Comparison between a targeted exercise program and a sham intervention on gluteal muscle activity in people with hip osteoarthritis: Analysis of secondary outcomes from a randomised clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: People with hip osteoarthritis (OA) typically display altered gluteus minimus (GMin) and gluteus medius (GMed) activity during gait, in addition to reduced walking speed and stride length. It is unknown if current rehabilitation programs address changes in gluteal muscle activity in people with hip OA. RESEARCH QUESTION: Can a targeted gluteal intervention restore normal gluteal muscle segment activity during gait in people with hip OA? METHODS: This study presents secondary outcomes from a multi-site, double-blinded clinical trial in which participants with radiologically confirmed mild-moderate hip OA were randomised into a targeted gluteal or sham intervention for 12-weeks following baseline testing. Electromyography (EMG) outcomes were only conducted at a single site and data were collected from 22 participants. Intramuscular electrodes were inserted into two segments of GMin (anterior, posterior) and three segments of GMed (anterior, middle, posterior) to record average amplitude, peak amplitude and time to peak (TTP) during the first 60 % of the gait cycle (stance phase) at baseline and post-intervention. RESULTS: Following the targeted gluteal intervention, posterior GMin displayed a decrease in average (P = 0.032, ES=1.04) and peak (P = 0.017, ES=1.17) muscle activity during late stance phase with a shift to an earlier TTP (P = 0.034, ES=1.02). There were no further significant changes between groups for other outcome measures. Similar trends for an earlier TTP were observed for the posterior segment of GMed following the targeted intervention (P = 0.095, ES=0.87). The earlier TTP in the posterior segments of both GMin and GMed post-intervention resembled patterns observed in a healthy young population. SIGNIFICANCE: A targeted gluteal intervention can positively impact activity in posterior GMin during gait in people with hip OA when compared to a sham intervention.

Effects of a targeted resistance intervention compared to a sham intervention on gluteal muscle hypertrophy, fatty infiltration and strength in people with hip osteoarthritis: analysis of secondary outcomes from a randomised clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: People with hip osteoarthritis are typically offered a combination of education and exercise to address muscle atrophy and weakness. Limited evidence exists to assess the efficacy of exercise programs on muscle structure or function in this population. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of targeted resistance exercise on gluteal muscle hypertrophy and strength in people with mild-to-moderate hip osteoarthritis. METHODS: Twenty-seven participants with radiologically confirmed hip osteoarthritis recruited from a single site of a multi-site, double-blind clinical trial were randomly allocated to receive a 12-week targeted gluteal intervention or sham intervention. Magnetic resonance imaging and hand-held dynamometry were used to determine change in gluteal muscle volume, fatty infiltration and hip muscle strength. For gluteal muscle volume and strength outcomes mixed model analyses of variance (ANOVA) were conducted. A general linear model (ANOVA) analysis with fixed effects parameter estimates was used to assess the impact of sex on gluteal muscle size and strength of the affected limb only. For muscle fat index a mixed method ANOVA was used to assess the differences between groups and over time. RESULTS: In the targeted intervention group, gluteus minimus volume increased from baseline to post-intervention in both limbs (pooled mean difference: 0.06 cm3/kg, 95% confidence interval: 0.01 to 0.11) while no change occurred in the sham group (time x group effect: P = 0.025). Gluteus medius, gluteus maximus and tensor fascia lata volume did not change significantly over time. Hip strength (abduction, adduction, flexion, extension, external and internal rotation) improved similarly in both groups (time main effect: P ≤ 0.042). There was a consistent, albeit non-significant, pattern of reduced fatty infiltration after the targeted intervention. CONCLUSION: Targeted resistance exercise resulted in gluteus minimus hypertrophy, but improvements in hip strength occurred in both groups. Clinicians delivering hip osteoarthritis rehabilitation programs might consider implementing a targeted exercise program to attenuate disease associated changes within gluteal muscles. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ID: ACTRN12617000970347. Registered prospectively on 5 July 2017.

Efficacy of Exercise-Based Rehabilitation Programs for Improving Muscle Function and Size in People with Hip Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of exercise-based rehabilitation programs on hip and knee muscle function and size in people with hip osteoarthritis. METHODS: Seven databases were systematically searched in order to identify studies that assessed muscle function (strength or power) and size in people with hip osteoarthritis after exercise-based rehabilitation programs. Studies were screened for eligibility and assessed for quality of evidence using the GRADE approach. Data were pooled, and meta-analyses was completed on 7 of the 11 included studies. RESULTS: Six studies reported hip and/or knee function outcomes, and two reported muscle volumes that could be included in meta-analyses. Meta-analyses were conducted for four strength measures (hip abduction, hip extension, hip flexion, and knee extension) and muscle size (quadriceps femoris volume). For hip abduction, there was a low certainty of evidence with a small important effect (effect size = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.01, 0.54) favouring high-intensity resistance interventions compared to control. There were no other comparisons or overall meta-analyses that identified benefits for hip or knee muscle function or size. CONCLUSION: High-intensity resistance programs may increase hip abduction strength slightly when compared with a control group. No differences were identified in muscle function or size when comparing a high versus a low intensity group. It is unclear whether strength improvements identified in this review are associated with hypertrophy or other neuromuscular factors.