[Comparison of the accuracy of rectal endoscopic sonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of colorectal endometriosis]. / Comparaison de l'échoendoscopie rectale et de l'IRM pour le diagnostic de l'atteinte colorectale par l'endométriose.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and rectal endoscopic sonography (RES) for the diagnosis of colorectal endometriosis. METHODS: In retrospective study, 407 patients operated on service of gynecology of Tenon hospital for deep endometriosis with suspected colorectal involvement. All patients underwent MRI and then RES. RESULTS: In the study, 239 patients (59%) had colorectal endometriosis which were diagnosed with the histology. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV) of RES and MRI for the diagnosis of colorectal endometriosis were respectively 92%, 87%, 91%, 88% and 85%, 88%, 91%, 80%. The accuracy of RES was not significantly different than MRI (90% versus 86%, P=0.09). CONCLUSION: RES is a good exam to diagnose colorectal endometriosis. It is able to improve diagnosis performances.

Pulmonary delivery of dry powders to rats: tolerability limits of an intra-tracheal administration model.

The inhaled route is increasingly developed to deliver locally acting or systemic therapies, and rodent models are used to assess tolerance before clinical studies. Endotracheal intubation of rats with a probe which generates powder aerosols enables controlled administration of drug directly into the respiratory tract. However, preliminary observations of intratracheal powder administration procedures have raised concerns with regard to pulmonary safety. The aim of the present work was to evaluate the safety of intra-tracheal administration of dry powder in a rat model. Sixty animals were administered various volumes of air alone, lactose or magnesium stearate through a Microsprayer(®) (Pencentury, USA). The mass of powder actually delivered to each animal was calculated. Rats were sacrificed immediately after administration, and the lungs, trachea and larynx were removed and examined for gross pathology. The mass of powder delivered varied, the full dose being rarely delivered. About one third of the administration procedures resulted in respiratory failure, and macroscopic pulmonary lesions were observed in about 55% of animals. Lung damages were observed with air alone, lactose and magnesium stearate. In conclusion, artifacts observed with this technique may limit the relevance of the model. These observations are particularly important in the context of regulatory toxicity studies.

Contribution of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the workup of mediastinal lymph nodes.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The aim of this retrospective study was to assess endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA), a minimally invasive technique, to determine its diagnostic accuracy and morbidity in the etiological diagnoses of mediastinal lymph nodes. METHODS: A total of 84 patients underwent EUS-FNA biopsy of the mediastinal lymph nodes, and were classified as either malignant disease, inflammatory disease or incidental diagnosis, according to the suspected clinical condition. To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA in each group, a comparison of the cytological results obtained with 19- and 22-gauge needles was performed. RESULTS: All 84 procedures were carried out between January 2004 and June 2008. Six patients were excluded because of non-contributory results. On analyzing the results of EUS-FNA in the malignant group (n=41), the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were 93, 100, 100 and 85%, respectively. In the inflammatory (n=20) and incidental diagnosis (n=17) groups, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were 85, 100, 100 and 75%, and 80, 100, 100 and 77%, respectively. There was no significant difference between the FNA results with the 19-gauge (20/78 patients) versus 22-gauge (58/78 patients) needles (P=0.55). Also, no complications were reported either during the procedure or after the 6-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: EUS-FNA is a safe and accurate diagnostic procedure for the study of mediastinal lymph nodes not only for malignancy, but also for inflammatory diseases and incidental diagnoses. In addition, there is no difference in diagnostic accuracy whether FNA is carried out with a 19-gauge or 22-gauge needle.

