The paradigm shift in treatment of severe venous thromboembolism.

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is the third leading cause of cardiovascular death and the main cause of preventable in-hospital death in the world. The PERT® (Pulmonary Embolism Response Team) concept involves multidisciplinary diagnosis and immediate treatment. Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is the initial cause of most cases of PE and is responsible for complications such as chronic thromboembolic recurrence, postthrombotic syndrome, and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. An aggressive approach to severe cases of iliofemoral DVT similar to the PERT® system can not only reduce the immediate risk of PE and death but can also reduce later sequelae. New percutaneous techniques and mechanical thrombectomy devices for venous thromboembolism (VTE) have shown encouraging clinical results. We propose the development of an expanded concept of rapid response to VTE, which involves not only PE (PERT®) but also severe cases of DVT: the Venous Thromboembolism Response Team (VTERT®).

A mudança de paradigma no tratamento do tromboembolismo venoso grave / The paradigm shift in treatment of severe venous thromboembolism

Resumo A embolia pulmonar (EP) é a terceira maior causa de morte cardiovascular e a principal de morte evitável intra-hospitalar no mundo. O conceito PERT® (do inglês, pulmonary embolism response team) envolve seu diagnóstico e tratamento precoce e multidisciplinar. A trombose venosa profunda (TVP) é a sua causa inicial na maioria dos casos e é responsável por complicações como a recidiva tromboembólica, a síndrome pós-trombótica e a hipertensão pulmonar tromboembólica crônica. Uma abordagem inicial semelhante ao PERT nos casos de TVP ilíaco-femoral grave pode reduzir não apenas o risco imediato de EP e morte, mas também suas sequelas tardias. Novas técnicas percutâneas e aparatos de trombectomia mecânica para o tromboembolismo venoso (TEV) vêm demonstrando resultados clínicos encorajadores. Propomos o desenvolvimento de um conceito ampliado de resposta rápida ao TEV, que envolve não apenas a EP (PERT®) mas também os casos graves de TVP: o time de resposta rápida para o TEV (TRETEV®), ou do inglês Venous Thromboembolism Response Team (VTERT®).

Abstract Pulmonary embolism (PE) is the third leading cause of cardiovascular death and the main cause of preventable in-hospital death in the world. The PERT® (Pulmonary Embolism Response Team) concept involves multidisciplinary diagnosis and immediate treatment. Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is the initial cause of most cases of PE and is responsible for complications such as chronic thromboembolic recurrence, postthrombotic syndrome, and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. An aggressive approach to severe cases of iliofemoral DVT similar to the PERT® system can not only reduce the immediate risk of PE and death but can also reduce later sequelae. New percutaneous techniques and mechanical thrombectomy devices for venous thromboembolism (VTE) have shown encouraging clinical results. We propose the development of an expanded concept of rapid response to VTE, which involves not only PE (PERT®) but also severe cases of DVT: the Venous Thromboembolism Response Team (VTERT®).

Management of traumatic superficial palmar arch pseudoaneurysm: a therapeutic challenge.

Pseudoaneurysm of the palmar arch is a rare entity. Diagnosis is dependent on high clinical suspicion. We present a case referred to the emergency department, with a history of glass penetrating trauma to the palmar surface with a pulsatile mass and jet bleeding. Doppler ultrasound evidenced a partially thrombosed pseudoaneurysm. A CT angiography examination showed a saccular formation arising from the superficial palmar arch. A conventional surgical approach was indicated. A clinical suspicion must be ventured to arrive at the correct diagnosis. Imaging modalities are needed to identify the pseudoaneurysm and plan the treatment course. Nonetheless, the sequence of diagnosis is individual, because further evaluation with different imaging methods may not change the rationale for the intervention. In our experience, conventional surgical removal is preferable, due to its safety and well-established outcomes.

