Screening mammography in men with BRCA mutations: is there a role?

Male breast cancer is rare, with an estimated incidence of 1.08 per 100,000 men, and a death rate less than one third of that. However, the incidence of breast cancer in men with the BRCA2 mutation is significantly higher, 7.1% before age 70 (Evans et al., J Med Genet. 2010; 47:710). Due to the low incidence of male breast carcinoma, and even lower incidence of male BRCA2 positive breast cancers, clear screening guidelines for patients at risk for male for breast cancer have not been established. We report a case of male breast carcinoma in a patient with the BRCA2 mutation detected by screening mammography, and review the literature regarding screening mammography in men.

Noncompliance with adjuvant radiation, chemotherapy, or hormonal therapy in breast cancer patients.

INTRODUCTION: There is little information on patient-driven noncompliance of adjuvant therapies and its consequences. METHODS: This retrospective study compares clinical, pathological features and outcomes of breast cancer patients who were compliant to recommended radiation, chemotherapy, and hormonal therapies to those who were noncompliant. RESULTS: Noncompliance rates for chemotherapy, radiation, and tamoxifen were 31 of 421 (7%), 30 of 855 (4%), and 294 of (37%) respectively. Old age was associated with noncompliance to chemotherapy and radiation, but younger women tend to be more often noncompliant to tamoxifen. Noncompliance with chemotherapy or radiation did not significantly affect 5-year local and distant disease-free survival rates. Noncompliance with tamoxifen was associated with decreased 5-year local and distant disease-free survivals (87% versus 96%, 76% versus 87%, respectively, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Noncompliance with tamoxifen is the most common, resulting in significantly increased risk of local and distant disease recurrence.

Reoperative sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with locally recurrent breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is considered a standard of care in the staging of breast cancer. The objective was to examine our experience with reoperative SLNB. METHODS: We identified 19 patients in our breast cancer database who had a SLNB in the reoperative setting. All 19 patients had undergone previous breast-conserving surgery with either an axillary lymph node dissection or an SLNB. The reoperative sentinel lymph node (SLN) was identified using blue dye, radioisotope, or both. RESULTS: The SLN was identified in 84% of the reoperative cases. Of these successful cases, both blue dye and radioisotope were used in five cases, and radioisotope alone was used in 11 cases. Radioisotope identified the SLN in the 100% of successful SLNB cases (P = .0003). There were 3 unsuccessful cases in which blue dye and radioisotope failed to identify the sentinel node. CONCLUSIONS: Reoperative SLNB after previous axillary surgery is technically feasible.

A single institution review of new breast malignancies identified solely by sonography.

BACKGROUND: The role of sonography as a sole identifier of breast malignancy remains undetermined. Currently, the American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN) trial, protocol 6666, is accruing high risk patients, with dense breast tissue on mammography, to evaluate the performance of screening sonography. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective single institution review to identify the detection rate of nonpalpable, mammographically occult breast malignancies identified solely by sonography. RESULTS: A total of 34,694 breast sonograms were performed at our outpatient radiology affiliate between April 1998 and April 2006. This number includes unilateral and bilateral examinations, and, 6-month followup examinations. Computerized databases and individual charts were retrospectively reviewed. Sonographic and mammographic findings were compared to determine concordance of identified lesions. Four thousand ninety-one ultrasound guided biopsies, (fine needle aspiration biopsy [FNA] and core needle biopsy [CNB]) were performed over the 8-year period, and 452 malignancies were identified. Discarded fluid contents of pure cyst aspirations were not included in this number. Seven percent (32) of the biopsy-proved malignancies were mammographically occult, of which 59% (19) were palpable, and 31% (10) were not palpable. Of all cancers diagnosed, 2.2% were identified solely by sonography. The number of cancers identified solely by sonography relative to the total number of sonograms done was 0.03%. CONCLUSIONS: Given these results, we advocate the selective use of sonography in appropriate populations, namely, in those with palpable findings, mammographic abnormalities, and in women with dense tissue who have personal or family history of breast cancer.

Significance of papillary lesions at percutaneous breast biopsy.