Accuracy of transvaginal sonography and rectal endoscopic sonography in the diagnosis of deep infiltrating endometriosis.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the accuracy of transvaginal sonography (TVS) and rectal endoscopic sonography (RES) for the diagnosis of deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE), with respect to surgical and histological findings. METHODS: This was a longitudinal study of 81 consecutive patients referred for surgical management of DIE, who underwent both TVS and RES preoperatively. The diagnostic criteria were identical for TVS and RES, and were based on visualization of hypoechoic areas in specific locations (uterosacral ligaments, vagina, rectovaginal septum and intestine). We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and accuracy of TVS and RES for the diagnosis of DIE. RESULTS: Endometriosis was confirmed histologically in 80/81 (98.7%) patients. Endometriomas and DIE were present in 43.2% and 97.5% of the women, respectively. For the diagnosis of DIE overall, TVS and RES, respectively, had a sensitivity of 87.3% and 74.7%, a positive predictive value of 98.6% and 98.3%, and an accuracy of 86.4% and 74%. For the diagnosis of uterosacral endometriosis, they had a sensitivity of 80.8% and 46.6%, a specificity of 75% and 50.0%, a positive predictive value of 96.7% and 89.5% and a negative predictive value of 30% and 9.3%. For the diagnosis of intestinal endometriosis, they had a sensitivity of 92.6% and 88.9%, a specificity of 100% and 92.6%, a positive predictive value of 100% and 96% and a negative predictive value of 87% and 80.6%. CONCLUSION: TVS is apparently more accurate than is RES for predicting DIE in specific locations, and should thus be the first-line imaging technique in this setting.

Accuracy of rectal endoscopic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of rectal involvement for patients presenting with deeply infiltrating endometriosis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of rectal endoscopic ultrasonography (REU) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for predicting rectal wall involvement in patients presenting histologically proven deeply infiltrating endometriosis (DIE). METHODS: This was a retrospective study of a continuous series of 81 patients presenting histologically proven DIE who underwent preoperative investigations using both REU and MRI. The sonographer and the radiologist, who were unaware of the clinical findings and patient history, but knew that DIE was suspected, were asked whether there was involvement of the digestive wall. RESULTS: Rectal DIE was confirmed histologically in 34 of the 81 (42%) patients. For the diagnosis of rectal involvement, sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive value for REU were 97.1%, 89.4%, 86.8% and 97.7% and for MRI they were 76.5%, 97.9%, 96.3% and 85.2%. CONCLUSION: The sensitivity and negative predictive value of REU were higher than those of MRI suggesting that REU performs better than MRI in the diagnosis of rectal involvement for patients presenting with DIE. Prospective studies with a large number of patients are needed in order to validate these preliminary results.

[Functional intestinal disorders: assessment and perception by physicians of their patients perception. Results of two national studies]. / Troubles fonctionnels intestinaux: évaluation de la perception par les praticiens du vécu de leurs patients. Résultats de deux enquêtes nationales.

OBJECTIVE: In 1999, a first national survey on functional intestinal disorders (FID) revealed the patients' good perception of the medical corps and treatments proposed. The aim of the present study was to assess the physicians' perception of their patients, their symptoms and their degree of satisfaction. METHODS: The survey was conducted among the physicians who had recruited the patients of the initial study. Eight hundred and eighty five replies were analysed (general practitioners--GPs: 88%; gastro-enterologists--GE: 11%). RESULTS: The mean number of patients with FID seen in one week was of 11.40 (GP: 10.80; GE: 16.29). Thirty percent of patients were seen for the first time by a GP and 65 percent by a GE. The mean yearly number of consultations for these patients was of 7.16 for the GPs and 3.81 pour les GEs. A coloscopy was prescribed by 49% of GPs and 66% of GEs. The pain and transit disorders mentioned in 98 and 78.7% of cases had evolved over a mean of 56.57 months. COMMENTS: Although aware of the repercussion of FID in daily life, the practitioners evaluated a psychological component of 69% in the expression of the disorder. They considered the pain intense in 6% of cases versus the 41% expressed by the patient. The scores out of 10 for 8 items showed a mean result of 6.86 in their evaluation of the degree of the patients' understanding of their disease and its treatment, and of 6.13 for the quality of the medical act. These same criteria, assessed one year earlier by the patients themselves, showed better scores.

