Design of the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy vs. Stenting Trial (CREST).

RATIONALE: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and medical therapy were shown superior to medical therapy alone for symptomatic (> or =50%) and asymptomatic (> or =60%) stenosis. Carotid angioplasty stenting (CAS) offers a less invasive alternative. Establishing safety, efficacy, and durability of CAS requires rigorous comparison with CEA in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. AIMS: The objective is to compare the efficacy of CAS versus CEA in patients with symptomatic (> or =50%) or asymptomatic (> or =60%) extracranial carotid stenosis. DESIGN: The Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy vs. Stenting Trial (CREST) is a prospective, randomized, parallel, two-arm, multi-center trial with blinded endpoint adjudication. Primary endpoints are analyzed using standard time-to-event statistical modeling with adjustment for major baseline covariates. Primary analysis is on an intent-to-treat basis. STUDY OUTCOMES: The primary outcome is the occurrence of any stroke, myocardial infarction, or death during a 30-day peri-procedural period, and ipsilateral stroke during follow-up of up to four years. Secondary outcomes include restenosis and health-related quality of life.

The challenge of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND/INTRODUCTION: Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) represent a spectrum of ischaemic myocardial events that share a similar pathophysiology. ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), the most severe form of ACS short of sudden cardiac death, is a significant public health problem with an estimated 500,000 STEMI events every year in the United States. TREATMENT/THERAPY: The mortality and morbidity associated with STEMI is significant. Early reperfusion therapy is the most important aspect of the treatment of STEMI. There are two main methods of reperfusion therapy: percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and fibrinolytic therapy, with PCI being the preferred method. In addition to standard reperfusion therapy, antithrombotics (unfractionated heparin and low molecular weight heparins) and antiplatelet agents (aspirin, clopidogrel and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors) are critical adjuncts, effective in the treatment of acute STEMI. CONCLUSIONS: The survival of patients with STEMI depends on rapid diagnosis and optimal early treatment. Guidelines for the management of patients with STEMI recommend PCI within 90 min of presentation and that fibrinolytics are administered within 30 min. However, only a fraction of patients undergo reperfusion within the recommended time. Improvements in protocols for identifying STEMI cases are therefore required to allow reperfusion therapy to be initiated sooner. Secondary prevention is another important aspect of STEMI management, and patients should be encouraged to adopt strategies that reduce the risk of subsequent ischaemic events.

Therapeutic angiogenesis for patients with limb ischemia by utilization of fibrin meshwork. Pilot randomized controlled study.

AIM: The aim of this paper is to assess the feasibility and efficacy of fibrin in inducing neovascularization as an angiogenic substance and/or carrier for vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in patients with limb ischemia. METHODS: Twenty-three patients with limb ischemia and referred for below the knee amputations were randomized for treatment: group 1, 7 patients received only a saline injection; group 2, 9 received intramuscular injection of fibrin and group 3, 7 received the fibrin composition with deferoxamine and added VEGF(165). The fibrin meshwork was introduced into the popliteal area of the diseased limbs using a dual syringe system (1 contained thrombin solution [1 mg, 5000 U] and 1 contained fibrinogen [1 mg, Baxter Hyland Immuno] solution). In group 3, Deferoxamine (100 microg) and 500 microg of VEGF(165) were added to the fibrinogen solution. RESULTS: In the control group 5 patients had undergone below the knee amputation at the 3-6 month follow-up. Only 1 patient from Group 2 had below the knee amputation 5 months following Fibrin only administration. Clinical improvement was noted in all 8 patients following fibrin administration and in all 7 patients injected with the fibrin meshwork, deferoxamine and VEGF combination. CONCLUSION: IM injection of fibrin is safe and appears to be an efficient method to treat limb ischemia. These findings indicate that use of fibrin may be a novel and simple method for inducing therapeutic angiogenesis.

Microembolization during carotid stenting with the distal-balloon antiemboli system.

