International perspectives on measuring national digital public health system maturity through a multidisciplinary Delphi study.

Unlocking the full potential of digital public health (DiPH) systems requires a comprehensive tool to assess their maturity. While the World Health Organization and the International Telecommunication Union released a toolkit in 2012 covering various aspects of digitalizing national healthcare systems, a holistic maturity assessment tool has been lacking ever since. To bridge this gap, we conducted a pioneering Delphi study, to which 54 experts from diverse continents and academic fields actively contributed to at least one of three rounds. 54 experts participated in developing and rating multidisciplinary quality indicators to measure the maturity of national digital public health systems. Participants established consensus on these indicators with a threshold of 70% agreement on indicator importance. Eventually, 96 indicators were identified and agreed upon by experts. Notably, 48% of these indicators were found to align with existing validated tools, highlighting their relevance and reliability. However, further investigation is required to assess the suitability and applicability of all the suggestions put forward by our participants. Nevertheless, this Delphi study is an essential initial stride toward a comprehensive measurement tool for DiPH system maturity. By working towards a standardized assessment of DiPH system maturity, we aim to empower decision-makers to make informed choices, optimize resource allocation, and drive innovation in healthcare delivery. The results of this study mark a significant milestone in advancing DiPH on a global scale.

Study protocol for the development, trial, and evaluation of a strategy for the implementation of qualification-oriented work organization in nursing homes.

BACKGROUND: Staffing ratios in nursing homes vary among the federal states of Germany, but there are no rational grounds for these variations. In a previous study, a new instrument for the standardized calculation of staffing requirements in nursing homes was developed (Algorithm 1.0). The development was based on a new empirical data collection method that derives actual and target values for the time and number of care interventions provided. Algorithm 1.0 found an increased requirement of 36% of staff in German nursing homes. Based on these results, the German legislature has commissioned a model program to trial and evaluate a complex intervention comprising increased staffing combined with strategies for organizational development. METHODS: The mixed-methods study consists of (i) developing a concept for restructuring the work organization, (ii) the application of this concept combined with increased staffing in 10 nursing homes (complex intervention), and the further development of the concept using a participatory and iterative formal evaluation process. The intervention consists of (a) quantitative measures of increased staffing based on a calculation using Algorithm 1.0 and (b) qualitative measures regarding organizational development. The intervention will be conducted over one year. The effects of the intervention on job satisfaction and quality of care will be evaluated in (iii) a comprehensive prospective, controlled summative evaluation. The results will be compared with ten matched nursing homes as a control group. Finally, (iv) prototypical concepts for qualification-oriented work organization, a strategy for the national rollout, and the further development of Algorithm 1.0 into Algorithm 2.0 will be derived. DISCUSSION: In Germany, there is an ongoing dynamic legislation process regarding further developing the long-term care sector. The study, which is the subject of the study protocol presented here, generates an evidence-based strategy for the staffing requirements for nursing homes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the German Association of Nursing Science (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Pflegewissenschaft) on 02.08.2023 (amended on 20.09.2023). Research findings are disseminated through presentations at national and international conferences and publications in peer-reviewed scientific journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: German Clinical Trails Register DRKS00031773 (Date of registration 09.11.2023).

[Digital technologies in nursing-what can they achieve?] / Digitale Technologien in der Pflege ­ Was können sie leisten?

Digital care technologies are becoming increasingly important in long-term care. They encompass all technologies that change processes and products by means of networking and/or sensor technology and include artificial intelligence, that is, processes, methods, and algorithms for learning by means of data and enabling meaningful decisions based on this. Their application ranges from the promotion of professional collaboration, control and management, knowledge acquisition and transfer, interaction and relationships to physical caregiving.Digital care technologies have the potential to simultaneously increase the quality of care and improve working conditions in care. However, there are obstacles to this at various levels: The development of these technologies is often driven by technical possibilities, resulting in products that do not provide any concrete benefits in routine nursing care. During implementation, only the operator is trained; however, there is no organizational development for the systematic integration of these technologies into routine work. In addition, there is a lack of high-quality evaluations showing evidence of the actual benefits to routine work in order to attract potential users to these technologies. Finally, there is no sustainable financing, especially for the maintenance of these technologies.Successful digitization in long-term care therefore requires that technology developers and users, as well as policymakers and scientists, jointly overcome these obstacles. This implies that caregivers are involved in the development process from the outset (co-creation) but also that spaces are created where the effect of digital care technologies can be evaluated in routine caregiving.