O pseudoaneurisma do arco palmar é uma entidade rara, cujo diagnóstico depende de alta suspeição clínica. Apresentamos o caso de um paciente encaminhado ao pronto-socorro com história de traumatismo penetrante por vidro na face palmar, com massa pulsátil e sangramento em jato. A ultrassonografia com Doppler evidenciou pseudoaneurisma parcialmente trombosado, e a angiotomografia demonstrou formação sacular originada do arco palmar superficial. Uma abordagem cirúrgica convencional foi indicada. Para prosseguir com o diagnóstico correto, essa suspeita clínica deve ser aventada. Modalidades de imagem são necessárias para identificar o pseudoaneurisma e planejar o curso do tratamento. No entanto, a sequência diagnóstica é individual, pois uma avaliação mais aprofundada, com diferentes métodos de imagem, pode não alterar o racional da intervenção. Em nossa experiência, a remoção cirúrgica convencional é preferível, visto sua segurança e seus resultados bem estabelecidos.

Aneurisma da artéria dorsal do pé: relato de caso: resumo / Aneurysm of the dorsal artery of the foot: case report modality: abstract

RESUMO: Paciente do sexo feminino, 59 anos, comerciante. Assintomática até há 1 ano, quando observou surgimento de massa pulsátil em dorso do pé direito, eventualmente dolorosa.

Association between the degree of iliac venous outflow obstruction by intravascular ultrasound and lower limb venous reflux.

OBJECTIVE: The present study aims to evaluate the association between the degree of iliac venous outflow obstruction (IVOO) identified by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and venous reflux presentation in the lower limbs on duplex ultrasound (DU). METHODS: Patients with bilateral chronic venous insufficiency, CEAP (clinical-etiology-anatomy-pathophysiology) C3 to C6, and a visual analog scale score for pain >5 underwent DU for reflux evaluation of the deep venous system (reflux ≥1 second); superficial system, great saphenous vein, and small saphenous vein (reflux ≥0.5 second); and perforator system (reflux ≥0.35 second). All patients underwent IVUS in the iliac venous territory. The area of the impaired venous segments was categorized as obstruction <50% (category 1), 50% to 79% (category 2), and ≥80% (category 3). The venous clinical severity score and reflux multisegment score (RMS) were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 51 patients (n = 102 limbs; age, 50.53 ± 14.5 years; 6 men) were included. The predominant clinical severity CEAP class was C3 in 54 of 102 limbs (52.9%). The mean VCSS was 14.3 ± 6.7. A severe RMS (≥3) was registered in 63.4% of the limbs. Of the 102 limbs, 51 (50%) presented with category 1, 27 (26.5%) with category 2, and 24 (23.5%) with category 3. Previous deep vein thrombosis (DVT) was associated with critical obstruction (odds ratio [OR], 3.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29-10.38; P = .015). The superficial and perforator venous systems had no association with the degree of IVOO. Deep venous reflux (DVR) had a significant association with significant IVOO (obstruction ≥50%; OR, 6.44; 95% CI, 2.19-18.93; P = .001) and critical IVOO (obstruction ≥80%; OR, 4.57; 95% CI, 1.70-12.27; P = .003) and a significant linear association with the IVOO degree and reflux in the femoral veins (P < .001) and popliteal vein (P = .008). Significant lesions were significantly more likely to develop in the left limb (OR, 5.76; 95% CI, 2.46-13.50; P < .001). After multivariate analysis, DVR remained a predictor for significant and critical obstruction (P < .003 and P < .012, respectively). Left limb and previous DVT remained as predictors for IVOO of ≥50% and ≥80% (P < .001 and P = .043, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: We found a significant linear association between the degree of IVOO and reflux in the deep venous system on DU. Limbs with DVR, a severe RMS, loss of respiratory variation on DU, and previous DVT were more likely to be affected by IVOO of ≥50%, especially with left leg involvement.

Efficacy and safety of iliofemoral bypass using arm veins as an alternative conduit for chronic limb-threatening ischemia.

OBJECTIVE: The use of basilic vein in iliofemoral revascularizations was previously described in the literature as an autologous option for the treatment of vascular prosthesis infection and as a primary conduit in patients at high risk of infectious surgical complications. However, the publications available include several different indications and are limited to case reports. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of the use of arm veins as a safe and effective autologous alternative for iliofemoral reconstruction in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) and at high risk of prosthesis infection. METHODS: We performed a multicenter, retrospective cohort study with 53 consecutive iliofemoral bypasses using arm veins as an alternative conduit. The procedures were performed between November 2013 and November 2021, exclusively for patients with CLTI classified as TASC aortoiliac C or D with increased risk of postoperative surgical infection. Demographic, clinical variables, and outcomes were collected from a prospective database. Main endpoints were amputation-free survival (AFS) and major adverse cardiovascular events. Secondary endpoints included primary and secondary patencies and overall survival. Cox regression analysis was used to identify the predictors of AFS. Postoperative surgical complications and 30-day mortality were also assessed. RESULTS: The mean age was 64.2 ± 8.4 years, with a predominance of male gender. The median follow-up period was 615 days. All patients had CLTI, with a predominance of tissue loss (n = 51; 96.2%) and a median ankle-brachial index of 0.28. The basilic vein was utilized in most procedures (69.8%). Thirty-day major adverse cardiovascular events occurred in five cases (9.4%), and the 30-day mortality rate was 3.8%. The AFS, primary patency, secondary patency, and overall survival in 720 days were 71%, 72%, 89%, and 75%, respectively. Cox regression analysis revealed no association between the variables analyzed for AFS. There was no graft late infection nor pseudoaneurysmal degeneration. CONCLUSIONS: Iliofemoral bypass using arm veins as an autologous conduit proved to be an effective and safe procedure with low incidence of postoperative cardiovascular complications and high rates of AFS in patients with CLTI. Also, this suggests that arm veins can be an interesting and suitable autologous alternative conduit for iliofemoral reconstructions, especially in cases in which a prosthesis should be avoided or when it is not available.

Efficacy and safety of iliofemoral bypass using arm veins as an alternative conduit for chronic limb-threatening ischemia

OBJECTIVE: The use of basilic vein in iliofemoral revascularizations was previously described in the literature as an autologous option for the treatment of vascular prosthesis infection and as a primary conduit in patients at high risk of infectious surgical complications. However, the publications available include several different indications and are limited to case reports. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of the use of arm veins as a safe and effective autologous alternative for iliofemoral reconstruction in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) and at high risk of prosthesis infection. METHODS: We performed a multicenter, retrospective cohort study with 53 consecutive iliofemoral bypasses using arm veins as an alternative conduit. The procedures were performed between November 2013 and November 2021, exclusively for patients with CLTI classified as TASC aortoiliac C or D with increased risk of postoperative surgical infection. Demographic, clinical variables, and outcomes were collected from a prospective database. Main endpoints were amputation-free survival (AFS) and major adverse cardiovascular events. Secondary endpoints included primary and secondary patencies and overall survival. Cox regression analysis was used to identify the predictors of AFS. Postoperative surgical complications and 30-day mortality were also assessed. RESULTS: The mean age was 64.2 ± 8.4 years, with a predominance of male gender. The median follow-up period was 615 days. All patients had CLTI, with a predominance of tissue loss (n = 51; 96.2%) and a median ankle-brachial index of 0.28. The basilic vein was utilized in most procedures (69.8%). Thirty-day major adverse cardiovascular events occurred in five cases (9.4%), and the 30-day mortality rate was 3.8%. The AFS, primary patency, secondary patency, and overall survival in 720 days were 71%, 72%, 89%, and 75%, respectively. Cox regression analysis revealed no association between the variables analyzed for AFS. There was no graft late infection nor pseudoaneurysmal degeneration. CONCLUSIONS: Iliofemoral bypass using arm veins as an autologous conduit proved to be an effective and safe procedure with low incidence of postoperative cardiovascular complications and high rates of AFS in patients with CLTI. Also, this suggests that arm veins can be an interesting and suitable autologous alternative conduit for iliofemoral reconstructions, especially in cases in which a prosthesis should be avoided or when it is not available.

Association between the degree of iliac venous outflow obstruction by intravascular ultrasound and lower limbs venous reflux

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the association between the degree of iliac venous outflow obstruction (IVOO) identified by Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS) and venous reflux presentation in lower limbs on Duplex Ultrasound (DU). METHODS: Patients with bilateral chronic venous insufficiency, CEAP C3-6 (Clinical-Etiology-Anatomy-Pathophysiology classification), and with Visual Analogic Scale score for pain > 5, underwent DU for reflux evaluation: deep venous system (reflux ≥ 1 s); superficial system, great saphenous vein (GSV) and small saphenous vein (SSV) (reflux ≥ 0.5 s); perforator system (reflux ≥ 0.35s). All patients underwent IVUS in the iliac venous territory. The area of the impaired venous segments was categorized as obstructions< 50% (Cat. 1); 50-79% (Cat. 2), and ≥ 80% (Cat. 3). Venous clinical severity scale (VCSS) and reflux multisegment score (RMS) were assessed. RESULTS: 51 patients (n=102 limbs; 50.53 ± 14.5 years, 6 men) were included. The predominant clinical severity CEAP class was C3 in 54/102 (52.9%) limbs. VCSS mean was 14.3 ± 6.7. Severe RMS (≥ 3) was registered in 63,4% of the limbs. In 51/102 limbs (50%) presented cat. 1, 27/102 (26.5%) cat. 2, and 24/102 (23.5%) cat. 3. Previous DVT was associated with critical obstruction (OR 3.65; 95% CI: 1.29-10.38; p=0.015). Superficial and perforator venous systems had no association with the degree of iliac obstruction. Deep venous reflux (DVR) had a significant association with significative IVOO (obstruction ≥ 50%) (OR 6.44; 95% CI: 2.19-18.93; p=0.001) and critical IVOO (obstruction ≥ 80%) (OR 4.57; 95% CI: 1.70-12.27; p=0.003), and significant linear association with IVOO degree and reflux in femoral veins (p<0.001) and popliteal vein (p=0.008). Significant lesions had 5.76 (95% CI: 2.46-13.50; p<0.001) more odds of happening in the left limb. After a multivariate analysis, DVR remained as predictor for significant and critical obstruction (p<0.003, p< 0.012; respectively). Left limb and previous DVT remained as predictors for IVOO ≥50% and IVOO≥ 80% (p<0.001, p=0.043; respectively) CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant linear association between the degree of iliac venous outflow obstruction and reflux in the deep venous system on DU. Limbs with DVR, severe RMS, loss of respiratory variation on DU, and previous DVT, were more likely to be affected by IVOO ≥ 50%, especially with the left leg involvement.

Management of traumatic superficial palmar arch pseudoaneurysm: a therapeutic challenge / Manejo de pseudoaneurisma do arco palmar superficial traumático: desafio terapêutico

Abstract Pseudoaneurysm of the palmar arch is a rare entity. Diagnosis is dependent on high clinical suspicion. We present a case referred to the emergency department, with a history of glass penetrating trauma to the palmar surface with a pulsatile mass and jet bleeding. Doppler ultrasound evidenced a partially thrombosed pseudoaneurysm. A CT angiography examination showed a saccular formation arising from the superficial palmar arch. A conventional surgical approach was indicated. A clinical suspicion must be ventured to arrive at the correct diagnosis. Imaging modalities are needed to identify the pseudoaneurysm and plan the treatment course. Nonetheless, the sequence of diagnosis is individual, because further evaluation with different imaging methods may not change the rationale for the intervention. In our experience, conventional surgical removal is preferable, due to its safety and well-established outcomes.

Resumo O pseudoaneurisma do arco palmar é uma entidade rara, cujo diagnóstico depende de alta suspeição clínica. Apresentamos o caso de um paciente encaminhado ao pronto-socorro com história de traumatismo penetrante por vidro na face palmar, com massa pulsátil e sangramento em jato. A ultrassonografia com Doppler evidenciou pseudoaneurisma parcialmente trombosado, e a angiotomografia demonstrou formação sacular originada do arco palmar superficial. Uma abordagem cirúrgica convencional foi indicada. Para prosseguir com o diagnóstico correto, essa suspeita clínica deve ser aventada. Modalidades de imagem são necessárias para identificar o pseudoaneurisma e planejar o curso do tratamento. No entanto, a sequência diagnóstica é individual, pois uma avaliação mais aprofundada, com diferentes métodos de imagem, pode não alterar o racional da intervenção. Em nossa experiência, a remoção cirúrgica convencional é preferível, visto sua segurança e seus resultados bem estabelecidos.

Real life outcomes of infrapopliteal endovascular and surgical bypass intervention for chronic limb threatening ischaemia in GLASS stages II and III

OBJETIVE: Great efforts have been made to determine when choosing between bypass surgery or angioplasty as first-time revascularization in chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). Endovascular therapy predominates despite limited evidence for their advantage. The purpose of this observational cohort study, was to investigate outcomes after open and endovascular infrapopliteal revascularization in extensive infrainguinal arterial disease. METHODS: The medical records of 1427 patients who underwent infrainguinal revascularization exclusively for CLTI in the period of January 2014 to February 2019 were reviewed. After detailed analysis, only infrapopliteal revascularizations classified as GLASS stage II or III were considered, resulting in 326 procedures. There were 127 patients who underwent endovascular therapy and 199 patients who underwent bypass graft surgery (BGS). The primary endpoints included amputation-free survival (AFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included the analyses of multiple factors related to long-term AFS. RESULTS: Regarding the primary endpoint, AFS were 75.2% and 65.2% at 1 and 3 years, respectively. Overall survival at 1 and 3 years were 91.2% and 83.1%, respectively. In the univariate analysis, the hazard of the combined endpoint of major amputation or death was higher following bypass surgery than after endovascular therapy (HR 1.80; 95% CI, 1.13-2.89; P= .013). After either revascularization method, TASCII femoropopliteal D was associated with a higher risk of amputation or death (HR 1.69; 95% CI, 1.10-2.58; P= .015). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed no association between the variables analysed for AFS. CONCLUSIONS: CLTI patients submitted to infrapopliteal revascularization and classified as GLASS II and III had satisfactory AFS and OS rates after indivualized team conference decision. Furthermore, the revascularization modality (endo or open) did not influence the results of AFS.

Thrombectomy in a severe case of iliofemoral venous thrombosis involving the deep femoral vein via a single percutaneous access from the jugular vein: case report and description of the technique.

Iliac vein thrombectomy is usually performed via access through veins located in the lower limbs, which makes it impossible to treat the deep femoral vein, which in turn is an important inflow route to the iliac vein stent. We describe a clinical case and the previously unpublished technique of percutaneous thrombectomy, angioplasty, and stent implantation performed in a single session and with a single access, obtained via the internal jugular vein.

Thrombectomy in a severe case of iliofemoral venous thrombosis involving the deep femoral vein via a single percutaneous access from the jugular vein: case report and description of the technique / Trombectomia em caso grave de trombose venosa iliofemoral afetando a veia femoral profunda pela técnica de punção e sessão única realizada pela veia jugular: relato de caso e descrição da técnica

ABSTRACT: Iliac vein thrombectomy is usually performed via access through veins located in the lower limbs, which makes it impossible to treat the deep femoral vein, which in turn is an important inflow route to the iliac vein stent. We describe a clinical case and the previously unpublished technique of percutaneous thrombectomy, angioplasty, and stent implantation performed in a single session and with a single access, obtained via the internal jugular vein.

RESUMO: A trombectomia mecânica venosa ilíaca geralmente é realizada por acesso em veias localizadas nos membros inferiores, o que impossibilita o tratamento da veia femoral profunda, que, por sua vez, é uma importante via de influxo ao stent venoso ilíaco. Descrevemos um caso clínico em que foi aplicada a técnica inédita de trombectomia percutânea, angioplastia e implante de stent, realizada por sessão e acesso único, obtido na veia jugular interna.