BACKGROUND: The distal-balloon protection system is being evaluated for its efficacy in preventing embolic neurological events during carotid stenting (CAS). We sought to determine the effect of this system on the frequency of the Doppler-detected microembolic signals (MES) during CAS. METHODS: Using transcranial Doppler, we compared the frequency of MES during CAS in 2 groups; 39 patients without distal protection and 37 with the distal-balloon protection system (GuardWire, Percusurge, Sunnyville, CA). There was no significant difference in the clinical or angiographic characteristics between the 2 groups. Three phases with increased MES counts were identified during the unprotected CAS; stent deployment, predilation, and postdilation (mean+/-SD: 75+/-57, 32+/-36, and 27+/-25, respectively). RESULTS: The distal-balloon protection significantly reduced the frequency of MES during CAS (MES-counts: 164+/-108 in the control vs 68+/-83 in the protection group, p=0.002) particularly during these 3 phases. MES in the protection group were detected predominantly during sheath placement, guidewire manipulation and during the distal-balloon deflation. CONCLUSIONS: Three phases with increased MES counts were identified during the unprotected CAS, e.g. stent deployment, predilation and postdilation. The distal-balloon protection system significantly reduced the frequency of MES during CAS, particularly during these 3 phases.

Subarachnoidal hemorrhage following carotid stenting with the distal-balloon protection.

A 61-year-old man underwent carotid stenting with the distal-balloon protection system for symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. During the procedure, progressive elevation of the systolic blood pressure occurred, reaching a peak of 220 mm Hg immediately following deflation of the distal balloon. This was associated with severe headaches and progressive deterioration in the mental status to a coma. Head CT scan showed massive subarachnoidal hemorrhage contralateral to the stented side and a secondary intracerebral hemorrhage. Despite immediate successful blood pressure control, his condition deteriorated and he died 2 days later.

Effect of short pulsed nonablative infrared laser irradiation on vascular cells in vitro and neointimal hyperplasia in a rabbit balloon injury model.

BACKGROUND: Neointimal hyperplasia after PTCA is an important component of restenosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: Cultures of rabbit endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells (SMCs) were irradiated with different doses of nonablative infrared (1064-nm) radiation. Normalized viability index detected with nondestructive Alamar Blue assay and direct cell count were studied. Our experiments demonstrated dose-dependent cytostatic or cytotoxic effects of laser irradiation. We also evaluated the long-term effect of endoluminal nonablative infrared laser irradiation on neointimal hyperplasia in a rabbit balloon injury model. PTCA of both iliac arteries of 23 New Zealand White rabbits was performed. One iliac artery was subjected to intra-arterial subablative infrared irradiation via a diffuse tip fiber. The contralateral vessel served as control. The diet was supplemented with 0.25% cholesterol and 2% peanut oil for 10 days before and 60 days after PTCA. Morphometry after 60 days showed that intimal areas were 0.76+/-0.18 and 1.85+/-0.30 mm(2) in the laser and control arteries, respectively (P=2.2x10(-11)). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that nonablative infrared laser inhibited neointimal hyperplasia after PTCA in cholesterol-fed rabbits for up to 60 days.

Procedural safety and short-term outcome of ambulatory carotid stenting.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Ambulatory procedures increase patient comfort and enhance cost-effectiveness. We sought to determine the feasibility and safety of ambulatory carotid stenting. METHODS: A selected group of patients was admitted and discharged the same day after the carotid stenting procedure. Immediate and short-term outcomes are reported. RESULTS: A total of 98 ambulatory carotid stenting procedures (98 hemispheres in 92 patients) were performed. There were 66 men (72%), and the mean age was 70+/-9 years. Of the patients, 28% had neurological symptoms related to the treated artery within 3 months before the procedure. Sixteen percent of the patients had prior carotid endarterectomy, 4% had prior ipsilateral neck radiation, and 8% had complete occlusion of the contralateral internal carotid artery. Successful access site hemostasis was ensured in all patients with suture-mediated vascular closure devices in 96 (98%) and manual compression in 2. Clinical follow-up was available for 96% of the patients at a mean time of 6+/-4 months. There were no neurological events, deaths, repeated procedures, or major access site complications. CONCLUSIONS: Ambulatory carotid stenting is both safe and feasible. This approach will enhance the applicability of the procedure by increasing patient comfort and potentially reducing procedural costs.

