Health mediation does not reduce the readmission rate of frequent users of emergency departments living in precarious conditions: what lessons can be learned from this randomised controlled trial?

BACKGROUND: Severe overcrowding of emergency departments (EDs) affects the quality of healthcare. One factor of overcrowding is precariousness, but it has rarely been considered a key factor in designing interventions to improve ED care. Health mediation (HM) aims to facilitate access to rights, prevention, and care for the most vulnerable persons and to raise awareness among healthcare providers about obstacles in accessing healthcare. The primary aim was to determine whether HM intervention for frequent users of EDs (FUED) living in precarious conditions could reduce the readmission rate at 90 days. METHODS: Between February 2019 and May 2022, we enrolled and interviewed 726 FUED in four EDs of southeastern France in this randomised controlled trial. The HM intervention started in the ED and lasted 90 days. In addition to the primary endpoint (first readmission at 90 days), secondary endpoints (readmission at 30 and 180 days, number of hospitalisations at 30, 90, 180 days, admissions for the same reasons as the first admission) were also studied. The outcomes were measured in the ED information systems. Statistical methods included an intention-to-treat analysis and a per-protocol analysis. Comparisons were adjusted for gender, age, ED, and health mediator. RESULTS: 46% of patients reported attending the ED because they felt their life was in danger, and 42% had been referred to the ED by the emergency medical dispatch centre or their GP; 40% of patients were considered to be in a serious condition by ED physicians. The proportion of patients who were readmitted at 90 days was high but did not differ between the control and the HM intervention groups (31.7% vs. 36.3%, p = 0.23). There was no significant difference in any of the secondary outcome measures between the control and HM intervention groups. Per-protocol analysis also showed no significant difference for the primary and secondary endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: This randomised controlled trial did not show that our health mediation intervention was effective in reducing the use of emergency services by FUED living in precarious conditions. Some limitations are discussed: the duration of the intervention (90 days), the long-term effects (> 6 months), the involvement of the ED staff. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered on clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03660215 on 4th September 2018.

Acceptability of interventional materials: public participation in public health interventional research / Acceptabilité d'une intervention : exemple de participation des publics en recherche interventionnelle en santé publique

Introduction: The uptake rate of colorectal cancer screening remains insufficient in France and decreases as the level of deprivation increases. Participants' health literacy appears to be an important determinant of screening uptake. Aim of the study: The aim of this study, nested in our multicenter-randomized controlled trial, was to present the development and acceptability of interventional material (training and a pictorial brochure) for general practitioners and healthcare users in disadvantaged geographical areas using a participatory involvement approach. Methods: The development of the brochure and the training was carried out in three stages, two for the development, usability, and acceptability testing and a third for its evaluation with the target audience. We used a qualitative approach based on focus groups and cognitive interviews. The qualitative analysis was based on Morville's "Honeycomb" conceptual model and the COREQ checklist. Results: The development and test of the acceptability of the material enabled us to adjust the content of the training by proposing examples that were more rooted in professional reality, and to produce a brochure that was easy to read, understand, acceptable and adapted to the intervention's targeted audience. Conclusions: This experience illustrates in a concrete way the feasibility of public participation and its value in the context of interventional research, and more generally in the creation of interventional material.

Introduction: Le taux de participation au dépistage du cancer colorectal reste insuffisant en France et diminue à mesure que le niveau de précarité augmente. La littératie en santé est un déterminant important du recours au dépistage. But de l'étude: Cette étude, nichée dans notre essai randomisé multicentrique, a pour but de présenter la procédure d'élaboration (procédé itératif de test d'utilisabilité et d'acceptabilité) et de vérification de l'acceptabilité de l'intervention (formation et brochure imagée) ciblant les médecins généralistes et usagers du soin dans des zones géographiques défavorisées, selon une approche participative. Méthodes: Le développement de la brochure et de la formation a été réalisé en trois étapes : deux pour l'élaboration et tests itératifs d'utilisabilité et acceptabilité et une troisième pour vérifier l'acceptabilité auprès des publics cibles. Nous avons utilisé une approche qualitative par focus group et entretiens individuels cognitifs dont l'analyse repose sur le « nid d'abeille ¼ de Morville et la grille COREQ. Résultats: Le développement itératif et la vérification de l'acceptabilité du matériel nous ont permis, d'une part, de réaliser des ajustements quant au contenu de la formation, en proposant des exemples plus ancrés dans la réalité professionnelle et, d'autre part, de produire une brochure imagée facile à lire et à comprendre, acceptable et adaptée au public ciblé par l'intervention. Conclusions: Cette expérience illustre, de manière concrète, la faisabilité de cette modalité de participation des publics concernés et son intérêt dans le cadre de la recherche interventionnelle et, plus généralement, dans le matériel interventionnel.

Health mediation: an intervention mode for improving emergency department care and support for patients living in precarious conditions.

BACKGROUND: Severe overcrowding of emergency departments (EDs) impacts the quality of healthcare. One factor of this overcrowding is precariousness, but it has rarely been considered a key factor in designing interventions to improve ED care. Health mediation (HM) aims to facilitate access to rights, prevention, and care for the most vulnerable persons and to raise awareness among healthcare providers about obstacles in accessing healthcare. We here present the results of an ancillary qualitative study to explore the prospects regarding a health mediation intervention implemented in EDs for deprived persons who are frequent ED users, from professionals' and patients' perspectives. METHODS: Design, data collection, and data analysis were done according to a psychosocial approach, based on thematic content analysis and semi-structured interviews of 16 frequent ED users and deprived patients exposed to HM and of 14 professionals in 4 EDs of South-eastern France. RESULTS: All patients reported multifactorial distress. Most of them expressed experiencing isolation and powerlessness, and lacking personal resources to cope with healthcare. They mentioned the use of ED as a way of quickly meeting a professional to respond to their suffering, and recognized the trustworthy alliance with health mediators (HMrs) as a means to put them back in a healthcare pathway. The presence of HMrs in EDs was appreciated by ED professionals because HMrs responded to requests they were not able to access and were perceived as an efficient support for caring for deprived persons in emergency contexts. CONCLUSIONS: Our results are in favour of health mediation in EDs as a promising solution, requested by patients and ED professionals, to cope with frequent ED users and deprived patients. Our results could also be used to adapt other strategies for the most vulnerable populations to reduce the frequency of ED readmissions. At the interface of the patients' health experience and the medico-social sector, HM could complete the immediate responses to medical needs given in EDs and contribute in alleviating the social inequalities of health.

Impact of a health literacy intervention combining general practitioner training and a consumer facing intervention to improve colorectal cancer screening in underserved areas: protocol for a multicentric cluster randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer burden worldwide. In France, it is the second most common cause of cancer death after lung cancer. Systematic uptake of CRC screening can improve survival rates. However, people with limited health literacy (HL) and lower socioeconomic position rarely participate. Our aim is to assess the impact of an intervention combining HL and CRC screening training for general practitioners (GPs) with a pictorial brochure and video targeting eligible patients, to increase CRC screening and other secondary outcomes, after 1 year, in several underserved geographic areas in France. METHODS: We will use a two-arm multicentric randomized controlled cluster trial with 32 GPs primarily serving underserved populations across four regions in France with 1024 patients recruited. GPs practicing in underserved areas (identified using the European Deprivation Index) will be block-randomized to: 1) a combined intervention (HL and CRC training + brochure and video for eligible patients), or 2) usual care. Patients will be included if they are between 50 and 74 years old, eligible for CRC screening, and present to recruited GPs. The primary outcome is CRC screening uptake after 1 year. Secondary outcomes include increasing knowledge and patient activation. After trial recruitment, we will conduct semi-structured interviews with up to 24 GPs (up to 8 in each region) and up to 48 patients (6 to 12 per region) based on data saturation. We will explore strategies that promote the intervention's sustained use and rapid implementation using Normalization Process Theory. We will follow a community-based participatory research approach throughout the trial. For the analyses, we will adopt a regression framework for all quantitative data. We will also use exploratory mediation analyses. We will analyze all qualitative data using a framework analysis guided by Normalization Process Theory. DISCUSSION: Limited HL and its impact on the general population is a growing public health and policy challenge worldwide. It has received limited attention in France. A combined HL intervention could reduce disparities in CRC screening, increase screening rates among the most vulnerable populations, and increase knowledge and activation (beneficial in the context of repeated screening). TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: 2020-A01687-32 . Date of registration: 17th November 2020.

[Regional differences in hospitalisations for complications of chronic hepatitis C in 2012]. / Disparités régionales des hospitalisations pour complication de l'hépatite chronique C en 2012.

Objective: Only limited recent information is available concerning the regional incidence and prevalence of chronic hepatitis C (CHC), but this information is critical for optimal definition of public health policies for the management of hepatitis C. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of mapping potential regional differences in the prevalence of CHC and its complications using data from a health administrative database. Methods: The 2012 PMSI MCO hospital database contains information on diagnosis and healthcare resource use, essentially related to all hospitalisations in France. Hospital stays related to CHC were identified on the basis of ICD-10 disease codes. Hospital stays were classified according to stage of liver disease: non-cirrhotic liver disease, compensated cirrhosis, decompensated cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). All study variables were documented for each French administrative region in 2012. Results: In 2012, 12,040 patients were hospitalised in France for a reason related to CHC, corresponding to a standardised age- and gender- adjusted prevalence rate of 19.3/100,000 persons. The highest prevalences of CHC and HCC were observed in the Ile de France, Alsace and Provence-Alpes-Côte-d'Azur regions. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the feasibility of using the PMSI database to identify regional differences in the prevalence of CHC. This information may be useful for planning regional healthcare resource provision for CHC.

Chronic hepatitis C: Burden of disease and cost associated with hospitalisations in France in 2012 (The HEPC-LONE study).

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This retrospective hospital database analysis aimed to determine the burden and cost of hospitalisations related to chronic hepatitis C (CHC) infections in France in 2012. METHODS: All hospital stays with CHC (ICD-10 code B18.2) coded as the principal, related or significantly associated diagnosis were extracted from the French National Hospital database 2012 (PMSI). Hospitalisations not directly related to CHC were excluded. Patients were assigned to a liver disease stage, namely non-cirrhotic liver disease, compensated cirrhosis, decompensated cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma or post-liver transplantation. Costing was performed using French national tariffs and expressed in 2013 Euros. We documented 22,056 hospital stays involving 12,040 patients who were considered to be directly related to CHC. Of these stays, 11,779 (53.4%) were documented in patients with severe complications (decompensated cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma or liver transplantation). RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The mean number and duration of hospital stays increased with disease severity. Overall, 1181 patients (9.8%) died during hospitalisation. The total cost of hospital stays for CHC was estimated to be € 61 million, of which 26.4% were attributable to hepatocellular carcinoma, 32.5% to post-liver transplantation and 21.0% to decompensated cirrhosis. Compared with a previous analysis in 2009, the number of patients hospitalised fell by 22%, although the patients hospitalised were overall more severely ill. The total cost of hospitalisation decreased by 8%, with a notably marked reduction in the number of biopsies performed (32%). This study illustrates the persistently high burden of CHC infections in France.

What is the impact of disease prevalence upon health technology assessment?

As national budgets for health care will remain under stress for the foreseeable future, health technology assessment (HTA) aimed at offering guidance to policy-making will have an increasing role to play in optimizing resources. The emergence of new treatment paradigms and health technologies, and the prevalence studies which determine when a disease is a current or future burden for patients and the community are in the roots of the HTA process. Analysing studies on screening test strategies and health care policy, this paper revisits two key concepts in epidemiology, prevalence and incidence, in order to show their major impact upon HTA. Utilization of the predictive values of screening tests that include prevalence in their calculations, and analysing all options for screening strategies are necessary in HTA. Cost-effectiveness analyses and statistical models should include potential externalities, especially the impact of prevention and treatment on infectious disease prevalence. Beyond estimates of cost-effectiveness ratios, decision makers also need to know by how much their annual health care budget is likely to increase or decrease in the years following the emergence of new technologies: hence the importance of incidence- or prevalence-based economic evaluations. As new paradigms are occurring, especially in the field of oncology, with treatments targeted to 'small' groups of patients identified through genetic testing, prevalence data are strongly needed. Precise estimates of disease prevalence, in general populations as well as in risk or targeted groups, will therefore be necessary to improve HTA process.

How did chronic hepatitis C impact costs related to hospital health care in France in 2009?

