Functional decline, long term symptoms and course of frailty at 3-months follow-up in COVID-19 older survivors, a prospective observational cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Aging is one of the most important prognostic factors increasing the risk of clinical severity and mortality of COVID-19 infection. However, among patients over 75 years, little is known about post-acute functional decline. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with functional decline 3 months after COVID-19 onset, to identify long term COVID-19 symptoms and transitions between frailty statesafter COVID-19 onset in older hospitalized patients. METHODS: This prospective observational study included COVID-19 patients consecutively hospitalized from March to December 2020 in Acute Geriatric Ward in Nantes University Hospital. Functional decline, frailty status and long term symptoms were assessed at 3 month follow up. Functional status was assessed using the Activities of Daily Living simplified scale (ADL). Frailty status was evaluated using Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS). We performed multivariable analyses to identify factors associated with functional decline. RESULTS: Among the 318 patients hospitalized for COVID-19 infection, 198 were alive 3 months after discharge. At 3 months, functional decline occurred in 69 (36%) patients. In multivariable analysis, a significant association was found between functional decline and stroke (OR = 4,57, p = 0,003), history of depressive disorder (OR = 3,05, p = 0,016), complications (OR = 2,24, p = 0,039), length of stay (OR = 1,05, p = 0,025) and age (OR = 1,08, p = 0,028). At 3 months, 75 patients described long-term symptoms (49.0%). Of those with frailty (CFS scores ≥5) at 3-months follow-up, 30% were not frail at baseline. Increasing frailty defined by a worse CFS state between baseline and 3 months occurred in 41 patients (26.8%). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence that both the severity of the COVID-19 infection and preexisting medical conditions correlates with a functional decline at distance of the infection. This encourages practitioners to establish discharge personalized care plan based on a multidimensional geriatric assessment and in parallel on clinical severity evaluation.

[Knowledge of geriatric oncology in nursing homes: survey among healthcare professionals working in nursing homes in Pays-de-la-Loire.] / Connaissance de l'onco-gériatrie en Ehpad : enquête réalisée auprès des professionnels de santé dans les Ehpad des Pays-de-la-Loire.

OBJECTIVE: The increased incidence of cancer with age and rise of oral chemotherapy will affect the management of nursing home's residents. The aim of our study was to evaluate knowledge and practices in oncogeratric of nursing home's professionals from Pays-de-la-Loire and to raise awareness. METHODS: In partnership with UCOG-pl, OMEDIT and Observatoire du Cancer, we realised an observational survey from April to September 2017. Three questionnaires were sent to coordonary doctors (CD), nurses and paramedics, along with informative documents. RESULTS: In 589 nursing homes, 82 CD, 147 nurses and 240 paramedics gave an answer. The estimation of cancer's prevalence was 8,75%. Breast and prostate cancers were the most frequent. Nursing homes were an appropriate place to screen cancers by 79% of professionals. Some difficulties were reported by more than 80 % of them (coordination, residents' relationships...). At least, 20% of professionals couldn't define properly oncogeriatric. Only 73% of CD, 16% of nurses and 5% of paramedics knew about ongeriatric evaluations. Only 50% of CD knew about the G8 table, 15% of the oral cancer treatment file, 34% UCOG and 23% of the Observatoire du Cancer. Less than 5% of other professionals knew about this tool and these organisations. After information, most of the professionals think they will use them. Oral chemotherapy was already used by 90% of nurses, but the follow-up was considered inadequate. DISCUSSION: Our survey shows a low awareness about oncogeriatric by the nursing home's professionals. This misreading and under-diagnosis of cancer in nursing homes could partly explain by the lake of training, communication and coordination with oncology professionals and the distinctive characteristics of nursing home's residents. Study suggests that raising awareness of oncogeriatric and its challenges to all professionals would improve the care of the elderly with cancer.

[Geriatric units at the beginning of the 2020 COVID-19 epidemic in France]. / Les unités de gériatrie au début de l'épidémie du Covid-19 de 2020 en France.

The COVID-19 epidemic that started in November in China became a national epidemic from March 16, 2020 with the declaration of population containment in order to reduce the spread of the virus in France. From March 17 to March 27, 2020, the monitoring unit of the French society of geriatrics and gerontology decided to conduct a survey to analyze the implementation of the mobilization of geriatric units, given that this epidemic had shown that it resulted in excess mortality mainly among the elderly. The survey was able to bring together the response of 34 services, nine of which were located in a high epidemic cluster zone. Dedicated acute geriatric units for patients infected with COVID-19 were present in eight facilities, only outside the cluster zones. Nine geriatric follow-up and rehabilitation services were dedicated, an additional telemedicine activity concerned 35% of the facilities, and family listening and tablet communication facilities concerned 36% of the facilities. This survey is a snapshot of an initial moment in the epidemic. It provides an opportunity to describe the context in which this epidemic occurred in terms of geriatric policy, and to assess the responsiveness and inventiveness of these services in meeting the needs of the elderly.

Comorbidities against quality control of VKA therapy in non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a French national cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Given the prevalence of non-valvular atrial fibrillation in the geriatric population, thromboembolic prevention by means of vitamin K antagonists (VKA) is one of the most frequent daily concerns of practitioners. The effectiveness and safety of treatment with VKA correlates directly with maximizing the time in therapeutic range, with an International Normalized Ratio (INR) of 2.0-3.0. The older population concentrates many of factors known to influence INR rate, particularly concomitant medications and concurrent medical conditions, also defined as comorbidities. OBJECTIVE: Determine whether a high burden on comorbidities, defined by a Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) of 3 or greater, is associated a lower quality of INR control. STUDY-DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTINGS: French geriatric care units nationwide. PARTICIPANTS: 2164 patients aged 80 and over and treated with vitamin K antagonists. MEASUREMENTS: Comorbidities were assessed using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). The recorded data included age, sex, falls, kidney failure, hemorrhagic event, VKA treatment duration, and the number and type of concomitant medications. Quality of INR control, defined as time in therapeutic range (TTR), was assessed using the Rosendaal method. RESULTS: 487 patients were identified the low-quality control of INR group. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, low-quality control of INR was independently associated with a CCI ≥3 (OR = 1.487; 95% CI [1.15; 1.91]). The other variables associated with low-quality control of INR were: hemorrhagic event (OR = 3.151; 95% CI [1.64; 6.07]), hospitalization (OR = 1.614, 95% CI [1.21; 2.14]). CONCLUSION: An elevated CCI score (≥3) was associated with low-quality control of INR in elderly patients treated with VKA. Further research is needed to corroborate this finding.