Impact of Adopting Routine Luminex-Based Pretransplant Assessment of HLA Antibodies on Clinical Practice and Outcomes in Kidney Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Accumulating evidence suggests that detection of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies by solid phase Luminex assays predicts renal allograft outcomes. However, several controversies exist regarding the interpretation, reproducibility, impact and financial feasibility of global utilization of this assay in pretransplant assessment. METHODS: We studied short-term patient-centered outcomes, medical standards of care, and financial plausibility of using Luminex-based screening for HLA antibodies in renal allograft recipients compared to outcomes in nontested patients. RESULTS: We included 1808 patients assessed for transplantation from 2011 to 2018. Luminex-tested patients had lower rates of rejection in the first post-transplant week (OR 0.36, P < .001) and lower odds of antibody-mediated rejection in the first 6 months (OR 0.4, P = .004). Forty-four patients with preformed, donor-specific antibodies were transplanted, and everolimus was introduced into our protocols for low-risk patients based on risk stratification by Luminex results. The number of tests needed to be performed to prevent 1 episode of antibody-mediated rejection in the first 6 months was 28 (P = .004), which was financially plausible. CONCLUSIONS: Routine pre-transplant assessment of HLA antibodies using Luminex assays may allow for better patient-centered, short-term graft outcomes and objective tailoring of immunosuppression at a financially plausible, cost-effective rate.

Use of rituximab as an induction therapy in anti-glomerular basement-membrane disease.

BACKGROUND: Anti-glomerular basement-membrane (anti-GBM) disease (or Goodpasture disease) is characterized by severe kidney and lung involvement. Prognoses have improved with treatments that combine plasma exchange and immunosuppressive drugs. However, patients with severe renal involvement can have poor renal outcomes and cyclophosphamide can cause significant complications. Anti-GBM antibodies have a direct pathogenic effect on the disease: thus, therapeutics that can decrease their production, such as rituximab, could be a good alternative. METHODS: The medical files of five patients that had received rituximab as a first-line therapy (instead of cyclophosphamide), plus plasma exchange and steroids, were reviewed. All patients had severe disease manifestations. RESULTS: Four patients required dialysis at diagnosis and remained dialysis-dependent over the mean follow-up of 15 months. Three patients had pulmonary involvement, but recovered even though mechanical ventilation was required. Anti-GBM antibodies became rapidly undetectable in all patients. One infectious and two hematological complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: We report the outcomes of five patients with Goodpasture disease and treated with rituximab as a first-line treatment. This strategy was effective at treating pulmonary manifestations and was associated with a good biological response with no major serious adverse events. However, renal outcomes were not significantly improved.

Effect of double-filtration plasmapheresis for antibody-mediated rejection on hemostasis parameters and thrombin generation.

INTRODUCTION: Donor-specific alloantibodies (DSAs) cause kidney-allograft loss in chronic antibody-mediated rejection (CAMR). Treatment relies on blocking antibody-producing cells and removing DSAs by apheresis: e.g., double-filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: To determine the impact of DFPP (6 or 8 sessions/patient) on clotting factors and natural anticoagulants, and on thrombin generation, we performed a prospective and observational study in five CAMR kidney-transplant patients who received DFPP plus rituximab therapy. Thrombin generation was performed in poor platelet plasma (PPP) with 5 pM tissue factor without and with 2 nM recombinant human thrombomodulin. RESULTS: After the first DFPP session, median levels of high molecular-weight proteins (fibrinogen, FV, FVIII, FXI, FXIII, von Willebrand factors and α2-MG) decreased significantly to <50% of baseline values, whereas levels of low molecular-weight factors (<100 kDa) were not significantly modified, except for protein S and TFPI. Of note, binding-protein (BP) S, i.e., C4BP, was significantly decreased. Over the course of successive DFPP sessions, both high and lower molecular-weight proteins (<100 kDa) with longer half-lives (>2 days, prothrombin and factor XII) were significantly decreased. DFPP also highly affected thrombin generation in the absence of thrombomodulin but not significantly in the presence of thrombomodulin. After the first DFPP session, mean endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) and peak thrombin (PH) significantly decreased when the thrombin generation assay was performed without thrombomodulin (respectively, 1084 nM·min for ETP and 210 nM for PH after the first DFPP session compared to 1616 nM·min and 264 nM at baseline). In the presence of thrombomodulin, there was only a slight decrease in ETP and PH (respectively 748 nM·min, and 172 nM after the first DFPP session compared to 822 nM·min and 179 nM at baseline). After the last session, median ETP and PH decreased respectively to 646 nM·min and 143 nM without thrombomodulin, and, to 490 nM·min and 117 nM with thrombomodulin. CONCLUSIONS: DFPP significantly removed high molecular-weight proteins from the haemostatic system and profoundly decreased levels of protein S and TFPI. Overall thrombin-generation balance was only moderately affected in the presence of thrombomodulin. Nevertheless, high depletion of fibrinogen, FXIII and Von Willebrand Factor may expose patients to an increased risk of bleeding.

