Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Prev Chronic Dis ; 8(4): A73, 2011 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21672397

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Recent initiatives aim to improve public awareness of health disparities. However, little research has actually documented the US public's awareness of racial/ethnic and socioeconomic health disparities. We sought to determine 1) whether the US public is aware of racial, educational, and income disparities in health, 2) whether awareness differs across these disparity domains, and 3) what respondent characteristics are associated with awareness of racial, educational, and income disparities in health. METHODS: We conducted the National Opinion Survey on Health and Health Disparities with 2,791 US adults. We asked respondents to answer questions about disparities in health between 1 of several pairs of population subgroups: African Americans versus whites, non-high school graduates versus high school graduates, high school graduates versus college graduates, the poor versus the middle class, or the middle class versus the rich. We used χ(2) tests and logistic regression to compare correlates of respondents' awareness of disparities across the different pairs of population subgroups. RESULTS: Most respondents were aware of health disparities between the poor and middle class (73%); fewer were aware of health disparities between African Americans and whites (46%). Although respondents recognized that education is associated with many positive life outcomes, they were less aware of the link between education and health. Respondents who were younger, less educated, lower-income, healthier, or politically conservative were less likely to be aware of health disparities. CONCLUSION: Public awareness of disparities in health differs depending on both the type of disparity and the characteristics of the individual respondent.


Assuntos
Conscientização , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Vigilância da População/métodos , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
2.
Prev Chronic Dis ; 7(1): A16, 2010 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20040231

RESUMO

Report cards are widely used in health for drawing attention to performance indicators. We developed a state health report card with separate grades for health and health disparities to generate interest in and awareness of differences in health across different population subgroups and to identify opportunities to improve health. We established grading curves from data for all 50 states for 2 outcomes (mortality and unhealthy days) and 4 life stages (infants, children and young adults, working-age adults, and older adults). We assigned grades for health within each life stage by sex, race/ethnicity, socioeconomics, and geography. We also assigned a health disparity grade to each life stage. Report cards can simplify complex information for lay audiences and garner media and policy maker attention. However, their development requires methodologic and value choices that may limit their interpretation.


Assuntos
Administração em Saúde Pública/normas , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Educação , Feminino , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Nível de Saúde , Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Programas Gente Saudável , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos Nutricionais , Vigilância da População , Administração em Saúde Pública/estatística & dados numéricos , Grupos Raciais , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
3.
J Public Health Manag Pract ; 15(1): 24-32, 2009.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19077591

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Assessment is a core function of public health; however, standard community health assessments often remain within the boundaries of the traditional public health system and rarely elicit public discussion and community-wide action. The University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute developed the annual Wisconsin County Health Rankings (Rankings) report in 2003 with three primary goals: (1) to increase media attention to local health outcomes and determinants; (2) to highlight the broad range of factors that influence health; and (3) to catalyze community health improvement efforts. METHODS: We assessed how well the Rankings met these goals through an examination of media coverage and a survey of the local public health community following the 2006 report. FINDINGS: Newspaper, television, and radio media across the state covered the Rankings, highlighting local results for outcomes and a broad range of determinants. Local public health officials used the Rankings for educating policy makers and community partners, performing needs assessments, and identifying program targets. CONCLUSIONS: The Rankings report is an approach to community health assessment that has received media attention and been found to be useful by local public health officials in their community health improvement efforts.


Assuntos
Planejamento em Saúde Comunitária/organização & administração , Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Disseminação de Informação , Meios de Comunicação de Massa , Saúde Pública , Wisconsin
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA