A Guideline for Open-Source Tools to Make Medical Imaging Data Ready for Artificial Intelligence Applications: A Society of Imaging Informatics in Medicine (SIIM) Survey.

In recent years, the role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in medical imaging has become increasingly prominent, with the majority of AI applications approved by the FDA being in imaging and radiology in 2023. The surge in AI model development to tackle clinical challenges underscores the necessity for preparing high-quality medical imaging data. Proper data preparation is crucial as it fosters the creation of standardized and reproducible AI models while minimizing biases. Data curation transforms raw data into a valuable, organized, and dependable resource and is a fundamental process to the success of machine learning and analytical projects. Considering the plethora of available tools for data curation in different stages, it is crucial to stay informed about the most relevant tools within specific research areas. In the current work, we propose a descriptive outline for different steps of data curation while we furnish compilations of tools collected from a survey applied among members of the Society of Imaging Informatics (SIIM) for each of these stages. This collection has the potential to enhance the decision-making process for researchers as they select the most appropriate tool for their specific tasks.

Checklist for Reproducibility of Deep Learning in Medical Imaging.

The application of deep learning (DL) in medicine introduces transformative tools with the potential to enhance prognosis, diagnosis, and treatment planning. However, ensuring transparent documentation is essential for researchers to enhance reproducibility and refine techniques. Our study addresses the unique challenges presented by DL in medical imaging by developing a comprehensive checklist using the Delphi method to enhance reproducibility and reliability in this dynamic field. We compiled a preliminary checklist based on a comprehensive review of existing checklists and relevant literature. A panel of 11 experts in medical imaging and DL assessed these items using Likert scales, with two survey rounds to refine responses and gauge consensus. We also employed the content validity ratio with a cutoff of 0.59 to determine item face and content validity. Round 1 included a 27-item questionnaire, with 12 items demonstrating high consensus for face and content validity that were then left out of round 2. Round 2 involved refining the checklist, resulting in an additional 17 items. In the last round, 3 items were deemed non-essential or infeasible, while 2 newly suggested items received unanimous agreement for inclusion, resulting in a final 26-item DL model reporting checklist derived from the Delphi process. The 26-item checklist facilitates the reproducible reporting of DL tools and enables scientists to replicate the study's results.

THA-Net: A Deep Learning Solution for Next-Generation Templating and Patient-specific Surgical Execution.

BACKGROUND: This study introduces THA-Net, a deep learning inpainting algorithm for simulating postoperative total hip arthroplasty (THA) radiographs from a single preoperative pelvis radiograph input, while being able to generate predictions either unconditionally (algorithm chooses implants) or conditionally (surgeon chooses implants). METHODS: The THA-Net is a deep learning algorithm which receives an input preoperative radiograph and subsequently replaces the target hip joint with THA implants to generate a synthetic yet realistic postoperative radiograph. We trained THA-Net on 356,305 pairs of radiographs from 14,357 patients from a single institution's total joint registry and evaluated the validity (quality of surgical execution) and realism (ability to differentiate real and synthetic radiographs) of its outputs against both human-based and software-based criteria. RESULTS: The surgical validity of synthetic postoperative radiographs was significantly higher than their real counterparts (mean difference: 0.8 to 1.1 points on 10-point Likert scale, P < .001), but they were not able to be differentiated in terms of realism in blinded expert review. Synthetic images showed excellent validity and realism when analyzed with already validated deep learning models. CONCLUSION: We developed a THA next-generation templating tool that can generate synthetic radiographs graded higher on ultimate surgical execution than real radiographs from training data. Further refinement of this tool may potentiate patient-specific surgical planning and enable technologies such as robotics, navigation, and augmented reality (an online demo of THA-Net is available at: https://demo.osail.ai/tha_net).

THA-AID: Deep Learning Tool for Total Hip Arthroplasty Automatic Implant Detection With Uncertainty and Outlier Quantification.

