Rates and Impact of Adherence to Recommended Care for Unhealthy Alcohol Use.

BACKGROUND: Unhealthy alcohol use is a major worldwide health problem. Yet few studies have assessed provider adherence to the alcohol-related care recommended in clinical practice guidelines, nor links between adherence to recommended care and outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To describe quality of care for unhealthy alcohol use and its impacts on drinking behavior RESEARCH DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study of quality of alcohol care for the population of patients screening positive for unhealthy alcohol use in a large Veterans Affairs health system. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 719 patients who screened positive for unhealthy alcohol use at one of 11 primary care practices and who completed baseline and 6-month telephone interviews. MAIN MEASURES: Using administrative encounter and medical record data, we assessed three composite and 21 individual process-based measures of care delivered across primary and specialty care settings. We assessed self-reported daily alcohol use using telephone interviews at baseline and 6-month follow-up. KEY RESULTS: The median proportion of patients who received recommended care across measures was 32.8% (range < 1% for initiating pharmacotherapy to 93% for depression screening). There was negligible change in drinking for the study population between baseline and 6 months. In covariate-adjusted analyses, no composites were significantly associated with changes in heavy drinking days or drinks per week, and just one of nine individual measures tested was significantly associated. In a subsample of patients drinking above recommended weekly limits prior to screening, two of nine individual measures were significantly associated. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows wide variability in receipt of recommended care for unhealthy alcohol use. Receipt of recommended interventions for reducing drinking was frequently not associated with decreased drinking. Results suggest deficits in provision of comprehensive alcohol care and in understanding how to improve population-based drinking outcomes.

The adult suicide-prone patient: a review of the medical literature and implications for oral and maxillofacial surgeons.

PURPOSE: Suicide is the 11th most common cause of death among American adults. Some individuals who commit suicide may have been treated by oral and maxillofacial surgeons in the days preceding the event. Because suicide often is preventable, in this report we review methods that are useful in identifying individuals at risk of imminent suicide and give suggestions for obtaining interventional assistance. METHODS: A Medline search using the key terms "suicide," "adult," and "oral surgery" was conducted. Articles selected were published in peer-reviewed journals. RESULTS: Individuals who have told their surgeon they have no further reason to live, have developed a suicide plan, have secured a lethal device, and have previously made such an attempt are at extreme risk and require immediate intervention. Additional risk factors include being white, aged older than 45 years, and unemployed; living alone, with poor social supports; having a current mental illness or history of mental illness, including substance abuse; and having a family history of suicide. Specialty-specific patients at highest risk are those treated for oral cancer and cosmetic issues and those with adverse surgical outcomes. With regard to assessment of these individuals, the modified SAD PERSONS acronym can assist surgeons in documenting the presence of major risk factors associated with adult suicide and in facilitating communication with emergency personnel. CONCLUSIONS: Suicide is a potentially preventable public health problem. Oral and maxillofacial surgeons can be key in elucidating clinically significant suicide potential in their patients and referring them for timely intervention.