Wound care in hard-to-reach populations: rough sleepers.

People sleeping rough commonly develop wounds and other skin disorders. Wounds vary and develop for multiple reasons. They include acute wounds such as burns, infected injection sites, abscesses and cellulitis, as well as chronic wounds such as pressure ulcers; rough sleepers have a high prevalence of lower limb wounds. Skin and soft tissue infections are common, especially in people who inject drugs via subcutaneous or intramuscular routes. Emergency departments are often the pathways into healthcare for homeless people as traditional health and care systems often fail to meet their needs. Across England, initiatives have been developed to improve access to wound care for those who sleep rough. A case study illustrates the care of a homeless man presenting with a lower limb wound.

Correlating area deprivation index with initial stage at presentation and with follow up and recurrence within an advanced practice provider-led survivorship clinic.

INTRODUCTION: Living in disadvantaged neighborhoods has been shown to result in worse healthcare outcomes. The Area Deprivation Index (ADI) is a metric that ranks neighborhoods by socioeconomic disadvantage utilizing numerous factors including income, education, employment, and housing quality. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent surveillance in an APP-led head and neck cancer survivorship clinic from Dec 2016 to Oct 2020 at an academic tertiary care center were included. Tumor characteristics, visit frequency, recurrence, number of missed appointments, loss of follow up, and ADI scores were collected. RESULTS: 543 patients were included in the study. A majority were male (69.9 %) and white race (84.9 %) with an average age of 64.6 years old. Average ADI national percentile score was 71.6(range: 17 to 100). ADI national percentile score was not predictive of tumor characteristics at initial presentation: lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.940; OR 1.0 [95 % CI: 0.9 to 1.1]), extranodal extension (p = 0.576; OR 1.0 [95 % CI: 0.9 to 1.2]), positive margins (p = 0.069; OR 0.9 [95 % CI: 0.9 to 1.0]). ADI national percentile score was not significantly correlated with loss to follow up (p = 0.153; OR 1.2 [95 % CI: 0.9 to 1.7] or cancer recurrence (p = 0.594; OR 1.0 [95 % CI: 0.9 to 1.1]). Missing one or more clinic visits was correlated with loss to follow up (p = 0.029; OR 13.1 [95 % CI: 1.3 to 131.7]. CONCLUSION: Living in a disadvantaged neighborhood did not correlate with negative tumor characteristics, loss to follow up, or recurrence within an APP-led survivorship head and neck cancer clinic.

Emergency department childhood anaphylaxis presentations in regional/remote Australia.

AIM: Explore the prevalence of childhood anaphylaxis and clinical presentation of anaphylaxis in children across two regional emergency departments over a 7-year period. METHODS: Retrospective audit of all children (0-18 years) presenting to emergency from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2016 with anaphylaxis, defined by Australasian Society of Clinical Immunology and Allergy definitions and doctor diagnosis. RESULTS: Seven hundred and twenty-four patients were identified with allergic diagnosis, 60% were diagnosed with non-anaphylaxis allergic reactions or unspecified urticaria and 40% with anaphylaxis (n = 286). Annual prevalence of anaphylaxis remained stable over the study period (M = 30.9/10 000 cases, range: 20.8-48.3/10 000). Gender distribution was equal, median age was 9.48 years (interquartile range = 4-15). Most (71%) arrived by private transport. 23% had a prior history of anaphylaxis. Food triggers (44%) were the most common cause of anaphylaxis. Insect bites/stings triggers occurred in 21%. Patients were promptly assessed (average wait time = 13 min), 16% received prior adrenaline injections. Adrenaline was administered in 26% and 20% were admitted to hospital. On discharge, 29% had a follow-up plan, 9% received an allergy clinic referral, 6% anaphylaxis action plan, 26% adrenaline autoinjector prescriptions and allergy testing performed in 6%. CONCLUSIONS: We found a relatively low prevalence of overall childhood anaphylaxis in a regional area. The two most common causes of anaphylaxis in this population (food and bites/stings) recorded increased prevalence providing an opportunity for further study. Significant gaps in evidence-based care of anaphylaxis were noted, demonstrating the need for improved recognition and treatment guideline implementation in regional areas.

