Multi-institutional analysis of stereotactic body radiation therapy for operable early-stage non-small cell lung carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Although stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is the standard of care for inoperable early-stage non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), its role for medically operable patients remains controversial. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted a multi-institutional study to assess post-SBRT disease control and survival outcomes in medically operable patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study including patients with biopsy-proven cT1-2N0M0 NSCLC treated with definitive SBRT (2006-2015). Per patient charts, inoperability referred to documentation of poor surgical candidacy with a given rationale for lack of resection. Charts of operable patients contained documentation of patients refusing surgery or choosing SBRT, without a documented rationale for inoperability. Subjects were excluded in cases of ambiguity regarding the aforementioned definitions and/or lack of clearly documented operability status. Endpoints included local failure (LF) and regional-distant failure, both evaluated with Fine and Gray competing risks regression; Kaplan-Meier methodology analyzed overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Of 952 patients, 408 (42.9%) were operable, and 544 (57.1%) were inoperable. Median follow-up was 22 months. Two-year LF was 9.7% in operable patients and 8.2% in inoperable patients (p = 0.36). There was no statistical difference in regional-distant failure (p = 0.55) between cohorts. Operable patients experienced statistically higher OS (p = 0.04), but not PFS (p = 0.11). Respective 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS in operable patients were 85.4%, 66.2%, and 51.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Although patients with operable NSCLC experience higher OS than their inoperable counterparts, disease-related outcomes are similar. These results may better inform shared decision-making between medically operable patients and their multidisciplinary providers.

Information Needs Expressed During Patient-Oriented Oncology Consultations: Quantity, Variation, and Barriers.

High-quality oncology consultation includes patient-oriented communication tailored to patients' individualized needs. Common methods used in studies to increase question-asking are prompt lists and coaching pre-consultations. However, our patients were encouraged to ask questions by the physician during their visit. We aimed to estimate the quantity, nature, and variation of their questions when they were invited to ask by their oncologist. During radiotherapy consultations from 2012 to 2016, patient's questions were deliberately elicited and physician-transcribed. We derived mean and median number of questions per patient, variance by patient factors, and a taxonomy of subjects using thematic analysis. Three hundred ninety-six patients asked 2386 questions, median asked per patient = 6 (interquartile range = 4). We found significant variance with age (mean = 6.9 questions for < 60 years, 5.4 for ≥ 70 years) p = 0.018, insurance type (mean = 4.7 for Medicaid, 7.2 for private insurance) p = 0.0004, and tumor site (mean number of questions: skin = 4.6, lymphoma = 5.2, lung = 5.8, breast = 6.1, prostate = 6.3, rectum = 6.7 head and neck = 6.9, brain = 7.0, bladder = 7.2, anus = 8.8, others = 5.8) p = 0.0440. Of the diverse set of 57 topics, the commonest were 1. logistics, 2. radiotherapy details, 3. side effects, 4. diagnosis, and 5. stage and prognosis. Only 17 topics were asked by more > 10% of patients and 40 topics were asked by < 10% of patients. With median of 6 questions, it is practicable to routinely elicit and address individualized information needs. Potential barriers may be older and underinsured patients. The wide variety of topics, often pertaining to individuals' case, suggests that cancer clinicians should take time-out during consultation to elicit patients' questions to accomplish best-practice communication.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy with adjuvant systemic therapy for early-stage non-small cell lung carcinoma: A multi-institutional analysis.

PURPOSE: Although adjuvant systemic therapy (ST) is often recommended for the treatment of patients with high-risk, early-stage non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) after surgery, there is little evidence supporting the use of ST with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using a multi-institutional database to identify consecutive patients with T1-3N0M0 NSCLC treated with definitive SBRT from 2006-2015. Treatment groups were defined as those who received SBRT + ST or SBRT alone. Regional-distant failure (RDF) was analyzed with Fine and Gray competing risks regression. Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression. Additional comparisons were made after 2:1 nearest-neighbor propensity-score matching on clinical risk factors. RESULTS: We identified 54 patients who received SBRT + ST. The most common ST regimen was a platinum doublet (n = 38; 70.4%). Compared with patients receiving SBRT (n = 1269), SBRT + ST patients were younger (median age: 70 v 77 years, p < 0.001), had larger tumors (>3 cm: 38.9% v 21.6%, p = 0.02) and higher T-stage (T2-3: 42.6% v 22.5%, p = 0.002). Compared with SBRT patients, SBRT + ST patients had lower 2-year RDF (3.1% v 16.9%, p = 0.02). On multivariable analysis, SBRT + ST was associated with reduced RDF (HR: 0.15, 95%CI: 0.04-0.62), with a trend toward improved PFS (HR: 0.70, 95%CI: 0.48-1.03), but not OS (HR: 0.74, 95%CI: 0.49-1.11). After propensity-score matching, the SBRT + ST cohort demonstrated improved RDF (HR: 0.17, 95%CI: 0.04-0.76) and PFS (HR: 0.59, 95%CI: 0.38-0.93). CONCLUSION: In this multi-institutional analysis, adjuvant ST was independently associated with reduced RDF in early-stage NSCLC patients treated with SBRT.

