Capecitabine for 5-fluorouracil-resistant brain metastases from breast cancer.

We report a case in which brain metastases originating from breast cancer responded to treatment with oral capecitabine. The metastases had progressed and Karnofsky performance status deteriorated despite whole brain irradiation, hormonal treatment, and systemic chemotherapy that included 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). In contrast, 2 months of treatment with oral capecitabine produced a partial response, documented by lesion size on magnetic resonance imaging and an improvement in performance status; both measures continued to improve during 11 months of capecitabine treatment.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of exatecan mesylate (DX-8951f): a novel camptothecin analog.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), pharmacokinetic (PK) profile, and recommended phase II dose of Exatecan mesylate (DX-8951f) when administered as a 24-hour continuous infusion every 3 weeks to patients with solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-two patients with advanced solid tumors, all previously treated, and with performance status < or = 2, were entered. The starting dose of DX-8951f was 0.15 mg/m(2); the dose was escalated according to the modified continual reassessment method. The drug was administered until disease progression or until unacceptable toxic effects occurred. RESULTS: Seven dose escalations were completed, and a total of 53 courses were delivered (median, two courses; range, one to eight courses) during the study. At doses 1.2 mg/m(2) and lower, toxicities were mostly grade 1, primarily hematologic. In the initial cohort of three patients treated at 2.4 mg/m(2), grade 2 hematologic toxicity was observed. Of the six additional patients entered at 2.4 mg/m(2), three had grade 3 or 4 granulocytopenia. At doses higher than 2.4 mg/m(2), DLT granulocytopenia was observed. Nonhematologic toxicities, including nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, fatigue, and alopecia, were mild to moderate. Neither complete nor partial responses were observed, but four patients had stable disease. The PK profile of DX-8951f seemed linear at the doses administered. The plasma clearance, total volume of distribution, and terminal elimination half-life were approximately 3 L/h, 40 L, and 14 hours, respectively. CONCLUSION: The DLT of this DX-8951f schedule was granulocytopenia for minimally pretreated patients, and both granulocytopenia and thrombocytopenia for heavily pretreated patients. The MTD for both minimally and heavily pretreated patients was 2.4 mg/m(2). DX-8951f seems to have a linear PK profile on the basis of single-dose administration. The recommended phase II dose with this schedule is 2.4 mg/m(2) for minimally pretreated patients. A lower dose should be used for heavily pretreated patients.

Novel oral chemotherapy agents.

The development of anticancer drugs has conventionally focused on intravenous rather than oral regimens. Recently, interest in oral administration of chemotherapy has been stimulated by the discovery of oral fluoropyrimidines, which appear to possess at least an equivalent efficacy and the potential to reduce toxicity compared with intravenous therapies. Using rational drug design, several oral fluoropyrimidines have been developed, including capecitabine, UFT (tegafur and uracil), eniluracil plus oral 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and S-1. In addition to the oral fluoropyrimidines, other novel agents available for potential oral administration include irinotecan and temozolomide.

Progress in colorectal cancer chemotherapy: how far have we come, how far to go?

Fluorouracil has been the mainstay of treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC) for almost 40 years. Various schedules and biochemical modulators have been investigated in an attempt to improve the therapeutic efficacy of fluorouracil. To date, fluorouracil plus folinic acid represents the standard therapy in CRC for the adjuvant treatment of patients at high risk for relapse and for the first-line treatment of metastatic disease. To gain clinical acceptance, however, oral fluoropyrimidines must confer at least the same survival advantages associated with the optimal intravenous fluorouracil regimens. Irinotecan and oxaliplatin are 2 other novel agents that have mechanisms of action that are uniquely different from those of fluorouracil, with demonstrated activity in patients with fluorouracil-refractory disease. Recent randomised trials comparing fluorouracil plus folinic acid with combinations of either irinotecan or oxaliplatin and fluorouracil plus folinic acid have shown that response rates are improved and time to progression is increased in patients receiving the combination regimens. These regimens are being rapidly introduced in the adjuvant setting, and the role and acceptance of these combination regimens as first-line therapy needs to be defined. Other novel agents being evaluated in the treatment of patients with advanced CRC include oral edrecolomab (monoclonal antibody 17-1A) and tumour vaccines. Future research is focused on enabling clinicians to individualise treatment strategies in patients with CRC, so as to improve clinical outcomes and reduce drug toxicity.

Colorectal cancer: chemotherapy treatment overview.