BACKGROUND: Revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) requires preoperatively identifying in situ implants, a time-consuming and sometimes unachievable task. Although deep learning (DL) tools have been attempted to automate this process, existing approaches are limited by classifying few femoral and zero acetabular components, only classify on anterior-posterior (AP) radiographs, and do not report prediction uncertainty or flag outlier data. METHODS: This study introduces Total Hip Arhtroplasty Automated Implant Detector (THA-AID), a DL tool trained on 241,419 radiographs that identifies common designs of 20 femoral and 8 acetabular components from AP, lateral, or oblique views and reports prediction uncertainty using conformal prediction and outlier detection using a custom framework. We evaluated THA-AID using internal, external, and out-of-domain test sets and compared its performance with human experts. RESULTS: THA-AID achieved internal test set accuracies of 98.9% for both femoral and acetabular components with no significant differences based on radiographic view. The femoral classifier also achieved 97.0% accuracy on the external test set. Adding conformal prediction increased true label prediction by 0.1% for acetabular and 0.7 to 0.9% for femoral components. More than 99% of out-of-domain and >89% of in-domain outlier data were correctly identified by THA-AID. CONCLUSIONS: The THA-AID is an automated tool for implant identification from radiographs with exceptional performance on internal and external test sets and no decrement in performance based on radiographic view. Importantly, this is the first study in orthopedics to our knowledge including uncertainty quantification and outlier detection of a DL model.

Anonymizing Radiographs Using an Object Detection Deep Learning Algorithm.

Radiographic markers contain protected health information that must be removed before public release. This work presents a deep learning algorithm that localizes radiographic markers and selectively removes them to enable de-identified data sharing. The authors annotated 2000 hip and pelvic radiographs to train an object detection computer vision model. Data were split into training, validation, and test sets at the patient level. Extracted markers were then characterized using an image processing algorithm, and potentially useful markers (eg, "L" and "R") without identifying information were retained. The model achieved an area under the precision-recall curve of 0.96 on the internal test set. The de-identification accuracy was 100% (400 of 400), with a de-identification false-positive rate of 1% (eight of 632) and a retention accuracy of 93% (359 of 386) for laterality markers. The algorithm was further validated on an external dataset of chest radiographs, achieving a de-identification accuracy of 96% (221 of 231). After fine-tuning the model on 20 images from the external dataset to investigate the potential for improvement, a 99.6% (230 of 231, P = .04) de-identification accuracy and decreased false-positive rate of 5% (26 of 512) were achieved. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of a two-pass approach in image de-identification. Keywords: Conventional Radiography, Skeletal-Axial, Thorax, Experimental Investigations, Supervised Learning, Transfer Learning, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2023 See also the commentary by Chang and Li in this issue.

Deep Learning Artificial Intelligence Tool for Automated Radiographic Determination of Posterior Tibial Slope in Patients With ACL Injury.

Background: An increased posterior tibial slope (PTS) corresponds with an increased risk of graft failure after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR). Validated methods of manual PTS measurements are subject to potential interobserver variability and can be inefficient on large datasets. Purpose/Hypothesis: To develop a deep learning artificial intelligence technique for automated PTS measurement from standard lateral knee radiographs. It was hypothesized that this deep learning tool would be able to measure the PTS on a high volume of radiographs expeditiously and that these measurements would be similar to previously validated manual measurements. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: A deep learning U-Net model was developed on a cohort of 300 postoperative short-leg lateral radiographs from patients who underwent ACLR to segment the tibial shaft, tibial joint surface, and tibial tuberosity. The model was trained via a random split after an 80 to 20 train-validation scheme. Masks for training images were manually segmented, and the model was trained for 400 epochs. An image processing pipeline was then deployed to annotate and measure the PTS using the predicted segmentation masks. Finally, the performance of this combined pipeline was compared with human measurements performed by 2 study personnel using a previously validated manual technique for measuring the PTS on short-leg lateral radiographs on an independent test set consisting of both pre- and postoperative images. Results: The U-Net semantic segmentation model achieved a mean Dice similarity coefficient of 0.885 on the validation cohort. The mean difference between the human-made and computer-vision measurements was 1.92° (σ = 2.81° [P = .24]). Extreme disagreements between the human and machine measurements, as defined by ≥5° differences, occurred <5% of the time. The model was incorporated into a web-based digital application front-end for demonstration purposes, which can measure a single uploaded image in Portable Network Graphics format in a mean time of 5 seconds. Conclusion: We developed an efficient and reliable deep learning computer vision algorithm to automate the PTS measurement on short-leg lateral knee radiographs. This tool, which demonstrated good agreement with human annotations, represents an effective clinical adjunct for measuring the PTS as part of the preoperative assessment of patients with ACL injuries.

A Stepwise Approach to Analyzing Musculoskeletal Imaging Data With Artificial Intelligence.