AIMS: To evaluate the health care burden of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) in French hospitals. METHODS: All hospital stays with CHC ICD-10 code were extracted from the 2009 French hospital discharge database and classified in five groups: non-complicated CHC, liver cirrhosis (CIR), hepatocarcinoma (HCC), liver transplantation (LT) and unclassified. Hospital costs were calculated according to the French official prices and expressed in 2010 euro. The economic analysis was carried out from the Social Security point of view. RESULTS: Twenty-seven thousand two hundred and fifty-eight of the 68,683 hospital stays with CHC ICD-10 code corresponding to 15,482 patients were considered as directly related to HCV: 52% for non-complicated CHC, 33% for CIR, 11% for HCC, 2% for LT and 2% unclassified. The total cost of hospital stays for CHC and its complications was estimated at 65,956,938 €. Almost half (47%) of total costs were attributable to CIR while HCC and LT contributed to 18% and 19%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This first analysis of the French hospital discharge database focused on CHC brings new and essential information. It shows that 84% of HCV-related hospital costs are attributable to advanced liver diseases. Together with more efficient therapies, enhancing screening and access to treatment policies could substantially relieve the hospital burden of CHC.

Adherence to treatment and quality of life during hepatitis C therapy: a prospective, real-life, observational study.

BACKGROUND: Adherence is important for therapy of chronic diseases, but has still not been well studied in real life in chronic hepatitis C. AIMS: To assess adherence to hepatitis C combination therapy in routine clinical practice and to identify factors associated with imperfect adherence. METHODS: This cohort study included unselected chronic hepatitis C patients initiating peginterferon α-2b plus ribavirin. 100% adherence was defined by taking all the prescribed doses of both drugs for the full initially intended duration, as declared by the patient or believed by the physician. Quality of life was assessed using the short-form health survey (SF-36) questionnaire. RESULTS: 1860 patients were analysed, including 72% treatment-naive, 36% genotype 2/3, 23% psychiatric, 44% drug addicts and 3% human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive patients. Early treatment discontinuation occurred in 30% of patients. Overall, 38% of patients reported 100% adherence. Patient- and physician-reported adherences were discordant, with a 20-30% overestimation by physicians. HIV co-infection [odds ratio (OR) 2.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.36-4.67], no drug use during follow-up (2.37, 1.30-4.31), genotype 3 (1.55, 1.20-2.00) and treatment-naive (1.32, 1.03-1.69) were associated with 100% adherence. Quality of life worsened during treatment but returned to baseline after the end of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Imperfect adherence to combination therapy is common in routine patients. Adherence is markedly overestimated by physicians and is associated with some patient's baseline characteristics. Knowledge of these factors might help identify patients who are most in need of intervention and plan more frequent and accurate follow-up.

Pegylated interferon-alpha2b plus ribavirin therapy in patients with hepatitis C and psychiatric disorders: results of a cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C antiviral therapies have significant psychiatric side effects. It is therefore believed that they might exacerbate mental illness in patients with pre-existing psychiatric disorders, resulting in poor adherence and response to antiviral treatment. We aimed to assess adherence to treatment, virological outcomes and mental safety in psychiatric patients, compared with non-psychiatric patients, treated for hepatitis C. METHODS: A cohort study involved unselected hepatitis C patients on scheduled therapy with pegylated interferon-alpha2b and ribavirin, between 2002 and 2005 in France, and followed-up until 6 months after the end of treatment. Virological response was reported by the physician according to standard definitions and adverse events were monitored. Adherence to treatment was assessed by patient report. RESULTS: Among 1,860 patients, 403 (22%) had pre-existing psychiatric disorders, mostly depressive and anxiety disorders. Strict adherence was similar in psychiatric and non-psychiatric patients (35% versus 39%; P=0.20) as was the rate of sustained virological response (52% versus 51%; P=0.75). Conversely the rate of mental adverse events was higher in psychiatric patients (78% versus 57%; P<0.001). Baseline characteristics independently associated with the risk of later mental adverse events were history of depression, initial pegylated interferon-alpha2b dose and female gender. CONCLUSIONS: Antiviral therapy in hepatitis C patients with associated psychiatric disease appears as effective as in other patients but results in a higher rate of mental adverse events, emphasizing the need for close monitoring of these psychiatric patients.

