Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 32(3): 403-410, 2018 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29055155

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Palmoplantar psoriasis is a variant of psoriasis vulgaris which can severely impair quality of life. OBJECTIVES: The main objectives of this double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study were to assess the efficacy and impact on quality of life and work productivity of apremilast for the treatment of moderate-to-severe palmoplantar psoriasis. METHODS: A total of 100 patients with moderate-to-severe palmoplantar psoriasis were randomized to either apremilast 30 mg bid or placebo for 16 weeks. At Week 16, all patients received apremilast 30 mg bid until Week 32. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved a Palmoplantar Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment (PPPGA) of 0/1 at Week 16. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients who achieved a PPPGA of 0/1 at Week 16 between patients randomized to apremilast (14%) and placebo (4%; P = 0.1595). After 32 weeks of treatment with apremilast, 24% of patients achieved a PPGA of 0/1. In addition, apremilast was superior to placebo in achieving Palmoplantar Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PPPASI) 75 (apremilast: 22%; placebo: 8%; P = 0.0499), in improving PPPASI (apremilast: -7.4 ± 7.1; placebo: -3.6 ± 5.9; P = 0.0167), Dermatology Life Quality Index score (apremilast: -4.3 ± 5.1; placebo: -0.8 ± 4.5; P = 0.0004) and in reducing activity impairment (apremilast: -11.0 ± 22.3; placebo: 2.5 ± 25.5; P = 0.0063). CONCLUSION: Despite the absence of a significant difference between apremilast and placebo in proportion of patients achieving a PPPGA of 0/1, the presence of significant differences observed for several secondary endpoints suggests that apremilast may have a role in the treatment of moderate-to-severe palmoplantar psoriasis.


Assuntos
Dermatoses do Pé/tratamento farmacológico , Dermatoses da Mão/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores da Fosfodiesterase 4/uso terapêutico , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Talidomida/análogos & derivados , Método Duplo-Cego , Eficiência , Feminino , Dermatoses do Pé/fisiopatologia , Dermatoses da Mão/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Placebos , Psoríase/fisiopatologia , Qualidade de Vida , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Talidomida/uso terapêutico , Trabalho
2.
Br J Dermatol ; 161(5): 1180-9, 2009 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19466959

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Combination therapy utilizing agents with complementary mechanisms of action is recommended by acne guidelines to help simultaneously target multiple pathogenic factors. A unique, topical, fixed-dose combination gel with adapalene 0.1% and benzoyl peroxide (BPO) 2.5% has recently been developed for the once-daily treatment of acne. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of adapalene 0.1%-BPO 2.5% fixed-dose combination gel (adapalene-BPO) relative to adapalene 0.1% monotherapy (adapalene), BPO 2.5% monotherapy (BPO), and the gel vehicle (vehicle) in a large population for the treatment of acne vulgaris. METHODS: In total, 1670 subjects were randomized in a double-blind controlled trial to receive adapalene-BPO, adapalene, BPO or vehicle for 12 weeks (1 : 1 : 1 : 1 randomization). Evaluations included success rate (subjects 'clear' or 'almost clear'), percentage change in lesion count from baseline, cutaneous tolerability and adverse events. RESULTS: Adapalene-BPO was significantly more effective than corresponding monotherapies, with significant differences in percentage lesion count change observed as early as 1 week. Cutaneous tolerability profile was similar to adapalene. Adverse events were more frequent with the combination therapy (mainly due to an increase in mild-to-moderate dry skin), occurred early in the study, and were transient. CONCLUSIONS: Adapalene-BPO provides significantly greater and synergistic efficacy and a faster onset of action with an acceptable safety profile in the treatment of acne vulgaris when compared with the corresponding vehicle and the adapalene and BPO monotherapies.


Assuntos
Acne Vulgar/tratamento farmacológico , Anti-Infecciosos Locais/uso terapêutico , Peróxido de Benzoíla/uso terapêutico , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapêutico , Naftalenos/uso terapêutico , Adapaleno , Administração Cutânea , Adolescente , Adulto , Anti-Infecciosos Locais/efeitos adversos , Peróxido de Benzoíla/efeitos adversos , Criança , Fármacos Dermatológicos/efeitos adversos , Método Duplo-Cego , Combinação de Medicamentos , Feminino , Géis/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Naftalenos/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA