Low Reinfection Rates But a High Rate of Complications in THA for Infection Sequelae in Childhood: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Childhood hip infections can result in serious sequelae during adulthood, including persistent pain, functional limitations, and premature THA. When THA is performed in patients who had hip joint infections during childhood, surgeons surmise these arthroplasties are at an increased risk of complications and incomplete recovery. However, the degree to which this is true is not well characterized and has varied across a large number of small, retrospective studies. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What proportion of THAs performed in patients who had pediatric septic arthritis result in periprosthetic joint infection? (2) What are the Harris hip scores associated with these reconstructions? (3) What proportion of these patients develop complications after THA? (4) What proportion of patients undergo revision after these THAs? METHODS: For this systematic review, we searched the MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus, and CINAHL (EbscoHost) electronic databases. We evaluated studies published in English between 1980 and 2020 that had a minimum of 10 patients (with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up) in whom sequelae of septic arthritis of the hip were treated with single-stage THA. We also evaluated studies reporting clinical outcomes by means of the Harris hip score, along with a radiographic assessment of the prosthesis. Updates of previous studies using the same database, case reports, surgical technique reports, systematic reviews, and expert opinions were excluded. No restrictions were applied regarding study design and loss to follow-up. A total of 430 studies were identified through the initial search, and 11 studies were included after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria. All but two studies, which included a historical control group, were retrospective case series. A total of 691 patients with a mean age of 45 years were involved. A total of 599 patients underwent cementless THAs, 84 patients underwent hybrid THA (cemented stems), and the remaining eight patients received a cemented THA. A total of 287 additional procedures were performed on the acetabulum, including autografting, allografting, and medial wall osteotomies; in three hips, tantalum augments were used. Three hundred thirty-five additional procedures were performed on the femora, including 223 shortening osteotomies and 112 greater trochanter osteotomies. The mean follow-up duration ranged from 5.5 to 15.2 years (minimum follow-up range 2-13 years). To assess the quality of the studies, we used the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies and the Assessment of Quality in Lower-limb Arthroplasty, for which a higher score represents a better study quality. The mean Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies score for case series was 9 of 16 (range 6-12), and 19 and 18 of 24 for the two comparative studies. The mean reporting quality of the Assessment of Quality in Lower Limb Arthroplasty score was 6 of 8 (range 3-8). RESULTS: Because of loss to follow-up, which was not consistently reported in the source studies, we caution the reader that the estimates provided here likely underestimate the risks of adverse events and overestimate the mean hip scores. The pooled proportion of patients in whom infections developed was 1% (seven of 691 THAs). Considering only studies published in the past 10 years, the proportion was 0.7% (two of 276 THAs). The Harris hip score increased from a mean of 52 ± 6 points before THA to a mean of 88 ± 2 points after THA. The pooled proportion of complications, including sciatic nerve palsy, femoral nerve palsy, intraoperative periprosthetic fracture, deep venous thrombosis, and dislocation, was 11% (76 complications among 691 THAs). The pooled proportion of patients who underwent revision was 8% (53 revisions of any components for any reason among 691 THAs) at a mean follow-up interval of 9.1 ± 3 years. CONCLUSION: In THAs for sequelae of childhood septic arthritis, reinfections were uncommon, whereas generally, infection rates were slightly higher than those reported for conventional primary THAs. However, the duration of follow-up might have been insufficient to identify all patients in whom infections later developed, and the available data were not adequate to precisely detect the minimum quiescent period to avoid reinfections. Moreover, the studies in this systematic review were retrospective, and selection bias, transfer bias, and assessment bias likely influenced our findings. The general effect of these biases is to cause an underestimation of the harms of the intervention. Complications, especially intraoperative fracture and nerve palsy, were common in patients with the most-severe infections. Further data on this topic are needed, ideally from multicenter or registry studies with even longer follow-up durations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.

Correction to: Spinal deformity and malocclusion association is not supported by high-quality studies: results from a systematic review of the literature.

Unfortunately, first name and family name in the author group were incorrectly swapped and published. The complete correct names of the author group are given below.

Spinal deformity and malocclusion association is not supported by high-quality studies: results from a systematic review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Several reports in the literature have suggested a causative association between oral occlusion and spinal deformity such as scoliosis and Scheuermann's disease or kyphosis. Based on these findings, a growing number of adolescents with spinal deformity receive orthodontic treatment, supposing a beneficial effect on the spine. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to verify the association between spinal deformity and malocclusion in the orthopedic population and potential effect of orthodontic treatment on the spinal deformity. METHOD: The databases: MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane Register, OTseeker and ScienceDirect were searched up to August 2017 for studies reporting on associations between spinal and occlusal conditions. Case series, cohort, case-control studies and randomized clinical trials were considered for analysis. Two reviewers independently selected studies, conducted quality assessment and extracted results. Methodological quality was assessed using MINORS score. RESULTS: Nine publications reporting on 1424 patients were included. Studies were two case series, five case-control studies, one cohort study and one randomized clinical trial. The methodological quality was poor in 8/9 studies. CONCLUSION: Evidence from three low-quality studies suggests an increased prevalence of occlusal dysfunction in patients with known spinal deformity, but the conclusions have a high risk of bias. No evidence of beneficial effects of orthodontic treatment on spinal deformity was found. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.