Risk of acute kidney injury after lower urinary tract reconstruction with early NSAID therapy: A propensity matched retrospective analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The opioid epidemic response led to increased use of postoperative, non-opioid analgesia. Some pediatric urologists do not routinely use non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for fear of causing acute kidney injury (AKI). While previous studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of NSAIDs in children, safety after lower urinary tract reconstruction has not been well characterized. OBJECTIVE: ptUsing the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria for AKI (increase in creatinine ≥0.3 mg/dL or increase in creatinine ≥1.5x baseline or urine output <0.5 mL/kg/hr for 6 h), we hypothesized there would be a difference in the incidence of postoperative AKI between patients who did and did not receive NSAIDs following surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Patients 2-18 years old who underwent lower urinary tract reconstruction (i.e., bladder augmentation and/or creation of a catheterizable channel) from 2009 to 2021 and had documented urine output were retrospectively reviewed. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage was calculated from creatinine and cystatin C within 6 months of surgery using the CKiD U25 equations. Patients who received NSAIDs were propensity matched on 11 characteristics with patients undergoing similar surgeries who did not receive NSAIDs. The primary outcome was incidence of AKI within 48 h of surgery. RESULTS: The unmatched cohorts included 243 patients. Propensity matching identified 166 patients in the NSAID arm and 41 in the no NSAID arm. 26 patients with CKD stage 2-3 were included. There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative AKI based on any KDIGO criteria (17.1% no NSAID versus 16.3% NSAID, p = 0.87). Median postoperative opioids fell from 0.88 mg/kg in the no NSAID arm to 0.37 mg/kg morphine equivalents in the NSAID arm, although this was not statistically significant. Log-rank testing by Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated no difference in time to incidence of low urine output between the groups (p = 0.32). In the whole population not stratified by NSAID use, no differences were seen in AKI between those with and without CKD (16.7% with versus 17.9% without CKD). DISCUSSION: There was no difference in the incidence of postoperative AKI among patients who did and did not receive NSAIDs after lower urinary tract reconstruction, excluding those with advanced CKD. CONCLUSION: These results support that postoperative NSAIDs were an unlikely source of AKI. However, AKI remained a risk following these surgeries, regardless of NSAID use, likely owing to underlying disease, longer operations, and fluid shifts.

Overnight Monitoring Criteria for Children with Obstructive Sleep-Disordered Breathing After Tonsillectomy: Revisited.

OBJECTIVES: Previous studies indicate children who pass an Asleep Room Air Challenge (AsRAC) do not have significant postoperative adverse respiratory events after adenotonsillectomy (T&A). Subsequently, we revised our overnight monitoring (OM) criteria, allowing patients with an obstructive apnea/hypopnea index (OAHI) ≤20 or nonsevere obesity (Class I) to be considered for same-day surgery (SDS) if they passed an AsRAC. Our hypothesis is that our modified OM criteria would not increase the return visits or readmission rates for patients undergoing SDS within 48 h or 15 days of T&A. METHODS: A retrospective review of all children aged ≥3 and <21 years who underwent T&A at a tertiary children's hospital and its satellite locations was performed from January 2017 to September 2022. Descriptive statistics and outcome measures were compared using a 3% margin noninferiority test before and after the new criteria implementation. RESULTS: Before intervention, 3,266 (58%) T&As were performed as SDS. Afterward, 74% of T&As were performed as SDS (p-value <0.05). There was no difference in the ED revisit rate for SDS within the 3% noninferiority margin. Following intervention, 29% more children with Class I obesity (62% vs. 33%) underwent SDS (p-value <0.001). Afterward, 19% more children with polysomnography underwent SDS (39% vs. 20%), p-value <0.001. After intervention, within 48 h of SDS, six (0.9%) children had revisits for bleeding and seven (1.2%) for vomiting. There were no perioperative respiratory events. CONCLUSION: Our revised monitoring criteria did not demonstrate an increase in ED visit or readmissions rates within 48 h or 15 days of T&A. Additionally, we found a 29% increase in Class I obese children undergoing SDS T&A. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 2024.

Development of an enhanced recovery after surgery program for pediatric solid tumors.

Introduction: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is an evidence-based, multi-modal approach to decrease surgical stress, expedite recovery, and improve postoperative outcomes. ERAS is increasingly being utilized in pediatric surgery. Its applicability to pediatric patients undergoing abdominal tumor resections remains unknown. Methods and Analysis: A group of key stakeholders adopted ERAS principles and developed a protocol suitable for the variable complexity of pediatric abdominal solid tumor resections. A multi-center, prospective, propensity-matched case control study was then developed to evaluate the feasibility of the protocol. A pilot-phase was utilized prior to enrollment of all patients older than one month of age undergoing any abdominal, retroperitoneal, or pelvic tumor resections. The primary outcome was 90-day complications per patient. Additional secondary outcomes included: ERAS protocol adherence, length of stay, time to administration of adjuvant chemotherapy, readmissions, reoperations, emergency room visits, pain scores, opioid usage, and differences in Quality of Recovery 9 scores. Ethics and Dissemination: Institutional review board approval was obtained at all participating centers. Informed consent was obtained from each participating patient. The results of this study will be presented at pertinent society meetings and published in peer-reviewed journals. We expect the results will inform peri-operative care for pediatric surgical oncology patients and provide guidance on initiation of ERAS programs. We anticipate this study will take four years to meet accrual targets and complete follow-up. Trial Registration Number: NCT04344899.