Intravenous Immunoglobulins in the Prevention of Rejection of a Second or Third Kidney Graft.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) reduces acute rejection episodes in kidney transplantation, but adverse events (AEs) are common. The aim of this study was to assess whether human IVIg enhances immunosuppressive effects without increasing AEs in the prevention of acute kidney graft rejection. METHODS: Patients receiving a second or third kidney graft were treated with standard immunosuppressant therapy with (n = 18) or without (n = 10) IVIg. The primary efficacy endpoint was biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) rate at 3 months, and secondary endpoints included acute rejection rate at 12 months, intensity of rejection, and patient survival. RESULTS: Patients in the experimental arm received 3 infusions of IVIg. The BPAR rate decreased with IVIg versus standard immunosuppression alone over 12 months of follow-up. Experimental versus control rates of survival without BPAR were 94% versus 63% and 82% versus 63% at 3 and 12 months. The intensity of the acute rejection episodes (BANFF 97 grade) was similar between groups. One patient from each group died during the 12-month follow-up period. Treatment-emergent AEs were reported in 100% and 94.4% of the control and experimental arms. Most AEs were considered unrelated or unlikely to be related to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the efficacy and safety of IVIg in highly sensitized transplant patients for improving transplant rates and reducing graft rejection episodes.

Propensity score-based comparison of the graft failure risk between kidney transplant recipients of standard and expanded criteria donor grafts: Toward increasing the pool of marginal donors.

From a prospective and multicentric French cohort, we proposed an external validation study for the expanded criteria donor (ECD), based on 4833 kidney recipients transplanted for the first time between 2000 and 2014. We estimated the subject-specific effect from a multivariable Cox model. We confirmed a 1.75-fold (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.53-2.00, P < .0001) increase in graft failure risk if a given patient received an ECD graft compared to a graft from a donor with standard criteria (standard criteria donor [SCD]). Complementarily, we estimated the population-average effect using propensity scores. We estimated a 1.34-fold (95% CI 1.09-1.64, P = .0049) increase in graft failure risk among ECD patients receiving an ECD graft compared to receiving a SCD graft. With a 10-year follow-up, it corresponded to a decrease of 8 months of the mean time to graft failure due to ECD transplantation (95% CI 2-14 months). The population-average relative risk due to ECD transplantation and the corresponding absolute effect seem finally not so high. Regarding the increase of quality of life in transplantation, our study constitutes an argument to extend the definition of marginality by considering more grafts at high risk and thereby enlarging the pool of kidney grafts.

Reduction of Extended-Release Tacrolimus Dose in Low-Immunological-Risk Kidney Transplant Recipients Increases Risk of Rejection and Appearance of Donor-Specific Antibodies: A Randomized Study.

The aim of this study (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01744470) was to determine the efficacy and safety of two different doses of extended-release tacrolimus (TacER) in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) between 4 and 12 mo after transplantation. Stable steroid-free KTRs were randomized (1:1) after 4 mo: Group A had a 50% reduction in TacER dose with a targeted TacER trough level (C0 ) >3 µg/L; group B had no change in TacER dose (TacER C0 7-12 µg/L). The primary outcome was estimated GFR at 1 year. Of 300 patients, the intent-to-treat analysis included 186 patients (group A, n = 87; group B, n = 99). TacER C0 was lower in group A than in group B at 6 mo (4.1 ± 2.7 vs. 6.7 ± 3.9 µg/L, p < 0.0001) and 12 mo (5.6 ± 2.0 vs. 7.4 ± 2.1 µg/L, p < 0.0001). Estimated GFR was similar in both groups at 12 mo (group A, 56.0 ± 17.5 mL/min per 1.73 m²; group B, 56.0 ± 22.1 mL/min per 1.73 m²). More rejection episodes occurred in group A than group B (11 vs. 3; p = 0.016). At 1 year, subclinical inflammation occurred more frequently in group A than group B (inflammation score [i] >0: 21.4% vs. 8.8%, p = 0.047; tubulitis score [t] >0: 19.6% vs. 8.7%, p = 0.076; i + t: 1.14 ± 1.21 vs. 0.72 ± 1.01, p = 0.038). Anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies appeared only in group A (6 vs. 0 patients, p = 0.008). TacER C0 should be maintained >7 µg/L during the first year after transplantation in low-immunological-risk, steroid-free KTRs receiving a moderate dose of mycophenolic acid.