The digitization of medical records and expanding electronic health records has created an era of "Big Data" with an abundance of available information ranging from clinical notes to imaging studies. In the field of rheumatology, medical imaging is used to guide both diagnosis and treatment of a wide variety of rheumatic conditions. Although there is an abundance of data to analyze, traditional methods of image analysis are human resource intensive. Fortunately, the growth of artificial intelligence (AI) may be a solution to handle large datasets. In particular, computer vision is a field within AI that analyzes images and extracts information. Computer vision has impressive capabilities and can be applied to rheumatologic conditions, necessitating a need to understand how computer vision works. In this article, we provide an overview of AI in rheumatology and conclude with a five step process to plan and conduct research in the field of computer vision. The five steps include (1) project definition, (2) data handling, (3) model development, (4) performance evaluation, and (5) deployment into clinical care.

Few-shot biomedical image segmentation using diffusion models: Beyond image generation.

BACKGROUND: Medical image analysis pipelines often involve segmentation, which requires a large amount of annotated training data, which is time-consuming and costly. To address this issue, we proposed leveraging generative models to achieve few-shot image segmentation. METHODS: We trained a denoising diffusion probabilistic model (DDPM) on 480,407 pelvis radiographs to generate 256 âœ• 256 px synthetic images. The DDPM was conditioned on demographic and radiologic characteristics and was rigorously validated by domain experts and objective image quality metrics (Frechet inception distance [FID] and inception score [IS]). For the next step, three landmarks (greater trochanter [GT], lesser trochanter [LT], and obturator foramen [OF]) were annotated on 45 real-patient radiographs; 25 for training and 20 for testing. To extract features, each image was passed through the pre-trained DDPM at three timesteps and for each pass, features from specific blocks were extracted. The features were concatenated with the real image to form an image with 4225 channels. The feature-set was broken into random patches, which were fed to a U-Net. Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) was used to compare the performance with a vanilla U-Net trained on radiographs. RESULTS: Expert accuracy was 57.5 % in determining real versus generated images, while the model reached an FID = 7.2 and IS = 210. The segmentation UNet trained on the 20 feature-sets achieved a DSC of 0.90, 0.84, and 0.61 for OF, GT, and LT segmentation, respectively, which was at least 0.30 points higher than the naively trained model. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated the applicability of DDPMs as feature extractors, facilitating medical image segmentation with few annotated samples.

Quantifying Uncertainty in Deep Learning of Radiologic Images.

In recent years, deep learning (DL) has shown impressive performance in radiologic image analysis. However, for a DL model to be useful in a real-world setting, its confidence in a prediction must also be known. Each DL model's output has an estimated probability, and these estimated probabilities are not always reliable. Uncertainty represents the trustworthiness (validity) of estimated probabilities. The higher the uncertainty, the lower the validity. Uncertainty quantification (UQ) methods determine the uncertainty level of each prediction. Predictions made without UQ methods are generally not trustworthy. By implementing UQ in medical DL models, users can be alerted when a model does not have enough information to make a confident decision. Consequently, a medical expert could reevaluate the uncertain cases, which would eventually lead to gaining more trust when using a model. This review focuses on recent trends using UQ methods in DL radiologic image analysis within a conceptual framework. Also discussed in this review are potential applications, challenges, and future directions of UQ in DL radiologic image analysis.

The use of deep learning in medical imaging to improve spine care: A scoping review of current literature and clinical applications.

Background: Artificial intelligence is a revolutionary technology that promises to assist clinicians in improving patient care. In radiology, deep learning (DL) is widely used in clinical decision aids due to its ability to analyze complex patterns and images. It allows for rapid, enhanced data, and imaging analysis, from diagnosis to outcome prediction. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the current literature and clinical utilization of DL in spine imaging. Methods: This study is a scoping review and utilized the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology to review the scientific literature from 2012 to 2021. A search in PubMed, Web of Science, Embased, and IEEE Xplore databases with syntax specific for DL and medical imaging in spine care applications was conducted to collect all original publications on the subject. Specific data was extracted from the available literature, including algorithm application, algorithms tested, database type and size, algorithm training method, and outcome of interest. Results: A total of 365 studies (total sample of 232,394 patients) were included and grouped into 4 general applications: diagnostic tools, clinical decision support tools, automated clinical/instrumentation assessment, and clinical outcome prediction. Notable disparities exist in the selected algorithms and the training across multiple disparate databases. The most frequently used algorithms were U-Net and ResNet. A DL model was developed and validated in 92% of included studies, while a pre-existing DL model was investigated in 8%. Of all developed models, only 15% of them have been externally validated. Conclusions: Based on this scoping review, DL in spine imaging is used in a broad range of clinical applications, particularly for diagnosing spinal conditions. There is a wide variety of DL algorithms, database characteristics, and training methods. Future studies should focus on external validation of existing models before bringing them into clinical use.