Dental care utilization among home care recipients, nursing home residents, and older adults not in need of long-term care: An observational study based on German insurance claims data.

OBJECTIVES: To describe and compare dental care utilization (DCU) among home care recipients, nursing home residents, and older adults not in need of long-term care (LTC). METHODS: Using nationwide claims data of 8 German statutory health and LTC insurance funds, proportions of home care recipients (n = 68,137), nursing home residents (n = 21,167), and non-LTC dependents (n = 632,205) aged 65+ years with DCU in 2017 were determined and compared. Associations between DCU and individual characteristics and setting were investigated via multivariable logistic regression. The proportions of individuals with DCU one year before and after transition to (a) home care (n = 23,590) and (b) nursing home care (n = 6,583) were compared. RESULTS: Proportions of home care recipients and nursing home residents with DCU were lower compared to non-LTC dependents (51.9, 53.1, and 73.2%, respectively). Adjusted odds ratios for DCU for home care recipients vs. non-LTC dependents ranged from 0.55 (LTC grades 1/2; 95% confidence interval 0.54-0.56) to 0.38 (LTC grades 4/5; 0.36-0.40). For nursing home residents vs. non-LTC dependents they ranged from 0.69 (3; 0.65-0.72) to 0.67 (4/5; 0.63-0.71). Women, older individuals, those with 0-1 diseases of the Elixhauser comorbidity index, dementia, and those from West Germany were also less likely to utilize dental care than their counterparts. Utilization decreased after transition to home care (60.0 vs. 55.6%) and increased after transition to nursing homes (46.1 vs. 53.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Nursing home residents and especially home care recipients utilized dental care less frequently than older non-LTC dependents. Organizational barriers for dental care utilization and ways to remove them should be investigated. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Dental care utilization among LTC dependents is low and should be improved in both the home care and nursing home setting.

[On the need for financial and structural reform of long-term care insurance]. / Zur Notwendigkeit einer Finanz- und Strukturreform der Pflegeversicherung.

When long-term care insurance was introduced in 1994, a number of conceptual decisions were made that continue to shape the system today. This discussion article examines three of these decisions. In each case, an evaluation standard is formulated against which the current situation is assessed. In the case of a negative assessment, reform options are discussed.In combination with the lack of benefit adjustments, the design of long-term care insurance as a system with capped insurance benefits and unlimited co-payments has led to co-payment levels in nursing homes that the majority of residents cannot cover from their income. Therefore, in order to fulfill its original objectives, long-term care insurance would have be turned upside down - by imposing an absolute limit on the amount and duration of the individual co-payments.The "dual insurance system" consisting of a social insurance for the majority and a private mandatory plan for a minority of the population has also proved to be a "birth defect" of the system. Since the group of privately insured persons has a much more favorable risk structure and higher average incomes, the "equal distribution of burdens" in financing required by the Federal Constitutional Court does not exist. To remedy this inequality, the dual system must be transformed into an integrated long-term care insurance system, or at least a risk structure equalization scheme between the two branches must be implemented.The introduction of long-term care insurance as a separate branch of social insurance, however, can be justified. In order to overcome interface problems, it would nevertheless be necessary to place the financing competence for geriatric rehabilitation with long-term care insurance and that for medical treatment care in nursing homes with health insurance.