[Renal transplantation]. / Transplantation rénale.

Renal transplantation is the best option for patients with end stage renal failure, since it significantly improves their duration and quality of life. The number of patients waiting for a kidney transplant continues to increase while the overall rate of organ procurement in France is stable. The graft shortage is worsening, as is the waiting time on list. Identifying the causes of this crisis and discussing the various options for addressing the kidney graft shortage is the aim of this talk. Among the solutions: (i) improving identification of potential donors through a national and hospitals policy to promulgate organ donation and understanding better the grounds for refusal; (ii) using infusion machines for all grafts with extended criteria; (iii) developing transplantation programs from deceased donors after cardiac arrest; (iv) developing transplantation programs from living donors.

Long-Term Outcomes in Belatacept- Versus Cyclosporine-Treated Recipients of Extended Criteria Donor Kidneys: Final Results From BENEFIT-EXT, a Phase III Randomized Study.

In the Belatacept Evaluation of Nephroprotection and Efficacy as First-Line Immunosuppression Trial-Extended Criteria Donors (BENEFIT-EXT), extended criteria donor kidney recipients were randomized to receive belatacept-based (more intense [MI] or less intense [LI]) or cyclosporine-based immunosuppression. In prior analyses, belatacept was associated with significantly better renal function compared with cyclosporine. In this prospective analysis of the intent-to-treat population, efficacy and safety were compared across regimens at 7 years after transplant. Overall, 128 of 184 belatacept MI-treated, 138 of 175 belatacept LI-treated and 108 of 184 cyclosporine-treated patients contributed data to these analyses. Hazard ratios (HRs) comparing time to death or graft loss were 0.915 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.625-1.339; p = 0.65) for belatacept MI versus cyclosporine and 0.927 (95% CI 0.634-1.356; p = 0.70) for belatacept LI versus cyclosporine. Mean estimated GFR (eGFR) plus or minus standard error at 7 years was 53.9 ± 1.9, 54.2 ± 1.9, and 35.3 ± 2.0 mL/min per 1.73 m2 for belatacept MI, belatacept LI and cyclosporine, respectively (p < 0.001 for overall treatment effect). HRs comparing freedom from death, graft loss or eGFR <20 mL/min per 1.73 m2 were 0.754 (95% CI 0.536-1.061; p = 0.10) for belatacept MI versus cyclosporine and 0.706 (95% CI 0.499-0.998; p = 0.05) for belatacept LI versus cyclosporine. Acute rejection rates and safety profiles of belatacept- and cyclosporine-based treatment were similar. De novo donor-specific antibody incidence was lower for belatacept (p ≤ 0.0001). Relative to cyclosporine, belatacept was associated with similar death and graft loss and improved renal function at 7 years after transplant and had a safety profile consistent with previous reports.

Impact of Early Blood Transfusion After Kidney Transplantation on the Incidence of Donor-Specific Anti-HLA Antibodies.