Fluorouracil (5-FU) has remained the standard therapy for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer for over 40 years. Unfortunately, only a minority of patients experience objective clinical response. Discussed herein are attempts to improve on the activity of 5-FU by biochemically modulating its action. In addition, novel agents for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer (oral fluoropyrimidines, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan) are discussed. Oral fluoropyrimidines (UFT plus leucovorin, capecitabine, eniluracil plus oral 5-FU) provide the convenience of oral delivery with a marked reduction in febrile neutropenia and mucositis. Recent randomized trials with these agents have demonstrated therapeutic activity that is comparable with intravenous schedules of 5-FU plus leucovorin. Compared to 5-FU, both oxaliplatin and irinotecan have uniquely different mechanisms of action and have demonstrated clinical activity in patients whose disease has progressed with 5-FU treatment. Combinations of either irinotecan or oxaliplatin plus 5-FU/leucovorin have demonstrated that the addition of these agents to 5-FU/leucovorin improves response rates and time to progression compared to 5-FU/leucovorin alone. Combination chemotherapy regimens with these novel agents are rapidly being introduced into the adjuvant setting.

Sequential biochemical modulation of fluorouracil with folinic acid, N-phosphonacetyl-L-aspartic acid, and interferon alfa-2a in advanced colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: Several agents have been evaluated for their effect as biochemical modulators of fluorouracil (5-FU) in the treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinoma. In this study, we used folinic acid (FA), N-phosphonacetyl-L-aspartic acid (PALA), and recombinant interferon alfa-2a (IFNalpha-2a) in a sequential order to assess the efficacy of this approach in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-four patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma were enrolled onto the study. The treatment course consisted of three cycles: (cycle 1) FA 20 mg/m(2) followed by 5-FU 425 mg/m(2) on days 1 to 5; (cycle 2) PALA 250 mg/m(2) on days 29, 36, 43, and 50 and 5-FU 2,600 mg/m(2) as a 24-hour infusion on days 30, 37, 44, and 51; and (cycle 3) IFNalpha-2a 9 million units (MU) three times a week for 5 weeks beginning on day 57, with a continuous infusion of 5-FU 750 mg/m(2) on days 57 to 61, and then weekly bolus of 5-FU 750 mg/m(2)/wk on days 71, 78, and 85. Response was determined after cycle 3. RESULTS: All patients had a Zubrod performance status >/= 2, measurable disease, and had received no prior chemotherapy for their metastatic disease. A total of 212 cycles were given. Thirty-six patients were assessable for response. No complete responses were seen. Seven patients had a partial response, eight had stable disease, and 15 had progressive disease. The median duration of response was 25 weeks, and the median survival was 53 weeks. Grade 3 and 4 toxic effects included granulocytopenia, stomatitis, diarrhea, rash, nausea, and fatigue. CONCLUSION: This trial provided no evidence that sequential biochemical modulation of 5-FU in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma had any therapeutic advantage over conventional treatment regimens of 5-FU plus FA.

Fluoropyrimidines: a critical evaluation.

After nearly four decades of clinical experience with the fluoropyrimidines, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) remains an integral part of chemotherapy for colorectal cancer. A range of 5-FU treatment regimens with or without biochemical modulation are currently used and toxicity appears to be schedule dependent. The use of oral 5-FU was abandoned because of erratic absorption caused by varying levels of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) found in the gastrointestinal tract. This effect may be overcome by administering agents that are converted to 5-FU or by inhibiting or inactivating DPD. Xeloda((R)) (capecitabine) was designed as an orally administered, selectively tumoractivated(TM) cytotoxic agent which achieves higher levels of 5-FU in the primary tumor than in plasma or other tissues. The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved Xeloda for use in patients with metastatic breast cancer resistant to paclitaxel and in whom further anthracycline therapy is contraindicated. Xeloda is also registered in Canada, Switzerland, Thailand and Argentina. In phase II clinical trials in colorectal cancer, Xeloda produced response rates of 21-24% and median time to disease progression of 127-230 days. Other oral agents in development for the treatment of colorectal cancer include tegafur/uracil plus oral leucovorin, S-1 and eniluracil plus oral 5-FU.

Novel chemotherapeutic agents for gastrointestinal cancers.

