How should multiple myeloma research change in a patient-oriented world? Findings and lessons from the pan-Canadian myeloma priority setting partnership.

BACKGROUND: Over the last decade there has been considerable research into the treatment, management, and quality of life of people living with multiple myeloma. However, there has been limited investigation into topics deemed important to patients and caregivers within this community. We conducted a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership to establish the 'Top 10 Priorities for Myeloma Research', informed by patient and public partners. METHODS: A research team and steering group were established in 2019 to conduct the myeloma priority setting partnership. Steering group members included patients, caregivers, and healthcare providers who advised the research team and oversaw the scope of the project, grounded on their lived experience. Following the James Lind Alliance guidelines for identification and ranking of research questions, we used surveys and a virtual workshop to collect and prioritize questions posed by myeloma patients, caregivers, and healthcare providers across Canada. RESULTS: The Top 10 list of priorities for myeloma research was finalized at the consensus-building workshop and encompassed questions related to diagnosis, treatment, management, and living well with myeloma. A final participant evaluation survey elicited a positive response. INTERPRETATION: The myeloma priority setting partnership identified the research priorities of people living with myeloma, caregivers, and healthcare providers to inform clinical research on this disease going forward. This project underscores the importance of patient and public engagement in the identification of research questions, highlighting the concerns of people affected by myeloma to ultimately improve the lives of people living with this disease.

Research on multiple myeloma, a rare blood cancer, rarely focuses on topics that are personally important to people living with myeloma, their caregivers, and their healthcare providers. The purpose of this study was to complete a priority setting partnership, following guidelines from the James Lind Alliance, to identify unanswered research questions from people directly affected by myeloma. The project was guided by a steering group of people living with myeloma, their caregivers, and healthcare providers who informed all stages of this process including two questionnaires to collect and rank questions and a priority setting workshop. The workshop brought together representatives from each group to form the final 'Top 10 Priorities for Myeloma Research', which included questions related to diagnosis, treatment, management, and living well with myeloma. This process allowed us to identify the research priorities of the myeloma community and highlighted the importance of including patients and the public as team members in the research process. We encourage other myeloma researchers to do the same to ensure research is meaningful and relevant to the communities who rely on it.

Psychosocial and supportive care needs of individuals with advanced myeloma.

Purpose: The purpose of this qualitative study is to understand, from the patient's perspective, their experience of living with advanced multiple myeloma, the psychosocial impact, and needs for support in managing and adapting to this illness. Methods: An interpretive descriptive approach was used. Individual semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with each participant, which focused on eliciting their descriptions of psychosocial issues and concerns, as well as the supports they use for coping with cancer. Transcripts were analyzed using interpretive description, resulting in the generation of common themes that represented the data. Results: The sample comprised twelve adults with a diagnosis of advanced multiple myeloma who had undergone at least three lines of treatment or were transfusion dependent. All participants were receiving ambulatory care for their myeloma in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Four themes were generated: (1) confusion about the diagnosis and treatment options; (2) challenges in finding relevant information; (3) dealing with the chronicity of treatment side effects; (4) social support as critical for coping with the life-threat of multiple myeloma. Conclusion: Findings suggest that the psychosocial impact of living with advanced multiple myeloma is greatly impacted by one's ability to understand the complexities of the diagnosis and access supports to cope with its physical and emotional consequences. Clinical interventions specifically tailored to meeting the information and support needs of this population are needed.

Canadian perspectives in multiple myeloma on the use of steroids in clinical practice based on patient and healthcare provider interviews.

Corticosteroid (steroid) medications are associated with challenging adverse effects that can negatively impact patient quality of life. However, owing to a long legacy of effective use in treatment protocols, they remain a cornerstone of multiple myeloma (MM) care. We conducted a roundtable with Canadian healthcare providers (HCPs) with diverse healthcare backgrounds and involvement in MM care as well as with patients with MM. Our goal was to develop clear guidance for steroid management aimed at improving patient quality of life, taking into account patient perspective and experiences with managing the disease. Our recommendations, which are based on the insights acquired from this discussion, can be categorized to the following areas: steroid prescribing, dosing, and modifications; managing adverse effects; and patient-HCP communication. These recommendations can be used by the entire multi-disciplinary hematology team to improve patient quality of life while being treated with steroid medication for multiple myeloma.

Clinical outcomes and transfusion management following intracranial hemorrhage in patients with acute leukemia.

BACKGROUND: There is little evidence to guide management of patients with acute leukemia and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Predictors of long-term outcome following ICH are unknown. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This study included adult patients with acute leukemia and ICH over an 8-year period. The primary outcome was data regarding 90-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included data related to the proportion of patients receiving post-remission therapy and predictors of 90-day mortality. RESULTS: ICH occurred in 101 patients; 12 patients died within 72 hours. For the 89 others, 90-day mortality was 40%. Of 43 patients who received induction, 30 achieved remission and 26 received post-remission therapy. Older age (p = 0.03) and higher white count (p = 0.02) at the time of ICH were predictive of inferior survival. During 90-day follow-up, median platelet count was 37 x 109 /L (0-1526 x 109 /L). Lower platelet count during follow-up was predictive of 90-day mortality (p = <0.01). Twenty-one percent of platelet transfusions were provided when the platelet count was less than 10 x 109 /L, 54% between 10 and 29 x 109 /L, and 25% greater than 30 x 109 /L. New or progressive ICH occurred in 23 patients. There was no difference in the median platelet transfusion trigger between patients who had new or progressive ICH and those who did not. CONCLUSION: In patients with acute leukemia, survival following ICH is poor. Older age and higher white count is associated with increased mortality, perhaps reflecting higher risk disease. Following ICH in acute leukemia platelet transfusions do not appear to alter the risk of progressive bleeding or mortality.