Smartphone-assisted training with education for patients with hip and/or knee osteoarthritis (SmArt-E): study protocol for a multicentre pragmatic randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Hip and knee osteoarthritis are associated with functional limitations, pain and restrictions in quality of life and the ability to work. Furthermore, with growing prevalence, osteoarthritis is increasingly causing (in)direct costs. Guidelines recommend exercise therapy and education as primary treatment strategies. Available options for treatment based on physical activity promotion and lifestyle change are often insufficiently provided and used. In addition, the quality of current exercise programmes often does not meet the changing care needs of older people with comorbidities and exercise adherence is a challenge beyond personal physiotherapy. The main objective of this study is to investigate the short- and long-term (cost-)effectiveness of the SmArt-E programme in people with hip and/or knee osteoarthritis in terms of pain and physical functioning compared to usual care. METHODS: This study is designed as a multicentre randomized controlled trial with a target sample size of 330 patients. The intervention is based on the e-Exercise intervention from the Netherlands, consists of a training and education programme and is conducted as a blended care intervention over 12 months. We use an app to support independent training and the development of self-management skills. The primary and secondary hypotheses are that participants in the SmArt-E intervention will have less pain (numerical rating scale) and better physical functioning (Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) compared to participants in the usual care group after 12 and 3 months. Other secondary outcomes are based on domains of the Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI). The study will be accompanied by a process evaluation. DISCUSSION: After a positive evaluation, SmArt-E can be offered in usual care, flexibly addressing different care situations. The desired sustainability and the support of the participants' behavioural change are initiated via the app through audio-visual contact with their physiotherapists. Furthermore, the app supports the repetition and consolidation of learned training and educational content. For people with osteoarthritis, the new form of care with proven effectiveness can lead to a reduction in underuse and misuse of care as well as contribute to a reduction in (in)direct costs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00028477. Registered on August 10, 2022.

[Medical care with or without cooperative agreements? A cross-sectional study in nursing homes in Bremen and Lower Saxony]. / Ärztliche Versorgung mit oder ohne Kooperationsvertrag? Eine Querschnittsuntersuchung in stationären Pflegeeinrichtungen in Bremen und Niedersachsen.

BACKGROUND: Empirical studies in nursing homes show that people in need of long-term care have less contact with medical specialists (except for neurologists) compared to those of the same age who are not in need of long-term care, which can be an indication of insufficient health care provision. Against this background, a cooperative agreement between medical specialists and nursing homes was first made legally possible, then requested and finally made mandatory (section 119b SGB V [Social Code Book V] in the currently valid version). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to investigate to what extent contact density to physicians and the needs-based medical treatment of nursing home residents in nursing homes with and without a cooperative agreement differ from each other and, hence, how effective such cooperation agreements are in this context. METHODOLOGY: Using data from 396 people in need of care from 44 nursing homes in Lower Saxony and Bremen we compared facilities with and without cooperative agreements with respect to the number of home visits, practice visits and telephone contacts and the realization of adequate specialist medical treatment. At the time of the survey, 26 of the 44 nursing homes had cooperative agreements with dentists, 17 with general practitioners and 7 with neurologists. RESULTS: The number of personal contacts to general practitioners tends to be higher if cooperation agreements between general practitioners and nursing homes exist. In nursing homes having cooperation agreements with dentists the number of home visits is twice as high as in nursing homes without such an agreement, whereas cooperation agreements with neurologists have no effect on the number of contacts with these specialists. Furthermore, cooperation agreements with dentists promote appropriate dental care. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that cooperation agreements can be a useful instrument to ensure medical care in nursing homes. To guarantee the effectiveness of the cooperation agreements, however, the number of medical visits should be stipulated in the agreements.

[Home-care services in the first two waves of the COVID-19 pandemic: challenges for staff and care recipients]. / Ambulante Pflege in den ersten beiden Wellen der COVID-19-Pandemie: Herausforderungen für Personal und Pflegebedürftige.