Routine bladder cancer treatment dictates divergence from trial-derived regimens: Results of treatment at 44 radiotherapy centers.

PURPOSE: To assess characteristics and outcome of patients treated with radiotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer at 44 community-based radiotherapy centers and compare these to those on clinical trials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed 155 patients who had been treated from 2010 to 2014. Overall survival and progression-free survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results were compared to a pooled analysis of 6 Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) protocols. RESULTS: What stood out was that our patients' characteristics were significantly inferior than those on RTOG studies: lower rate of complete transurethral resection of bladder tumor: 36.8% vs. 70% (P<0.0001), higher median age: 79 years vs. 66 (P<0.0001), more medically inoperable: (51.0%) vs. 0% in RTOG (P<0.001), and 46.9% had refused surgery. Fewer patients underwent concurrent chemotherapy: 56.1% vs. 100% (P<0.0001). It was also striking that at median follow-up 12.6 months (range: 3.1-49.2), the 36-month overall survival was 51.3% for those who refused surgery vs. 24.5% for medically inoperable (P = 0.009); 58.1% with complete transurethral resection of bladder tumor vs. 29.8% if incomplete (P = 0.07); 54.3% with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) vs. 17.2% without (P = 0.03); 66.3% for those who refused surgery and had CRT vs. 38.9% for medically inoperable who had CRT (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The cohort at community-based centers was older, more medically inoperable, and less likely to receive CRT than clinical trial patients. This suggests that we may not be able to apply trial-derived regimens for many patients in this setting. There is a pressing need to find treatment options for such patients, especially given the aging population. Survival of medically operable CRT patients was comparable to results of RTOG protocols notwithstanding this study's smaller sample size, retrospective nature and suboptimal documentation of patient characteristics.

Radiation dose and cardiac risk in breast cancer treatment: An analysis of modern radiation therapy including community settings.

PURPOSE: Adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) for breast cancer improves outcomes, but prior studies have documented substantive cardiac dose and cardiac risk. We assessed the mean heart dose (MHD) of RT and estimated the risk of RT-associated cardiac toxicity in women undergoing adjuvant RT for breast cancer in contemporary (predominantly) community practice. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We identified women with left-sided breast cancer receiving adjuvant RT between 2012 and 2014 from 94 centers across 16 states. We used bivariate analyses and multivariable linear regression to assess associations between RT techniques and MHD. Excess RT-related cardiac risk by age 80 was estimated for women diagnosed at age 60 using the previously reported relationship between MHD and cardiac risk. RESULTS: Among 1161 women, 77.3% were treated in community practice and with breast conservation (77.8%). The most common techniques were free-breathing (92.2%), supine (94.8%), and fixed gantry intensity modulated RT (FG-IMRT; 46.9%). The median MHD was 2.76 Gy (interquartile range, 1.47-5.03). In multivariable analyses, the predicted median MHD with deep inspiration breath hold was 2.41 Gy compared with 3.86 Gy with free-breathing (P < .001). Three-dimensional conformal RT (3D-CRT) was associated with a lower predicted median MHD (2.78 Gy) than FG-IMRT (4.02 Gy) or rotational IMRT, 6.60 Gy, P < .001). For 60-year-old women with the median MHD of the study population (2.76 Gy) and no cardiovascular risk factors, the 20-year predicted excess risk of death from ischemic heart disease attributable to radiation was 3.5 excess events/1000 patients, in contrast to estimates of 8 events/1000 from prior analyses. The predicted risk of cardiac events varied based on radiation technique, with 4 excess events/1000 with 3D-CRT, 5 excess events/1000 with FG-IMRT, and 8 excess events/1000 with rotational IMRT. CONCLUSIONS: MHD varies substantially across patients and is influenced by technique in predominantly community settings. Overall risk of cardiac toxicity is modest.