Effect of the distal-balloon protection system on microembolization during carotid stenting.

BACKGROUND: The distal-balloon protection system is being evaluated for its efficacy in preventing embolic neurological events during carotid stenting (CAS). We sought to determine the effect of this system on the frequency of Doppler-detected microembolic signals (MES) during CAS. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using transcranial Doppler, we compared the frequency of MES during CAS in 2 groups: 39 patients without distal protection and 37 who used the distal-balloon protection system (GuardWire). There were no significant differences in the clinical or angiographic characteristics between the 2 groups. Three phases with increased MES counts were identified during unprotected CAS; these were stent deployment, predilation, and postdilation (75+/-57, 32+/-36, and 27+/-25 METS, respectively). The distal-balloon protection significantly reduced the frequency of MES during CAS (MES counts: 164+/-108 in the control versus 68+/-83 in the protection group; P=0.002), particularly during these 3 phases. MES in the protection group were detected predominantly during sheath placement, guidewire manipulation, and distal-balloon deflation. CONCLUSION: Three phases with increased MES counts were identified during unprotected CAS (eg, stent deployment, predilation, and postdilation). The distal-balloon protection system significantly reduced the frequency of MES during CAS, particularly during these 3 phases.

Embolization via collateral circulation during carotid stenting with the distal balloon protection system.

PURPOSE: To describe a potential route for embolization to the middle cerebral artery (MCA) during carotid stenting with the distal balloon protection system. CASE REPORT: An 82-year-old man with symptomatic severe carotid artery stenosis underwent elective carotid stenting with distal-balloon protection. Despite complete occlusion of the distal internal carotid artery, frequent emboli were detected in the ipsilateral MCA by transcranial Doppler (TCD) during the procedure. Intracranial angiography, performed during the distal-balloon protection, revealed filling of the MCA through collaterals from the ipsilateral external carotid artery. The procedure was successfully completed without complications. The patient remains asymptomatic at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: During carotid stenting with distal-balloon protection, asymptomatic embolization into the ipsilateral MCA may occur through collateral circulation. The clinical significance of these emboli is uncertain.

Emergency stenting to treat neurological complications occurring after carotid endarterectomy.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of emergency stent implantation for the treatment of perioperative stroke after carotid endarterectomy (CEA). BACKGROUND: Carotid endarterectomy has been proven safe and effective in reducing the risk of stroke in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with >60% carotid artery stenosis. However, perioperative stroke has been reported in 1.5% to 9% of CEA cases. The management of such a complication is challenging. Recently, percutaneous transluminal carotid angioplasty with stent deployment has emerged as a valuable and alternative strategy for the treatment of carotid artery disease. METHODS: Between April 1998 and February 2000, 18 of the 995 patients (1.8%) who had CEA in our institution experienced perioperative major or minor neurological complications. Of these, 13 patients underwent emergency carotid angiogram and eventual stent implantation, whereas the remaining five had surgery re-exploration. RESULTS: Carotid angiogram was performed within 20+/-10 min and revealed vessel flow-limiting dissection (five cases) or thrombosis (eight cases). Percutaneous transluminal carotid angioplasty with direct stenting (self-expandable stent) was performed in all 13 cases. Angiographic success was 100%. Complete remission of neurological symptoms occurred in 11 of the 13 patients treated by stent implantation and in one of the five patients treated by surgical re-exploration (p = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: Stent implantation seems to be a safe and effective strategy in the treatment of perioperative stroke complicating CEA, especially when carotid dissection represents the main anatomic problem.

Current status of carotid bifurcation angioplasty and stenting based on a consensus of opinion leaders.