INTRODUCTION: During the COVID-19 pandemic, people in need of long-term care were among the most vulnerable population groups. Home-care services were under exceptional strain, especially at the beginning of the pandemic. The aim of this study is to examine the situation and problems of care services and the people in need of care during the first two waves of the pandemic in Germany. METHODS: Two cross-sectional studies were conducted during the first two COVID-19 waves (first survey 28 April to 12 May 2020, second survey 12 January to 7 February 2021). In total, data from N = 1029 outpatient care services were included in the analysis. Descriptive measures were used for the analysis. RESULTS: The clients of home-care services were severely burdened in the first two waves of the pandemic. This can be seen on the one hand in an increased risk of illness and increased mortality, and on the other in the loss of various care and support services. The latter also has negative effects on the psychosocial condition of those in need of care, for example. Care services were affected by high staff absenteeism and additional work due to protective measures. DISCUSSION: The COVID-19 pandemic led to immense burdens for people in need of care and home-care services and to a reduction in care services. The deterioration of care provision met with an already tense situation. It has become clear that the provision of care for those in need of care by outpatient care services is not crisis-proof, and that additional challenges such as a pandemic can have dramatic consequences. For the future, reliable structures and readily available emergency plans should be established with concrete instructions for action.

[The situation of informal caregivers of working age in the COVID-19 pandemic-results of an online survey in Germany]. / Die Situation pflegender Angehöriger im erwerbsfähigen Alter in der COVID-19-Pandemie ­ Ergebnisse einer Onlinebefragung in Deutschland.

BACKGROUND: The consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic have posed major challenges to different groups. One of these are informal caregivers. This study investigates the changes the pandemic has caused for informal caregivers and the extent to which quality of life and burden of care have changed for specific subgroups. METHODS: Data for this cross-sectional study was gathered in the summer of 2020 in a convenient sample of informal caregivers (< 67 years of age, N = 1143). In addition to sociodemographic data, information on the care situation, compatibility of care and work, as well as stress and quality of life was collected in an online survey. The analysis of care situations and compatibility of care and work is done descriptively. Logistic regression models are used for a subgroup analysis of quality of life and care burden. RESULTS: The care situation has changed for 54.7% of participants and has become more time consuming. For 70.8% of respondents, the COVID-19 pandemic has made it even more difficult to balance care-giving and work. However, most respondents were satisfied with their employers' pandemic management (65.9%). A sharp decline in the quality of life and an increase in the burden of care for informal caregivers was ascertained. Both developments are stronger for young and female caregivers and for those caring for people with a greater need of support. DISCUSSION: The results indicate that living situations worsened for a substantial proportion of informal caregivers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Policymakers should recognize additional challenges that informal caregivers have faced since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic and how they vary by subgroups. It is important to include home-based informal care as well as other care settings in future pandemic concepts.

Health economic evaluation of digital nursing technologies: a review of methodological recommendations.

BACKGROUND: Health economic evaluation of digital nursing technologies (DNT) is important to provide information that helps avoid undesirable developments and implementations as well as increase the chances of success of developed applications. At the same time, studies and evidence on cost-effectiveness are still very rare in this field. Review studies in related technology areas such as telemedicine frequently criticise the quality and comparability of health economic evaluations conducted in this field. Based on a content analysis of methodological literature on the economic evaluation of innovative (digital) technologies in health and nursing, this article aims to identify specific challenges in this research area and offers recommendations on how to address these challenges to promote more sound health economic evaluations in the future. METHODS: A rapid review was conducted, consisting of a systematic search in the Pubmed database as well as Google Scholar. In addition, the literature lists of the analysed texts were scoured for additional texts to be included. Methodological literature, single studies, and reviews were included. A total of 536 studies were screened, of which 29 were included in the full text analysis. RESULTS: Based on the systematic content analysis of the studies under consideration, 10 specific methodological challenges are identified, and the methodological recommendations were examined for consideration. A particular focus was given to whether specific methodological approaches might be needed in the context of evaluating the efficiency of DNT. CONCLUSION: Many of the challenges identified for the health economic evaluations of digital nursing technologies are comparable to those of other complex health care interventions. The recommendations discussed can help to alleviate those challenges. Future research should focus on alternative approaches to assessing causality in different phases of technology development while maintaining high evidence standards. High-evidence economic assessment of technologies in nursing care should be carried out in routine use, especially if they are intended to be reimbursed by the social insurance.