Little is known about the impact of posttransplant blood transfusion on the sensitization of anti-HLA antibodies and the formation of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs). The aims of our study were to determine the 1-year incidence of DSAs (assessed using a solid-phase assay) and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in kidney transplant patients who had or had not received a blood transfusion during the first year after transplantation. Included were 390 non-HLA-sensitized patients who had received an ABO-compatible kidney transplant and had not previously or simultaneously received a nonkidney transplant. Overall, 64% of patients received a red blood cell transfusion within the first year after transplantation, most within the first month. The overall 1-year incidence of DSAs was significantly higher in patients that had undergone transfusion (7.2% vs. 0.7% in patients with no transfusion, p < 0.0001). AMR occurred more often in the transfusion group (n = 15, 6%) compared with the nontransfusion group (n = 2, 1.4%; p = 0.04). Blood transfusion was an independent predictive factor for de novo DSA formation but not for AMR. Patients who had a transfusion and developed DSAs were more often treated with cyclosporin A (n = 10, 55.5%) rather than tacrolimus (n = 45, 19.4%; p = 0.0001). In conclusion, early posttransplant blood transfusion may increase immunological risk, especially in underimmunosuppressed patients.

Efficacy and Safety of Sofosbuvir-Based Antiviral Therapy to Treat Hepatitis C Virus Infection After Kidney Transplantation.

There is no approved therapy for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection after kidney transplantation, and no data regarding the use of new-generation direct antiviral agents (DAAs) have been published so far. The aims of this pilot study were to assess the efficacy and safety of an interferon-free sofosbuvir-based regimen to treat chronic HCV infection in kidney transplant recipients. Twenty-five kidney transplant recipients with chronic HCV infection were given, for 12 (n = 19) or 24 weeks (n = 6), sofosbuvir plus ribavirin (n = 3); sofosbuvir plus daclatasvir (n = 4); sofosbuvir plus simeprevir, with (n = 1) or without ribavirin (n = 6); sofosbuvir plus ledipasvir, with (n = 1) or without ribavirin (n = 9); and sofosbuvir plus pegylated-interferon plus ribavirin (n = 1). A rapid virological response, defined by undetectable viremia at week 4 after starting DAA therapy, was observed in 22 of the 25 patients (88%). At the end of therapy, HCV RNA was undetectable in all patients. At 4 and 12 weeks after completing DAA therapy, all had a sustained virological response. The tolerance to anti-HCV therapy was excellent and no adverse event was observed. A significant decrease in calcineurin inhibitor levels was observed after HCV clearance. New-generation oral DAAs are efficient and safe to treat HCV infection after kidney transplantation.

Fibrosis progression according to epithelial-mesenchymal transition profile: a randomized trial of everolimus versus CsA.

Markers of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) may identify patients at high risk of graft fibrogenesis who could benefit from early calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) withdrawal. In a randomized, open-label, 12-month trial, de novo kidney transplant patients received cyclosporine, enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) and steroids to month 3. Patients were stratified as EMT+ or EMT- based on month 3 biopsy, then randomized to start everolimus with half-dose EC-MPS (720 mg/day) and cyclosporine withdrawal (CNI-free) or continue cyclosporine with standard EC-MPS (CNI). The primary endpoint was progression of graft fibrosis (interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy [IF/TA] grade increase ≥1 between months 3-12) in EMT+ patients. 194 patients were randomized (96 CNI-free, 98 CNI); 153 (69 CNI-free, 84 CNI) were included in histological analyses. Fibrosis progression occurred in 46.2% (12/26) CNI-free EMT+ patients versus 51.6% (16/31) CNI EMT+ patients (p = 0.68). Biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR, including subclinical events) occurred in 25.0% and 5.1% of CNI-free and CNI patients, respectively (p < 0.001). In conclusion, early CNI withdrawal with everolimus initiation does not prevent interstitial fibrosis. Using this CNI-free protocol, in which everolimus exposure was relatively low and administered with half-dose EC-MPS, CNI-free patients were overwhelmingly under-immunosuppressed and experienced an increased risk of BPAR.

Successful treatment of hepatitis E virus-associated cryoglobulinemic membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis with ribavirin.

Hepatitis E virus genotype-3 (HEV3) infection can cause chronic hepatitis in immunosuppressed patients and induce extra-hepatic manifestations, such as neurological symptoms, kidney injuries, and immune-mediated thrombocytopenia. Very few cases of HEV-induced kidney manifestations have been reported. Herein, we report, for the first time, a case of de novo membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis that occurred in a kidney transplant patient who developed a chronic HEV3 infection, which was successfully treated with ribavirin.

Renal Function in De Novo Liver Transplant Recipients Receiving Different Prolonged-Release Tacrolimus Regimens-The DIAMOND Study.