Increased Number of Beam Angles Is Associated With Higher Cardiac Dose in Adjuvant Fixed Gantry Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy of Left-Sided Breast Cancer.

PURPOSE: To analyze the relationship between angle number and mean heart dose (MHD) in adjuvant fixed gantry intensity modulated radiation therapy (FG-IMRT) treatment of left-sided breast cancer as is currently practiced in the community. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We performed a retrospective, multi-institutional review of women with left-sided breast cancer receiving adjuvant FG-IMRT between 2012 and 2014, encompassing 85 centers in 15 states. Bivariate and multivariate regression analyses were done to identify factors associated with MHD. Long-term cardiac risk was estimated according to a previously published model. RESULTS: Of the 538 women included, 284 had >2 gantry angle treatment plans (multi-angle), and 254 had 2 gantry angle (standard) plans. Median MHD was higher in patients with multi-angle plans compared with standard (median 475 vs 203 cGy). Number of gantry angles was significantly associated with MHD, with multi-angle plans independently increasing MHD by 229 cGy. Absolute risk of acute coronary events 20 years after treatment was estimated as 7 excess events per 1000 women for standard plans, compared with 12 excess events for multi-angle plans. CONCLUSIONS: Fixed gantry IMRT breast treatment plans with >2 gantry angles were associated with increased MHD, which translated to an increased cardiac risk. Clinicians should account for this potential drawback in treatment technique when assessing overall plan quality.

The Effect of Biologically Effective Dose and Radiation Treatment Schedule on Overall Survival in Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy.

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of biologically effective dose (BED10) and radiation treatment schedule on overall survival (OS) in patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Using data from 65 treatment centers in the United States, we retrospectively reviewed the records of T1-2 N0 NSCLC patients undergoing SBRT alone from 2006 to 2014. Biologically relevant covariates, including dose per fraction, number of fractions, and time between fractions, were used to quantify BED10 and radiation treatment schedule. The linear-quadratic equation was used to calculate BED10 and to generate a dichotomous dose variable of <105 Gy versus ≥105 Gy BED10. The primary outcome was OS. We used the Kaplan-Meier method, the log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards regression with propensity score matching to determine whether prescription BED10 was associated with OS. RESULTS: We identified 747 patients who met inclusion criteria. The median BED10 was 132 Gy, and 59 (7.7%) had consecutive-day fractions. Median follow-up was 41 months, and 452 patients (60.5%) had died by the conclusion of the study. The 581 patients receiving ≥105 Gy BED10 had a median survival of 28 months, whereas the 166 patients receiving <105 Gy BED10 had a median survival of 22 months (log-rank, P=.01). Radiation treatment schedule was not a significant predictor of OS on univariable analysis. After adjusting for T stage, sex, tumor histology, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, BED10 ≥105 Gy versus <105 Gy remained significantly associated with improved OS (hazard ratio 0.78, 95% confidence interval 0.62-0.98, P=.03). Propensity score matching on imbalanced variables within high- and low-dose cohorts confirmed a survival benefit with higher prescription dose. CONCLUSIONS: We found that dose escalation to 105 Gy BED10 and beyond may improve survival in NSCLC patients treated with SBRT.

Patient-reported quality of life after stereotactic body radiation therapy versus moderate hypofractionation for clinically localized prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Evaluate changes in bowel, urinary and sexual patient-reported quality of life following treatment with moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy (<5Gray/fraction) or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT;5-10Gray/fraction) for prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a pooled multi-institutional analysis of men treated with moderate hypofractionation or SBRT, we compared minimally detectable difference in bowel, urinary and sexual quality of life at 1 and 2years using chi-squared analysis and logistic regression. RESULTS: 378 men received moderate hypofractionation compared to 534 men who received SBRT. After 1year, patients receiving moderate hypofractionation were more likely to experience worsening in bowel symptoms (39.5%) compared to SBRT (32.5%; p=.06), with a larger difference at 2years (37.4% versus 25.3%, p=.002). Similarly, patients receiving moderate fractionation had worsening urinary symptom score compared to patients who underwent SBRT at 1 and 2years (34.7% versus 23.1%, p<.001; and 32.8% versus 14.0%, p<.001). There was no difference in sexual symptom score at 1 or 2years. After adjusting for age and cancer characteristics, patients receiving SBRT were less likely to experience worsening urinary symptom scores at 2years (odds ratio: 0.24[95%CI: 0.07-0.79]). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who received SBRT or moderate hypofractionation have similar patient-reported change in bowel and sexual symptoms, although there was worse change in urinary symptoms for patients receiving moderate hypofractionation.

Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy use and the risk of death in men with prostate cancer treated with brachytherapy who have no or at least a single risk factor for coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant hormone therapy (NHT) use is associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (ACM) in men with a history of coronary artery disease (CAD)-induced congestive heart failure (CHF) or myocardial infarction (MI). However, its effect in men with no or at least a single risk factor for CAD stratified by prostate cancer (PCa) aggressiveness is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether NHT use affects the risk of ACM in men with low-, intermediate-, and high-risk PCa treated with brachytherapy who have no or at least a single risk factor for CAD. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective study cohort consisted of 5411 men with low-risk PCa (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] <10 ng/ml, Gleason score 6, and clinical stage T1-T2a); 4365 men with intermediate-risk PCa (PSA 10-20 ng/ml or Gleason score <8 or clinical stage

Identification of comorbidities that place men at highest risk of death from androgen deprivation therapy before brachytherapy for prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine which specific comorbidities predispose men to excess mortality by androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) given before and during brachytherapy for prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We analyzed 5972 men with T1c-T3b prostate cancer treated with brachytherapy-based radiation with or without neoadjuvant ADT. Cox multivariable analysis with propensity scoring was used to determine if ADT was associated with increased all-cause mortality (ACM) in men divided into groups stratified by cardiac comorbidities. Tests for interaction between risk group and outcome were performed. RESULTS: ADT was associated with increased ACM in men with a history of myocardial infarction or congestive heart failure, regardless of whether they underwent revascularization (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 2.1 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.02-4.17; p=0.04]) or not (AHR, 1.8 [95% CI, 1.05-3.20; p = 0.03]), but this effect was not seen in men with less severe comorbidity. However, among men with diabetes, there was a significant interaction with risk group (p=0.01) such that ADT was associated with excess mortality in men with low-risk disease (AHR = 2.21 [1.04-4.68]; p=0.04) but not in men with intermediate or high-risk disease (AHR, 0.64 [0.33-1.22]; p=0.17). CONCLUSIONS: ADT was associated with excess ACM in all patients with a history of congestive heart failure or myocardial infarction, regardless of whether they were revascularized, and in diabetics with low-risk disease. ADT for gland downsizing before brachytherapy should be avoided in these men.

Coronary artery revascularization and the risk of death in men with prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: We investigated whether the decrease in death from cardiovascular disease, a major competing risk, explains the observed increase in prostate cancer specific mortality before 1992. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1991 and 2006, 1,880 men with known cardiovascular disease underwent radiation therapy for prostate cancer and were followed until July 2008. Cox regression multivariable analysis was performed to assess whether known prostate cancer prognostic factors, history of coronary artery revascularization for cardiovascular disease, age, Charlson comorbidity score and prostate cancer treatment were associated with the risk of death. RESULTS: Despite a significantly higher Charlson comorbidity score (p<0.001) due to a higher rate of prior myocardial infarction, the risk of death was significantly lower (adjusted hazard ratio 0.63, 95% CI 0.49-0.82, p<0.001) in men who underwent revascularization. High grade prostate cancer contributed significantly to the risk of death in men who underwent revascularization (AHR 1.74, 95% CI 1.04-2.91, p=0.04) but not in those who did not (AHR 1.18, 95% CI 0.88-1.58, p=0.27). CONCLUSIONS: The availability of and appropriate selection for revascularization may explain the increase in prostate cancer specific mortality before 1992. Men with cardiovascular disease in whom revascularization was not appropriate could consider active surveillance of prostate cancer because the increased risk of death was not associated with high grade prostate cancer.

