human Starting Dose: An International Consortium for Innovation and Quality in Pharmaceutical Development (IQ) Assessment.

Various approaches to first-in-human (FIH) starting dose selection for new molecular entities (NMEs) are designed to minimize risk to trial subjects. One approach uses the minimum anticipated biological effect level (MABEL), which is a conservative method intended to maximize subject safety and designed primarily for NMEs having high perceived safety risks. However, there is concern that the MABEL approach is being inappropriately used for lower risk molecules with negative impacts on drug development and time to patient access. In addition, ambiguity exists in how MABEL is defined and the methods used to determine it. The International Consortium for Innovation and Quality in Pharmaceutical Development convened a working group to understand current use of MABEL and its impact on FIH starting dose selection, and to make recommendations for FIH dose selection going forward. An industry-wide survey suggested the achieved or estimated maximum tolerated dose, efficacious dose, or recommended phase II dose was > 100-fold higher than the MABEL-based starting dose for approximately one third of NMEs, including trials in patients. A decision tree and key risk factor table were developed to provide a consistent, data driven-based, and risk-based approach for selecting FIH starting doses.

A quantitative systems pharmacology model of colonic motility with applications in drug development.

We developed a mathematical model of colon physiology driven by serotonin signaling in the enteric nervous system. No such models are currently available to assist drug discovery and development for GI motility disorders. Model parameterization was informed by published preclinical and clinical data. Our simulations provide clinically relevant readouts of bowel movement frequency and stool consistency. The model recapitulates healthy and slow transit constipation phenotypes, and the effect of a 5-HT4 receptor agonist in healthy volunteers. Using the calibrated model, we predicted the agonist dose to normalize defecation frequency in slow transit constipation while avoiding the onset of diarrhea. Model sensitivity analysis predicted that changes in HAPC frequency and liquid secretion have the greatest impact on colonic motility. However, exclusively increasing the liquid secretion can lead to diarrhea. In contrast, increasing HAPC frequency alone can enhance bowel frequency without leading to diarrhea. The quantitative systems pharmacology approach used here demonstrates how mechanistic modeling of disease pathophysiology expands our understanding of biology and supports judicious hypothesis generation for therapeutic intervention.

Targeting RNA: A Transformative Therapeutic Strategy.

The therapeutic pathways that modulate transcription mechanisms currently include gene knockdown and splicing modulation. However, additional mechanisms may come into play as more understanding of molecular biology and disease etiology emerge. Building on advances in chemistry and delivery technology, oligonucleotide therapeutics is emerging as an established, validated class of drugs that can modulate a multitude of genetic targets. These targets include over 10,000 proteins in the human genome that have hitherto been considered undruggable by small molecules and protein therapeutics. The approval of five oligonucleotides within the last 2 years elicited unprecedented excitement in the field. However, there are remaining challenges to overcome and significant room for future innovation to fully realize the potential of oligonucleotide therapeutics. In this review, we focus on the translational strategies encompassing preclinical evaluation and clinical development in the context of approved oligonucleotide therapeutics. Translational approaches with respect to pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, cardiac safety evaluation, and dose selection that are specific to this class of drugs are reviewed with examples. The mechanism of action, chemical evolution, and intracellular delivery of oligonucleotide therapies are only briefly reviewed to provide a general background for this class of drugs.

A Semi-Mechanistic Population Pharmacokinetic Model of Nusinersen: An Antisense Oligonucleotide for the Treatment of Spinal Muscular Atrophy.

A pharmacokinetic (PK) model was developed for nusinersen, an antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) that is the first approved treatment for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). The model was built with data from 92 nonhuman primates (NHPs) following intrathecal doses (0.3-7 mg) and characterized the PK in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), plasma, total spinal cord, brain, and pons. The estimated volumes were 13.6, 937, 4.5, 53.8, and 2.11 mL, respectively. Global sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the CSF-to-plasma drug distribution rate (0.09 hour-1 ) is a major determinant of the maximum nusinersen concentration in central nervous system (CNS) tissues. Physiological age-based and body weight-based allometric scaling was implemented with exponent values of -0.08 and 1 for the rate constants and the volume of distribution, respectively. Simulations of the scaled model were in agreement with clinical observations from 52 pediatric phase I PK profiles. The developed model can be used to guide the design of clinical trials with ASOs.

Best practices for the use of itraconazole as a replacement for ketoconazole in drug-drug interaction studies.

