Long-Term Survival Following Primary Graft Dysfunction Development in Lung Transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is a known risk factor for early mortality following lung transplant (LT). However, the outcomes of patients who achieve long-term survival following index hospitalization are unknown. We aimed to determine the long-term association of PGD grade 3 (PGD3) in patients without in-hospital mortality. METHODS: LT recipients were identified from the United Network for Organ Sharing Database. Patients were stratified based on the grade of PGD at 72 h (No PGD, Grade 1/2 or Grade 3). Groups were assessed with comparative statistics. Long-term survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier methods and a multivariable shared frailty model including recipient, donor, and transplant characteristics. RESULTS: The PGD3 group had significantly increased length of stay, dialysis, and treated rejection post-transplant (P < 0.001). Unadjusted survival analysis revealed a significant difference in long-term survival (P < 0.001) between groups; however, following adjustment, PGD3 was not independently associated with long-term survival (hazard ratio: 0.972; 95% confidence interval: 0.862-1.096). Increased mortality was significantly associated with increased recipient age and treated rejection. Decreased mortality was significantly associated with no donor diabetes, bilateral LT as compared to single LT, transplant in 2015-2016 and 2017-2018, and no post-transplant dialysis. CONCLUSIONS: While PGD3 remains a challenge post LT, PGD3 at 72 h is not independently associated with decreased long-term survival, while complications such as dialysis and rejection are, in patients who survive index hospitalization. Transplant providers should be aggressive in preventing further complications in recipients with severe PGD to minimize the negative association on long-term survival.

Thoracic retransplantation: Does time to retransplantation matter?

OBJECTIVE: For some individuals, chronic allograft failure is best treated with retransplantation. We sought to determine if time to retransplantation impacts short- and long-term outcomes for heart or lung retransplant recipients with a time to retransplantation more than 1 year. METHODS: The United Network for Organ Sharing/Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network STAR file was queried for all adult, first-time heart (June 1, 2006, to September 30, 2020) and lung (May 1, 2005, to September 30, 2020) retransplantations with a time to retransplantation of at least 1 year. Patients were grouped according to the tertile of time to retransplantation (tertile 1: 1-7.7 years, tertile 2: 7.7-14.7 years, tertile 3: 14.7+ years; lung: tertile 1: 1-2.8 years, tertile 2: 2.8-5.6 years, tertile 3: 5.6+ years). The primary outcome was survival after retransplantation. Comparative statistics identified differences in groups, and Kaplan-Meier methods and a Cox proportional hazard model were used for survival analysis. RESULTS: After selection, 908 heart and 871 lung retransplants were identified. Among heart retransplant recipients, tertile 1 was associated with male sex, smoking history, higher listing status, and increased mechanical support pretransplant. Tertile 3 had the highest rate of concomitant kidney transplant; however, the incidence of morbidity and in-hospital mortality was similar among the groups. Unadjusted and adjusted analyses revealed no survival difference among all groups. Regarding lung retransplant recipients, tertile 1 was associated with increased lung allocation score, pretransplant hospitalization, and mechanical support. Unadjusted and adjusted survival analyses revealed decreased survival in tertile 1. CONCLUSIONS: Time to retransplant does not appear to affect heart recipients with a time to retransplantation of more than 1 year; however, shorter time to retransplantation for prior lung recipients is associated with decreased survival. Potential lung retransplant candidates with a time to retransplantation of less than 2.8 years should be carefully evaluated before retransplantation.

Trends in Donation After Circulatory Death in Lung Transplantation in the United States: Impact Of Era.

Background: Use of lungs donated after circulatory death (DCD) has expanded, but changes in donor/recipient characteristics and comparison to brain dead donors (DBD) has not been studied. We examined the evolution of the use of DCD lungs for transplantation and compare outcomes to DBD lungs. Methods: The SRTR database was used to construct three 5-year intervals. Perioperative variables and survival were compared by era and for DCD vs. DBD. Geographic variation was estimated using recipient permanent address. Results: 728 DCD and 27,205 DBD lung transplants were identified. DCD volume increased from Era 1 (n = 73) to Era 3 (n = 528), representing 1.1% and 4.2% of lung transplants. Proportionally more DCD recipients were in ICU or on ECMO pre-transplant, and had shorter waitlist times. DCD donors were older, had lower PaO2/FiO2 ratios compared to DBD, more likely to be bilateral, had longer ischemic time, length of stay, post-op dialysis, and increased use of lung perfusion. There was no difference in overall survival. Geographically, use was heterogeneous. Conclusion: DCD utilization is low but increasing. Despite increasing ischemic time and transplantation into sicker patients, survival is similar, which supports further DCD use in lung transplantation. DCD lung transplantation presents an opportunity to continue to expand the donor pool.