Race and survival following brachytherapy-based treatment for men with localized or locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

PURPOSE: We investigated whether race was associated with risk of death following brachytherapy-based treatment for localized prostate cancer, adjusting for age, cardiovascular comorbidity, treatment, and established prostate cancer prognostic factors. METHODS: The study cohort was composed of 5,360 men with clinical stage T1-3N0M0 prostate cancer who underwent brachytherapy-based treatment at 20 centers within the 21st Century Oncology consortium. Cox regression multivariable analysis was used to evaluate the risk of death in African-American and Hispanic men compared to that in Caucasian men, adjusting for age, pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, Gleason score, clinical T stage, year and type of treatment, median income, and cardiovascular comorbidities. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 3 years, there were 673 deaths. African-American and Hispanic races were significantly associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (ACM) (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.77 and 1.79; 95% confidence intervals, 1.3-2.5 and 1.2-2.7; p < 0.001 and p = 0.005, respectively). Other factors significantly associated with an increased risk of death included age (p < 0.001), Gleason score of 8 to 10 (p = 0.04), year of brachytherapy (p < 0.001), and history of myocardial infarction treated with stent or coronary artery bypass graft (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: After adjustment for prostate cancer prognostic factors, age, income level, and revascularized cardiovascular comorbidities, African-American and Hispanic races were associated with higher ACM in men with prostate cancer. Additional causative factors need to be identified.

Coronary revascularization and mortality in men with congestive heart failure or prior myocardial infarction who receive androgen deprivation.

BACKGROUND: A study was undertaken to determine the impact of prior coronary revascularization (angioplasty, stent, or coronary artery bypass graft) on the risk of all-cause mortality after neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (HT) for prostate cancer (PC) in men with a history of coronary artery disease (CAD)-induced congestive heart failure (CHF) or myocardial infarction (MI). METHODS: Among 7839 men who received radiation with or without a median of 4 months of HT for PC from 1991 to 2006, 495 (6.3%) had CAD-induced CHF or MI and formed the study cohort. Of these men, 250 (50.5%) had been revascularized before treatment for PC. Cox regression was used to determine whether HT increased the risk of all-cause mortality, and whether revascularization altered this risk, after adjusting for known PC prognostic factors and a propensity score for revascularization. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 4.1 years. Neoadjuvant HT was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (28.9% vs 15.7% at 5 years; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-2.64; P = .01). Men who received HT without revascularization had the highest risk of all-cause mortality (33.3%; adjusted HR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.01-2.18; P = .047), whereas men who were revascularized and did not receive HT had the lowest risk of all-cause mortality (9.4%; adjusted HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.28-0.93; P = .028). The reference group had an intermediate risk of all-cause mortality (23.4%) and was comprised of men in whom HT use and revascularization were either both given or both withheld. CONCLUSIONS: In men with a history of CAD-induced CHF or MI, neoadjuvant HT is associated with an excess risk of mortality, which appears to be reduced but not eliminated by prior revascularization.

Risk of all-cause and prostate cancer-specific mortality after brachytherapy in men with small prostate size.

BACKGROUND: Brachytherapy for prostate cancer can be technically challenging in men with small prostates (≤20 cc), but it is unknown whether their outcomes are different than those of men with larger prostates. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We studied 6,416 men treated with brachytherapy in one of 21 community-based practices. Cox regression and Fine and Gray's regression were used to determine whether volume ≤20 cc was associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality (ACM) or prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM), respectively, after adjustment for other known prognostic factors. RESULTS: 443 patients (6.9%) had a prostate volume ≤20 cc. After a median follow-up of 2.91 years (interquartile range, 1.06-4.79), volume ≤20 cc was associated with a significantly higher risk of ACM (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.33 [95% CI 1.08-1.65], p = 0.0085) with 3-year estimates of ACM for ≤20 cc vs. >20 cc of 13.0% vs. 6.9% (p = 0.028). Only 23 men (0.36%) have died of prostate cancer, and no difference was seen in PCSM by volume (p = 0.4). CONCLUSION: Men with small prostates at the time of implant had a 33% higher risk of ACM, and the underlying cause of this remains uncertain. No increase in PCSM was observed in men with volume ≤20cc, suggesting that a small prostate should not in itself be a contraindication for brachytherapy, but inasmuch as absolute rates of PCSM were small, further follow-up will be needed to confirm this finding.