Eversion Endarterectomy of the External Iliac Artery in Treating Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia in TASC II C and D Iliofemoral Occlusive Disease

BACKGROUND: Endovascular treatment of iliofemoral occlusive disease is a challenging approach, especially for TransAtlantic Inter-Society C and D lesions. Therefore, the revascularization procedure in such situations is preferably performed by bypass graft surgery with synthetic materials. The purpose of this study is to report the feasibility and mid-term results of eversion endarterectomy of the external iliac artery (EEEIA), as an alternative autologous option. METHODS: Retrospective study with 18 EEEIA performed between September 2015 and February 2020, exclusively for chronic limb-threatening ischemia treatment in patients with increased risk of postoperative surgical infection and inadvisable for endovascular treatment. Demographic, clinical variables and outcomes were collected from a prospective database. The main end points are: amputation-free survival (AFS) and 30-day mortality. Secondary end points include: primary patency (PP), cumulative patency (CP), overall survival (OS), and postoperative surgical complication. Kaplan­Meier analysis was used to estimate cumulative time of outcomes. RESULTS: The mean age was 64.8 ± 8.3 years, with predominance of men. The median follow-up period was 1012 days, 95% confidence interval [119, 1365] days. Most had Rutherford 5 (n = 13, 72.2%) and mean ankle brachial index was 0.38 ± 0.22. The PP, CP, AFS, and OS in 730 days were 81%, 92%, 80%, and 88%, respectively. There was no 30-day mortality or postoperative surgical infection. CONCLUSIONS: Iliofemoral reconstruction through EEEIA is an effective surgical procedure with good patency rates, AFS and OS. In addition, it can be considered an useful and safe option, especially in cases in which a prosthesis should be avoided.

Eversion Endarterectomy of the External Iliac Artery in Treating Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia in TASC II C and D Iliofemoral Occlusive Disease.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular treatment of iliofemoral occlusive disease is a challenging approach, especially for TransAtlantic Inter-Society C and D lesions. Therefore, the revascularization procedure in such situations is preferably performed by bypass graft surgery with synthetic materials. The purpose of this study is to report the feasibility and mid-term results of eversion endarterectomy of the external iliac artery (EEEIA), as an alternative autologous option. METHODS: Retrospective study with 18 EEEIA performed between September 2015 and February 2020, exclusively for chronic limb-threatening ischemia treatment in patients with increased risk of postoperative surgical infection and inadvisable for endovascular treatment. Demographic, clinical variables and outcomes were collected from a prospective database. The main end points are: amputation-free survival (AFS) and 30-day mortality. Secondary end points include: primary patency (PP), cumulative patency (CP), overall survival (OS), and postoperative surgical complication. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate cumulative time of outcomes. RESULTS: The mean age was 64.8 ± 8.3 years, with predominance of men. The median follow-up period was 1012 days, 95% confidence interval [119, 1365] days. Most had Rutherford 5 (n = 13, 72.2%) and mean ankle brachial index was 0.38 ± 0.22. The PP, CP, AFS, and OS in 730 days were 81%, 92%, 80%, and 88%, respectively. There was no 30-day mortality or postoperative surgical infection. CONCLUSIONS: Iliofemoral reconstruction through EEEIA is an effective surgical procedure with good patency rates, AFS and OS. In addition, it can be considered an useful and safe option, especially in cases in which a prosthesis should be avoided.

Arteriovenous fistula as adjuvant treatment in arterial revascularization of an at-risk limb.

Acute arterial occlusion remains a major challenge for the vascular surgeon. The therapeutic approach depends mostly upon the severity of the tissue injury and the duration of symptoms. Several techniques are available in the current therapeutic arsenal, however, regardless of the technique chosen, postoperative factors frequently observed, such as poor outflow status, or even low graft flow, can contribute negatively to the outcome of revascularization. We describe a case of acute limb ischemia, in the postoperative period of a femoral-tibial bypass, which was occluded due to outflow limitation and high peripheral vascular resistance. The patient underwent a second tibial revascularization combined with construction of an arteriovenous fistula, followed by forefoot amputation and partial skin graft. An energetic approach to the at-risk limb makes it possible to reduce unfavorable outcomes, such as amputation and death, and accelerates recovery of tissues affected by acute ischemia.