Ketoconazole has been widely used as a strong cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A (CYP3A) inhibitor in drug-drug interaction (DDI) studies. However, the US Food and Drug Administration has recommended limiting the use of ketoconazole to cases in which no alternative therapies exist, and the European Medicines Agency has recommended the suspension of its marketing authorizations because of the potential for serious safety concerns. In this review, the Innovation and Quality in Pharmaceutical Development's Clinical Pharmacology Leadership Group (CPLG) provides a compelling rationale for the use of itraconazole as a replacement for ketoconazole in clinical DDI studies and provides recommendations on the best practices for the use of itraconazole in such studies. Various factors considered in the recommendations include the choice of itraconazole dosage form, administration in the fasted or fed state, the dose and duration of itraconazole administration, the timing of substrate and itraconazole coadministration, and measurement of itraconazole and metabolite plasma concentrations, among others. The CPLG's recommendations are based on careful review of available literature and internal industry experiences.

Population pharmacokinetics of recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein.

Population pharmacokinetics (PK) of FVIII activity-time profiles following recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein (rFVIIIFc) and recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) dosing were evaluated in previously treated patients with severe hemophilia A (from two clinical trials). Potential covariates that may be determinants of variability in FVIII activity were identified. A 2-compartment model adequately described the PK of both compounds. von Willebrand Factor (VWF) concentration was the major covariate for rFVIIIFc clearance, reflecting its protective role in FVIII activity clearance. The effect of body weight and hematocrit on the central volume of distribution of rFVIIIFc was minor. The results of these analyses confirmed that rFVIIIFc clearance (1.65 dL/h) is much lower than that of rFVIII (2.53 dL/h), while the steady state volumes of distribution were similar. The strong positive correlations between the PK parameters of rFVIIIFc and rFVIII suggest that individuals who have high time-related PK characteristics with rFVIII are likely to have comparable characteristics with rFVIIIFc. Steady-state activity-time profiles for selected rFVIIIFc dosing regimens were simulated accounting for uncertainty in model parameters. These population PK analyses and simulations provide a comprehensive characterization of the PK of rFVIIIFc and rFVIII and may be useful for designing dosing regimens.

Pharmacokinetics of renally excreted drug dexpramipexole in subjects with impaired renal function.

This phase I, open-label, single-dose study evaluated the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of renally excreted drug dexpramipexole in subjects with normal and impaired renal function, i.e. mild, moderate, severe renal impairment, or end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring hemodialysis when matched by age and sex. Dexpramipexole area under the curves (AUCs), but not Cmax , were significantly increased with the severity of renal impairment after a single dose administration. The geometric mean ratio of dose-normalized AUC(0-72) was 1.4, 1.7, 2.7, and 4.5, respectively, in mild, moderate, severe renal impairment, and ESRD subjects when compared to healthy subjects. There was a strong association between renal function (eGFR) and dexpramipexole CLr. The slope (90% confidence interval(CI)) of eGFR and renal clearance (CLr) in the regression model was 3.1 (2.4, 3.7). Dexpramipexole elimination in ESRD subjects during both dialysis and non-dialysis (i.e., interval between dialysis) was insignificant. Single 75 mg and 150 mg doses of dexpramipexole were well tolerated, and the safety profile was comparable across renal function groups. Extensive drug accumulation may occur with repeated dosing in patients with significant renal impairment. It is recommended that dexpramipexole not to be given to patients with severe renal impairment or in those with ESRD.

Interferon beta assessment in non-Chinese and Chinese subjects: pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic activity of an endogenous cytokine are not race dependent.

Interferon beta-1a (IFNß-1a) is a first-line therapy for relapsing multiple sclerosis when administered as 30 mcg intramuscularly (IM) once weekly. This endogenous cytokine displays pharmacokinetic (PK) attributes consistent with a glycoprotein of 20-kDa molecular weight that is administered IM. In this study, 24 healthy Chinese subjects (11 male, 13 female) each received 4 once-weekly 60-mcg IM doses of IFNß-1a. Serial blood samples were drawn for PK and pharmacodynamic (PD) assessments following the first and last dose of drug. Results were compared with historical data from a recent PK/PD assessment conducted in non-Chinese subjects. Noncompartmental analysis revealed that no meaningful differences in either IFNß-1a exposure or response were apparent between the Chinese and non-Chinese populations. Thus, it was concluded that no adjustment in dose regimen is warranted for future assessments of safety and efficacy in multiple sclerosis patients of Chinese origin.