Anal carcinoma: prognostic value of endorectal ultrasound (ERUS). Results of a prospective multicenter study.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The classification of anal carcinoma is based on the clinical examination and the estimation of the tumor height (Union Internationale Contre le Cancer (UICC) 1987 Classification). This classification has a direct therapeutic application since tumors which are designated T1 and T2 are generally treated by radiotherapy whereas T3, T4 or N+ lesions are treated by concomitant radiation and chemotherapy. The aim of this prospective multicenter study was to evaluate endorectal ultrasound (ERUS) and to define an ERUS-based classification. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1994 and May 1997, 146 patients (42 men and 104 women; mean age, 63) from eight different centers were studied prospectively. The ERUS classification incorporates disease of the anal canal and the perirectal lymph nodes, thus: usT1 describes involvement of the mucosa and submucosa with sparing of the internal sphincter; usT2, involvement of the internal sphincter with sparing of the external sphincter; usT3, involvement of the external sphincter; usT4, involvement of a pelvic organ; N0 describes no suspicious perirectal lymph nodes, and N+, perirectal lymph nodes fulfilling endosonographic criteria for malignancy (e.g. round, hypoechoic). Tumors classified as UICC T1-T2 (<4cm) N0 were treated by radiotherapy alone, whereas lesions with a UICC classification of T2 (> 4 cm), T3-T4, N0-N1-2-3 received combined radiochemotherapy. RESULTS: Data concerning the treatment and follow-up were available for 115/146 patients (78.7%). We compared the prognostic importance of the two classification schemes for treatment response and the rate of local relapse (chi-squared test). A significantly greater proportion of T1-T2N0 lesions classified by ERUS had a complete response to treatment than those classified by conventional UICC staging (94.5% vs. 80%, respectively; P = 0.008). The ERUS T and N stage were significant predictors of relapse (P=0.001 and P=0.03, respectively) whereas the corresponding clinical (UICC) stages were not (P = 0.4 and P = 0.5, respectively). Using a Cox model, usT stage was the only significant predictive factor for patient survival. CONCLUSION: This muticenter prospective study demonstrated the superiority of ERUS-based staging over traditional clinical staging in the prediction of important outcomes such as local tumor recurrence and patient survival.

[Gastrointestinal functional disorders. National evaluation survey of patient symptoms and management]. / Troubles fonctionnels intestinaux. Enquête nationale d'évaluation par les patients des symptômes et leur prise en charge.

OBJECTIVE: An anonymous self-administered questionnaire was completed by patients with gastrointestinal functional disorders to determine symptoms and management strategies employed. METHODS: The questionnaire was filled out by 1266 patients who complained of abdominal pain in 8 out of 10 cases as well as disturbed bowel movements and abdominal distension. RESULTS: Half of the patients had started self medication, generally before consulting their general practitioner. The patients were generally satisfied with their medical care. Superior efficacy was observed for antispasmodics in combination or not with anxiolytic agents (75%, 71% and 69% efficacy respectively). The digestive disorders led to an interruption of occupational activities in 21% of the patients. DISCUSSION: Optimal management of patients with this benign chronic disorder that nevertheless has a major impact on their quality of life requires sufficient knowledge of the opinions of both the patients and their physicians. A second survey on this question has been initiated.

Biliary varices on endoscopic ultrasonography: clinical presentation and outcome.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Bile duct varices are not a well-recognized feature of portal venous obstruction. The aim of the present study was to describe the clinical and endosonographic features of biliary involvement in patients with extrahepatic portal venous obstruction (EPVO). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted of the clinical features, outcome, and endosonographic findings (using Olympus EUM-3 or EUM-20 probes) in 21 patients with EPVO and endosonographic features of biliary varices. Biliary varices were defined as multiple, large, serpiginous, anechoic vascular channels in and/or surrounding the extrahepatic biliary tracts. RESULTS: Biliary varices have not previously been visible using conventional imaging methods (computed tomography and ultrasonography). They were identified using EUS in the wall of the common bile duct in 16 patients (76%), surrounding the common bile duct (CBD) in 11 patients (52%), and in the gallbladder in nine (43%). The varices were the cause of obstructive jaundice in three of the 21 patients (14%), but only when they were in the wall of the CBD. Two of these patients were treated using portosystemic shunting, and the other received a biliary endoprosthesis. The EUS examination also provided evidence of unrecognized pancreatic or biliary tumors in three other patients with EPVO of undetermined origin. CONCLUSIONS: EUS can serve to diagnose biliary varices in patients with EPVO and jaundice. Although biliary varices are mainly asymptomatic, they may cause obstructive jaundice when they are located in the wall of the CBD. EUS can also detect unrecognized malignant tumors in patients with EPVO of undetermined origin.

