Early vs Late Anticoagulation in Minor, Moderate, and Major Ischemic Stroke With Atrial Fibrillation: Post Hoc Analysis of the ELAN Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Whether infarct size modifies the treatment effect of early vs late direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) initiation in people with ischemic stroke and atrial fibrillation is unknown. Objective: To assess whether infarct size modifies the safety and efficacy of early vs late DOAC initiation. Design, Setting, and Participants: Post hoc analysis of participants from the multinational (>100 sites in 15 countries) randomized clinical Early Versus Later Anticoagulation for Stroke With Atrial Fibrillation (ELAN) trial who had (1) acute ischemic stroke, (2) atrial fibrillation, and (3) brain imaging available before randomization. The ELAN trial was conducted between October 2017 and December 2022. Data were analyzed from October to December 2023 for this post hoc analysis. Intervention: Early vs late DOAC initiation after ischemic stroke. Early DOAC initiation was within 48 hours for minor or moderate stroke or on days 6 to 7 for major stroke; late DOAC initiation was on days 3 to 4 for minor stroke, days 6 to 7 for moderate stroke, and days 12 to 14 for major stroke. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was a composite of recurrent ischemic stroke, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, extracranial bleeding, systemic embolism, or vascular death within 30 days. The outcome was assessed according to infarct size (minor, moderate, or major) using odds ratios and risk differences between treatment arms. Interrater reliability for infarct size between the core laboratory and local raters was assessed, and whether this modified the estimated treatment effects was also examined. Results: A total of 1962 of the original 2013 participants (909 [46.3%] female; median [IQR] age, 77 [70-84] years) were included. The primary outcome occurred in 10 of 371 participants (2.7%) with early DOAC initiation vs 11 of 364 (3.0%) with late DOAC initiation among those with minor stroke (odds ratio [OR], 0.89; 95% CI, 0.38-2.10); in 11 of 388 (2.8%) with early DOAC initiation vs 14 of 392 (3.6%) with late DOAC initiation among those with moderate stroke (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.35-1.74); and in 8 of 219 (3.7%) with early DOAC initiation vs 16 of 228 (7.0%) with late DOAC initiation among those with major stroke (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.21-1.18). The 95% CI for the estimated risk difference of the primary outcome in early anticoagulation was -2.78% to 2.12% for minor stroke, -3.23% to 1.76% for moderate stroke, and -7.49% to 0.81% for major stroke. There was no significant treatment interaction for the primary outcome. For infarct size, interrater reliability was moderate (κ = 0.675; 95% CI, 0.647-0.702) for local vs core laboratory raters and strong (κ = 0.875; 95% CI, 0.855-0.894) between core laboratory raters. Conclusions and Relevance: The treatment effect of early DOAC initiation did not differ in people with minor, moderate, or major stroke assessed by brain imaging. Early treatment was not associated with a higher rate of adverse events, especially symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, for any infarct size, including major stroke. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03148457.

Early Versus Late Initiation of Direct Oral Anticoagulants After Ischemic Stroke in People With Atrial Fibrillation and Hemorrhagic Transformation: Prespecified Subanalysis of the Randomized-controlled ELAN Trial.

BACKGROUND: Whether hemorrhagic transformation (HT) modifies the treatment effect of early versus late initiation of direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) in people with ischemic stroke and atrial fibrillation is unknown. METHODS: This is a post-hoc analysis of the ELAN trial. The primary outcome was a composite of recurrent ischemic stroke, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), major extracranial bleeding, systemic embolism, or vascular death within 30 days. Secondary outcomes were the individual components, 30- and 90-day functional outcome. We estimated outcomes based on HT, subclassified as hemorrhagic infarction (HI) or parenchymal hemorrhage (PH) on pre-randomization imaging (core-lab rating) using adjusted risk differences (aRD) between treatment arms. RESULTS: Overall, 247/1970 (12.5%) participants had HT (114 HI 1, 77 HI 2, 34 PH 1, 22 PH 2). For the primary outcome, the estimated aRD (early versus late) was -2.2% (-7.8 to 3.5%) in people with HT (HI: -4.7%, -10.8 to 1.4%; PH: 6.1%, -8.4 to 20.7%), and -0.9% (-2.6 to 0.8%) in people without. Numbers of sICH were identical in people with and without HT. With early treatment, the estimated aRD for poor 90-day functional outcome (mRS 3-6) was 11.4% (-0.9 to 23.7%) in participants with HT (HI: 7.2%, -6.6 to 21.0%; PH: 25.1%, 0.2 to 50.0%), and -2.6% (-7.1 to 1.8%) in people without HT. CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence of major treatment effect heterogeneity or safety concerns with early versus late DOAC initiation in people with and without HT. However, early DOAC initiation may worsen functional outcomes in people with PH.

Brain Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension Score for Treatment Monitoring After Surgical Closure of the Underlying Spinal Dural Leak.

BACKGROUND: Spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH) is a debilitating condition requiring effective treatment; however, objective data on treatment response are scarce. PURPOSE: To assess the suitability of the brain MRI-based SIH score (bSIH) for monitoring treatment success in SIH patients with a proven spinal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak after microsurgical closure of the underlying dural breach. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included consecutive SIH patients with a proven spinal CSF leak, investigated at dedicated referral centre January 2012 to March 2020. The bSIH score integrates 6 imaging findings; 3 major (2 points) and 3 minor (1 point), and ranges from 0 to 9, with 0 indicating low and 9 high probability of spinal CSF loss. The score was calculated using brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before and after surgical treatment of the underlying CSF leak. Headache intensity was registered on a numeric rating scale (NRS) (range 0-10). RESULTS: In this study 52 SIH patients, 35 (67%) female, mean age 45.3 years, with a proven spinal CSF leak were included. The mean bSIH score decreased significantly from baseline to after surgical closure of the underlying dural breach (6.9 vs. 1.3, P < 0.001). A decrease in the NRS score was reported (8.6 vs. 1.2, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The bSIH score is a simple tool which may serve to monitor treatment success in SIH patients after surgical closure of the underlying spinal dural leak. Its decrease after surgical closure of the underlying spinal dural breach indicates restoration of an equilibrium within the CSF compartment.