UNLABELLED: DIAMOND: multicenter, 24-week, randomized trial investigating the effect of different once-daily, prolonged-release tacrolimus dosing regimens on renal function after de novo liver transplantation. Arm 1: prolonged-release tacrolimus (initial dose 0.2mg/kg/day); Arm 2: prolonged-release tacrolimus (0.15-0.175mg/kg/day) plus basiliximab; Arm 3: prolonged-release tacrolimus (0.2mg/kg/day delayed until Day 5) plus basiliximab. All patients received MMF plus a bolus of corticosteroid (no maintenance steroids). PRIMARY ENDPOINT: eGFR (MDRD4) at Week 24. Secondary endpoints: composite efficacy failure, BCAR and AEs. Baseline characteristics were comparable. Tacrolimus trough levels were readily achieved posttransplant; initially lower in Arm 2 versus 1 with delayed initiation in Arm 3. eGFR (MDRD4) was higher in Arms 2 and 3 versus 1 (p = 0.001, p = 0.047). Kaplan-Meier estimates of composite efficacy failure-free survival were 72.0%, 77.6%, 73.9% in Arms 1-3. BCAR incidence was significantly lower in Arm 2 versus 1 and 3 (p = 0.016, p = 0.039). AEs were comparable. Prolonged-release tacrolimus (0.15-0.175mg/kg/day) immediately posttransplant plus basiliximab and MMF (without maintenance corticosteroids) was associated with lower tacrolimus exposure, and significantly reduced renal function impairment and BCAR incidence versus prolonged-release tacrolimus (0.2mg/kg/day) administered immediately posttransplant. Delayed higher-dose prolonged-release tacrolimus initiation significantly reduced renal function impairment compared with immediate posttransplant administration, but BCAR incidence was comparable.

Risk factors of Pneumocystis pneumonia in solid organ recipients in the era of the common use of posttransplantation prophylaxis.

Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients becomes rare in the immediate posttransplantation period thanks to generalized prophylaxis. We aimed to identify the predictive factors for PCP in the era of universal prophylaxis and to propose a strategy for preventing PCP beyond the first year after transplantation. In a retrospective case-control study, 33 SOT cases with PCP diagnosed between 2004 and 2010 were matched with two controls each to identify risk factors for PCP by uni- and multivariate analysis. All the patients benefited from 6 months of posttransplantation trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis. Most PCP in SOT patients occurred during the second year posttransplantation (33%). By univariate analysis, age, nonuse of tacrolimus, total and CD4 lymphocyte counts, gamma-globulin concentration and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection appeared to be PCP risk factors. In the final multivariate analysis, age (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 3.7, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3-10.4), CMV infection (OR: 5.2, 95% CI: 1.8-14.7) and total lymphocyte count (OR: 3.9, 95% CI: 1.4-10.7) were found to be independently associated with PCP. The second year posttransplantation appeared to be the new period of highest risk of PCP. Age, CMV viremia and lymphocytes were the most pertinent predictive criteria to evaluate the risk of PCP in clinical practice.

Novel once-daily extended-release tacrolimus (LCPT) versus twice-daily tacrolimus in de novo kidney transplants: one-year results of Phase III, double-blind, randomized trial.

This Phase III randomized trial examined efficacy and safety of a novel once-daily extended-release tacrolimus formulation (LCP-Tacro [LCPT]) versus twice-daily tacrolimus in de novo kidney transplantation. Primary efficacy end point was proportion of patients with treatment failure (death, graft failure, biopsy-proven acute rejection or lost to follow-up) within 12 months. Starting doses were, LCPT: 0.17 mg/kg/day and tacrolimus twice-daily: 0.1 mg/kg/day; 543 patients were randomized, LCPT: n = 268; tacrolimus twice-daily: n = 275. At 12 months treatment failure was LCPT: 18.3% and tacrolimus twice-daily: 19.6%; the upper 95% CI of the treatment difference was +5.27%, below the predefined +10% noninferiority criteria. There were no significant differences in the incidence of individual efficacy events or adverse events. Target tacrolimus trough levels were more rapidly achieved in the LCPT group. Following initial dose, 36.6% of patients in the LCPT group had rapidly attained trough levels within 6-11 ng/mL versus 18.5% of tacrolimus twice-daily patients; majority of tacrolimus twice-daily patients (74.7%) had troughs <6 ng/mL compared with 33.5% in the LCPT group. Overall, cumulative study dose was 14% lower for LCPT. Results suggest that use of once-daily LCPT in de novo kidney transplantation is efficacious and safe. Lower LCPT dose reflects the improved absorption provided by the novel formulation.

