Performance of a self-administered mailed version of the Quality of Well-Being (QWB-SA) questionnaire among older adults.

OBJECTIVES: The Quality of Well-Being questionnaire is a measure of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) that has several desirable properties. Its widespread use has been hindered because it is difficult to administer. To overcome this limitation, a new self-administered form has recently been developed. This study examined the feasibility of using the Quality of Well-Being-Self-Administered (QWB-SA) questionnaire in an older population. METHODS: The Quality of Well-Being-Self-Administered questionnaire was sent to 430 community-dwelling individuals aged 65 years and older who were randomly selected from primary care physicians' offices. Response patterns, scaling distributions, and the acceptability of the survey were examined for all respondents. The results of the QWB-SA questionnaire were compared to the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) and the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) for those individuals who also had completed the latter two surveys approximately 10 months earlier and whose health had not changed substantially in the meantime. RESULTS: Three hundred and one older adults (70%) responded. The mean QWB-SA questionnaire score was 0.7035. The scores were not skewed, and there were no floor or ceiling effects. The mean time to complete the QWB-SA questionnaire was 14.2 minutes, which was significantly shorter than for the SIP (19.3 minutes) but significantly longer than for the SF-36 (12.5 minutes). Subjects rated their satisfaction with the QWB-SA questionnaire somewhat lower than for the SIP and similar to SF-36. Correlations between the QWB-SA questionnaire and the SIP and SF-36 were moderate and were generally stronger for measures of physical health than for other domains such as mental health. CONCLUSIONS: The self-administered QWB questionnaire was acceptable to older respondents, and it correlated with other measures of health-related quality of life. It can be considered as a candidate for some research applications among older adults.

Selecting a generic measure of health-related quality of life for use among older adults. A comparison of candidate instruments.

Selecting an outcomes assessment instrument requires knowledge of their relative merits, especially head-to-head comparisons. The authors compare health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) instruments among older adults for their psychometric properties and subject burden, specifically the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) and Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 (SF-36). Subjects were 282 of 373 eligible older adults (75.6% response) ranging in age from 65 to 96. SIP scores demonstrated a strong skew toward low (good health) scores with a mean of 11.1% (+/- SD 11.5) on the Total SIP index score. Similar components of the SIP and SF-36 were moderately to strongly correlated. The SIP suffered from a ceiling (good health) scaling effect, and the SF-36 scales also demonstrated some scaling extremes. These results demonstrate the relative scaling limits, especially the ceiling effect, of the SIP compared to the SF-36, and in general, the SF-36 is preferred for use among community-living older adults.

The effect of accurate patient screening on the cost-effectiveness of case management programs.

Case management programs are expensive and therefore require careful screening of enrollees to ensure cost-effectiveness. Screening tools, however, are imperfect, with positive predictive values usually below 50%. This article examines the relationship between the accuracy of the screening tools and the cost-effectiveness of case management. Using data from a Medicare health maintenance organization (HMO), we develop an optimized 5-question screening tool. We then simulate the use of this screening tool and its impact on the cost-effectiveness of several hypothetical case management programs. The article demonstrates that even screening tools with only 20-30% positive predictive value could turn a case management program into a cost-effective program.

Test-retest performance of a mailed version of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey among older adults.

OBJECTIVES: This study reports the reliability, internal consistency, and response patterns for a mailed version of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) among older adults. METHODS: The SF-36 surveys were mailed to patients living in the community aged 65 years and older who were enrolled in two primary care practice clinics. Comorbidity scores also were assigned to patients based on their diagnoses from computerized clinic encounter forms using Deyo et al's modification of the Charlson Index. Subjects repeated the SF-36 by mail after 1 months. RESULTS: Four-hundred twenty-two subjects were mailed surveys and 253 returned them (60.0%). Missing items further reduced the number of subjects with scores on all SF-36 scales. A total of 186 subjects completed both base-line and retest SF-36 surveys. Intraclass correlation coefficients generally were high and ranged from 0.648 to 0.868. Internal consistency of scales also was high (0.802 to 0.924). Mean SF-36 scale scores decreased significantly with increasing comorbidity levels. CONCLUSIONS: The SF-36 demonstrated good retest reliability and internal consistency among these older adults and also showed a strong relationship to an external measure of comorbidity/health status. Mailed surveys pose a problem of response among older adults, a problem not unique to the SF-36, and methods for increasing response are needed when personal interviews are not feasible.

Traumatic brain injuries: predictive usefulness of CT.

The computed tomographic (CT) scans from 72 patients with traumatic brain injury were reviewed to determined whether a specific type, location, or size of lesion correlated with changes in neurologic function (assessed with the Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS]), patient outcome (assessed with the Glasgow Outcome Scale [GOS]), or catecholamine levels. The lesions were classified as focal or diffuse. GOS changed as a function of lesions size (P = .00004) in the 48 patients with focal hemorrhages, regardless of whether the lesions were intra- or extraaxial, and in the 19 patients with normal CT scans. Patients with lesions larger than 4,100 mm3 had a twofold greater risk of a poor outcome than patients with smaller lesions (100% vs 50%). Patients with normal CT scans were significantly more likely to have mild neurological dysfunction or none than patients with abnormal CT scans (P = .03), but lesion location, skull fracture, and pineal shift were not significant predictors of GCS or GOS scores. A positive relationship existed between lesion size and both plasma norepinephrine and epinephrine levels (P less than .02); a significant relationship existed between lesion size and GCS score (P = .02).

Evaluation of the carotid artery bifurcation: comparison of magnetic resonance angiography and digital subtraction arch aortography.

Thirty-four carotid artery bifurcations were examined using both magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and digital subtraction arch aortography to determine their accuracy when compared to selective carotid angiography. The sensitivity of MRA was 73% and its specificity was 91% when compared with selective carotid angiography. The sensitivity of arch aortography was 27% and its specificity was 100%.