Clinical Validation of a Plasma Donor-derived Cell-free DNA Assay to Detect Allograft Rejection and Injury in Lung Transplant.

Background: Lung transplant patients are vulnerable to various forms of allograft injury, whether from acute rejection (AR) (encompassing acute cellular rejection [ACR] and antibody-mediated rejection [AMR]), chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), or infection (INFXN). Previous research indicates that donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is a promising noninvasive biomarker for the detection of AR and allograft injury. Our aim was to validate a clinical plasma dd-cfDNA assay for detection of AR and other allograft injury and to confirm and expand on dd-cfDNA and allograft injury associations observed in previous studies. Methods: We measured dd-cfDNA fraction using a novel single-nucleotide polymorphism-based assay in prospectively collected plasma samples paired with clinical-pathologic diagnoses. dd-cfDNA fraction was compared across clinical-pathologic cohorts: stable, ACR, AMR, isolated lymphocytic bronchiolitis, CLAD/neutrophilic-responsive allograft dysfunction (NRAD), and INFXN. Performance characteristics were calculated for AR and combined allograft injury (AR + CLAD/NRAD + INFXN) versus the stable cohort. Results: The study included 195 samples from 103 patients. Median dd-cfDNA fraction was significantly higher for ACR (1.43%, interquartile range [IQR]: 0.67%-2.32%, P = 5 × 10-6), AMR (2.50%, IQR: 2.06%-3.79%, P = 2 × 10-5), INFXN (0.74%, IQR: 0.46%-1.38%, P = 0.02), and CLAD/NRAD (1.60%, IQR: 0.57%-2.60%, P = 1.4 × 10-4) versus the stable cohort. Area under the receiver operator characteristic curve for AR versus stable was 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.83-0.98). Using a ≥1% dd-cfDNA fraction threshold, sensitivity for AR was 89.1% (95% CI: 76.2%-100.0%), specificity 82.9% (95% CI: 73.3%-92.4%), positive predictive value, 51.9% (95% CI: 37.5%-66.3%), and negative predictive value, 97.3% (95% CI: 94.3%-100%). For combined allograft injury area under the receiver operator characteristic curve was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.66-0.85), sensitivity 59.9% (95% CI: 46.0%-73.9%), specificity 83.9% (95% CI: 74.1%-93.7%), positive predictive value, 43.6% (95% CI: 27.6%-59.6%), and negative predictive value, 91.0% (95% CI: 87.9%-94.0%). Conclusions: These results indicate that our dd-cfDNA assay detects AR and other allograft injury. dd-cfDNA monitoring, accompanied by standard clinical assessments, represents a valuable precision tool to support lung transplant health and is appropriate for further assessment in a prospective randomized-controlled study.

Lung transplantation in the septuagenarian can be successfully performed though long-term results impacted by diseases of aging.

BACKGROUND: Advanced age is considered a risk factor for lung transplantation (LTX). We sought to evaluate the long-term outcomes of LTX in the septuagenarian. METHODS: LTX recipients in the UNOS transplant registry (May 1, 2005-June 12, 2020) were stratified into 18-59, 60-69, and > = 70 years of age. Recipient and transplant characteristics were evaluated for survival, cause of death (COD), length of stay (LOS), and complications. A Kaplan-Meier analysis examined long-term survival for all patients stratified by age, specifically looking at cause of death. RESULTS: A total of 27 632 recipients were identified. As recipients aged, we found a decrease in proportion of cystic fibrosis and an increase in restrictive disease while obstructive disease peaked in the 60-69yo cohort (P < .001). Septuagenarians had higher rates of single LTX, male gender, and white race (P < .001). Older recipients had significantly longer donor recovery distances traveled with paradoxical shorter ischemic times, shorter hospital LOS and were transplanted at higher volume centers. There was no difference with in-hospital mortality among groups (P = .5). Acute rejection during initial hospitalization, rejection within 1 year, and post-transplant dialysis incidence decreased with age. Graft failure was a common COD in younger patients while malignancy and cardio/cerebrovascular diseases were common COD in > = 70yo. CONCLUSION: Select septuagenarian LTX candidates may be safely transplanted with relatively few complications. Immunosenescence and conditions of the aged are likely contributing factors to the decreased rejection and graft failure observations. Septuagenarians should not be excluded from LTX consideration based solely on age. Transplantation in septuagenarians should only be done in very selected patients (screened for malignancies and atherosclerotic disease) and these recipients should be carefully followed after transplantation because of these risk factors.

