Impact of Hydrocolloid Dressing and Moisturizing Cream as Facial Skin Protectants Among Health Care Workers.

INTRODUCTION: During the novel coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, health care workers experienced facial problems from prolonged use of N95 masks, including skin irritation, pigmentation changes, and contact dermatitis. We assessed the use of hydrocolloid dressing versus dimethicone cream to prevent skin breakdown among military health care workers while wearing an N95. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants were recruited using convenience and snowball sampling in this nonblinded, randomized, cross-over study with 2 active treatments, hydrocolloid dressing and dimethicone cream, across 3 time points. The skin was assessed using photographs and subepidermal moisture scanner (SEM). N95 seal integrity was assessed using qualitative fit test. Institutional review board approval was obtained from the Madigan Army Medical Center Institutional Review Board. RESULTS: Among the 73 participants, wearing an N95 alone versus with dimethicone cream or hydrocolloid dressing caused more adverse skin reactions. There were no significant differences in qualitative fit test failure rate between groups. Participants experienced minimal to no dizziness, loss of energy/tiredness/fatigue, claustrophobia, shortness of breath, difficulty breathing, and dry or itchy eyes. For all interventions, wearing an N95 did not interfere with participants' concentration, verbal communication, hearing, vision, and, importantly, delivery of care. CONCLUSIONS: Using a skin protectant with an N95 may prevent adverse skin reactions while preserving health care workers' ability to safely and competently care for patients in routine and pandemic conditions.

Surgical Safety Does Not Happen By Accident: Learning From Perioperative Near Miss Case Studies.

Adverse surgical events cause negative patient health outcomes and harm that can often overshadow the safe and effective patient care provided daily by nurses as members of interprofessional healthcare teams. Near misses occur far more frequently than adverse events and are less visible to nurse leaders because patient harm is avoided due to chance, prevention, or mitigation. However, near misses have comparable root causes to adverse events and exhibit the same underlying patterns of failure. Reviewing near misses provides nurses with learning opportunities to identify patient care weaknesses and build appropriate solutions to enhance care. As the operating room is one of the most complex work settings in healthcare, identifying potential weaknesses or sources for errors is vital to reduce healthcare-associated risks for patients and staff. The purpose of this manuscript is to educate, inform, and stimulate critical thinking by discussing perioperative near miss case studies and the underlying factors that lead to errors. Our authors discuss 15 near miss case studies occurring across the perioperative patient experience of care and discuss barriers to near miss reporting. Nurse leaders can use our case studies to stimulate discussion among perioperative and perianesthesia nurses in their hospitals to inform comprehensive risk reduction programs.

Advancing Readiness Through Military Programs: An Evidence-Based Practice Perspective.

INTRODUCTION: Military nurses comprise the largest percentage of military health care providers. In the current military health care system, they have two roles: (1) Patient care in military treatment facilities (MTFs) and (2) patient care during combat operations. Although in MTFs, the military nurse's roles are similar to those of their civilian counterpart, their roles are unique and varied in the combat operational environment. These combined roles lead to questions regarding readiness training to ensure that nurses are proficient in both MTFs and combat operational settings where treatment requirements may differ. The purpose of this paper is to (1) present the current state of educational readiness programs to maintain a ready medical force that entail formal teaching programs, military-civilian partnerships, and joint exercises of combat simulations, and (2) identify gaps as presented in an evidence-based practice educational panel. METHODS: On March 11, 2022, TriService Nursing Research Program hosted the virtual First Military Evidence-Based Practice Summit from the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences in Bethesda, MD. As part of the summit, an evidence-based practice education panel discussed the availability of current evidence-driven military medical readiness programs and identified gaps in the integration of military readiness for nursing personnel into the Defense Health Agency and Armed Services. RESULTS: The panel participants discussed the separate requirements for training within the MTFs and in combat operational settings. The available training programs identified by the panel were primarily those developed in local MTF settings to meet local needs. Although these programs support the MTFs' peacetime mission, competing roles, limited time, and limited funds contributed to limited preparation of nursing personnel in skills associated with combat-related injuries and illnesses. Prolonged casualty care has become an important focus for the Department of Defense as greater considerations are directed to wartime operations in austere expeditionary environments. Although there is some training available that is specific for prolonged casualty care, the focus has been the adaptation of combat casualty care during contingency operations. A keynote here was the concept that combat casualty care training must include both development of individual skills and integration of the team since maximal care can be achieved only when the individual and the team operate as a unit. A key point was the utility of central repositories for storing information related to training a ready medical force at individual and unit levels and that these repositories could also be used to collect and facilitate the accession of current evidence-based information. DISCUSSION: Optimal patient care at all levels of the military health system requires training that maximizes individual and unit skills specific to the environment at an MTF or in a combat operational setting. Training must be designed to incorporate evidence-driven knowledge in all military settings with guidance that is specific to the environment. CONCLUSION: Enhanced communication of evidence-based training and knowledge is an important component of maintaining a ready medical force for broader medical support of combat contingency operations.