Generalizability and reach of a randomized controlled trial to improve oral health among home care recipients: comparing participants and nonparticipants at baseline and during follow-up.

BACKGROUND: The generalizability of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a low response can be limited by systematic differences between participants and nonparticipants. This participation bias, however, is rarely investigated because data on nonparticipants is usually not available. The purpose of this article is to compare all participants and nonparticipants of a RCT to improve oral health among home care recipients at baseline and during follow-up using claims data. METHODS: Seven German statutory health and long-term care insurance funds invited 9656 home care recipients to participate in the RCT MundPflege. Claims data for all participants (n = 527, 5.5% response) and nonparticipants (n = 9129) were analyzed. Associations between trial participation and sex, age, care dependency, number of Elixhauser diseases, and dementia, as well as nursing, medical, and dental care utilization at baseline, were investigated using multivariable logistic regression. Associations between trial participation and the probability of (a) moving into a nursing home, (b) being hospitalized, and (c) death during 1 year of follow-up were examined via Cox proportional hazards regressions, controlling for baseline variables. RESULTS: At baseline, trial participation was positively associated with male sex (odds ratio 1.29 [95% confidence interval 1.08-1.54]), high (vs. low 1.46 [1.15-1.86]) care dependency, receiving occasional in-kind benefits to relieve caring relatives (1.45 [1.15-1.84]), having a referral by a general practitioner to a medical specialist (1.62 [1.21-2.18]), and dental care utilization (2.02 [1.67-2.45]). It was negatively associated with being 75-84 (vs. < 60 0.67 [0.50-0.90]) and 85 + (0.50 [0.37-0.69]) years old. For morbidity, hospitalizations, and formal, respite, short-term, and day or night care, no associations were found. During follow-up, participants were less likely to move into a nursing home than nonparticipants (hazard ratio 0.50 [0.32-0.79]). For hospitalizations and mortality, no associations were found. CONCLUSIONS: For half of the comparisons, differences between participants and nonparticipants were observed. The RCT's generalizability is limited, but to a smaller extent than one would expect because of the low response. Routine data provide a valuable source for investigating potential differences between trial participants and nonparticipants, which might be used by future RCTs to evaluate the generalizability of their findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00013517 . Retrospectively registered on June 11, 2018.

Social Health among German Nursing Home Residents with Dementia during the COVID-19 Pandemic, and the Role of Technology to Promote Social Participation.

The COVID-19 pandemic severely impacted the social health of nursing home residents with dementia due to social isolation. Consequently, the frequency of Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms in Dementia (BPSD) might increase. Technological solutions might help safeguard the social health of nursing home residents with dementia. This study investigates the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on clinical outcomes and the availability of social activities and technology to promote social participation in nursing home residents with dementia. The study analyzed cross-sectional data from a follow-up questionnaire nested in a larger national survey of care facilities in Germany. A mixed-methods approach integrated statistical analyses of closed-ended responses and thematic analysis of free-text responses. A total of 417 valid individual responses were received, showing an overall increase in observed BPSD-with anxiety and depression most frequently occurring. Many nursing homes canceled all social activities for residents with dementia, though a few had established procedures to facilitate social participation using technology. Requirements to promote social participation in this population using technology were identified at the micro-, meso-, and macro levels. Technology requirements permeated all three levels. During and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic, technology-driven solutions to promote social health among nursing home residents with dementia should be integrated into caregiving procedures.

Contacts with general practitioners, dentists, and medical specialists among nursing home residents: a cross-sectional study in 44 German nursing homes.

