Exercise Blood Pressure in Heart Failure With Preserved and Reduced Ejection Fraction.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate hemodynamic correlates of inducible blood pressure (BP) pulsatility with exercise in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), to identify relationships to outcomes, and to compare this with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). BACKGROUND: In HFpEF, determinants and consequences of exercise BP pulsatility are not well understood. METHODS: We measured exercise BP in 146 patients with HFpEF who underwent invasive cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Pulsatile BP was evaluated as proportionate pulse pressure (PrPP), the ratio of pulse pressure to systolic pressure. We measured pulmonary arterial catheter pressures, Fick cardiac output, respiratory gas exchange, and arterial stiffness. We correlated BP changes to central hemodynamics and cardiovascular outcome (nonelective cardiovascular hospitalization) and compared findings with 57 patients with HFrEF from the same referral population. RESULTS: In HFpEF, only age (standardized beta = 0.593; P < 0.001), exercise stroke volume (standardized beta = 0.349; P < 0.001), and baseline arterial stiffness (standardized beta = 0.182; P = 0.02) were significant predictors of peak exercise PrPP in multivariable analysis (R = 0.661). In HFpEF, lower PrPP was associated with lower risk of cardiovascular events, despite adjustment for confounders (HR:0.53 for PrPP below median; 95% CI: 0.28-0.98; P = 0.043). In HFrEF, lower exercise PrPP was not associated with arterial stiffness but was associated with lower peak exercise stroke volume (P = 0.013) and higher risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes (P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: In HFpEF, greater inducible BP pulsatility measured using exercise PrPP reflects greater arterial stiffness and higher risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes, in contrast to HFrEF where inducible exercise BP pulsatility relates to stroke volume reserve and favorable outcome.

Exercise performance in patients with post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to patients with unexplained dyspnea.

BACKGROUND: Dyspnea and exercise intolerance are commonly reported post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC), but routine diagnostic testing is often normal. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) offers comprehensive assessment of dyspnea to characterize pulmonary PASC. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of CPET performed on patients reporting dyspnea and/or exercise intolerance following confirmed Covid-19 between August 1, 2020 and March 1, 2021, and compared them to age- and sex-matched patients with unexplained dyspnea referred for CPET at the same center in the pre-Covid-19 era. FINDINGS: Compared to matched unexplained dyspnea comparators, PASC patients shared similar medical comorbidities and subjective dyspnea at referral (mMRC score 1.6 ± 0.9 vs. 1.4 ± 0.9, P = 0.5). Fifteen (83.3%) PASC patients underwent high resolution computed tomography of the chest, of which half (46.7%) were normal, and 17 (94.4%) patients had pulmonary function testing, of which the majority (76.5%) were normal. All patients underwent CPET, and 12 (67%) had normal findings. Compared to matched comparators, PASC patients had similar peak oxygen consumption, oxygen consumption at ventilatory anaerobic threshold, and ventilatory efficiency measured by the minute ventilation to carbon dioxide production (VE/VCO2) slope. INTERPRETATION: Despite prominent dyspnea, physiological abnormalities on CPET were mild across a range of initial Covid-19 severity and similar to matched comparators referred for dyspnea without antecedent SARS-CoV-2. FUNDING: The project was supported by the NHLBI (R01HL131029, R01HL151841, U10HL110337, T32HL116275) and a KL2 award (5KL2TR002542-02) from Harvard Catalyst.

Metabolic Cost of Exercise Initiation in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction vs Community-Dwelling Adults.

