The relationship between self-care, long-term mortality, and heart failure hospitalization: insights from a real-world cohort study.

AIMS: The assumption that improved self-care in the setting of heart failure (HF) care necessarily translates into improvements in long-term mortality and/or hospitalization is not well established. We aimed to study the association between self-care and long-term mortality and other major adverse HF events (MAHFE). METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted an observational, prospective, cohort study of 1123 consecutive patients with chronic HF. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. We used the European Heart Failure Self-care Behaviour Scale 9-item version (EHFSCBS-9) to measure global self-care (overall score) and three specific dimensions of self-care including autonomy-based adherence, consulting behaviour and provider-based adherence. After a mean follow-up of 3.3 years, all-cause death occurred in 487 patients (43%). In adjusted analysis, higher EHFScBS-9 scores (better self-care) at baseline were associated with lower risk of all-cause death [hazard ratio (HR) 0.993, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.988-0.997), P-value = 0.002], cardiovascular (CV) death [HR 0.989, 95% CI (0.981-0.996), P-value = 0.003], HF hospitalization [HR 0.993, 95% CI (0.988-0.998), P-value = 0.005], and the combination of MAHFE [HR 0.995, 95% CI (0.991-0.999), P-value = 0.018]. Similarly, impaired global self-care [HR 1.589, 95% CI (1.201-2.127), P-value = 0.001], impaired autonomy-based adherence [HR 1.464, 95% CI (1.114-1.923), P-value = 0.006], and impaired consulting behaviour dimensions [HR 1.510, 95% CI (1.140-1.923), P-value = 0.006] were all associated with higher risk of all-cause mortality. CONCLUSION: In this study, we have shown that worse self-care is an independent predictor of long-term mortality (both, all-cause and CV), HF hospitalization, and the combinations of these endpoints in patients with chronic HF. Important dimensions of self-care such as autonomy-based adherence and consulting behaviour also determine the risk of all these outcomes in the long term.

Validation of the Spanish version of the questionnaire on Patient Empowerment in Long-Term Conditions.

BACKGROUND: Patient empowerment is a key factor in improving health outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the questionnaire on Patient Empowerment in Long-Term Conditions (PELC) that evaluates the degree of empowerment of patients with chronic diseases. METHODS: Three measurements were made (at baseline, 2 weeks and 12 weeks) of quality of life (QoL), self-care, self-efficacy and empowerment. Reliability was evaluated as internal consistency for the entire sample. Test-retest reproducibility was evaluated for patients who were stable from baseline to week 2 (n = 70). Validity was analysed (n = 124) as baseline correlations with QoL, self-care, self-efficacy, clinical data and psychosocial variables. Sensitivity to change was analysed in terms of effect size for patients who had improved between baseline and week 12 (n = 48). RESULTS: The study was carried out with 124 patients with a diagnosis of heart failure. Cronbach's alpha was high, at >0.9, and the interclass correlation coefficient was low, at 0.47. PELC questionnaire scores showed differences depending on New York Heart Association functional class (p<0.05) and, as posited in the a priori hypotheses, were moderately correlated with emotional dimensions of QoL (0.53) and self-efficacy (0.43). Effect size for the clinically improved subsample was moderate (0.67). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the Spanish version of the PELC questionnaire has appropriate psychometric properties in terms of internal consistency and validity and is low in terms of reproducibility and sensitivity to change.

Frailty in elderly patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of frailty, cognitive impairment and disability and its prognostic impact in patients with myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention is unknown. AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of frailty and other ageing-related variables and their association with inhospital mortality in consecutive elderly ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention in a tertiary care hospital. METHODS: We prospectively included patients aged 75 years or older with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. The nursing team provided pre-discharge, standardised questionnaires and tests to each patient to study the presence of frailty (FRAIL scale), comorbidity (Charlson index), disability (Barthel test, Lawton-Brody index), nutritional risk (MNA-SF test) and cognitive status (Pfeiffer test). The association between ageing-related variables and mortality was assessed by binary logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 259 patients were included with a mean age of 82.6±6 years, 57.9% men. A total of 51 patients (19.7%) were frail, 26 presented with moderate or severe disability (10%), and 82 were at risk of malnutrition (31.7%). Frailty was associated with a higher prevalence of diabetes, hypertension and previous stroke, and a higher inhospital mortality (21.6% vs. 3.4%; P<0.001). After adjusting for potential confounders, this association remained significant (odds ratio 3.96; 95% confidence interval 1.16-13.56; P=0.028). CONCLUSION: A not negligible proportion of elderly patients with STEMI fulfilled the frailty criteria. Frailty was independently associated with mortality. A very simple, feasible geriatric assessment by trained nurses can contribute to predict mortality.