Model of an Advanced Practice Provider-Led Head and Neck Cancer Survivorship Clinic: Evaluation of a 4-Year Experience.

OBJECTIVE: To report the efficacy and safety of an advanced practice provider-led head and neck cancer survivorship clinic. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Tertiary academic medical center. METHODS: Patients were enrolled into the survivorship clinic after undergoing 1-year follow-up with the primary head and neck surgeon. Those enrolled between December 2016 and October 2020 were retrospectively reviewed for diagnosis, staging, pattern of recurrence, visit frequency, and compliance. Surgical respectability of recurrent disease was used as a surrogate for timely diagnosis. RESULTS: An overall 570 patients were followed within the survivorship clinic. The mean length of follow-up was 13.6 months. Mucosal primaries represented 72.6% of patients. A majority of the primary malignancies were squamous cell carcinoma (77.7%). The most common primary subsites were the oropharynx (26.7%), oral cavity (25.1%), cutaneous (17.0%), and larynx (15.3%). Recurrence was detected in 50 patients (8.8%): 26 local, 12 regional, and 14 distant. Two patients had multiple synchronous recurrences. Twelve (2.1%) second primary cancers were detected. Of the 36 cases of locoregional recurrence, 32 (88.9%) were deemed amenable to salvage surgical intervention, with or without adjuvant therapy. Negative margins were obtained in 21 of the 23 (91.3%) local recurrences that underwent salvage resection. CONCLUSION: Advanced practice provider-based surveillance of head and neck cancer, without risk stratification, appears to be a sound model but needs further prospective evaluation. Consistent with literature, 88.9% of patients with locoregional recurrence were candidates for curative-intent salvage surgery, emphasizing that recurrences are identified in a timely fashion.

Integrative study of the upper and lower airway microbiome and transcriptome in asthma.

Relatively little is known about interactions between the airway microbiome and airway host transcriptome in asthma. Since asthma affects and is affected by the entire airway, studying the upper (e.g., nasal) and lower (e.g., bronchial) airways together represents a powerful approach to understanding asthma. Here, we performed a systematic, integrative study of the nasal and bronchial microbiomes and nasal and bronchial host transcriptomes of children with severe persistent asthma and healthy controls. We found that (a) the microbiomes and host transcriptomes of asthmatic children are each distinct by site (nasal versus bronchial); (b) among asthmatic children, Moraxella and Alloiococcus are hub genera in the nasal microbiome, while there are no hubs among bronchial genera; (c) bronchial Actinomyces is negatively associated with bronchial genes for inflammation, suggesting Actinomyces may be protective; (d) compared with healthy children, asthmatic children express more nasal genes for ciliary function and harbor more nasal Streptococcus; and (e) nasal genera such as Corynebacterium are negatively associated with significantly more nasal genes for inflammation in healthy versus asthmatic children, suggesting a potentially stronger protective role for such nasal genera in healthy versus asthmatic children. Our systematic, integrative study provides a window into host-microbiome associations in asthma.

Feasibility of a novel classification for parotid gland cytology: A retrospective review of 512 cytology reports taken from 4 United Kingdom general hospitals.

BACKGROUND: A novel classification for parotid cytology has been previously proposed. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and clinical relevance of this classification. METHOD: Between 2010 and 2013, cytology reports from 4 United Kingdom general hospitals were retrospectively classified and compared to histological and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Based on the cytology reports of 512 patients, we revised our previous "P" system to a "Sal" (salivary) classification to encompass all cytologic outcomes. The percentage of patients with a final diagnosis of malignancy according to each category heading were: Sal 1 (inadequate) 7.9%; Sal 2I (nonneoplastic) 10%; Sal 2N (benign neoplastic) 1.4%; Sal 3 (atypical) 20.4%; Sal 4 (suspicious) 52.6%; Sal 5P (primary salivary gland malignancy) 71.4%; Sal 5NOS (malignancy not otherwise specified) 100%; and Sal 5M (metastasis) 91.7%. CONCLUSION: By stratifying the probability of encountering a malignant neoplasm, the classification could guide clinical management decisions. A future prospective study is warranted. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: 1708-1716, 2016.