Expert Consensus on Pediatric Urodynamics Reporting Using Modified Delphi Technique.

PURPOSE: Urodynamic testing (UDS) is an important tool in the management of pediatric lower urinary tract conditions. There have been notable efforts to standardize pediatric UDS nomenclature and technique, but no formal guidelines exist on essential elements to include in a clinical report. We sought to identify ideal structure and elements of a pediatric UDS assessment based on expert consensus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pediatric urologists regularly performing UDS were queried using a Delphi process. Participants were invited representing varied geographic, experience, and societal involvement. Participants underwent 3 rounds of questionnaires between November 2022 and August 2023 focusing on report organization, elements, definitions, and automated electronic health record clinical decision support. Professional billing requirements were also considered. Consensus was defined as 80% agreeing either in favor of or against a topic. Elements without consensus were discussed in subsequent rounds. RESULTS: A diverse sample of 30 providers, representing 27 institutions across 21 US states; Washington, District of Columbia; and Canada completed the study. Participants reported interpreting an average number of 5 UDS reports per week (range 1-22). The finalized consensus report identifies 93 elements that should be included in a pediatric UDS report based on applicable study conditions and findings. CONCLUSIONS: This consensus report details the key elements and structure agreed upon by an expert panel of pediatric urologists. Further standardization of documentation should aid collaboration and research for patients undergoing UDS. Based on this information, development of a standardized UDS report template using electronic health record implementation principles is underway, which will be openly available for pediatric urologists.

Feasibility of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) implementation in Pediatric Urology: Pilot-phase outcomes of a prospective, multi-center study.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a fundamental shift in perioperative care that has consistently demonstrated an improved outcome for a wide variety of surgeries in adults but has only limited evidence in the pediatric population. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the success with and barriers to implementation of ERAS in a prospective, multi-center study on patients undergoing complex lower urinary tract reconstruction. STUDY DESIGN: Centers were directed to implement an ERAS protocol using a multidisciplinary team and quality improvement methodologies. Providers completed pre- and post-pilot surveys. An audit committee met after enrolling the first 5 patients at each center. Pilot-phase outcomes included enrollment of ≥2 patients in the first 6 months of enrollment, completion of 90 days of follow-up, identification of barriers to implementation, and protocol adherence. RESULTS: A total of 40 patients were enrolled across 8 centers. The median age at surgery was 10.3 years (IQR 6.4-12.5). Sixty five percent had a diagnosis of myelomeningocele, and 33 % had a ventriculoperitoneal shunt. A bladder augmentation was performed in 70 %, Mitrofanoff appendicovesicostomy in 52 %, Monti ileovesicostomy in 15 %, and antegrade continence enema channel in 38 %. The most commonly perceived barriers to implementation on the pre-pilot survey were "difficulty initiating and maintaining compliance with care pathway" in 51 % followed by a "lack of time, money, or clinical resources" in 36 %. The pre-pilot study experience, implementation, and pilot-phase outcomes are provided in the Table. All primary and secondary outcomes were achieved. DISCUSSION: The findings of the present study were similar to several small comparative studies with regard to the importance of a multidisciplinary team, strong leadership, and continuous audit for successful implementation of ERAS. Similar barriers were also encountered to other studies, which primarily related to a lack of administrative support, leadership, and buy-in from other services. The limitations of the present study included a relatively small heterogeneous cohort and absence of a comparative group, which will be addressed in the larger exploratory phase of the trial. The findings may also not be generaziable due to the need for sustainable processes that were unique to each center as well as an absence of adequate volume or resources at smaller centers. CONCLUSIONS: ERAS was successfully implemented for complex lower urinary tract reconstruction across 8 centers through a multidisciplinary team, structured approach based on the local context, and focus on a continuous audit.

Research prioritization of men's health and urologic diseasess

ABSTRACT Objectives We sought to determine whether disease representation in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) reflects disease burden, measured by the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) Study as disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs). Materials and Methods Two investigators performed independent assessment of ten men’s health and urologic diseases (MHUDs) in CDSR for systematic review and protocol representation, which were compared with percentage of total 2010 DALYs for the ten conditions. Data were analyzed for correlation using Spearman rank analysis. Results Nine of ten MHUDs were represented by at least one CDSR review. There was a poor and statistically insignificant positive correlation between CDSR representation and disease burden (rho = 0.42, p = 0.23). CDSR representation was aligned with disease burden for three conditions, greater than disease burden for one condition, and less than disease burden for six conditions. Conclusions These results yield high-quality estimates to inform future research prioritization for MHUDs. While prioritization processes are complex and multi-faceted, disease burden should be strongly considered. Awareness of research priority setting has the potential to minimize research disparities on a global scale.