BACKGROUND: Nursing home residents have high medical care needs. Their medical care utilization is, however, lower compared to community-dwelling elderly and varies widely among nursing homes. This study quantified the utilization of general practitioners (GPs), dentists, and medical specialists among nursing homes and residents, and investigated whether dentist utilization is associated with individual and nursing home characteristics. METHODS: Forty-four nursing homes invited 2124 residents to participate in a cross-sectional study. For 10 medical specialties, data on contacts in nursing homes, practices, and by telephone in the last 12 months were assessed at individual and nursing home level. The proportion of nursing homes and residents with any form of contact, and the median number and interquartile range (IQR) of contacts among individuals with contact were determined. Using multilevel logistic regression, associations between the probability of individual dental care utilization and sex, age, LTC grade, years of residence, sponsorship, number of nursing home beds, and transport and medical escort services for consultations at a practice were investigated. RESULTS: The proportion of nursing homes with any form of contact with physicians ranged from 100% for GPs, dentists, and urologists to 76.7% for gynecologists and orthopedists. Among the nursing homes, 442 residents participated (20.8% response). The proportion of residents with any contact varied from 97.8% for GPs, 38.5% for neurologists/psychiatrists, and 32.3% for dentists to 3.0% for gynecologists. Only for GPs, neurologists/psychiatrists, dentists, otorhinolaryngologists, urologists, and dermatologists, the proportion was higher for nursing home contacts than for practice and telephone contacts. Among residents with any contact, the median number of contacts was highest for GPs (11.0 [IQR 7.0-16.0]), urologists (4.0 [IQR 2.0-7.0]), and neurologists/psychiatrists (3.0 [IQR 2.0-5.0]). Dentist utilization varied widely among nursing homes (median odds ratio 2.5) and was associated with higher age. CONCLUSIONS: Almost all residents had regular contact to GPs, but only one third had contact with dentists. Lower proportions with contact were found for medical specialists, except for neurologists/psychiatrists. Reasons for the large variations in dental care utilization among nursing homes should be identified. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DRKS00012383 [2017/12/06].

COVID-19 in German Nursing Homes: The Impact of Facilities' Structures on the Morbidity and Mortality of Residents-An Analysis of Two Cross-Sectional Surveys.

The COVID-19 pandemic constitutes an exceptional risk to people living and working in nursing homes (NHs). There were numerous cases and deaths among NH residents, especially at the beginning of the pandemic when no vaccines had yet been developed. Besides regional differences, individual NHs showed vast differences in the number of cases and deaths: while in some, nobody was affected, in others, many people were infected or died. We examine the relationship between facility structures and their effect on infections and deaths of NH residents and infections of staff, while considering the influence of COVID-19 prevalence among the general population on the incidence of infection in NHs. Two nationwide German surveys were conducted during the first and second pandemic waves, comprising responses from n = 1067 NHs. Different hurdle models, with an assumed Bernoulli distribution for zero density and a negative binomial distribution for the count density, were fitted. It can be shown that the probability of an outbreak, and the number of cases/deaths among residents and staff, increased with an increasing number of staff and the general spread of the virus. Therefore, reverse isolation of NH residents was an inadequate form of protection, especially at the beginning of the pandemic.

Effectiveness of a Dental Intervention to Improve Oral Health among Home Care Recipients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

We quantified the effectiveness of an oral health intervention among home care recipients. Seven German insurance funds invited home care recipients to participate in a two-arm randomized controlled trial. At t0, the treatment group (TG) received an intervention comprising an oral health assessment, dental treatment recommendations and oral health education. The control group (CG) received usual care. At t1, blinded observers assessed objective (Oral Health Assessment Tool (OHAT)) and subjective (Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP)) oral health and the objective periodontal situation (Periodontal Screening Index (PSI)). Of 9656 invited individuals, 527 (5.5%) participated. In the TG, 164 of 259 (63.3%) participants received the intervention and 112 (43.2%) received an outcome assessment. In the CG, 137 of 268 (51.1%) participants received an outcome assessment. The OHAT mean score (2.83 vs. 3.31, p = 0.0665) and the OHIP mean score (8.92 vs. 7.99, p = 0.1884) did not differ significantly. The prevalence of any periodontal problems (77.1% vs. 92.0%, p = 0.0027) was significantly lower in the TG than in the CG, but the prevalence of periodontitis was not (35.4% vs. 44.6%, p = 0.1764). Future studies should investigate whether other recruitment strategies and a more comprehensive intervention might be more successful in improving oral health among home care recipients.