Insights into early postoperative acute kidney injury following lung transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication after lung transplantation (LT) and is associated with higher cost and mortality. We sought to evaluate the incidence of postoperative AKI, defined as AKI within 14 days of transplant, and identify associated perioperative factors. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, retrospective review of 153 lung transplant recipients. Postoperative AKI was determined using the RIFLE (Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, End Stage) criteria. Perioperative covariates and their association with postoperative AKI were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed to evaluate patient survival at 1 year and data finalization. A sub-analysis was performed evaluating factors associated with early AKI (within 48 h of transplant) and late AKI. RESULTS: Postoperative AKI occurred in 36.6% of patients with 51.8% of cases occurring within 48 h of LT. Recipient race, transplant type, cardiopulmonary support, and red blood cell administration were associated with postoperative AKI. Survival was significantly lower in patients with postoperative AKI following LT. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative AKI within 2 weeks of lung transplant is associated with lower short- and long-term survival. Perioperative factors associated with postoperative AKI may be potential points of intervention to minimize AKI development in the future.

Therapeutic closure of bronchopleural fistulas using ethanol.

Bronchopleural fistula (BPF) leading to persistent air leak (PAL), be it a complication of pulmonary resection, radiation, or direct tumor mass effect, is associated with high morbidity, impaired quality of life, and an increased risk of death. Incidence of BPF following pneumonectomy ranges between 4.4% and 20% with mortality ranging from 27.2% to 71%. Following lobectomy, incidence ranges from 0.5% to 1.5% in reported series. BPFs are more likely to occur following right-sided pneumonectomy, while patients undergoing bi-lobectomy were more likely to suffer BPF than those undergoing single lobectomy. In addition to supportive care, including appropriate antibiotics and nutrition, management of BPF includes pleural decontamination, BPF closure, and ultimately obliteration of the pleural space. There are surgical and bronchoscopic approaches for the management of BPF. Surgical interventions are best suited for large BPFs, and those occurring in the early postoperative period. Bronchoscopic techniques may be used for smaller BPFs, or when an individual patient is no longer a surgical candidate. Published reports have described the use of polyethylene glycol, fibrin glues, autologous blood products, gel foam, silver nitrate, and stenting among other techniques. The Amplatzer device, used to close atrial septal defects has shown promise as a bronchoscopic therapy. Following their approval under the humanitarian device exemption program for treatment of prolonged air leaks, endobronchial valves have been used for BPF. No bronchoscopic technique is universally applicable, and treatment should be individualized. In this report, we describe two separate cases where we use an Olympus© 21-gauge EBUS-TBNA (endobronchial ultrasound-transbronchial needle aspiration) needle for directed submucosal injection of ethanol leading to closure of the BPF and subsequent successful resolution of PAL.

Lung transplantation for pulmonary hypertension.

From its identification as a distinct disease entity, understanding and management of pulmonary hypertension has continuously evolved. Diagnostic and therapeutic interventions have greatly improved the prognostic implications of this devastating disease, previously rapidly and uniformly fatal to one chronically managed by multi-disciplinary teams. Improved diagnostic algorithms and active research into biochemical signatures of pulmonary hypertension (PH) have led to earlier diagnosis of PH. Medical therapy has moved from upfront use of continuous intravenous prostaglandins to administration of combinations of oral medications targeting multiple pathways underlying this disease process. In addition to improved medical therapies, recently introduced interventions such as pulmonary endarterectomy and pulmonary artery balloon angioplasty for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) give patients an increasing array of treatment options. Despite these many advances, lung transplantation remains the definitive treatment for patients with disease refractory to or progressing on best medical therapy. As our understanding of medical therapy has advanced, so to have best practices for lung transplantation. Recipient selection and approach to organ transplantation techniques have continuously evolved. Mechanical circulatory support has become increasingly employed to bridge patients through lung transplantation in the immediate post transplantation recovery. In this review, we give a history of lung transplantation for PH, an overview of PH, discuss current best practices and look to the future for insights into the care of these patients.