OBJECTIVE: Carotid bifurcation angioplasty and stenting (CBAS) has generated controversy and widely divergent opinions about its current therapeutic role. To resolve differences and establish a unified view of CBAS' present role, a consensus conference of 17 experts, world opinion leaders from five countries, was held on November 21, 1999. METHODS: These 17 participants had previously answered 18 key questions on current CBAS issues. At the conference these 18 questions and participants' answers were discussed and in some cases modified to determine points of agreement (consensus), near consensus, (prevailing opinion), or divided opinion (disagreement). RESULTS: Conference discussion added two modified questions, placing a total of 20 key questions before the participants, representing four specialties (interventional radiology, seven; vascular surgery, six; interventional cardiology, three; neurosurgery, one). It is interesting that consensus was reached on the answers to 11 (55%) of 20 of the questions, and near consensus was reached on answers to 6 (30%) of 20 of the questions. Only with the answers to three (15%) of the questions was there persisting controversy. Moreover, both these differences and areas of agreement crossed specialty lines. Consensus Conclusions: CBAS should not currently undergo widespread practice, which should await results of randomized trials. CBAS is currently appropriate treatment for patients at high risk in experienced centers. CBAS is not generally appropriate for patients at low risk. Neurorescue skills should be available if CBAS is performed. When cerebral protection devices are available, they should be used for CBAS. Adequate stents and technology for performing CBAS currently exist. There were divergent opinions regarding the proportions of patients presently acceptable for CBAS treatment (<5% to 100%, mean 44%) and best treated by CBAS (<3% to 100%, mean 34%). These and other consensus conclusions will help physicians in all specialties deal with CBAS in a rational way rather than by being guided by unsubstantiated claims.

Integrated minimally invasive approaches for the treatment of atherosclerotic vascular diseases: Hybrid procedures.

Patients may develop simultaneous symptoms of atherosclerotic vascular disease from different arterial beds. A concurrent minimally invasive approach to the management of these clinical situations may be an advantage over conventional surgical procedures. This study describes two separate case series of patients undergoing coronary/peripheral (n = 38) and peripheral/peripheral procedures (n = 10). Technical and clinical success was achieved in all patients. There were two periprocedural complications (retroperitoneal bleed and septicemia) in the coronary/peripheral series and no complications in the peripheral/peripheral series. We also present five case reports to illustrate the utility of hybrid procedures in various clinical settings. This study suggests that the use of simultaneous or sequential minimally invasive procedures appears to be a safe and feasible strategy for the treatment of patients with symptoms from more than one vascular bed. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2001;52:154-161.

Carotid angioplasty with stenting in post-carotid endarterectomy restenosis.

Recurrent stenosis post-carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is not a solitary or unusual phenomenon. Compared to the initial CEA, the reoperation is often more technically challenging and frequently results in local and neurological complications. Carotid artery angioplasty with stenting (CAS) is currently being investigated as an alternative to carotid endarterectomy. In our study, ninety-nine patients underwent CAS in 110 arteries. Procedural success was 99% (109/110). Our results show that CAS treatment in post-CEA restenosis, especially with improved technique and distal protection, is safe with a low neurological complication rate, without any "local" complications and without any cranial nerve palsies. This study suggests that the future primary mode of treatment of post-CEA restenosis might be carotid stenting rather than surgery.

Immediate and late clinical outcomes of carotid artery stenting in patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis: a 5-year prospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Carotid stenting is a less invasive percutaneous procedure than carotid endarterectomy for the treatment of carotid stenosis. Reports suggest that it can be performed with periprocedural complication rates similar to those of carotid endarterectomy. The purpose of this study was to determine short- and long-term outcomes in the largest prospective cohort of carotid stenting patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study followed 528 consecutive patients (604 hemispheres/arteries) undergoing carotid stenting. There was a 0.6% (n=3) fatal stroke rate and 1% (n=5) nonstroke death rate at 30 days. The major stroke rate was 1% (n=6), and the minor stroke rate was 4.8% (n=29). The overall 30-day stroke and death rate was 7.4% (n=43). Over the 5-year study period, the 30-day minor stroke rate improved from 7.1% (n=7) for the first year to 3.1% (n=5) for the fifth year (P:<0.05 for trend). The best predictor of 30-day stroke and death was age >/=80 years. After the 30-day period, the incidence of fatal and nonfatal stroke was 3.2% (n=31). On Kaplan-Meier analysis, the 3-year freedom from ipsilateral or fatal stroke was 92+/-1%. CONCLUSIONS: Experience from a single group of operators demonstrates that carotid stenting can be performed with an acceptable 30-day complication rate. Late follow-up also demonstrates a low rate of fatal and nonfatal stroke. These results suggest that carotid stenting may be comparable to carotid endarterectomy, and it underscores the clinical equipoise and premise for the National Institute of Health-supported, randomized Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy Versus Stent Trial comparing carotid stenting with carotid endarterectomy.