[Medical specialist undertreatment in nursing home residents-Prevalence and extrapolation]. / Fachärztliche Unterversorgung bei Heimbewohnern ­ Prävalenzstudie und Hochrechnung.

BACKGROUND: Nursing home residents tend to have lower medical specialist utilization than other groups of older people; however, as yet there is little evidence whether nursing home residents obtain adequate medical specialist care. This study investigated whether nursing home residents receive adequate oral health care, ophthalmological care, otorhinolaryngologist care and neurological care. The unmet needs of the nursing home population in Germany was extrapolated. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Audiometry, eye examinations and oral visual inspection were performed in 409 residents from 44 nursing homes. Medical care in the previous 12 months as well as existing diagnoses were retrieved from the nursing documentation. Teams of physicians evaluated for each resident based on all collected data if the resident obtained specialist care that was adequate to the needs. RESULTS: Between 15% and 45% of the residents with need for medical specialist care did not receive adequate specialist care. Of all residents 27% had unmet need of specialist care in at least one of the investigated medical specialties. It is projected that up to 205,000 nursing home residents in Germany do not receive adequate medical specialist care. CONCLUSION: Given a considerable proportion of nursing home residents with unmet need of specialist care, interventions should be developed that help reduce the level of unmet needs.

Home care recipients have poorer oral health than nursing home residents: Results from two German studies.

OBJECTIVES: To describe and compare the objective and subjective oral health of older nursing home residents and home care recipients, and to investigate whether oral health is associated with sociodemographic characteristics and the long-term care (LTC) setting. METHODS: In two German studies, the oral health of 246 nursing home residents and 90 home care recipients aged ≥60 years was assessed objectively using the Oral Health Assessment Tool (OHAT) and subjectively using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP). OHAT and OHIP scores were compared between both settings. Multivariable logistic regressions were applied to investigate whether oral health is associated with sex, age group, LTC grade, and LTC setting. RESULTS: OHAT and OHIP mean scores in the home care setting were higher compared to the nursing home setting (OHAT: 3.13 vs. 1.28, p < .0001; OHIP: 7.81 vs. 2.15, p < .0001). The adjusted odds ratios for poor objective and subjective oral health for home care recipients vs. nursing home residents were 6.71 (95 % confidence interval 3.29-13.69) and 4.92 (2.77-8.76). No significant associations with sociodemographic characteristics were found. CONCLUSIONS: Oral health was poor in both settings, but home care recipients were more likely to have poor oral health than nursing home residents. Interventions to improve oral health are needed in the nursing home setting and, even more importantly, in the home care setting. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Oral health among older people in need of LTC is poor and should be improved. From a health policy perspective, home care recipients may need more attention.

Comparing apples to oranges? Minimizing typological biases to better classify healthcare systems globally.

The present study explores the role of typologies as an analytical device in understanding both the theoretical and empirical manifestations of healthcare systems globally. In a first step, we explore the relative benefits and limits of different classificatory logics - inductive vs. deductive - before conducting a review of scholarship on healthcare system classifications. We argue that, in order to capture the role of global actors (international organizations, donor countries etc.) in low-to-upper-middle income economies, classificatory systems must account for potential territorial shifts across the dimensions of financing, service provision and regulation defining all healthcare systems. In its absence, comparative research involving countries of significantly different levels of economic development becomes obfuscated. In an effort to redress this gap in the literature, we lay out how state, societal, market and global actors feature across different dimensions of healthcare systems, putting forth a deductively derived and actor-centered typology.

Effectiveness of Digital Technologies to Support Nursing Care: Results of a Scoping Review.