Reproducibility of Deep Learning Algorithms Developed for Medical Imaging Analysis: A Systematic Review.

Since 2000, there have been more than 8000 publications on radiology artificial intelligence (AI). AI breakthroughs allow complex tasks to be automated and even performed beyond human capabilities. However, the lack of details on the methods and algorithm code undercuts its scientific value. Many science subfields have recently faced a reproducibility crisis, eroding trust in processes and results, and influencing the rise in retractions of scientific papers. For the same reasons, conducting research in deep learning (DL) also requires reproducibility. Although several valuable manuscript checklists for AI in medical imaging exist, they are not focused specifically on reproducibility. In this study, we conducted a systematic review of recently published papers in the field of DL to evaluate if the description of their methodology could allow the reproducibility of their findings. We focused on the Journal of Digital Imaging (JDI), a specialized journal that publishes papers on AI and medical imaging. We used the keyword "Deep Learning" and collected the articles published between January 2020 and January 2022. We screened all the articles and included the ones which reported the development of a DL tool in medical imaging. We extracted the reported details about the dataset, data handling steps, data splitting, model details, and performance metrics of each included article. We found 148 articles. Eighty were included after screening for articles that reported developing a DL model for medical image analysis. Five studies have made their code publicly available, and 35 studies have utilized publicly available datasets. We provided figures to show the ratio and absolute count of reported items from included studies. According to our cross-sectional study, in JDI publications on DL in medical imaging, authors infrequently report the key elements of their study to make it reproducible.

A Deep Learning Tool for Automated Landmark Annotation on Hip and Pelvis Radiographs.

BACKGROUND: Automatic methods for labeling and segmenting pelvis structures can improve the efficiency of clinical and research workflows and reduce the variability introduced with manual labeling. The purpose of this study was to develop a single deep learning model to annotate certain anatomical structures and landmarks on antero-posterior (AP) pelvis radiographs. METHODS: A total of 1,100 AP pelvis radiographs were manually annotated by 3 reviewers. These images included a mix of preoperative and postoperative images as well as a mix of AP pelvis and hip images. A convolutional neural network was trained to segment 22 different structures (7 points, 6 lines, and 9 shapes). Dice score, which measures overlap between model output and ground truth, was calculated for the shapes and lines structures. Euclidean distance error was calculated for point structures. RESULTS: Dice score averaged across all images in the test set was 0.88 and 0.80 for the shape and line structures, respectively. For the 7-point structures, average distance between real and automated annotations ranged from 1.9 mm to 5.6 mm, with all averages falling below 3.1 mm except for the structure labeling the center of the sacrococcygeal junction, where performance was low for both human and machine-produced labels. Blinded qualitative evaluation of human and machine produced segmentations did not reveal any drastic decrease in performance of the automatic method. CONCLUSION: We present a deep learning model for automated annotation of pelvis radiographs that flexibly handles a variety of views, contrasts, and operative statuses for 22 structures and landmarks.

Developing and validating a national set of standards for undergraduate medical education using the WFME framework: the experience of an accreditation system in Iran.

BACKGROUND: Defining standards is the first step toward quality assurance and improvement of educational programs. This study aimed at developing and validating a set of national standards for the Undergraduate Medical Education (UME) program through an accreditation system in Iran using the World Federation for Medical Education (WFME) framework. METHODS: The first draft of standards was prepared through consultative workshops with the participation of different UME program stakeholders. Subsequently, standards were sent to medical schools and UME directors were asked to complete a web-based survey. The content validity index at the item level (I-CVI) was computed using criteria including clarity, relevance, optimization and evaluability for each standard. Afterward, a full-day consultative workshop was held and a wide range of UME stakeholders across the country (n = 150) discussed the survey results and made corrections to standards. RESULTS: Analysis of survey results showed that relevance criteria had the best CVI as only 15 (13%) standards demonstrated CVI < 0.78. More than two-thirds (71%) and a half (55%) of standards showed CVI < 0.78 for optimization and evaluability criteria. The final set of UME national standards was structured in 9 areas, 24 sub-areas, 82 basic and 40 quality development standards, and 84 annotations. CONCLUSIONS: We developed and validated national standards as a framework to ensure the quality of UME training with input from UME stakeholders. We used WFME standards as a benchmark while addressing local requirements. The standards and participatory approach to developing standards may guide relevant institutions.

Frank Stinchfield Award: Creation of a Patient-Specific Total Hip Arthroplasty Periprosthetic Fracture Risk Calculator.

