Implementation and impact of a surgical dashboard on pediatric tonsillectomy outcomes: A quality improvement study.

Introduction: In pediatric tonsillectomy management, the consistent tracking of surgical outcomes and adherence to guidelines are vital. This study explores how a surgical dashboard can serve as a tool in research analysis, translating AAO-HNSF guidelines into measurable performance improvements. Methods: Using a prospective registry from three pediatric hospitals, a Tableau dashboard was constructed to graphically visualize key demographic and postoperative outcomes (including intensive care unit [ICU] utilization, 30-day emergency department (ED) visits, and postoperative bleed rates) in children undergoing tonsillectomy from 2020 to 2024. From the dashboard data, a retrospective cohort study analyzing 6767 tonsillectomies was conducted from January 2, 2020, to June 20, 2023. Patients were categorized into low-risk, OSA-only (by ICD-10 codes), and high-risk groups based on comorbidities. Logistic regression identified factors influencing ED revisits and unplanned nursing calls. Three quality initiatives were assessed: preoperative school absence notes, perioperative dexamethasone recording, and post-tonsillectomy parental education. Results: A total of 2122 (31%) were low-risk, 2648 (39%) were OSA-only, and 1997 (30%) high risk. Risk factors that increased the likelihood of ED visits were high-risk comorbidities (OR = 1.46; 95% CI = 1.24-1.74; p < 0.001) and older age (OR = 1.05; 95% CI = 1.03-1.08; p < 0.001). Risk factors that increased the likelihood of an unplanned nursing communication were high-risk comorbidities (OR = 1.53; 95% CI = 1.34-1.75; p < 0.001), older age (OR = 1.03, 95% CI = 1.01-1.04; p = 0.001), and Medicaid insurance (OR = 1.25; 95% CI = 1.09-1.43; p = 0.002). Postoperative bleed control was generally comparable between the groups, at 2.8% (low risk), 2.7% (OSA), 3.2 (high risk) (p = 0.651). Conclusion: The dashboard aided in data collection, data visualization, and data analysis of quality improvement initiatives, effectively translating guidelines into tangible measures to enhance care. Level of evidence: NA.

Congenital nasal pyriform aperture stenosis: Analysis of twenty cases at a single institution.

OBJECTIVES: Congenital nasal pyriform aperture stenosis (CNPAS) is a rare cause of neonatal respiratory distress that is difficult to treat. The primary objective of this study was to identify factors that predict the need for initial and revision surgery for CNAPS. The secondary objective is to identify risk factors in maternal history associated with the development of CNPAS. METHODS: Infants with CNPAS between 2010 and 2017 were identified by ICD- 9 and 10 codes. Demographics, maternal history, anatomic features on imaging and medical and/or surgical management were reviewed. Frequencies, means and standard deviations were calculated. A p-value <.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Twenty infants were included. All underwent flexible nasal endoscopy with inability to pass the scope in either nostril in 65% of infants. Nineteen had a CT scan and 13 had a MRI with midline defects in 76.3% and 53.8%, respectively. Solitary central mega-incisor was present in 65%. Half underwent surgical intervention at a mean age of 74.8 days, with 90% requiring revision surgery. There was no difference in pyriform aperture distance in the surgical and non-surgical patient subgroups (5.4 mm and 5.2 mm, p = .6 respectively). No specific variables were predictive of need for initial or revision surgery. Maternal diabetes mellitus (MDM) was found in 55% of mothers of infants with CNPAS. CONCLUSION: Pyriform aperture distance was not a predictor of surgical intervention. MRI should be considered in all infants with CNPAS as the rate of intracranial complications is high. MDM may be a risk factor for CNPAS.