Nationwide microbiological baseline data collected by sponge sampling during 1997 and 1998 for cattle, swine, turkeys, and geese.

During 1997 and 1998, the U.S. Food Safety and Inspection Service completed nationwide microbiological baseline studies on four separate categories of livestock and poultry. Data were collected by sponge-sampling techniques. These studies were designed to provide nationwide estimates of the prevalence of Salmonella and prevalence and concentrations of Escherichia coli in cattle (n = 1,881), swine (n = 2,127), turkeys (n = 1,396), and geese (n = 102) in establishments under federal inspection. Salmonella prevalence ranged from 1.2% in cattle to 6.9% in swine, 13.7% in geese, and 19.6% in turkeys. The prevalence of E. coli was 16.6% in cattle (geometric mean = 0.26 CFU/cm2), 44.1% in swine (mean = 0.78 CFU/cm2), 92.7% in turkey (mean = 2.46 CFU/cm2), and 96.5% in geese (mean = 1.97 CFU/cm2). These values are similar to or somewhat lower than previous baseline values obtained for steers and heifers, cows and bulls, market hogs, and young turkeys. This study is the first in which nationwide microbiological baseline data have been compiled for geese. These data will be useful to individuals working with hazard analysis critical control point plans and risk assessment and to the research and academic communities.

Methods Used for Detection and Recovery of Escherichia coli O157:H7 Associated with a Food-Borne Disease Outbreak †.

The current Food Safety and Inspection Service method for detection and recovery of Escherichia coli O157:H7, (including modified EC broth with novobiocin (mEC+n) and a direct blot ELISA). was used to analyze beef and environmental samples during an investigation of a food-borne disease outbreak attributed to consumption of undercooked hamburger patties. Double-modified trypticase soy broth (dmTSB) and a commercially available dipstick immunoassay were also used to improve detection/recovery of E. coli O157:H7. A total of 1,115 beef and environmental samples was screened with the direct blot ELISA and the dipstick immunoassay; 178 presumptive-positive samples (by either or both of the screening methods) were subjected to recovery/isolation procedures. Toxigenic E. coli O157:H7 was recovered from 45 samples: 40 hamburger-patty samples produced on the epidemiologically identified date, 3 hamburger-patty samples produced on another date, and 2 beef briskets. The organism was not recovered from environmental samples. Limited quantitative analyses indicated that contaminated hamburger patties contained fewer than 4.3 CFU of E. coli O157:H7 per g. Atypical, toxigenic ornithine decarboxylase-negative E. coli O157:H7 and nontoxigenic sorbitol-positive E. coli O157:H29 were also recovered. Both enrichment broths gave strong positive reactions with the two immunoassay screening methods, but E. coli O157:H7 was recovered more often from mEC+n broth than from dmTSB. Both screening methods gave positive results for 44 of the 45 beef samples found to contain E. coli O157:H7. False-positive results were frequently observed with both screening methods.