Effectiveness of chronic hepatitis C treatment in drug users in routine clinical practice: results of a prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Injection drug users are often excluded from hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment. This study compares sustained virological response, adherence, and quality of life in patients with or without a history of illicit drug use in routine clinical practice. METHODS: This is a post-hoc analysis of a prospective, observational study conducted in 1860 patients who received peginterferon alpha-2b/ribavirin combination therapy. Nondrug users (NDUs) were defined as patients without a history of drug addiction; former drug users (FDUs) as patients who had stopped using illicit drugs or opioid maintenance therapy and active drug users (ADUs) as patients using illicit drugs or on opioid maintenance therapy. Virological response, adherence, and the health-related quality of life were assessed by the measure of HCV RNA in the serum, self-report and 36-item short-form health survey Questionnaire, respectively. RESULTS: The analyzed population included 1038 (56%) NDUs, 578 (31%) FDUs, and 244 (13%) ADUs. About 85% of ADUs were on opioid maintenance therapy and 25% used illicit drugs. Although ADUs had a more chaotic lifestyle and more psychiatric disorders, sustained virological response of ADUs (58%) did not differ from that of NDUs (49%) and FDUs (51%) (P=0.133). Adherence rates were 39% in NDUs and FDUs, and 37% in ADUs (P=0.883). Health-related quality of life was improved in the three groups after the end of treatment. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that HCV therapy in ADUs on opioid maintenance therapy is as effective as in other HCV patients. The effectiveness of HCV therapy in illicit drug users needs to be evaluated in further studies.

Maintenance therapy and 3-year outcome of opioid-dependent prisoners: a prospective study in France (2003-06).

AIMS: To describe the profile of imprisoned opioid-dependent patients, prescriptions of maintenance therapy at imprisonment and 3-year outcome in terms of re-incarceration and mortality. DESIGN: Prospective, observational study (France, 2003-06). SETTING: Health units of 47 remand prisons. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 507 opioid-dependent patients included within the first week of imprisonment between June 2003 and September 2004, inclusive. MEASUREMENTS: Physicians collected socio-demographic data, penal history, history of addiction, maintenance therapy and psychoactive agent use, general health status and comorbidities. Prescriptions at imprisonment were recorded by the prison pharmacist. Re-incarceration data were retrieved from the National Register of Inmates, survival data and causes of death from the National Registers of vital status and death causes. FINDINGS: Prison maintenance therapy was delivered at imprisonment to 394/507 (77.7%) patients. These patients had poorer health status, heavier opioid use and prison history and were less socially integrated than the remaining 113 patients. Over 3 years, 238/478 patients were re-incarcerated [51.3 re-incarcerations per 100 patient-years, 95% confidence interval (CI) 46.4-56.2]. Factors associated independently with re-incarceration were prior imprisonment and benzodiazepine use. After adjustment for confounders, maintenance therapy was not associated with a reduced rate of re-incarceration (adjusted relative risk 1.28, 95% CI 0.89-1.85). The all-cause mortality rate was eight per 1000 patient-years (n = 10, 95% CI 4-13). CONCLUSIONS: Prescription of maintenance therapy has increased sharply in French prisons since its introduction in the mid-1990s. However, the risk of re-imprisonment or death remains high among opioid-dependent prisoners. Substantial efforts are needed to implement more effective preventive policies.

Patient education improves adherence to peg-interferon and ribavirin in chronic genotype 2 or 3 hepatitis C virus infection: a prospective, real-life, observational study.

AIM: To evaluate the impact of therapeutic education on adherence to antiviral treatment and sustained virological response (SVR) in a real-life setting in genotype 2/3 hepatitis C, as there are few adherence data in genotype 2/3 infection, even from randomized trials. METHODS: This prospective survey included genotype 2/3 patients who received peg-interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin. There was no intervention. Adherence was self-reported over the past 4 wk (peg-interferon) or 7 d (ribavirin). Adherence to bitherapy was defined as adherence to the two drugs for >or= 20 wk. SVR was defined as undetectable RNA >or= 12 wk after the end of treatment. RESULTS: 370/674 patients received education during the first 3 mo of treatment. After 6 mo, adherence to bitherapy was higher in educated patients (61% vs 47%, P = 0.01). Adherence to peg-interferon was 78% vs 69% (P = 0.06). Adherence to ribavirin was 70% vs 56% (P = 0.006). The SVR (77% vs 70%, P = 0.05) and relapse (10% vs 16%, P = 0.09) rates tended to be improved. After adjustment for baseline differences, education improved adherence [Odds ratio (OR) 1.58, P = 0.04] but not the SVR (OR 1.54, P = 0.06). CONCLUSION: In genotype 2/3 patients, therapeutic education helped maintain real-life adherence to bitherapy.