Nonclinical development of a biosimilar: the current landscape.

Preclinical studies have always been a critical component in the development program of a biopharmaceutical. With the advent of biosimilars the traditional preclinical program has changed to a new paradigm that integrates the concept of comparability with existing knowledge of the biopharmaceutical reference drug. Recently, the recommended preclinical program espoused by the European Medicines Agency has been modified to an abbreviated one that now emphasizes in vitro studies in lieu of in vivo for monoclonal antibody biosimilars. Likewise, the US FDA guidance on biosimilars suggests a flexible approach rather than the 28-day comparative toxicology studies that have historically been conducted for worldwide marketing. For now, structure and function studies will continue to be the foundation of the overall analytical assessment of biosimilarity. Traditional, comparative animal safety assessments will have limited value in determination of biosimilarity and in an abbreviated design they may have most value in providing assurance of safety in first-in-human trials when structural attributes are not indistinguishable. Unless this value can be proven, particularly as analytical technology improves in sensitivity, accuracy and precision, the need for these animal safety studies will diminish. Thus, the future lies in the ever evolving and sophisticated analytical studies that will replace the current in vivo studies for biosimilar products.

A novel PEGylated interferon beta-1a for multiple sclerosis: safety, pharmacology, and biology.

This study clinically evaluated a novel PEGylated form of interferon beta-1a (PEG-IFN beta-1a), a potential first-line treatment for relapsing multiple sclerosis, in healthy volunteers. Two randomized, blinded phase I studies were conducted: a single-dose study (n = 60) comparing subcutaneous or intramuscular PEG-IFN beta-1a (63, 125, or 188 µg) with intramuscular unmodified IFN beta-1a 30 µg and a multiple-dose study (n = 69) comparing subcutaneous PEG-IFN beta-1a dosed once every 2 or 4 weeks with placebo. Assessments included pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (serum neopterin and 2',5'-OAS) measures, exploratory immune assessments, safety, and tolerability. A dose-proportional increase in PEG-IFN beta-1a exposure was observed, with a 4-fold greater exposure at 63 µg (6 million international units [MIU]) of PEG-IFN beta-1a than with 30 µg (6 MIU) intramuscular unmodified IFN beta-1a. Increases in neopterin and 2',5'-OAS levels and changes in T helper cell pathway gene expression and lymphocyte subsets were greater and more sustained with PEG-IFN beta-1a than with unmodified IFN beta-1a. PEG-IFN beta-1a was well tolerated, with only transient reductions in absolute neutrophils and some lymphocytes. Flu-like symptoms were a commonly reported adverse event. These data support the continued clinical development of PEG-IFN beta-1a as a potentially effective treatment for patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of tonapofylline: evaluation of dose proportionality, oral bioavailability, and gender and food effects in healthy human subjects.

Tonapofylline is an antagonist of adenosine A1 receptor being developed for heart failure. In the present studies, pharmacokinetic characteristics, including dose proportionality, bioavailability, and effects of gender and food, were evaluated in healthy subjects receiving single-dose tonapofylline (0.2-375 mg) in a parallel or crossover design. Following oral administration, tonapofylline concentrations mostly peaked within 3 hours and declined over time in a multiple phasic manner. Based on a power model, dose proportionality of peak concentration (C(max)), area under the time-concentration curve for all values (AUC(all)), and area under the time-concentration curve to infinity (AUC(inf)) was concluded in a clinical setting. The bioavailability of tonapofylline was 81.2% (90% confidence interval, 70.6%-93.5%). Following intravenous administration, the steady-state volume of distribution of tonapofylline was estimated to be 756 mL/kg. The total clearance of tonapofylline was low (64.8 mL/h/kg), approximately 5% of hepatic blood flow. The terminal half-life was variable within groups and ranged from 11.2 to 24.2 hours across the dose range. Female subjects showed significantly higher C(max), AUC(all), and AUC(inf) than male subjects (P < .05). Food decreased C(max) by approximately 39%, whereas it did not appear to affect AUC(all) and AUC(inf). The intersubject variability of the pharmacokinetic parameters of tonapofylline was generally less than 30%. In these studies, a single dose of tonapofylline was safe and well tolerated.