Although 5-fluorouracil has been the most commonly prescribed chemotherapy agent in the treatment of patients with gastrointestinal malignancies, new agents discussed herein provide options for the treatment of patients with colorectal, gastric, and pancreas cancer. Irinotecan was recently approved for the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer refractory to 5-fluorouracil. It has also been evaluated in chemotherapy-naïve patients both alone and in combination with 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin or with oxaliplatin. Evaluated primarily in patients with colorectal cancer, oxaliplatin, a novel platinum compound, is an active agent. In combination with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin, oxaliplatin provides a higher response rate than 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin alone. Furthermore, when oxaliplatin was added to the same 5-fluorouracil-based regimen in which patients had disease progression, clinical activity was observed. Other agents discussed herein are raltitrexed and the oral fluorinated pyrimidines, including uracil:tegafur plus leucovorin, capecitabine, eniluracil plus oral 5-fluorouracil, and S-1. Gemcitabine has been demonstrated to be more effective than 5-fluorouracil in the alleviation of disease-specific symptoms in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Gemcitabine also confers a modest survival advantage. Combinations of these novel compounds are evaluated in gastrointestinal malignancies in the advanced disease setting and in adjuvant therapy programs.

Phase II trial of docetaxel for cholangiocarcinoma.

The authors evaluated the activity and toxicity of docetaxel given as a 1-hour infusion every 21 days in patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma. Seventeen patients with cytologically or histologically confirmed cholangiocarcinoma received intravenous docetaxel over 1 hour, repeated every 21 days. The initial dose of docetaxel was 100 mg/m2, with a subsequent 25% dose reduction for patients experiencing grade 3 or 4 toxicities. Treatment was continued until disease progression or occurrence of intolerable side effects. All patients received premedication with dexamethasone 8 mg by mouth twice daily for 5 days, starting 1 day before docetaxel infusion. Sixteen of the 17 patients were assessable for response and toxicity; one patient was removed from the trial for intercurrent illness. Thirty-eight cycles of docetaxel were delivered (median, two cycles). No complete or partial responses were noted. Fourteen patients had progressive disease, one patient had stable disease, and one patient died of septic shock shortly after starting treatment. Granulocytopenia was the dose-limiting toxicity. Thirteen patients had grade 4 granulocytopenia, 11 of whom required antibiotics for neutropenic fever. Granulocytopenia was the only grade 4 toxicity observed. Grade 3 toxicities included stomatitis, anemia, fatigue, vomiting, and hypotension. Grade 1 or 2 toxicities included alopecia, diarrhea, peripheral edema, myalgias, and anorexia. Administered on this dose and schedule, docetaxel lacked activity in patients with cholangiocarcinoma. The toxicity profile, including dose-limiting granulocytopenia, has been previously described in patients receiving docetaxel.

Novel chemotherapy agents for colorectal cancer: oral fluoropyrimidines, oxaliplatin, and raltitrexed.

Agents now under investigation for treatment of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) include the oral fluoropyrimidines, oxaliplatin, and raltitrexed. Research efforts directed at finding agents that conveniently and effectively deliver 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in a protracted fashion have led to the development of several oral fluoropyrimidines. These agents, which include capecitabine; tegafur and uracil plus leucovorin (UFT/LV); eniluracil plus oral 5-FU; and S-1, are convenient and less toxic than intravenous bolus 5-FU. Oxaliplatin has a uniquely different mechanism of action compared with that of 5-FU and has demonstrated activity not only in the first-line treatment setting but also in patients whose disease has progressed during or following 5-FU treatment. In the first-line setting, when oxaliplatin is combined with 5-FU plus LV, response rates and time to disease progression are remarkably improved compared with 5-FU/LV alone. Raltitrexed, a unique thymidylate synthase inhibitor, has undergone extensive phase III evaluation in CRC. The advent of these novel agents has led to development of combined chemotherapy regimens now being introduced into the adjuvant setting.

Identification of DNA sequences required for mouse APRT gene expression.

The mouse aprt promoter contains four GC boxes, which bind transcription factor Spl in vitro, and lacks both TATA and CCAAT boxes. Removal of the two most distal GC boxes of this promoter had little effect on APRT enzyme levels produced in a transient expression assay. Deletion of the distal three GC boxes resulted in a 50% reduction, and deletion of all GC boxes resulted in essentially complete loss of APRT activity. There are two predominant transcription start sites which are located within the region containing the GC boxes. The promoter behaved as a relatively strong promoter when compared to the RSV LTR promoter in a transient CAT assay, and operated in one orientation only. No upstream anti-sense transcripts were detected in either mouse CAK or liver cells, confirming that the mouse aprt promoter, unlike some other GC-rich promoters appears not to support bidirectional transcription.