A randomized trial of low-animal-protein or high-fiber diets for secondary prevention of calcium nephrolithiasis.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this trial was to evaluate the efficacy of a low-animal-protein diet (LAPD) or a high-fiber diet (HFD) for the prevention of calcium nephrolithiasis recurrence. METHODS: We conducted a 4-year randomized trial comparing the effect of 2 diets in 175 idiopathic calcium stone formers. Fifty-five were assigned to a LAPD (<13% of total energy derived from protein), 60 were assigned to a HFD (>25 g/day fiber) and 60 were placed on a normal diet (control group). The primary outcome measure was the time to the first recurrence of calcium nephrolithiasis. Daily urine compositions were analyzed at baseline, at month 4 (M4), M12, M24, M36 and M48. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients completed the trial (23 in the LAPD group, 27 in the HFD group and 23 in the control group). Recurrence was 48% (11/23) in the LAPD group, 63% (17/27) in the HFD group and 48% (11/23) in the control group (p = not significant). During follow-up, urinary calcium levels and other urine parameters did not change significantly in the 3 groups, except for a significant decrease in 24-hour urinary sulfate in the LAPD group. CONCLUSIONS: In idiopathic calcium stone formers, neither a LAPD nor a HFD appeared to provide protection against recurrence.

High dose daily interferon-alpha induction and secondary adjunction of ribavirin in treatment-naive patients with chronic hepatitis C. A multicentric, randomised, controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate in naive patients with chronic hepatitis C 1- the efficacy and safety of one month interferon alpha (IFN-alpha) induction regimen; 2- the potential virological benefit of a secondary adjunction of ribavirin among HCV RNA negative patients after 20 weeks of IFN therapy, with or without an initial 4-week IFN induction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 151 naive HCV-RNA positive patients presenting with biopsy- proven chronic hepatitis C and elevated ALT were randomised in a 2: 1 ratio in two arms: IFN-alpha 3 MU thrice a week (tiw) for 24 weeks (non-induced patients); IFN-alpha 6 MU daily for two weeks, then 3 MU daily for two weeks then 3 MU tiw for 20 weeks (induced patients). At week 24, HCV-RNA negative patients were randomised to receive in addition or not ribavirin 1-1.2 g daily for 24 additional weeks. Induction efficacy was assessed on the early viral response (EVR) defined as undetectable HCV RNA at week 4 then week 20. Ribavirin efficacy was assessed on the proportion of maintained complete response until the end of follow-up, 24 weeks after discontinuation of treatment. Data were analysed on an intent-to-treat basis. RESULTS: Efficacy of IFN-alpha induction: 104 patients were randomised to the non-induction group, 47 to the induction group. Gender, age, genotype distribution and HCV viral load at baseline did not differ significantly between the two groups. There was one treatment discontinuation because of adverse events in induced patients versus four in non-induced patients (P > 0.05). The 4 week EVR was significantly greater in induced patients in patients with HCV genotype 1, 4 or 5 (47% vs 12%, P=0.0002) only. There was no impact of induction in patients with HCV genotype 2 or 3. Efficacy of ribavirin: at week 24, 28 and 26 HCV-RNA negative patients were randomised to addition of ribavirin or not, respectively. Patients randomised to secondary additive ribavirin were more often HCV-RNA negative at the end of follow-up than patients treated with IFN-alpha alone: 18/28 (64%) vs 10/26 (39%); P=0.06. Among patients randomised to bitherapy, the relapse rate was significantly lower in patients with genotype 2 or 3 (0/12 vs 6/13, P=0.01) and not in those with genotype 1, 4 or 5 (5/11 vs 3/6, P=0.99). CONCLUSION: A 4 week IFN-alpha induction significantly increases the EVR rate in patients with HCV genotype 1, 4 or 5. Late secondary adjunction of ribavirin to IFN-alpha for 6 months in HCV-RNA negative patients after 6 months of IFN-alpha significantly decreases the relapse rate in patients with HCV genotype 2 or 3, but not in patients with genotypes 1, 4 or 5.

Independent prospective multicenter validation of biochemical markers (fibrotest-actitest) for the prediction of liver fibrosis and activity in patients with chronic hepatitis C: the fibropaca study.