Early COVID-19 infection after lung transplantation.

COVID-19, the clinical syndrome caused by the novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, continues to rapidly spread, leading to significant stressors on global healthcare infrastructure. The manifestations of COVID-19 in solid organ transplant recipients are only beginning to be understood with cases reported to date in transplant recipients on chronic immunosuppression. Herein, we report the first case of COVID-19 in a lung transplant recipient in the immediate posttransplant period, and we describe the epidemiologic challenges in identifying the source of infection in this unique situation.

Early Graft Dysfunction after Lung Transplantation.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Primary graft dysfunction is an acute lung injury syndrome occurring immediately following lung transplantation. This review aims to provide an overview of the current understanding of PGD, including epidemiology, immunology, clinical outcomes and management. RECENT FINDINGS: Identification of donor and recipient factors allowing accurate prediction of PGD has been actively pursued. Improved understanding of the immunology underlying PGD has spurred interest in identifying relevant biomarkers. Work in PGD prediction, severity stratification and targeted therapies continue to make progress. Donor expansion strategies continue to be pursued with ex vivo lung perfusion playing a prominent role. While care of PGD remains supportive, ECMO has established a prominent role in the early aggressive management of severe PGD. SUMMARY: A consensus definition of PGD has allowed marked advances in research and clinical care of affected patients. Future research will lead to reliable predictive tools, and targeted therapeutics of this important syndrome.

EBUS-TBNA and EUS-FNA: Risk Assessment for Patients Receiving Clopidogrel.

BACKGROUND: Clopidogrel is widely used for the prevention of thrombotic vascular complications. Its primary potential toxicity is bleeding. Management of clopidogrel therapy for patients undergoing invasive procedures is an area of ongoing study. We sought to evaluate the bleeding risk for patients undergoing needle aspiration biopsy by endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) or esophageal ultrasound (EUS) while taking clopidogrel. METHODS: Retrospective review of sequential cases of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and esophageal ultrasound fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA). RESULTS: Three hundred ninety-five consecutive procedures were reviewed. Thirty-seven patients were taking clopidogrel at time of biopsy. The patients taking clopidogrel were significantly older than those in the control group. Two patients (1%) in the control group were admitted for observation, but neither was found to have a significant bleed. There were no clinically significant bleeding complications in either of the study groups. CONCLUSIONS: It is reasonable to proceed with EBUS-TBNA or EUS-FNA when both, (1) clopidogrel cannot be stopped and, (2) an important diagnostic question is at stake.

Nalbuphine-induced psychosis treated with naloxone.

PURPOSE: A case of nalbuphine-induced psychosis, which resolved after the administration of naloxone, is described. SUMMARY: A 25-year-old African-American woman with a history of systemic lupus erythematosus was admitted to the hospital for management of cholecystitis. A laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed, and the patient received multiple doses of i.v. hydromorphone for postoperative pain management. Four days later, shortly after receiving a dose of i.v. nalbuphine for opioid-induced pruritus, she experienced an acute psychotic event, with symptoms including intense headache, akathisia, altered mental status, and formication (a hallucinatory sensation of insects crawling on the skin). The neuropsychiatric symptoms abated within 5 minutes of two consecutively administered doses of i.v. naloxone. During this event, which lasted 25-30 minutes, there was no evidence of metabolic abnormalities and were no signs of infection. The patient did not have a history of mental illness or substance abuse. The patient did not receive further doses of nalbuphine and did not experience similar events during her hospital stay; she was discharged home 10 days later without further complications. According to the algorithm of Naranjo et al., the case was assigned a score of 6, indicating a probable adverse reaction to nalbuphine. CONCLUSION: A patient developed an acute psychotic reaction that was probably secondary to administration of i.v. nalbuphine for opioid-induced pruritus. Evidence supporting this diagnosis included correlation between the timing of administration of nalbuphine and symptom onset and the marked improvement in mentation following the administration of naloxone.