Perioperative Pressure Injury Prevention Program in a Military Medical Treatment Facility: A Quality Improvement Project.

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of perioperative pressure injuries (PPIs) at a military medical treatment facility (MTF) increased from three PPI events in 2018 to five PPI events in the first half of 2019. The purpose of this quality improvement initiative was to determine whether an evidence-based PPI prevention program introduced during the second half of 2019 reduced pressure injuries compared to the previous 1.5 years that followed the standard of care for perioperative patient positioning. METHODS: We used a multidisciplinary quality improvement PPI prevention approach that included education, Scott Triggers® patient risk assessment, application of a five-layer silicone dressing to at-risk surgical position sites, and feedback via multidisciplinary postoperative rounding. RESULTS: There was an observed decrease in the rate of PPIs from 0.62 to 0.00 per 1,000 patient surgeries during the 26-month period that this protocol was implemented. CONCLUSION: This project was conducted at a major MTF using a multidisciplinary PPI prevention approach that may be of value in reducing PPIs in other settings. This approach seems worthy of further investigation and may be applicable to other military MTFs and in deployed settings.

Reducing Setup and Turnover Times in the OR With an Innovative Sterilization Container: Implications for the COVID-19 Era Military Medicine.

INTRODUCTION: The global 2019 coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) is setting unprecedented demands on the nation and the military and surgical services. Surgical demands include a large backlog of surgical cases, strain on available resources, and the need for additional measures to prevent exposure. The purpose of this project was to evaluate the feasibility, duration, adverse events, and potential gains associated with using a Turbett Sterilization Pod (TSP) for total joint replacements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multidisciplinary team used the Plan-Do-Study-Act model to guide this project. A time-motion study was completed in the operating room (OR) to measure the average time required to set up surgical instrumentation for total joint replacement cases that required 12 or more instrument trays. We compared the amount of time it took to complete the setting up of instrumentation using the traditional method versus the TSP method. The traditional method consisted of unwrapping each surgical tray, checking for holes in the blue wrapper, and placing the tray on the back table. In the case of the TSP, the door of the pod was opened, and the instrument trays were transferred directly to the back table. We measured the time the staff took to perform the task using each of these methods. RESULTS: When compared to the traditional method, the use of the TSP resulted in improved turnover time, decreased room setup time, reduced environmental waste, and eliminated both the effect of damage to wrappers and the time previously spent wrapping surgical trays. CONCLUSION: The TSP minimizes the time needed by the staff to set up an OR suite for a total joint replacement, therefore permitting them to focus more on direct patient care. This time improvement suggests that all surgical specialties, including those requiring greater than 12 traditional instrument sets, may experience reduced turnover time between cases. The use of the TSP is one means to help rectify the OR backlog brought on by COVID-19.