BACKGROUND: The field of digital technologies being developed or applied to support nursing care is extensive. The aim of this scoping review is to provide an overview on technologies for which results on positive or negative effects on persons in need of care, caregivers or care institutions are available and to appraise the reliability of these results. METHODS: A scoping review design has been used to identify studies focussing on the effectiveness of digital technologies in nursing care for persons in need of care, caregivers or care institutions. The screening process included 19,510 scientific publications from 9 databases. RESULTS: A total of 123 single studies and 31 reviews were subjected to the analysis. The included technologies comprise nursing and health information technologies, such as assistive devices, information and communication technologies, sensors and robotics. The results show that there are many studies that demonstrate positive effects, but the level of evidence is mostly low and study sizes are often small. Hardly any technology has been researched intensively enough to produce conclusive results. Studies on a high level of evidence (RCTs) lack for most technological areas. Heterogeneous results in some areas indicate that effects may depend strongly on the mode and specific context into which the technologies are introduced. CONCLUSION: Due to the limited evidence on effectiveness of digital technologies in nursing care, it is not surprising that care institutions are reluctant to put innovative technologies into practice. The scoping review indicates technology areas that should be subject to future research with higher quality studies. Research on outpatient, informal and cross-sectoral care should be intensified to further exploit the potential of digital technologies with a view to improving independence of care-recipients and unburdening formal and informal carers.

Application of digital technologies in nursing practice: Results of a mixed methods study on nurses' experiences, needs and perspectives.

INTRODUCTION: Even though the importance of nurses' participation in the process of technology development is frequently stressed by stakeholders, participation has been described as negligible and limited by nurses' abilities to identify and communicate their needs and ideas for application scenarios or the improvement of digital nursing technologies (DNT) in everyday care practice. Prior research often uses hypothetical scenarios or laboratory settings with little real-world relevance, and the number of studies investigating needs for technology development, application scenarios or requested technologies from the perspective of nurses with experience in technology use is exceedingly small. Against this background, this study aims to investigate needs, application scenarios and perspectives of nurses with practical experience in real-world DNT application in a range of different care settings. METHODS: An explanatory sequential mixed methods design including an online survey (QUANT) and focus group (FG) discussions (qual) was used to explore nurses' perspectives and experiences. A convenience sample of participants was accessed via 19,000 e-mail contacts of directors of nursing (DONs) in care facilities and hospitals throughout Germany. Preliminary results of the online survey were discussed and elaborated in depth in three FGs. Quantitative results of the online survey were included in the development of the interview guideline for and data collection from the FGs. Descriptive, setting-specific analysis was conducted for quantitative data, and qualitative data was analysed by identifying key aspects. RESULTS: A total of 1,335 participants took part in the online survey, most of whom worked in ambulatory care institutions and held management positions such as DON or team leader. There were 14 FG participants. Ninety-five per cent of the participants of the online survey reported having experience in the use of DNT, predominantly with information and communication technologies (ICT). Overall, DNT were deemed to make work easier, and participants concurred on other positive effects such as increased efficiency or saved time and improved quality of care. Negative effects or concerns were reported less frequently. Reasons for non-adoption included technology-related (e.g. usability, functionality) and non-technology-related (e.g. competencies and context factors) issues, and facilitators for adoption were discussed in the FGs. Key aspects of application scenarios were enhanced technological support of direct nursing care tasks to reduce physical burden and mental stressors. Specifically, participants of the FGs expressed their wish for participative development and a general openness for nurses to be included in the development and testing of digital technologies. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Although efforts in development, research and theory-building have been increasing over recent years, DNT that go beyond more traditional or common applications within the ICT category (such as electronic nursing records or process planning) are rare. There are already technologies available for many of the expressed needs for which, however, adoption fails or does not happen. The reported barriers and facilitators indicate issues that should be taken into account when developing DNT for application in nursing practice. The study reveals a distinct need for information, counselling, facilitation and organizational development, and brings to light broad opportunities for the collaborative development of guided DNT implementation and evaluation processes. Future development and research activities should preferably be conducted by interdisciplinary research groups.