Action anticipation and motor resonance in elite basketball players.

We combined psychophysical and transcranial magnetic stimulation studies to investigate the dynamics of action anticipation and its underlying neural correlates in professional basketball players. Athletes predicted the success of free shots at a basket earlier and more accurately than did individuals with comparable visual experience (coaches or sports journalists) and novices. Moreover, performance between athletes and the other groups differed before the ball was seen to leave the model's hands, suggesting that athletes predicted the basket shot's fate by reading the body kinematics. Both visuo-motor and visual experts showed a selective increase of motor-evoked potentials during observation of basket shots. However, only athletes showed a time-specific motor activation during observation of erroneous basket throws. Results suggest that achieving excellence in sports may be related to the fine-tuning of specific anticipatory 'resonance' mechanisms that endow elite athletes' brains with the ability to predict others' actions ahead of their realization.

Motor facilitation during action observation: topographic mapping of the target muscle and influence of the onlooker's posture.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) studies report that viewing a given action performed by a model activates the neural representation of the onlooker's muscles that are activated during the actual execution of the observed action. Here we sought to determine whether this mirror observation-execution facilitation reflects only muscular specificity or whether it is also influenced by postural congruency between onlooker/model body parts. We recorded motor potentials evoked by single-pulse TMS from the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) and abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscles during observation of the right index and little finger abduction/adduction movements of models who kept their hands in a palm-down or palm-up position. Moreover, in different experiments observers kept their right hand palm down or palm up. Selective motor facilitation was observed during observation of movements that map the motor function of the targeted muscles, regardless of the posture of the observed hand. Modulation of FDI, however, was obtained only when participants kept their hand palm down; by contrast, modulation of ADM was obtained only when participants kept their hand palm up. Interestingly, electromyographic recordings showed that FDI is mostly active when index abduction/adduction movements are performed in the palm-down position, whereas ADM is mostly active when little finger abduction/adduction movements are performed in the palm-up position. Results show that the influence of the onlooker's hand posture is comparable in action execution and observation, thus indicating a fine-grain functional correspondence between these two processes.

Motor facilitation of the human cortico-spinal system during observation of bio-mechanically impossible movements.

Neurophysiological and neuroimaging studies in the human and the monkey brain indicate that links between action observation and execution are much tighter than previously believed. Indeed, the mere observation of movements performed by other individuals brings about a clear increase in activity in specific fronto-parietal neural networks (mirror system). Here, we report a series of four single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation studies of the motor system, which show that observation of index and little finger movements brings about a facilitation of potentials recorded from muscles that would be involved in the actual execution of the observed action. Remarkably, however, a clear representational selectivity was found also during observation of bio-mechanically impossible index or little finger movements. Thus, in movement observation tasks, the human cortico-spinal system reacts similarly to the vision of bio-mechanically possible and impossible movements but it is able to detect which muscle would be involved in the actual execution of the observed movement. Importantly, this system may be more related to coding body part movements than precisely simulating their execution.

Time-related changes of excitability of the human motor system contingent upon immobilisation of the ring and little fingers.

OBJECTIVES: To examine possible changes of excitability of the human motor system contingent upon immobilisation of two hand fingers. METHODS: Two series of 5 transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) sessions were carried out on different days (1, 2, 3, 4, and 7). In one series (fingers immobilised, FI), subjects wore for 4 days a device that kept immobilised the left fourth and fifth finger. In the other series (fingers free, FF), no constraining device was used. Focal TMS was applied over the right motor cortex and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from left abductor digiti minimi (immobilised) and first dorsal interosseus (non-immobilised) muscles. Intensities of 10, 30, and 50% above the resting motor threshold (rMT), were used. RESULTS: In FI series, rMT for both muscles showed significant increase on days 3, 4, and 7 with respect to day 1. At high stimulation intensity a clear decrease of MEPs amplitude was observed on days 3 and 4 for both muscles. Since no time-related changes of peripheral (M-wave) and spinal (F-wave) excitability were noted, MEPs and rMT changes are likely to have a cortical origin. In FF series, no changes of excitability were detected. CONCLUSIONS: Sensorimotor restriction of two fingers induces an early decrease of excitability, possibly at cortical level, which involves not only the immobilised muscle but also muscles with purportedly overlapping neural representations.