Polyubiquitination and proteasomal turnover controls the anti-apoptotic activity of Bcl-B.

Anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 family members can contribute to tumorigenesis and may convey resistance to anti-cancer regimens. Therefore, they are important targets for novel therapeutics, particularly Bcl-2 homology (BH)3 mimetics. Bcl-B (BCL-2-like protein-10) is a relatively understudied member of the Bcl-2 protein family. Its physiological function is unknown, but it has been proven to have an anti-apoptotic activity and to act as a tumor promoter in mice. In human, high Bcl-B protein expression levels correlate with poor prognosis in various carcinomas and predict treatment resistance in acute myeloid leukemia. We here report that protein expression level and anti-apoptotic activity of Bcl-B are dictated by its ubiquitination. We demonstrate that Bcl-B is polyubiquitinated at steady state, in a unique loop between the BH1 and BH2 domains. Mutagenesis identified lysine (K)128 as an acceptor site for polyubiquitin chains, and K119 and K120, but not K181, as potential ubiquitination sites. Mass spectrometry confirmed K128 as a ubiquitination site and defined the polyubiquitin chains as K48-linked, which was confirmed by linkage-specific antibodies. Accordingly, Bcl-B proved to be an instable protein that is subject to ubiquitin-dependent proteasomal degradation at steady state. At equal mRNA expression, protein expression of a lysineless, nonubiquitinated Bcl-B mutant was fivefold higher than that of wild-type Bcl-B, demonstrating that ubiquitination is a key determinant for Bcl-B protein expression levels. Ubiquitination controlled the anti-apoptotic capacity of Bcl-B, in response to a variety of conventional and novel anti-cancer drugs. Certain anti-cancer drugs, known to reduce Mcl-1 protein levels, likewise downregulated Bcl-B. Together, these data demonstrate that polyubiquitination and proteasomal turnover dictate the expression level and anti-apoptotic capacity of Bcl-B.

Bcl-2 is a better ABT-737 target than Bcl-xL or Bcl-w and only Noxa overcomes resistance mediated by Mcl-1, Bfl-1, or Bcl-B.

The novel anticancer drug ABT-737 is a Bcl-2 Homology 3 (BH3)-mimetic that induces apoptosis by inhibiting pro-survival Bcl-2 proteins. ABT-737 binds with equal affinity to Bcl-2, Bcl-xL and Bcl-w in vitro and is expected to overrule apoptosis resistance mediated by these Bcl-2 proteins in equal measure. We have profiled ABT-737 specificity for all six pro-survival Bcl-2 proteins, in p53 wild-type or p53-mutant human T-leukemic cells. Bcl-B was untargeted, like Bfl-1 and Mcl-1, in accord with their low affinity for ABT-737 in vitro. However, Bcl-2 proved a better ABT-737 target than Bcl-xL and Bcl-w. This was reflected in differential apoptosis-sensitivity to ABT-737 alone, or combined with etoposide. ABT-737 was not equally effective in displacing BH3-only proteins or Bax from Bcl-2, as compared with Bcl-xL or Bcl-w, offering an explanation for the differential ABT-737 sensitivity of tumor cells overexpressing these proteins. Inducible expression demonstrated that BH3-only proteins Noxa, but not Bim, Puma or truncated Bid could overrule ABT-737 resistance conferred by Bcl-B, Bfl-1 or Mcl-1. These data identify Bcl-B, Bfl-1 and Mcl-1, but also Bcl-xL and Bcl-w as potential mediators of ABT-737 resistance and indicate that target proteins can be differentially sensitive to BH3-mimetics, depending on the pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 proteins they are complexed with.

Effects of cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) and the drug transporters P-glycoprotein (MDR1/ABCB1) and MRP2 (ABCC2) on the pharmacokinetics of lopinavir.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Lopinavir is extensively metabolized by cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) and is considered to be a substrate for the drug transporters ABCB1 (P-glycoprotein) and ABCC2 (MRP2). Here, we have assessed the individual and combined effects of CYP3A, ABCB1 and ABCC2 on the pharmacokinetics of lopinavir and the relative importance of intestinal and hepatic metabolism. We also evaluated whether ritonavir increases lopinavir oral bioavailability by inhibition of CYP3A, ABCB1 and/or ABCC2. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Lopinavir transport was measured in Madin-Darby canine kidney cells expressing ABCB1 or ABCC2. Oral lopinavir kinetics (+/- ritonavir) was studied in mice with genetic deletions of Cyp3a, Abcb1a/b and/or Abcc2, or in transgenic mice expressing human CYP3A4 exclusively in the liver and/or intestine. KEY RESULTS: Lopinavir was transported by ABCB1 but not by ABCC2 in vitro. Lopinavir area under the plasma concentration - time curve (AUC)(oral) was increased in Abcb1a/b(-/-) mice (approximately ninefold vs. wild-type) but not in Abcc2(-/-) mice. Increased lopinavir AUC(oral) (>2000-fold) was observed in cytochrome P450 3A knockout (Cyp3a(-/-)) mice compared with wild-type mice. No difference in AUC(oral) between Cyp3a(-/-) and Cyp3a/Abcb1a/b/Abcc2(-/-) mice was observed. CYP3A4 activity in intestine or liver, separately, reduced lopinavir AUC(oral) (>100-fold), compared with Cyp3a(-/-) mice. Ritonavir markedly increased lopinavir AUC(oral) in all CYP3A-containing mouse strains. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: CYP3A was the major determinant of lopinavir pharmacokinetics, far more than Abcb1a/b. Both intestinal and hepatic CYP3A activity contributed importantly to low oral bioavailability of lopinavir. Ritonavir increased lopinavir bioavailability primarily by inhibiting CYP3A. Effects of Abcb1a/b were only detectable in the presence of CYP3A, suggesting saturation of Abcb1a/b in the absence of CYP3A activity.