Importance: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a joint metabolic and cardiovascular disorder with significant noncardiac contributions. Objective: To define and quantify the metabolic cost of initiating exercise in individuals with and without HFpEF and its functional consequences. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study included individuals with hemodynamically confirmed HFpEF from the Massachusetts General Hospital Exercise Study (MGH-ExS) and community-dwelling participants from the Framingham Heart Study (FHS). Analysis began April 2016 and ended November 2020. Exposures: Internal work (IW), a measure of work equivalents required to initiate movement. Main Outcomes and Measures: Using breath-by-breath oxygen uptake (V̇o2) measurements and V̇o2-work rate associations, cost of initiating exercise (IW) in patients with HFpEF (MGH-ExS) and in community-dwelling individuals (FHS) was quantified. Linear regression was used to estimate associations between IW and clinical/hemodynamic measures. Results: Of 3231 patients, 184 (5.7%) had HFpEF and were from MGH-ExS, and 3047 (94.3%) were community-dwelling individuals from FHS. In the MGH-ExS cohort, 86 (47%) were women, the median (interquartile range) age was 63 (53-72) years, and the median (interquartile range) peak V̇o2 level was 13.33 (11.77-15.62) mL/kg/min. In the FHS cohort, 1620 (53%) were women, the median (interquartile range) age was 54 (48-60) years, and the median (interquartile range) peak V̇o2 level was 22.2 (17.85-27.35) mL/kg/min. IW was higher in patients with HFpEF and accounted for 27% (interquartile range, 21%-39%) of the total work (IW + measured external workload on the cycle), compared with 15% (interquartile range, 12%-20%) of that in FHS participants. Body mass index accounted for greatest explained variance in patients with HFpEF from MGH-ExS and FHS participants (22% and 18%, respectively), while resting cardiac output and biventricular filling pressures were not significantly associated with variance in IW in patients with HFpEF. A higher IW in patients with HFpEF was associated with a greater increase in left- and right-sided cardiac filing pressure during unloaded exercise, despite similar resting hemodynamic measures across IW. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that internal work, a new body mass index-related measure reflecting the metabolic cost of initiating movement, is higher in individuals with HFpEF compared with middle-aged adults in the community and is associated with steep, early increases in cardiac filling pressures. These findings highlight the importance of quantifying heterogeneous responses to exercise initiation when evaluating functional intolerance in individuals at risk for or with HFpEF.

Feasibility and Consistency of Results with Deployment of an In-Line Filter for Exercise-Based Evaluations of Patients With Heart Failure During the Novel Coronavirus Disease-2019 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Exercise testing plays an important role in evaluating heart failure prognosis and selecting patients for advanced therapeutic interventions. However, concern for severe acute respiratory syndrome novel coronavirus-2 transmission during exercise testing has markedly curtailed performance of exercise testing during the novel coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic. METHODS AND RESULTS: To examine the feasibility to conducting exercise testing with an in-line filter, 2 healthy volunteer subjects each completed 2 incremental exercise tests, one with discrete stages of increasing resistance and one with a continuous ramp. Each subject performed 1 test with an electrostatic filter in-line with the system measuring gas exchange and air flow, and 1 test without the filter in place. Oxygen uptake and minute ventilation were highly consistent when evaluated with and without use of an electrostatic filter with a >99.9% viral efficiency. CONCLUSIONS: Deployment of a commercially available in-line electrostatic viral filter during cardiopulmonary exercise testing is feasible and provides consistent data compared with testing without a filter.

Impaired Exercise Tolerance in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Quantification of Multiorgan System Reserve Capacity.

Exercise intolerance is a principal feature of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), whether or not there is evidence of congestion at rest. The degree of functional limitation observed in HFpEF is comparable to patients with advanced heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. Exercise intolerance in HFpEF is characterized by impairments in the physiological reserve capacity of multiple organ systems, but the relative cardiac and extracardiac deficits vary among individuals. Detailed measurements made during exercise are necessary to identify and rank-order the multiorgan system limitations in reserve capacity that culminate in exertional intolerance in a given person. We use a case-based approach to comprehensively review mechanisms of exercise intolerance and optimal approaches to evaluate exercise capacity in HFpEF. We also summarize recent and ongoing trials of novel devices, drugs, and behavioral interventions that aim to improve specific exercise measures such as peak oxygen uptake, 6-min walk distance, heart rate, and hemodynamic profiles in HFpEF. Evaluation during the clinically relevant physiological perturbation of exercise holds promise to improve the precision with which HFpEF is defined and therapeutically targeted.