BACKGROUND: Many risk factors have been described for periprosthetic femur fracture (PPFFx) following total hip arthroplasty (THA), yet a patient-specific risk assessment tool remains elusive. The purpose of this study was to develop a high-dimensional, patient-specific risk-stratification nomogram that allows dynamic risk modification based on operative decisions. METHODS: We evaluated 16,696 primary nononcologic THAs performed between 1998 and 2018. During a mean 6-year follow-up, 558 patients (3.3%) sustained a PPFFx. Patients were characterized by individual natural language processing-assisted chart review on nonmodifiable factors (demographics, THA indication, and comorbidities), and modifiable operative decisions (femoral fixation [cemented/uncemented], surgical approach [direct anterior, lateral, and posterior], and implant type [collared/collarless]). Multivariable Cox regression models and nomograms were developed with PPFFx as a binary outcome at 90 days, 1 year, and 5 years, postoperatively. RESULTS: Patient-specific PPFFx risk based on comorbid profile was wide-ranging from 0.4-18% at 90 days, 0.4%-20% at 1 year, and 0.5%-25% at 5 years. Among 18 evaluated patient factors, 7 were retained in multivariable analyses. The 4 significant nonmodifiable factors included the following: women (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.6), older age (HR = 1.2 per 10 years), diagnosis of osteoporosis or use of osteoporosis medications (HR = 1.7), and indication for surgery other than osteoarthritis (HR = 2.2 for fracture, HR = 1.8 for inflammatory arthritis, HR = 1.7 for osteonecrosis). The 3 modifiable surgical factors were included as follows: uncemented femoral fixation (HR = 2.5), collarless femoral implants (HR = 1.3), and surgical approach other than direct anterior (lateral HR = 2.9, posterior HR = 1.9). CONCLUSION: This patient-specific PPFFx risk calculator demonstrated a wide-ranging risk based on comorbid profile and enables surgeons to quantify risk mitigation based on operative decisions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Prognostic.

Creating High Fidelity Synthetic Pelvis Radiographs Using Generative Adversarial Networks: Unlocking the Potential of Deep Learning Models Without Patient Privacy Concerns.

BACKGROUND: In this work, we applied and validated an artificial intelligence technique known as generative adversarial networks (GANs) to create large volumes of high-fidelity synthetic anteroposterior (AP) pelvis radiographs that can enable deep learning (DL)-based image analyses, while ensuring patient privacy. METHODS: AP pelvis radiographs with native hips were gathered from an institutional registry between 1998 and 2018. The data was used to train a model to create 512 × 512 pixel synthetic AP pelvis images. The network was trained on 25 million images produced through augmentation. A set of 100 random images (50/50 real/synthetic) was evaluated by 3 orthopaedic surgeons and 2 radiologists to discern real versus synthetic images. Two models (joint localization and segmentation) were trained using synthetic images and tested on real images. RESULTS: The final model was trained on 37,640 real radiographs (16,782 patients). In a computer assessment of image fidelity, the final model achieved an "excellent" rating. In a blinded review of paired images (1 real, 1 synthetic), orthopaedic surgeon reviewers were unable to correctly identify which image was synthetic (accuracy = 55%, Kappa = 0.11), highlighting synthetic image fidelity. The synthetic and real images showed equivalent performance when they were assessed by established DL models. CONCLUSION: This work shows the ability to use a DL technique to generate a large volume of high-fidelity synthetic pelvis images not discernible from real imaging by computers or experts. These images can be used for cross-institutional sharing and model pretraining, further advancing the performance of DL models without risk to patient data safety. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Machine Learning in Cardiovascular Imaging: A Scoping Review of Published Literature.

Purpose of Review: In this study, we planned and carried out a scoping review of the literature to learn how machine learning (ML) has been investigated in cardiovascular imaging (CVI). Recent Findings: During our search, we found numerous studies that developed or utilized existing ML models for segmentation, classification, object detection, generation, and regression applications involving cardiovascular imaging data. We first quantitatively investigated the different aspects of study characteristics, data handling, model development, and performance evaluation in all studies that were included in our review. We then supplemented these findings with a qualitative synthesis to highlight the common themes in the studied literature and provided recommendations to pave the way for upcoming research. Summary: ML is a subfield of artificial intelligence (AI) that enables computers to learn human-like decision-making from data. Due to its novel applications, ML is gaining more and more attention from researchers in the healthcare industry. Cardiovascular imaging is an active area of research in medical imaging with lots of room for incorporating new technologies, like ML. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40134-022-00407-8.