An exploratory study of test anxiety management workshop based on the Unified Protocol / Estudio exploratorio de un taller basado en el Protocolo Unificado para el manejo de ansiedad ante exámenes.

Introduction: Test anxiety is a multidimensional construct, defined as a set of phenomenological, physiological and behavioral responses associated with cognitive processes linked to excessive concern about possible negative consequences in an evaluative situation. In university students, it presents occurrence rates between 10 % and 40 %. Therefore, the main objective of the present study is to evaluate the usefulness of a group and online workshop for managing this problem based on the Unified Protocol. Methods: A total of 31 Argentinian students aged 18 to 35 years (M=25; SD=5.24) participated in the study, from which 93.5 % were women. They were evaluated with pre, post and follow-up measures in symptomatology associated with test anxiety (GTAI-AR), emotional regulation strategies (ERQ) and mindfulness (MAAS). The Wilcoxon test corroborated intragroup differences, and Hedge's g was calculated to measure effect size (ES). Results: Regarding the primary variable, the differences were significant with moderate & large ES, which were maintained between the three measures applied. Respecting the secondary variables, in the pre-post measures, only cognitive reappraisal reflected significant ES (small).; in the post-follow-up, expressive suppression was the only dimension that showed meaningful ES (moderate), and in the pre-follow-up, it was found that only mindfulness showed considerable ES (small). Discussion: The results are consistent with the Unified Protocol framework and current research on its application. Conclusions: These results are expected to be helpful for the design of similar interventions. Although the results were encouraging, more rigorous research is needed to study their efficacy.

Introducción: La ansiedad ante exámenes es un constructo multidimensional, caracterizado por respuestas fenomenológicas, fisiológicas, conductuales y cognitivas asociadas a una preocupación excesiva sobre posibles consecuencias negativas ante una situación evaluativa. En estudiantes universitarios, presenta tasas de  ocurrencia entre 10 % y 40 %. El objetivo es evaluar la utilidad de un taller grupal y online para el manejo de esta problemática, basado en el Protocolo Unificado. Método: Participaron 31 estudiantes argentinos con edades de 18 a 35 años (M=25; DE= 5,24), siendo el 93.5 % mujeres. Se evaluó medidas pre, post y seguimiento en sintomatología asociada a la ansiedad ante exámenes (GTAI-AR) como variable primaria, y estrategias de regulación emocional (ERQ) y conciencia plena (MAAS) como variables secundarias. Para corroborar diferencias intra grupo se calculó la prueba de Wilcoxon, y como medida de tamaño del efecto (TE), la g de Hedges. Resultados: En cuanto a la variable primaria entre las tres medidas aplicadas, las diferencias fueron significativas con TE moderados y grandes. En las variables secundarias, solo la  reevaluación cognitiva reflejó TE considerables (pequeños) en el pre-post; en el post-seguimiento la supresión expresiva fue la única dimensión que reflejó TE significativos (moderados); y en el pre-seguimiento, únicamente la conciencia plena arrojó TE relevantes (pequeños). Discusión: Los resultados son coherentes con el marco del Protocolo Unificado y las investigaciones actuales sobre su aplicación. Conclusiones: Se espera que estos resultados sean útiles para el diseño de intervenciones similares. Si bien éstos fueron alentadores, se requieren investigaciones de mayor rigurosidad que permitan estudiar su eficacia.

Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS) and Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale (ODSIS): Adaptation and Validation in Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Background: The OASIS and ODSIS scales are two transdiagnostic brief 5-item instruments designed to assess the severity and functional impairment associated with symptoms of anxiety and depression, respectively. The present study aimed to adapt and validate the online versions of both scales in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Method: A sample of 344 women and men from the general population of Buenos Aires completed a test battery consisting of the OASIS, the ODSIS, the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), the Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS) and the Multicultural Quality of Life Index (MQLI). Descriptive statistics and item discrimination of both scales were analyzed, as well as their factorial structure, internal consistency, and convergent and discriminant validity, using the R programming language. Results: The results showed a unidimensional factorial structure, excellent internal consistency, and adequate construct validity for both the OASIS and the ODSIS. Conclusion: These results supports the use of both scales as valid and reliable instruments to assess severity and interference due to anxiety and depression in the general population of Buenos Aires, Argentina.