Fístula arteriovenosa como tratamento adjunto na revascularização arterial do membro em risco / Arteriovenous fistula as adjuvant treatment in arterial revascularization of an at-risk limb

Resumo A oclusão arterial aguda do membro inferior continua sendo um grande desafio para o cirurgião vascular. A abordagem cirúrgica depende principalmente da gravidade da lesão tecidual e da duração dos sintomas. Diversas técnicas estão disponíveis no arsenal terapêutico atual; porém, independentemente da técnica escolhida, fatores pós-operatórios, como o escoamento arterial limitado e o baixo fluxo nos substitutos arteriais, podem contribuir negativamente no resultado da revascularização. Descrevemos um caso de oclusão arterial aguda de membro inferior, no pós-operatório de uma derivação femorotibial, que se encontrava ocluída devido a limitação de escoamento e a alta resistência vascular periférica. Foi submetido a nova revascularização femorotibial, associada à confecção de uma fístula arteriovenosa, seguido de amputação de antepé e enxerto parcial de pele. O investimento enérgico no membro em risco possibilita reduzir os desfechos desfavoráveis, como amputação e óbito, e acelera a recuperação dos tecidos acometidos pela isquemia aguda.

Abstract Acute arterial occlusion remains a major challenge for the vascular surgeon. The therapeutic approach depends mostly upon the severity of the tissue injury and the duration of symptoms. Several techniques are available in the current therapeutic arsenal, however, regardless of the technique chosen, postoperative factors frequently observed, such as poor outflow status, or even low graft flow, can contribute negatively to the outcome of revascularization. We describe a case of acute limb ischemia, in the postoperative period of a femoral-tibial bypass, which was occluded due to outflow limitation and high peripheral vascular resistance. The patient underwent a second tibial revascularization combined with construction of an arteriovenous fistula, followed by forefoot amputation and partial skin graft. An energetic approach to the at-risk limb makes it possible to reduce unfavorable outcomes, such as amputation and death, and accelerates recovery of tissues affected by acute ischemia.

The Descending Genicular Artery as a Recipient Vessel in Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia-A Case Report and Literature Review.

In recent decades, the increasing complexity of arterial bypasses in the management of chronic limb-threatening ischemia has spurred the development of alternative techniques, such as revascularization of genicular arteries. Few publications on this technique can be found in the literature, and its use has been restricted to specialized vascular groups. This article describes the case of a patient with extensive femorotibial occlusive disease who received a collateral artery bypass, using the deep femoral artery as a donor, the cephalic vein as an alternative autogenous substitute, and the descending genicular artery as a recipient. Bypass to the descending genicular artery, although underutilized, is an effective option and increases the possibility of limb salvage in the management of chronic limb-threatening ischemia.

The descending genicular artery as a recipient vessel in chronic limb-threatening ischemia - case report and literature review

ABSTRACT: In recent decades, the increasing complexity of arterial bypasses in the management of chronic limb-threatening ischemia has spurred the development of alternative techniques, such as revascularization of genicular arteries. Few publications on this technique can be found in the literature, and its use has been restricted to specialized vascular groups. This article describes the case of a patient with extensive femorotibial occlusive disease who received a collateral artery bypass, using the deep femoral artery as a donor, the cephalic vein as an alternative autogenous substitute and the descending genicular artery as a recipient. Bypass to the descending genicular artery, although underutilized, is an effective option and increases the possibility of limb salvage in the management of chronic limb-threatening ischemia.

Venous thromboembolism in COVID-19 patients.

COVID-19 is a potentially serious respiratory disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus that involves an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Its pathophysiology is apparently related to an exacerbated inflammatory process and coagulopathy, verified by an increase in D-dimer, fibrinogen, and fibrin degradation products. Occurrence must be monitored, prevented, and treated according to existing recommendations and guidelines. The increased risk of thrombosis, and the association between this phenomenon and the most severe forms of the disease and death have prompted some groups to propose a more aggressive prophylactic and therapeutic approach. However, the risk-benefit profile of this type of conduct has not been defined and cases must be assessed individually, with a multidisciplinary approach. In this study, we review the main studies and evidence available to date on diagnosis, prophylaxis, and treatment of venous thromboembolism in COVID-19 patients.