Validity of duplex ultrasound as a diagnostic modality for internal carotid artery disease.

There is an increasing trend to rely on duplex ultrasound rather than angiography to measure an internal carotid artery stenosis. The aim of this study was to determine the validity of ultrasound assessment of carotid stenosis performed in community based vascular laboratories. We compared ultrasound with angiography in 225 patients referred to us for carotid intervention. Mild lesions were diagnosed by ultrasound with a sensitivity of 54%, specificity of 89%, and a positive predictive value of 89% compared with angiography. Severe lesions had a sensitivity of 93%, a specificity of 67%, and a positive predictive value of 45%. Receiver operator characteristic curves demonstrated the optimal ultrasound cut-off value of 66% stenosis as a predictor of >60% stenosis measured angiographically, is associated with a false positive rate of 38%, and a false negative rate of 9%. Similarly, if a cut-off of 76% on ultrasound is used to predict >70% stenosis measured angiographically, it would be associated with a 29% false positive rate and a false negative rate of 11%. Despite the value of non-invasive testing for carotid disease, duplex ultrasonography performed in non-accredited and some accredited laboratories may produce highly variable results. Using ultrasound as the sole diagnostic test to determine the severity of a carotid stenosis may result in a high number of inappropriate operations and a large proportion of patients who may not be offered treatment due to false negative diagnoses.

Carotid stenting with distal-balloon protection via the transbrachial approach.

PURPOSE: To document the feasibility of brachial artery access for carotid stenting with distal-balloon protection of the internal carotid artery (ICA). TECHNIQUE: Via percutaneous access to the brachial artery, a large double-curve catheter is advanced into the aortic arch over a hydrophilic guidewire to cannulate the left common carotid artery. Following sheath exchange, a GuardWire distal-protection balloon is positioned within the left ICA distal to the stenosis. The lesion is dilated, followed by deployment and dilation of a self-expanding stent. Transcranial Doppler monitoring shows only scarce microembolic signals during the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Carotid stenting with distal balloon protection via the brachial artery appears feasible as an alternative to standard femoral access.

Carotid artery stenting: technical considerations.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is one of the most frequently performed operations in the United States. To offer patients a less invasive means to achieve the same goal, carotid artery stenting (CAS) is investigated as an alternative treatment to CEA. METHODS: Three hundred ninety patients underwent CAS, with 451 vessels treated. CAS was performed using a coaxial system with a 7F 90-cm sheath for predilation, stent placement, and stent dilation. Pretreatment antiplatelet therapy was administered. We currently practice same-day admissions and 23-hour discharges. RESULTS: The technical success rate was 98%. The 30-day mortality/morbidity rates were as follows: death, 1.7% (two [0.5%] neurologic and five [1.2%] systemic] major strokes, 0.9% (two of four were related to the intervention); minor strokes, 5.5%. Among 25 patients who suffered minor strokes, 14 achieved complete recovery. On an annual basis, the incidence of minor stroke declined from 6.8% (1994-1995), to 5.8% (1995-1996), 5.3% (1996-1997), and then 4% (1997-1998), with no major strokes or neurologic deaths occurring during the 1997 to 1998 period. CONCLUSION: CAS is an effective treatment for carotid stenosis. With proper selection of patients and meticulous technique, complication rates compare favorably with those of CEA.