Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Urology ; 180: 257-261, 2023 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37517678

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To report the incidence of the reoperation surgeries of nearly all the Rigicon Infla10 implants performed since device introduction in 1/2019. Inflatable penile prosthesis has some of the highest survival from revision surgery of any medical device implanted in humans [1]. We expand on previous Rigicon Infla10 research, adding more patients and increasing follow-up duration [2]. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 535 patients had Rigicon Infla10 devices implanted from 1/2019 to 8/2022. 103 surgeons from 26 centers in 15 countries participated in the study. Patient information forms were analyzed from virtually all implantations. Explantation or revision surgery for mechanical failure, infection, other medical reasons, and patient dissatisfaction were cataloged. SPSS 25.0 (IBM) was used for the statistical analysis of Kaplan Meier survival statistics. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 24.2months (7-43months). Mean patient age was 56years. Reoperation was necessary for 3.5% of subjects. Revision for mechanical failure occurred in 2.24% (12/535). The rate of explant for patient dissatisfaction was 0.56% (3/535). Revision for component out of place was 0.37% (2/535) with an infection rate and unsuccessful Peyronie's correction being 0.19% (1/535). Survival from requiring another corrective surgery at 1, 2, and 3years was 96.4%, 95.0%, and 94.0%, respectively. These initial survival rates compare favorably to devices currently available, which have been repeatedly enhanced to improve reliability. CONCLUSION: In its first 2-3years of availability, The Rigicon Infla10 inflatable penile prosthesis shows freedom from revision comparable to existing enhanced devices that have been on the market for decades.


Assuntos
Disfunção Erétil , Implante Peniano , Prótese de Pênis , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Prótese de Pênis/efeitos adversos , Reoperação , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Implante Peniano/efeitos adversos , Disfunção Erétil/etiologia , Satisfação do Paciente , Estudos Retrospectivos , Desenho de Prótese , Falha de Prótese
2.
BJU Int ; 131(6): 729-733, 2023 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36633050

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To analyse data from patient information forms (PIFs) submitted to the manufacturer of a new three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP), the Rigicon Infla10®, to summarize early outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective review of PIFs from 319 patients implanted with the IPP between 6 January 2019 and 31 December 2021 was performed to assess device durability and rates of reoperation for infection, mechanical failure or medical reasons. RESULTS: The mean ± sd (range) follow-up was 21.2 ± 11 (5-36) months and the mean ± sd patient age was 58.5 ± 8.7 years. Of the total, 4.4% of devices required removal or revision. Complications included mechanical failure (2.5%) and component migration (0.7%). No infections were observed in this series. One patient (0.4%) required revision for inadequate straightening of Peyronie's disease. Three patients (0.9%) requested device removal because of dissatisfaction. A total of 95.6% of the Rigicon Infla10 devices were free from explant or revision 21 months after the original implant date. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed the rates of cumulative survival of the device at 12, 24, 36 months were 95.6%, 94.7% and 93.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The vast majority of the early Rigicon Infla10 IPPs implanted prior to January 2022 were included in this retrospective analysis of volunteered PIFs. These early results demonstrate initial durability from reoperation equivalent to that of other contemporary devices.


Assuntos
Disfunção Erétil , Implante Peniano , Induração Peniana , Prótese de Pênis , Masculino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Prótese de Pênis/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Implante Peniano/métodos , Induração Peniana/complicações , Reoperação , Satisfação do Paciente , Desenho de Prótese , Disfunção Erétil/etiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...