Correlation between visuo-cognitive tests and simulator performance of commercial drivers in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Driving commercial vehicles requires intact visuo-cognitive skills. Approximately 13% of all fatal motor vehicle crashes in the United States involve commercial drivers. The ability to accurately predict risk factors for unsafe commercial driving is essential for public safety. Accurate prediction tools will advance the field of commercial driver science, provide policy guidance for driver testing and assist healthcare providers during testing. Prior studies have correlated clinical tools to roadway safety; translating these results to commercial drivers has not yet been done. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify specific demographic, driving history and visuo-cognitive test results that correlate with driving simulator performance. Using the Cumulative Simulator Score (CSS) as a surrogate for driving ability, the objective was to correlate both sets of data (self-reported and visuo-cognitive testing) with the CSS to identify screening tools for unsafe driving in commercial drivers. PRINCIPAL RESULTS: Baseline assessments of 120 variables were collected from October 2020 to January 2022. Of the 31 participants, 3 were female and 28 were male with a mean age of 53 years. Average BMI was 32, blood pressure 136/84, 32 years of CDL driving experience, 36,500 annual CDL mileage, 11,000 annual personal mileage, 14 years of education, average number of medications: 2, average number of medical conditions: 2, six participants with personal and/or commercial crashes or tickets in past five years, MOCA 27/30, Trails B time 66 s, UFOV Speed of Processing 15 ms, Stroke Disease Severity Assessment pass rate 94 %. The Cumulative Simulator Score (CSS), correlated significantly with education (r = 0.42; p = 0.02), commercial driving experience (r = 0.42; 0 = 0.02), and number of tickets as a commercial driver (Spearman rho = 0.40; p = 0.02). In a stepwise multivariable linear regression analysis, the number of tickets as a CDL driver in the past five years and years of education were retained as significant variables in the multivariable linear regression model, explaining 38 % of the variance of total scores on the CSS. MAJOR CONCLUSIONS: Descriptive and self-reported driving characteristics correlate better with the Cumulative Simulator Score in CDL drivers than visuo-cognitive tests. Since simulator performance has been shown to be a reliable surrogate for driving performance, the number of tickets as a CDL driver in the past five years and years of education can be considered as additions to annual physicals for policy makers and health care providers to help assess their on-the-road safety.

Sex-Based Differences in Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopic Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Systematic Review.

Background: While sex-based differences in outcomes after hip arthroscopic surgery for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) are often recorded, no studies have been dedicated to analyzing the literature as a whole. Purpose: To investigate whether sex is a predictor of outcomes in studies evaluating hip arthroscopic surgery for FAIS. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. We searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Ovid, and PubMed Central databases for English-language studies that evaluated sex-specific outcomes in human populations. The search terms used were as follows: ("Hip Arthroscopy") AND ("Femoroacetabular Impingement" OR "FAI") AND ("Sex" OR "Gender" OR "Male" OR "Female"). Studies with evidence levels 2 through 4 were included. The studies were then screened, followed by data extraction. Modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) outcomes and return-to-sport (RTS) rates were recorded. These were analyzed using random-effects meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was calculated using the I 2 statistic. Results: Of 256 full-text articles screened, 48 articles were included in this analysis; of these, 14 studies (29%) concluded that female sex was a negative predictor of postoperative outcomes, while 6 studies (13%) found female sex to be positive predictor. The remaining 28 studies (58%) found no sex-based differences in postoperative outcomes. Of 7 studies (416 male and 519 female) included in the mHHS analysis, 2 studies concluded that male patients had significantly higher postoperative mHHS scores. Of 6 studies (502 male and 396 female) included in the RTS analysis, 1 study concluded that male patients had a significantly higher RTS rate. Conclusion: Almost one-third of the included studies determined that female sex was a negative predictor of postoperative outcomes, 13% found female sex to be a positive predictor, and 58% found no sex-based differences. Our study illustrates an insufficiency of high-level evidence supporting sex-specific differences in outcomes after hip arthroscopic surgery, but findings indicated that the postoperative mHHS score and RTS rate may be influenced by sex.