Prostate cancer-specific mortality and the extent of therapy in healthy elderly men with high-risk prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: The risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) in healthy elderly men may depend on extent of treatment. The authors of this report compared the use of brachytherapy alone with combined brachytherapy, external-beam radiation to the prostate and seminal vesicles, and androgen-suppression therapy (CMT) in this population. METHODS: The study cohort comprised 764 men aged > or = 65 years with high-risk prostate cancer (T3 or T4N0M0, prostate-specific antigen >20 ng/mL, and/or Gleason score 8-10) who received either brachytherapy alone (n = 206) or CMT (n = 558) at the Chicago Prostate Cancer Center or at a 21st Century Oncology facility. Men either had no history of myocardial infarction (MI) or had a history of MI treated with a stent or surgical intervention. Fine and Gray regression analysis was used to identify the factors associated with PCSM. RESULTS: The median patient age was 73 years (interquartile range, 70-77 years). After a median follow-up of 4.9 years, 25 men died of prostate cancer. After adjusting for age and prostate cancer prognostic factors, the risk of PCSM was significantly less (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.29; 95% confidence interval, 0.12-0.68; P = .004) for men who received CMT than for men who received brachytherapy alone. Other factors that were associated significantly with an increased risk of PCSM included a Gleason score of 8 to 10 (P = .017). CONCLUSIONS: Elderly men who had high-risk prostate cancer without cardiovascular disease or with surgically corrected cardiovascular disease had a lower risk of PCSM when they received CMT than when they received brachytherapy alone. These results support aggressive locoregional treatment in healthy elderly men with high-risk prostate cancer.

The use of supplemental external beam radiotherapy in men with low-risk prostate cancer undergoing brachytherapy before and after the 1999 American Brachytherapy Society Guideline statement.

PURPOSE: In 1999, the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) recommended brachy-monotherapy for men with low-risk prostate cancer because of the potential for increased toxicity with combined external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and brachytherapy without the proof of increased efficacy. We investigated the patterns of care in the community in this patient population before and after the reporting of the ABS guideline. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The study cohort consisted of 4943 men (median age, 69.0 years) with low-risk prostate cancer treated with brachytherapy with or without supplemental EBRT from 1991 to 2007 across 21 community radiation oncology centers. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine if there was a significant association between the year of brachytherapy, prostate-specific antigen level, clinical tumor (T) category, patient's age, and the use of supplemental EBRT. RESULTS: Supplemental EBRT was used in 647 men (13%). The EBRT use initially increased until 2001 and then decreased yielding a significant association (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.92; p<0.001) between the EBRT use and the year of brachytherapy using a quadratic formulation. Specifically, EBRT use peaked at 24.6% in 2001 and subsequently declined to 3.3% by 2007. Men with clinical category T2a as compared with T1c disease (AOR, 1.43; p<0.001) were more likely to receive combined modality therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The use of supplemental EBRT in men with low-risk prostate cancer treated with brachytherapy has decreased since 2001. This change in practice patterns suggests gradual adoption of the 1999 ABS practice guidelines.

Androgen-suppression therapy for prostate cancer and the risk of death in men with a history of myocardial infarction or stroke.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of short-course androgen-suppression therapy (AST) before brachytherapy on all-cause mortality (ACM) rates, stratified by the presence or absence of a history of myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke. AST is used to reduce prostate size to enable men with favourable-risk prostate cancer to undergo brachytherapy, but no disease-specific benefit has been reported for this practice, and AST use has been associated with an increased risk of ACM in some men with pre-existing cardiovascular disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study comprised 12792 men with favourable-risk disease, i.e. a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of <20 ng/mL, Gleason score ≤7 and clinical category ≤T2c, treated between 1991 and 2007 at community-based medical centres with brachytherapy ± neoadjuvant AST. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to assess whether there were significant associations between AST use in men with a history of MI or stroke and the risk of ACM, adjusting for age, treatment year, and known prognostic factors of prostate cancer. RESULTS: After a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 3.8 (2.0-5.9) years there were 1557 deaths. The risk of ACM was lower in men with no history of MI or stroke than in those with this history, whether AST was used (adjusted hazard ratio 0.79, 95% confidence interval 0.67-0.92; P= 0.003) or not (0.74, 0.65-0.85; P < 0.001). However, men with a history of MI or stroke treated with AST had a greater risk of ACM than those not treated with AST (1.2, 1.05-1.38; P= 0.008). CONCLUSION: The use of short-course AST in men with a history of MI or stroke is associated with a greater risk of ACM in men with favourable-risk prostate cancer.

