Mitigation of COVID-19 During Dental Treatment in a State Prison System.

In congregate living settings when active coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) transmission is present, limiting the scope of dental care to urgent and emergent treatment minimizes exposure risk for patients and staff. Engineering controls to mitigate aerosol production during dental procedures, including enhanced high-volume evacuation, high-efficiency particulate absorbing air filtration, and the use of a dental dam provide additional protection for dental providers and staff. Properly fitted N-95 respirators are of particular importance to limit COVID-19 transmission when SARS-CoV-2 containing aerosols may be present. When patients are known to be COVID-19 positive, the use of powered air-purifying respirators is appropriate. Further protection against the spread of disease among patients and staff may be provided by point-of-care testing for patients prior to dental procedures during outbreaks.

Surgical Safety Checklists Are Underutilized in Ambulatory Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to determine attitudes toward and the prevalence of using a surgical safety checklist in ambulatory oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMS) practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors designed and implemented a cross-sectional study and enrolled a random sample of oral and maxillofacial surgeons. The predictor variable was years removed from residency. The primary outcome was the prevalence of surgical safety checklist usage in ambulatory OMS practice. The secondary outcome was to determine whether surgeons who do not currently use a checklist would be willing to do so if provided with one. Other demographic variables included age, gender, location of practice, type of practice, and number of ambulatory procedures performed per week. Appropriate uni- and bivariate statistics were computed and the level of significance set at .05; 95% confidence intervals also were calculated. RESULTS: The study sample was composed of 120 clinicians. Forty-two percent of respondents reported that they were not using a surgical safety checklist for ambulatory surgery. Ninety-three percent of those respondents not currently using a checklist reported they would consider implementing a surgical safety checklist in their practice if provided with one. In addition, 45.3% of surgeons performing more than 30 procedures a week reported not using a surgical safety checklist. Most respondents (67.9%) who had completed OMS training more than 20 years previously reported not using a checklist in their practice. CONCLUSION: According to this survey, most practicing oral and maxillofacial surgeons do not currently use surgical safety checklists. Although the response rate was only 12%, the survey does reflect a clear lack of use of checklists among practicing oral and maxillofacial surgeons despite its widespread acceptance in the medical community.

Most American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons Members Have Not Adopted the American Society of Anesthesiologists-Recommended Nil Per Os Guidelines.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine if American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons members have integrated the current American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) nil per os (NPO) guidelines into their preoperative instructions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We designed and implemented a cross-sectional study and enrolled a random sample of private-practice American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons members who practice in the United States. The predictor variables were year of graduation from residency, dual degree (MD and DDS or DMD) or single degree, and region. The primary outcome variable was adoption of the ASA NPO guidelines, defined as recommending fasting times of 2 hours for clear liquids and 6 hours for solid foods. To collect data, a systematic online search was implemented. Appropriate univariate and bivariate statistics were computed, and the level of significance was set at .05; in addition, 95% confidence intervals were calculated. RESULTS: The study sample was composed of 431 oral and maxillofacial surgeons (OMSs). Almost all of the study sample (99.1%) did not adopt the ASA guidelines. The fasting recommendations were different from 2 hours for clear liquids and 6 hours for solid foods. However, recommendations of 2 hours or greater for clear liquids were made by 99.8% of OMSs, and recommendations of 6 hours or greater for solid foods were made by 99.3%. Only 4.4% of OMSs made different recommendations for clear liquids and solid foods. No substantial association was found between whether OMSs adopted the most current ASA guidelines and the year they graduated from residency or the obtainment of dual degrees. CONCLUSIONS: OMSs in private practice are overwhelmingly recommending longer fasting times for clear liquids and solid foods on their Web sites when compared with the current ASA guidelines before ambulatory anesthesia. The ASA guidelines are based on meta-analysis; therefore, deviations in practice, although not incorrect, may call for discussion.

Prevalence of Substance Abuse Among Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Residents From 2006 to 2015.

PURPOSE: Substance abuse in oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMS) training programs is an important and under-represented topic in the literature. This study's purpose was to assess the prevalence of substance abuse in OMS training programs in the United States during a 10-year period and to determine the substances most abused by OMS residents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional survey study was conducted by sending an online questionnaire to program directors and chairpersons of all OMS graduate training programs accredited by the Commission on Dental Accreditation. The content- and validity-tested survey asked respondents to report on substance abuse cases at their program from 2006 to 2015. Auxiliary questions asked opinions on substance abuse. To analyze the data, percentages were calculated, including the estimated prevalence of abuse; results were presented as bar charts. RESULTS: Forty-six of the 101 OMS training programs (45.5%) responded. Sixteen of the responding 46 programs (34.8%) reported at least 1 suspected or encountered incident of substance abuse. The 2 most abused substances were alcohol and narcotics. During the decade studied, the prevalence of resident substance abuse was estimated to be 1.2%. CONCLUSION: The estimated prevalence of resident substance abuse has gone unchanged since Rosenberg's initial study in 1986 (J Oral Maxillofac Surg 44:458, 1986). With the introduction of new drugs and despite more stringent protocols, substance abuse continues to be a germane issue for OMS requiring ongoing attention clinically and in the literature.

Essentials of Airway Management, Oxygenation, and Ventilation: Basic Equipment and Devices.

