Prognostic Factors for Visual Outcomes in Closed Idiopathic Macular Holes after Vitrectomy: Outcomes at 4 Years in a Monocentric Study.

Purpose: To identify predictive factors of visual outcomes in the eyes after successful macular hole (MH) surgery. Methods: It is a retrospective monocentric study of the eyes that underwent successful vitrectomy for full-thickness MH in an academic, tertiary care center (CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, Canada) between 2014 and 2018. We included a single eye per patient and excluded the eyes with ocular comorbidities. Clinical and anatomical features of patients were collected, including demographics, MH duration, baseline MH size, baseline visual acuity (VA), and final VA. Multiple logistic regressions were performed to determine predictive factors of VA ≥70 ETDRS letters (Snellen equivalent: 20/40) and VA gain ≥15 ETDRS letters at final follow-up. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were used to determine the performance of each model and identify the Youden index maximizing performance at a given threshold. Results: A total of 460 eyes were included in this study; 274/460 eyes (60%) achieved final VA ≥70 ETDRS letters and 304/460 eyes (66%) had a VA gain ≥15 ETDRS letters at 24 months follow-up. Multiple logistic regression analyses showed that the main predictive factors for final VA ≥70 ETDRS letters (model AUC = 0.716) were baseline VA (OR = 1.064; p < 0.001), MH duration (OR = 0.950; p=0.005), and age (OR = 0.954; p=0.004). Predictors of VA gain ≥15 ETDRS letters at final follow-up (model AUC = 0.615) were baseline VA (OR = 0.878; p < 0.001), MH duration (OR = 0.940; p < 0.001), and MH size (OR = 0.998; p=0.036). Thresholds for the final VA ≥70 ETDRS letters model and the VA gain ≥15 ETDRS letters model were VA ≥55.5 ETDRS letters (Snellen equivalent: 6/30) and MH size of 237 µm, respectively. Conclusion: The eyes with shorter MH duration, smaller MH size, and higher preoperative VA achieved better visual outcomes after successful MH surgery.

DELAYED FOLLOW-UP IN PATIENTS WITH NEOVASCULAR AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION TREATED UNDER UNIVERSAL HEALTH COVERAGE: Risk Factors and Visual Outcomes.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: To report the rate of delayed follow-up visits (DFU), to identify risk factors of DFU, and to assess the impact of DFU on outcomes in neovascular age-related macular degeneration. METHODS: This retrospective study included all patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (n = 1,291) treated with antivascular endothelial growth factor injections between January 2013 and December 2020 in 2 centers in Quebec, Canada. A DFU was defined as a delay of ≥4 weeks than scheduled. Visual outcomes, especially ≥15 letters loss, were reported. RESULTS: A total of 351 patients (27.2%) experienced ≥1 DFU. Odds were greater among older patients ( P = 0.005), patients treated at the hospital rather than the clinic ( P < 0.001), and patients with worse initial visual acuity ( P = 0.024). A DFU was associated with a mean visual acuity loss of 4.2 ± 13.4 letters ( P < 0.001) and an increased incidence of intraretinal fluid and subretinal fluid ( P = 0.001, P = 0.005) at 6 months despite resumption of injections. Central foveal thickness increased after DFU but returned to pre-DFU visit at 6 months. CONCLUSION: The DFU rate in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration treated under a universal health care system was around 27%. Delayed follow-up visits caused significant decreases in visual acuity and increases in intraretinal fluid and subretinal fluid on optical coherence tomography that did not recover after injections resumption despite normalization of central foveal thickness.

Clinical Characteristics and Prognostic Factors of Posterior Segment Intraocular Foreign Body: Canadian Experience from a Tertiary University Hospital in Quebec.

PURPOSE: To identify predictive factors for visual outcomes of patients presenting with a posterior segment intraocular foreign body (IOFB). METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed for all consecutive patients operated for posterior segment IOFB removal between January 2009 and December 2018. Data were collected for patient demographics, clinical characteristics at presentation, IOFB characteristics, surgical procedures, and postoperative outcomes. A multiple logistic regression model was built for poor final visual acuity (VA) as an outcome (defined as final VA 50 letters or worse [Snellen equivalent: 20/100]). RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were included in our study. Ninety-three percent of patients were men, with a mean age of 40.4 ± 12.6 years. Metallic IOFB comprised 88% of cases with a mean ± standard deviation (SD) size of 5.31 ± 4.62 mm. VA improved in 70% of patients after IOFB removal. Predictive factors for poor VA outcome included poor baseline VA, larger IOFB size, high number of additional diagnoses, an anterior chamber extraction, a second intervention, the use of C3F8 or silicone tamponade, and the presence of vitreous hemorrhage, hyphema, and iris damage. Predictive factors for a better visual outcome included first intention intraocular lens (IOL) implantation and the use of air tamponade. In the multiple logistic regression model, both baseline VA (p = 0.009) and number of additional complications (p = 0.01) were independent risk factors for a poor final VA. CONCLUSIONS: A high number of concomitant complications and poor baseline VA following posterior segment IOFB were significant predictive factors of poor visual outcome.

Fear Associated with COVID-19 in Patients with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

PURPOSE: Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, news related to the pandemic has created a feeling of fear, particularly among high-risk groups including elderly patients. This study aimed to assess the fear associated with COVID-19 and to evaluate the fear of vision decrease related to the delay of treatment in neovascular age-related macular degeneration patients (nAMD) during the pandemic. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a prospective cross-sectional study of 160 actively treated patients with nAMD enrolled between September and November 2020 at a tertiary hospital in Québec, Canada. For each participant, demographic and clinical data were collected. The anxiety was rated in a questionnaire composed of two sections: the Fear of COVID-19 Scale (FCV-19S) and eight additional questions to assess ophthalmology-related COVID-19 statements. RESULTS: The mean ± standard deviation level of FCV-19S was 17.05±4.38. In the multivariable analysis, it was significantly higher in women (p<0.001) and lower in patients with a high school education vs elementary school (p=0.009). In the ophthalmology-related statements, 16% feared vision loss because of difficulties in maintaining regular follow-ups during the pandemic. The female gender was significantly associated with a higher tendency to postpone their appointment (p=0.03). No association was found between the patients' underlying disease characteristics and higher fear of vision loss. CONCLUSION: Despite the massive impact of the pandemic, anxiety related to COVID-19 and delaying ophthalmology treatments remained relatively low in nAMD patients. Greater explanations to address this fear may reduce anxiety level, especially among female patients and those with an elementary school education.