Early corticosteroid avoidance in kidney transplant recipients receiving ATG-F induction: 5-year actual results of a prospective and randomized study.

One hundred ninety-seven patients received anti-T-lymphocyte globulins Fresenius, mycophenolate mofetil and delayed cyclosporine, and were randomized to ≥6-month corticosteroids (+CS; n=99) or no CS (-CS; n=98). One- and five-year actual graft survival (censored for death) was 93.2% and 86.4% in the +CS group versus 94.9% and 89.8% in the -CS group (5-year follow-up, p=0.487). Freedom from clinical rejection was 86.9% and 81.8% versus 74.5% and 74.5% (p=0.144), respectively, at 1 and 5 years; 5-year freedom from biopsy-proven rejection was 88.9% versus 83.7% (p=0.227). More late first rejections occurred in the +CS group. Significantly lower 5-year graft survival in patients experiencing rejection was observed for +CS (55.6% vs. 92.0%; p=0.005) with 8/18 versus 2/25 graft losses. Renal function at 5 years was stable and comparable (median serum creatinine, 159 vs. 145 µmol/L; creatinine clearance, 53.5 vs. 56.6 mL/min). More +CS patients developed diabetes, dyslipidemia and malignancies. Rejections in -CS patients occurred early after transplantation and did not impair long-term renal function. In patients receiving CS, rejections occurred later and with a higher risk for subsequent graft failure. A similar and not inferior 5-year efficacy profile and a reduced morbidity were observed in CS-free patients compared to patients who received CS for at least 6 months.

Belatacept-based immunosuppression in de novo liver transplant recipients: 1-year experience from a phase II randomized study.

This exploratory phase II study evaluated the safety and efficacy of belatacept in de novo adult liver transplant recipients. Patients were randomized (N = 260) to one of the following immunosuppressive regimens: (i) basiliximab + belatacept high dose [HD] + mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), (ii) belatacept HD + MMF, (iii) belatacept low dose [LD] + MMF, (iv) tacrolimus + MMF, or (v) tacrolimus alone. All received corticosteroids. Demographic characteristics were similar among groups. The proportion of patients who met the primary end point (composite of acute rejection, graft loss, death by month 6) was higher in the belatacept groups (42­48%) versus tacrolimus groups (15­38%), with the highest number of deaths and grafts losses in the belatacept LD group. By month 12, the proportion surviving with a functioning graft was higher with tacrolimus + MMF (93%) and lower with belatacept LD (67%) versus other groups (90%: basiliximab + belatacept HD; 83%: belatacept HD; 88%: tacrolimus). Mean calculated GFR was 15­34 mL/min higher in belatacept-treated patients at 1 year. Two cases of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease and one case of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy occurred in belatacept-treated patients. Follow-up beyond month 12 revealed an increase in death and graft loss in another belatacept group (belatacept HD), after which the study was terminated.

Prevalence, incidence and risk factors for donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies in maintenance liver transplant patients.

Although large retrospective studies have identified the presence of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) to be a risk factor for rejection and impaired survival after liver transplantation, the long-term predicted pathogenic potential of individual DSAs after liver transplantation remains unclear. We investigated the incidence, prevalence and consequences of DSAs in maintenance liver transplant (LT) recipients. Two hundred sixty-seven LT recipients, who had undergone transplantation at least 6 months previously and had been screened for DSAs at least twice using single-antigen bead technology, were included and tested annually for the presence of DSAs. At a median of 51 months (min-max: 6-220) after an LT, 13% of patients had DSAs. At a median of 36.5 months (min-max: 2-45) after the first screening, 9% of patients have developed de novo DSAs. The sole predictive factor for the emergence of de novo DSAs was retransplantation (OR 3.75; 95% CI 1.28-11.05, p = 0.025). Five out of 21 patients with de novo DSAs (23.8%) developed an antibody-mediated rejection. Fibrosis score was higher among patients with DSAs. In conclusion, monitoring for the development of DSAs in maintenance LT patients is useful in case of graft dysfunction and to identify patients with a high risk of developing liver fibrosis.