Offices and outpatient dental facilities must be properly equipped with devices for airway management, oxygenation, and ventilation. Optimizing patient safety using crisis resource management involves the entire dental office team being familiar with airway rescue equipment. Basic equipment for oxygenation, ventilation, and airway management is mandated in the majority of U.S. dental offices, per state regulations. The immediate availability of this equipment is especially important during the administration of sedation and anesthesia, as well as the treatment of medical urgencies/emergencies. This article reviews basic equipment and devices essential in any dental practice, whether providing local anesthesia alone or in combination with procedural sedation.

Airway Assessment for Office Sedation/Anesthesia.

Whenever a patient is about to receive sedation or general anesthesia, no matter what the technique, the preoperative assessment of the airway is one of the most important steps in ensuring patient safety and positive outcomes. This article, Part III in the series on airway management, is directed at the ambulatory office practice and focuses on predicting the success of advanced airway rescue techniques.

A prospective randomized controlled trial of two different sedation sequences for third molar removal in adults.

PURPOSE: In oral and maxillofacial outpatient surgery, sedation techniques are an important component in patient management for a wide variety of surgical procedures. Fentanyl and midazolam are commonly used sedatives with different mechanisms of action and specific analgesic or amnestic properties. This study examined whether the order of their administration would affect a patient's pain perception or procedural vital signs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After institutional review board approval and written informed consent, a prospective, randomized, parallel-group clinical trial was conducted in patients who planned to undergo removal of at least 2 third molars under intravenous moderate sedation. Patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups. The fentanyl-first group received fentanyl and then midazolam; the midazolam-first group received midazolam and then fentanyl. Recollection of the intraoperative pain score was assessed 24 hours after surgery using the Wong-Baker FACES pain scale. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to assess for the presence of a statistically significant difference between the 2 groups. Statistically significant differences in procedural vital sign fluctuations were examined using the t test. Patients' satisfaction with the procedure was assessed and intergroup comparisons were made. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients were enrolled, 1 of whom did not complete the study. Recollected procedural pain scores at 24 hours after surgery were not statistically different between groups. Median scores on the Wong-Baker FACES pain scale for the 2 groups were 2.0 (interquartile range, 3.1) for the fentanyl-first group and 1.5 (interquartile range, 2.5) for the midazolam-first group (P = .333). There was no statistical difference in the change in vital signs from baseline to 2 surgical end points in the 2 groups. In addition, patient satisfaction with the procedure did not statistically differ between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, selective sequencing of midazolam or fentanyl during an intravenous moderate-sedation procedure did not result in a measurable difference of recollected procedural pain scores at 24 hours after third molar extraction. The choice of the sedation agents and the order of their administration should be tailored to the patient's needs, type of surgical procedure, and surgeon preference.

Essentials of airway management, oxygenation, and ventilation: part 1: basic equipment and devices.

Offices and outpatient dental facilities must be properly equipped with devices for airway management, oxygenation, and ventilation. Optimizing patient safety using crisis resource management (CRM) involves the entire dental office team being familiar with airway rescue equipment. Basic equipment for oxygenation, ventilation, and airway management is mandated in the majority of US dental offices per state regulations. The immediate availability of this equipment is especially important during the administration of sedation and anesthesia as well as the treatment of medical urgencies/emergencies. This article reviews basic equipment and devices essential in any dental practice whether providing local anesthesia alone or in combination with procedural sedation. Part 2 of this series will address advanced airway devices, including supraglottic airways and armamentarium for tracheal intubation and invasive airway procedures.

Adult airway evaluation in oral surgery.

Patients with a history of difficult intubation or with conditions associated with difficult airway should be approached with organized primary and secondary plans for airway management. When these potential problems are detected, patient safety may be improved with use of advanced airway management techniques and equipment. Additionally, patient referral for consultation and/or management at facilities where advanced airway management practitioners and equipment are available may be beneficial in some cases.

Salivary cortisol, salivary alpha amylase, and the dental anxiety scale.

The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between dental anxiety, salivary cortisol, and salivary alpha amylase (sAA) levels. Furthermore, the aim was to look into individual differences such as age, race, gender, any existing pain, or traumatic dental experience and their effect on dental anxiety. This study followed a cross-sectional design and included a convenience sample of 46. Every patient was asked to complete the Dental Anxiety Scale (DAS) and a basic demographic/dental history questionnaire. A saliva sample, utilizing the method of passive drooling, was then collected in 2-mL cryovials. Samples were analyzed for salivary cortisol and sAA levels by Salimetrics. Significant associations were observed between DAS scores and presence of pain and history of traumatic dental experience. However, no significant correlations were observed between DAS, cortisol, and sAA levels. Our study reconfirms that dental anxiety is associated with presence of pain and a history of traumatic dental experience. On the other hand, our study was the first to our knowledge to test the correlation between the DAS and sAA; nevertheless, our results failed to show any significant correlation between dental anxiety, cortisol, and sAA levels.

Management of allergy and anaphylaxis during oral surgery.

Minor and major allergic reactions occur during oral and maxillofacial treatment. Immediate diagnosis and pharmacologic intervention are imperative. Signs and symptoms may be variable. The early administration of epinephrine is critical.

Pharmacology of local anesthetics used in oral surgery.

This article provides a comprehensive review of the pharmacology of local anesthetics as a class, and provides details of the individual drugs available in dental cartridges. Maximum recommended doses of local anesthetics and vasoconstrictors are presented for healthy adult and pediatric patients, and for patients with cardiovascular system impairments. Various complications and reasons for failure of local anesthesia effectiveness are discussed, and current and future trends in local anesthesia are presented to provide an overview of current research in local anesthesia.