To Tube or Not to Tube ... That Continues to Be the Question.

In the prehospital setting, "to tube, or not to tube" will persist as a probing question - long after this article is published. It is the hope of the authors simply to position a compilation of thoughts to consider in regards to alternate airways vs. endotracheal intubation. Ultimately, it's all about the right care, for the right patient, at the right time!

Implementing the 2005 American Heart Association Guidelines improves outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to determine whether applying highly recommended changes in the 2005 American Heart Association (AHA) Guidelines would improve outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. BACKGROUND: In 2005, AHA recommended multiple ways to improve circulation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). METHODS: Conglomerate quality assurance data were analyzed during prospective implementation of the 2005 AHA Guidelines in five emergency medical services (EMS) systems. All EMS personnel were trained in the key new aspects of the 2005 AHA Guidelines, including use of an impedance threshold device. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes were return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), survival by initial cardiac arrest rhythm, and the cerebral performance category (CPC) score at hospital discharge. RESULTS: There were 1,605 patients in the intervention group and 1,641 patients in the control group. Demographics, the rate of bystander CPR, and time from the 911 call for help to arrival of EMS personnel were similar between groups. Survival to hospital discharge was 10.1% in the control group versus 13.1% in the intervention group (P = .007). For patients with a presenting rhythm of ventricular fibrillation/ventricular tachycardia, survival to discharge was 20% in controls versus 32.3% in the intervention group (P <.001). Survival to discharge with a CPC classification of 1 or 2 was 33.3% (10/30) in the control versus 59.6% (31/52) in the intervention group (P = .038). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with controls, patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest treated with a renewed emphasis on improved circulation during CPR had significantly higher neurologically intact hospital discharge rates.

From laboratory science to six emergency medical services systems: New understanding of the physiology of cardiopulmonary resuscitation increases survival rates after cardiac arrest.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to: 1) describe a newly mechanism of blood flow to the brain during cardiopulmonary resuscitation using the impedance threshold device in a piglet model of cardiac arrest, and 2) describe the survival benefits in humans of applying all of the highly recommended changes in the 2005 guidelines related to increasing circulation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation, including use of the impedance threshold device, from six emergency medical services systems in the United States. DESIGN: Animal studies prospective trial with each piglet serving as its own control. Historical controls were used for the human studies. SUBJECTS: Piglets and patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. INTERVENTIONS: Piglets (10-12 kg) were treated with an active (n = 9) or sham (n = 9) impedance threshold device after 6 mins of ventricular fibrillation. Humans were treated with cardiopulmonary resuscitation per the American Heart Association 2005 guidelines and the impedance threshold device. ANIMALS: The primary endpoint in the piglet study was carotid blood flow which increased from 59 mL/min without an impedance threshold device to 91 mL/min (p = 0.017) with impedance threshold device use. Airway pressures during the chest recoil phase decreased from -0.46 mm Hg to -2.59 mm Hg (p = 0.0006) with the active impedance threshold device. Intracranial pressure decreased more rapidly and to a greater degree during the decompression phase of cardiopulmonary resuscitation with the active impedance threshold device. Humans: Conglomerate quality assurance data were analyzed from six emergency medical services systems in the United States serving a population of approximately 3 million people. There were 920 patients treated for cardiac arrest after implementation of the 2005 American Heart Association guidelines, including impedance threshold device use, and 1750 patients in the control group during the year before implementation. Demographics were similar between the two groups. Survival to hospital discharge was 9.3% in the control group versus 13.6% in the intervention group. The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p value were 1.54 (1.19-1.99) and p = 0.0008, respectively. This survival advantage was conferred to patients with a presenting cardiac arrest rhythm of ventricular fibrillation (28.5% vs. 18.0%, p = 0.0008). CONCLUSIONS: Use of the impedance threshold device in piglets increased carotid blood flow and coronary and cerebral perfusion pressures and reduced intracranial pressure during the decompression phase of cardiopulmonary resuscitation at a faster rate than controls, resulting in a longer duration of time when intracranial pressures are at their nadir. Patients in six emergency medical services systems treated with the impedance threshold device together with the renewed emphasis on more compressions, fewer ventilations, and complete chest wall recoil had a nearly 50% increase in survival rates after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest compared with historical controls.

The 2003 Air Medical Leadership Congress: findings and recommendations.

To address important concerns facing the air medical community, 149 air medical transport leaders, providers, consultants, and experts met September 4-6, 2003, in Salt Lake City, Utah, for a 3-day summit-the Air Medical Leadership Congress: Setting the Health Care Agenda for the Air Medical Community. Using data from a Web-based survey, top air medical transport issues were identified in four core areas: safety, medical care, cost/benefit, and regulatory/compliance. This report reviews the findings of previous congresses and summarizes the discussions, findings, recommendations, and proposed industry actions to address these issues as set forth by the 2003 congress participants.

The Air Medical Leadership Congress: setting the health care agenda for the air medical community.

BACKGROUND: Emergency air medical transport provides the means for critically ill or injured patients to rapidly access sophisticated medical flight teams and medical centers. However, issues such as surging emergency medical services helicopter accidents, expected pilot and nurse shortages, falling reimbursements, and new compliance regulations are now threatening these important but expensive transport services. Unless an industry strategy can be developed to address these and other threats, many medical flight programs may be forced to curtail the availability of these lifesaving services. PURPOSE: On September 4-6, 2003, air medical leaders, experts, program managers, providers, and users of emergency air medical services gathered in Salt Lake City, Utah, to discuss and formulate recommendations to address the top issues that threaten the future of air medical transport services. This congress was open to anyone engaged in the field of air medical transport. This historic meeting resulted in a plan to enhance transport safety, foster appropriate utilization, improve in-flight medical care, maximize cost and reimbursement effectiveness, and develop strategies to reduce the adverse effects of new regulatory and compliance mandates. OBJECTIVES: This article describes the significance of the Air Medical Leadership Congress and the 10-Point Plan method used to develop it.