BACKGROUND: The management of nonpalpable papillary lesions found in specimens obtained by percutaneous breast biopsy is controversial. We reviewed the treatment of patients found to have papillary lesions by stereotactic, sonographic, or fine-needle aspiration breast biopsy to identify indications for surgical excision. METHODS: Consecutive patients with intraductal papilloma, atypical papilloma/papilloma with atypical ductal hyperplasia, papillary neoplasm, and papillomatosis according to percutaneous breast biopsy were identified from radiology records. The charts were reviewed to identify patients who had subsequent surgical excision, and the pathologic findings were correlated with the biopsy method and indications for surgery. RESULTS: Papillary lesions were found in 120 biopsy samples from 109 patients. Malignancy was found at operation in 19 (24%) of 80 lesions that underwent surgical excision: 12 (63%) were ductal carcinoma-in-situ, 4 (21%) were infiltrating ductal carcinoma, 2 (11%) were infiltrating papillary carcinoma, and 1 (5%) was intracystic papillary carcinoma. Malignancy was found in 9 (30%) of 30 fine-needle biopsy papillary lesions, 6 (35%) of 17 core biopsy papillary lesions, and 4 (12%) of 33 stereotactic biopsy papillary lesions. Malignancy was missed significantly less frequently with stereotactic biopsy (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: Malignancy is frequently found at surgical excision for papillary lesions found on percutaneous breast biopsy. Malignancy is missed significantly less frequently with stereotactic biopsy.

The significance of atypical lobular hyperplasia at percutaneous breast biopsy.

Atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH) is occasionally found in specimens obtained by percutaneous stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy for microcalcifications. Since malignancy is often found at surgical excision when atypical ductal hyperplasia is found at percutaneous biopsy, we reviewed our pathologic findings from surgery for ALH at percutaneous biopsy. This was a retrospective review of all percutaneous breast biopsy specimens for mammographic microcalcifications obtained from a single institution over a 30-month period. The pathologic findings from percutaneous biopsy were correlated with the radiologic appearance and the pathology from surgical excision. ALH was found in 13 of 766 (1.7%) stereotactic vacuum-assisted core needle biopsies performed for mammographic microcalcifications. Subsequent surgery in six patients revealed ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in two patients and one case of invasive ductal carcinoma. Surgical excision is indicated for areas with ALH discovered by percutaneous biopsy for mammographic microcalcifications.

The prognostic significance of Gail model risk factors for women with breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Because many risk factors for breast cancer are related to hormonal factors and hormonal factors influence breast cancer prognosis, risk factors may have prognostic value. In order to assess the prognostic value of risk factors for breast cancer we divided patients with breast cancer into those at high risk and low risk using the Gail model. METHODS: Patients with available follow-up and information concerning age, age at menarche, number of children, age at first birth, number of first degree relatives with breast cancer, and number of previous breast biopsies were divided into low and high-risk groups by the average relative risk calculated using the Gail model. Risk factors, clinical presentations, pathologic findings, tumor characteristics, extent of disease, treatment and outcomes for the 106 high-risk women were compared with the 206 low-risk women. Stage IV patients were excluded. RESULTS: The average relative risk of breast cancer was 2.09. The 106 high-risk women were significantly older (58 years versus 53 years; P = 0.001), older at first live birth (30 years versus 23 years; P <0.001), more likely to have a first degree relative with breast cancer (57% versus 0%; P <0.001), and more likely to have previously had a breast biopsy (19% versus 1%; P <0.001). There was no difference in the average age at menarche. Low-risk patients were significantly more frequently nulliparous (40% versus 22%; P = 0.002). Clinical presentation, pathologic findings, extent of disease, and treatment were comparable in high and low-risk patients. Cancers of low-risk patients were more frequently poorly differentiated (39% versus 25%, P = 0.044). Tamoxifen was used more frequently in high-risk patients (56% versus 41%; P = 0.012). High-risk patients exhibited significantly better 5-year (95% versus 88%; P = 0.047) and 10-year distant disease-free survival than low-risk patients (88% versus 79%; P = 0.050). In multivariate analysis only the number of involved lymph nodes was related to local (P = 0.001) and distant (P <0.001) disease-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: Breast cancer patients considered high risk by the Gail model have significantly better disease-free survival than low-risk patients. This study does not support the notion that risk factors for breast cancer are prognostic factors.