OBJECTIVES: Fibrotest (FT) and Actitest (AT) are biochemical markers of fibrosis and activity for use as a non-invasive alternative to liver biopsy in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV). The aim of this study was to perform an external validation of FT and AT and to study the discordances between FT/AT and liver biopsy in patients with chronic hepatitis C. METHODS: A total of 519 consecutive patients with chronic HCV were prospectively included in five centers, with liver biopsy and biochemical markers taken at the same day. Fifteen patients were excluded because their biopsies could not be interpreted. Diagnostic accuracies were assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: Median biopsy size was 15 mm (range: 2-58), with 9 portal tracts (1-37) and 1 fragment (1-12). 46% (230/504) were classified F2-F4 in fibrosis and 39% A2-A3 in activity. FT area under ROC curve for diagnosis of activity (A2-A3), significant fibrosis (F2-F4), and severe fibrosis (F3-F4) were 0.73 [0.69-0.77], 0.79 [0.75-0.82], and 0.80 [0.76-0.83], respectively. Among the 92 patients (18%) with 2 fibrosis stages of discordance between FT and biopsy, the discordance was attributable to FT in 5% of cases, to biopsy in 4%, and undetermined in 9%. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective independent and multicenter study confirms the diagnostic value of FT and AT found in the princeps study and suggests that FT and AT can be an alternative to biopsy in most patients with chronic HCV.

Hepatitis B virus genotypes and extrahepatic manifestations.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study aimed at correlating the presence of extrahepatic manifestations with hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotypes in patients with chronic HBV infection. METHODS: This was a national (France), multicenter, retrospective, cross-sectional study. HBV genotypes were determined in 190 patients HBsAg-positive for at least 6 months and documented before any treatment. RESULTS: Patients were aged 42+/-15 years and mainly male (77%). Alcohol intake was high in 6% of them, ALT elevated in 73%; 27% were cirrhotic. All HBV genotypes were found, mainly A (24%), D (29%), C (11%), and E (10%). Thirty (16%) patients had clinical extrahepatic manifestations, mainly sensory-motor deficiency, sicca syndrome, myalgia, glomerulonephritis, and arthralgia-arthritis. Their presence was not related to any epidemiologic, viral (including genotypes) or hepatic factor, but to a higher platelet count (P=0.004). Twenty-nine (15%) patients had biological extrahepatic manifestations, mainly anti-smooth muscle, antinuclear, and anti-nucleosome antibodies. Their presence was related only to anti-HBe antibodies positivity (P=0.007) or elevated platelet count (P=0.003). Carrying precore mutant HBV increased by 2.8 folds the risk to have at least one extrahepatic biological manifestation. CONCLUSIONS: No relationships between HBV genotypes and the presence of extrahepatic manifestations were evidenced in patients with chronic HBV infection.

Assessment of exposure to a flood disaster in a mental-health study.

The lasting psychological consequences of disasters are an important public health issue, especially for determining the support needed by victims. One important question in evaluating psychological consequences remains the assessment of individual disaster-related experiences or stressors. This article proposes two approaches towards the construction of cumulative exposure indicators (CEIs) for a disaster and discusses their relevance for other disasters. In 1997, we carried out a cross-sectional study of the association between the severity of exposure to a 1992 flood in southeastern France and the prevalence of psychological symptoms 5 years later. We interviewed 500 randomly selected subjects residing in one of the most affected municipalities and constructed two CEIs: one based on relevant articles in the literature and the second based on the results of a principal component analysis (PCA) of all the items exploring exposure to the flood. We compared these CEIs with a map of flood damage and tested the association between these indicators and a score of post-traumatic stress symptoms. Most of the subjects (79.1%) had been exposed to at least one stressor besides physical presence. The two CEIs were significantly correlated with one another; comparisons with the map showed that both had good ability to discriminate between mild and severe exposure. Multiple regression analyses showed a significant exposure-effect relation, of the same level of magnitude and significance, between the post-traumatic stress disorder score and each CEI. Our results show the appropriateness of such indicators in assessing the effect of cumulative stress from natural disasters. Guidelines should be developed to improve the comparability of instruments and help standardize methods for evaluating cumulative stress from disasters insofar as possible. Further research is nonetheless necessary to assess the consistency and reproducibility of the data collected.