Utilization of combination bowel preparation (CBP) is protective against the development of post-operative Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), decreases septic complications, and provides a survival benefit.

BACKGROUND: The current standard recommended by the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) is to utilize a combined bowel preparation (CBP) that involves both mechanical (MBP) and oral antibiotic (ABP) components. The current literature is equivocal on whether ABP predisposes to post-operative Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). CDI following colorectal surgery is a significant complication leading to increase in significant morbidity and mortality. Objective was to further delineate the association between CBP and CDI. METHODS: Retrospective review of the American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) registry was performed. Specifically the main and targeted colectomy/proctectomy databases for 2015 and 2016 were analyzed. 64,449 colorectal surgeries were contained. Exclusion of non-elective cases and cases that did not utilize a bowel preparation or used ABP alone resulted in 24,000 cases for final analysis. Primary endpoint was post-operative CDI development. Secondary analysis involved surgical site infections (SSIs), anastomotic leaks, and sepsis development. 30-day mortality rates, rapidity of return of bowel function, and length of stay were also evaluated. RESULTS: Approximately two-thirds of the cases analyzed involved CBP and the remaining third used MBP alone. Cases that utilized CBP had statistically significant lower rates of all infectious complications evaluated. CBP was found to be protective in regard to the development of CDI with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.58. Our results collaborate the current literature that CBP decreases SSIs and anastomotic leaks with ORs of 0.58 and 0.79, respectively. CBP had its most profound effect on lowering septic shock and mortality rates halving the incidence of both. CONCLUSION: Our findings support the ASCRS guidelines for routine utilization of CBP to optimize post-operative outcomes. CBP does not increase the risk of CDI and in fact is significantly protective. CBP potentially also provides decreased risk of sepsis and mortality.

Evaluation of Operative Waste in a Military Medical Center: Analysis of Operating Room Cost and Waste during Surgical Cases.

Operating rooms (ORs) contribute to at least 40 per cent of hospital costs. There is an existing cost waste in ORs for surgical devices that are opened without being used. There is a paucity of data evaluating the hospital cost of opened but unused OR supplies. The goal of this observational study is to examine the cost of opened but unused OR supplies for general surgery cases. We performed a quality improvement project of OR cost waste by observing 30 cases. Surgical cases of a senior surgeon who had been at the institution for more than five years were evaluated for items opened appropriately and whether the items are used. The cases evaluated ranged from open hernia repairs to robotic-assisted hernia repairs. We found that the cost of instruments opened but not used was $4528.18. Of the cases evaluated, we found that a range of 0 per cent to 27 per cent of total items were wasted, an average of 8.3 per cent. We found that for the open inguinal hernia case, there was minimal waste. The highest waste was among complex cases such as the robotic-assisted inguinal hernia with an average waste and cost of 15.8 per cent and $379. We found that on average for less complex cases such as open inguinal hernia repairs, $1.44 was potentially wasted per case, whereas for more complex cases up to $379 was wasted per case. We identified the outdated preference cards, lack of instrument knowledge, circulating nurse, and surgical technician distractions as reasons for contributing to waste.