Predictors of prostate cancer-specific mortality in elderly men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated with brachytherapy with or without external beam radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: To identify clinical factors associated with prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM), adjusting for comorbidity, in elderly men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated with brachytherapy alone or in conjunction with external beam radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The study cohort comprised 1,978 men of median age 71 (interquartile range, 66-75) years with intermediate-risk disease (Gleason score 7, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) 20 ng/mL or less, tumor category T2c or less). Fine and Gray's multivariable competing risks regression was used to assess whether prevalent cardiovascular disease (CVD), age, treatment, year of brachytherapy, PSA level, or tumor category was associated with the risk of PCSM. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 3.2 (interquartile range, 1.7-5.4) years, the presence of CVD was significantly associated with a decreased risk of PCSM (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.20; 95% CI 0.04-0.99; p = 0.05), whereas an increasing PSA level was significantly associated with an increased risk of PCSM (adjusted hazard ratio 1.14; 95% CI 1.02-1.27; p = 0.02). In the absence of CVD, cumulative incidence estimates of PCSM were higher (p = 0.03) in men with PSA levels above as compared with the median PSA level (7.3 ng/mL) or less; however, in the setting of CVD there was no difference (p = 0.27) in these estimates stratified by the median PSA level (6.9 ng/mL). CONCLUSIONS: In elderly men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer, CVD status is a negative predictor of PCSM and affects the prognostic capacity of pretreatment PSA level. These observations support the potential utility of prerandomization stratification by comorbidity to more accurately assess prognostic factors and treatment effects within this population.

Total androgen blockade versus a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist alone in men with high-risk prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: To assess whether short-course total androgen blockade vs. a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist alone affects the risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) in men with localized but high-risk disease treated with radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The study cohort comprised 628 men with T1-T4, N0, M0 prostate cancer with high-risk disease (prostate-specific antigen level >20 ng/mL, Gleason score >or=8, or clinical category >or=T3) treated with 45 Gy of external beam radiotherapy followed by a brachytherapy boost in addition to receiving a median of 4.3 (interquartile range [IQR], 3.6-6.4) months of hormonal blockade with an LHRH agonist plus an antiandrogen or monotherapy with an LHRH agonist. Fine and Gray's multivariable regression analysis was used to determine whether combination androgen suppression therapy (AST) vs. monotherapy affected the risk of PCSM, adjusting for treatment year, duration of AST, age, and known prognostic factors. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 4.9 (IQR, 3.5-6.5) years, men receiving combination AST had a lower risk of PCSM than those treated with monotherapy (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 0.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.04-0.90; p = 0.04). An increasing prostate-specific antigen level (AHR, 2.70; 95% CI, 1.64-4.45; p < 0.001) and clinical category T3/4 disease (AHR, 29.6; 95% CI, 2.88-303.5; p = 0.004) were also associated with an increased risk of PCSM. CONCLUSIONS: In men with localized but high-risk prostate cancer treated with external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy, short-course AST with an LHRH agonist plus an antiandrogen is associated with a decreased risk of PCSM when compared with monotherapy with an LHRH agonist.

Risk of death from prostate cancer after brachytherapy alone or with radiation, androgen suppression therapy, or both in men with high-risk disease.

PURPOSE: We estimated the risk of prostate cancer (PC) -specific mortality (PCSM) after brachytherapy alone or in conjunction with androgen suppression therapy (AST), external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT), or both in men with high-risk PC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study cohort comprised 1,342 men with a prostate-specific antigen level more than 20 ng/mL and clinical T3 or 4 and/or Gleason score 8 to 10 disease. Competing risks multivariable regression was performed to estimate the risk of PCSM in men treated with brachytherapy alone or with supplemental AST, EBRT, or both, adjusting for age, year of treatment, and known PC prognostic factors. RESULTS: Despite higher baseline probabilities of PCSM after a median follow-up of 5.1 years, there was a significant reduction in the risk of PCSM (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 0.32; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.73; P = .006) in men treated with brachytherapy and both AST and EBRT as compared with neither. When compared with brachytherapy alone, a significant decrease in the risk of PCSM was not observed in men treated with either supplemental AST (AHR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.27 to 1.47; P = .28) or EBRT (AHR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.21 to 1.52; P = .26). There was a near-significant reduction (AHR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.27 to 1.07; P = .079) in the risk of PCSM in men treated with tri- as compared with bimodality therapy. CONCLUSION: Supplemental AST and EBRT but not either supplement compared with brachytherapy alone was associated with a decreased risk of PCSM in men with high-risk PC.