Rectosigmoid endometriosis: endoscopic ultrasound features and clinical implications.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The main area of the gastrointestinal tract affected by deep pelvic endometriosis is the rectosigmoid colon in 3-37% of cases. Due to the risk of infiltration and the clinical symptoms of endometriosis, with pain and infertility, the condition may require surgical resection. Preoperative imaging diagnosis of rectosigmoid involvement is therefore important. Rectal endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), which is already used for the staging of anorectal carcinoma and submucosal lesions, may be a promising technique for this indication. The present study was conducted in order to describe the endosonographic appearance of rectosigmoid endometriosis, and to define the potential relevance of the technique to the choice of resection method. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1993 and 1997, 46 women (mean age 31) with deep pelvic endometriosis underwent imaging investigations and surgical resection. The clinical and imaging findings, and the surgical and histological features identified--mainly with regard to infiltration of the rectal wall--were compared retrospectively. The impact of the EUS findings on the decision on whether or not to carry out resection, either by laparoscopy or open abdominal surgery, was also examined. RESULTS: When there was deep pelvic endometriosis with suspected rectal wall infiltration, EUS showed normal anatomy in nine patients, endometriotic lesions without rectal wall infiltration in 12, and typical rectal infiltration in 25. The lesions were confirmed by the surgical findings during therapeutic laparoscopy (n = 22) and laparotomy (n = 25), as well as by clinical follow-up. Rectal wall infiltration, demonstrated in all cases using EUS, had initially been suspected on the basis of clinical examinations, rectoscopy, barium enema, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in 62%, 50%, 33%, 67% and 66% of cases, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: EUS is a simple and noninvasive technique capable of correctly diagnosing rectal wall infiltration in deep pelvic endometriosis. It may be helpful in determining the choice between laparoscopy and laparotomy when complete resection is indicated.

Endosonographic features predictive of benign and malignant gastrointestinal stromal cell tumours.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Some endoscopic ultrasonographic (EUS) features have been reported to be suggestive of malignancy in gastrointestinal stromal cell tumours (SCTs). The aim of this study was to assess the predictive value of these features for malignancy. METHODS: A total of 56 histologically proven cases of SCT studied by EUS between 1989 and 1996 were reviewed. There were 42 gastric tumours, 12 oesophageal tumours, and two rectal tumours. The tumours were divided into two groups: (a) benign SCT, comprising benign leiomyoma (n = 34); (b) malignant or borderline SCT (n = 22), comprising leiomyosarcoma (n = 9), leiomyoblastoma (n = 9), and leiomyoma of uncertain malignant potential (n = 4). The main EUS features recorded were tumour size, ulceration, echo pattern, cystic spaces, extraluminal margins, and lymph nodes with a malignant pattern. The two groups were compared by univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Irregular extraluminal margins, cystic spaces, and lymph nodes with a malignant pattern were most predictive of malignant or borderline SCT. Pairwise combinations of the three features had a specificity and positive predictive value of 100% for malignant or borderline SCT, but a sensitivity of only 23%. The presence of at least one of these three criteria had 91% sensitivity, 88% specificity, and 83% predictive positive value. In multivariate analysis, cystic spaces and irregular margins were the only two features independently predictive of malignant potential. The features most predictive of benign SCTs were regular margins, tumour size < or = 30 mm, and a homogeneous echo pattern. When the three features were combined, histology confirmed a benign SCT in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: The combined presence of two out of three EUS features (irregular extraluminal margins, cystic spaces, and lymph nodes with a malignant pattern) had a positive predictive value of 100% for malignant or borderline gastrointestinal SCT. Tumours less than 30 mm in diameter with regular margins and a homogeneous echo pattern are usually benign.

[Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in severe pelvic endometriosis].

UNLABELLED: Deep pelvic endometriosis may lead to severe pain, the treatment of which may require complete surgical resection of lesions. Digestive infiltration is a difficult therapeutic problem. Preoperative diagnosis is difficult and digestive infiltration may remain unknown with incomplete resection and sometimes repeated surgery. Both magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and endoscopic ultrasonography are able to detect rectosigmoid infiltration but their usefulness in the preoperative staging is still to be evaluated. The aim of this work was to evaluate and compare both techniques in the preoperative detection of deep pelvic endometriosis, particularly digestive infiltration. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1996 to 1998, 48 women with painful deep pelvic endometriosis had preoperative imaging exploration with endoscopic ultrasonography and MRI, and were operated on in order to attempt complete endometriosis resection. Patients were proposed for laparoscopic resection if endoscopic ultrasonography and/or MRI did not reveal digestive infiltration or for open resection if endoscopic ultrasonography and/or MRI were positive for digestive infiltration. RESULTS: Endoscopic ultrasonography and/or MRI led to suspicion of digestive endometriosis in 16 patients. Surgical resection was performed in 12 and digestive wall invasion was histologically demonstrated. At final follow-up, all patients had a dramatic decrease of their symptoms. The remaining 4 patients refused digestive resection and had only laparoscopic gynecologic resection. Infiltration although not histologically proven was very likely both on operative findings and clinical evolution. Digestive infiltration was preoperatively excluded in the 32 other patients. All had a laparoscopic treatment without digestive resection and pain diminished in all patients. In the 12 patients group who had digestive resection, digestive infiltration was correctly diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasonography in all cases (no false negative) whereas MRI, even with the use of endocoil antenna, led to correct diagnosis in 8 out of 12 cases. When endoscopic ultrasonography was negative for digestive infiltration, laparoscopic resection of lesions at surgery appeared complete in all cases. For the 16 patients with presumed digestive infiltration, sensitivity of endoscopic ultrasonography and MRI was 100 and 75% respectively, with a 100% specificity in both cases. MRI appeared very accurate for the detection of ovarian endometriotic locations. MRI was more sensitive but less specific than endoscopic ultrasonography for the diagnosis of isolated endometriotic recto-vaginal septum and utero-sacral ligaments lesions. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic ultrasonography was the best technique for the diagnosis of digestive endometriotic infiltration, which complicates the therapeutic strategy. MRI, however, allows more complete staging of other pelvic endometriotic lesions.

[Anorectal echo-endoscopy: applications in pediatrics]. / Echo-endoscopie ano-rectale. Applications en pédiatrie.

PEDIATRIC INDICATIONS: Anorectal echoendoscopy is widely used in adults for the pretreatment work-up of rectal cancer and for the exploration of fecal incontinence. It can also be useful in the pediatric setting as recently described with rotative or linear heads. The exploration can be performed after an evacuating enema or if needed after giving a neuroleptanalgesic. The anorecal walls and neighboring areas-bladder, genital organs, perirectal spaces, vessels-can be explored. The ultrasonographic aspect of the walls is similar to that described in adults although less thick, particularly at the level of the anus sphincters. Signs of defects, abscesses and fistulizations are the same as in adults. BOWEL DISORDERS AND INCONTINENCE: Echoendoscopy can characterize rare subepithelial tumors of the rectum and vascular anomalies, but its main interest is for the exploration of bowel disorders and incontinence, particularly after surgical treatment for anorectal malformations. The quality of the muscular tissue and the quality of the surgical repair can be assessed before deciding on the need for a second operation. In this context, anorectal echoendoscopy can also disclose Hirschsprung's disease and other forms of idiopathic megarectum, including certain types with major thickening of the internal sphincter. It can also detect defects induced by prior disimpaction maneuvers. A NONINVASIVE EXAM: Anorectal echoendoscopy is a promising exploration technique in pediatric gastroenterology. Descriptions of the sphincters and anorectal anatomy are very precise and descriptions of functional disorders, whether primary or secondary to surgery, can be quite helpful for guiding subsequent management.