Uncemented hip revision cup as an alternative for T-type acetabular fractures: A cadaveric study.

BACKGROUND: The current rise in elderly patients with compromised bone quality complicates the surgical treatment of acetabular T-type fractures (AO type 62B2 fractures). There is on ongoing discussion about the treatment options, mostly consisting of an open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with or without primary or secondary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Yet, these patients are oftentimes unable to fulfil weight-bearing restrictions and mostly present with an unavailability of a stable anchor site. Consequently, this study investigates the feasibility of a cementless hip revision cup for acetabular T-type fractures and compares its biomechanical properties to ORIF. HYPOTHESIS: The cementless hip revision cup provides sufficient biomechanical stability under the simulation of full weight-bearing. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study compared two groups of human cadaveric hip bones with T-type fractures, of whom 6 subjects were treated with ORIF (6 male; mean age: 62±17years; mean body weight: 75±15) versus 6 subjects treated with a cementless hip revision cup (2 male; 69±12 years; 73±15kg). The group-assignment was controlled for comparable BMD results (mean BMD: ORIF 110±37 mg Ca-Ha/mL versus hip revision cup 134±32 mg Ca-Ha/mL). To compare for biomechanical stability cyclic loading was applied measuring the force and dislocation of the fracture gap at standardized bone loci using an all-electric testing machine and a 3D-ultrasound measuring system. RESULTS: Comparing superior pubic ramus versus iliac wing (cementless hip revision cup versus ORIF [mean±standard deviation]: 5.8±2.0 versus 7.0±3.2; p=0.032) as well as sacral ala versus iliac wing (4.6±2.2 versus 6.4±3.7; p=0.002), the cementless revision cup achieved a significantly higher stability than the plate osteosynthesis. CONCLUSION: Revision cup and ORIF withstood biomechanical loading forces exceeding full weight-bearing in this biomechanical study. The results of our study suggest that the cementless hip revision cup might be promising alternative to the current standard care of ORIF with or without primary THA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III; case control experimental study.

Novel Tape Suture Osteosynthesis for Hyperextension Injuries of the Subaxial Cervical Spine: A Biomechanical Study.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Anterior tension band injuries are usually the result of high impact hyperextension trauma. Current surgical treatment includes anterior cervical discectomy and fusion bearing the risk of soft tissue irritation, degeneration of adjacent cervical segments, implant failure or iatrogenic spondylodesis. This study examined the biomechanical properties of tape suture constructs reenforcing ligamental stability for the treatment of Association of Osteosynthesis (AO) type B3 injuries compared to anterior fusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After creation of an AO type B3 injury in synthetic cervical segments (C5/6, Sawbone®), seven segments were treated with anterior fusion and seven with a tape suture construct, similar to the SpeedBridge™ (Arthrex®). Biomechanical testing was performed, simulating extension, flexion, lateral bending, and rotation. Dislocation (°) and corresponding force (N) were measured and compared. RESULTS: Anterior fusion displayed a mean range of extension, lateral bending, and rotation of 3.60° (SD 1.87°), 2.28° (SD 1.55°), and 2.81° (SD 0.78°), respectively. The tape suture showed a mean range of extension, lateral bending, and rotation of 4.24° (SD 0.81°) (p=0.146), 5.44° (SD 1.56°) (p=0.013), and 5.29° (SD 1.44°) (p<0.01), respectively. No specimen suffered from implant failure. CONCLUSION: The tape suture construct provides sufficient biomechanical stability for the treatment of AO type B3 injuries compared to anterior fusion. Regarding cervical extension, whose limitation is crucial for ligamental healing, the tape suture shows no significant inferiority. Yet, the tape suture approaches physiological mobility in the planes not affected by the injury. Consequently, the tape suture is a promising alternative preventing an iatrogenic spondylodesis.

Improving stability of atlantoaxial fusion: a biomechanical study.

PURPOSE: The incidence of atlanto-axial injuries is continuously increasing and often requires surgical treatment. Recently, Harati developed a new procedure combining polyaxial transarticular screws with polyaxial atlas massae lateralis screws via a rod system with promising clinical results, yet biomechanical data is lacking. This biomechanical study consequently aims to evaluate the properties of the Harati technique. METHODS: Two groups, each consisting of 7 cervical vertebral segments (C1/2), were formed and provided with a dens axis type 2 fracture according to Alonzo. One group was treated with the Harms and the other with the Harati technique. The specimen was loaded via a lever arm to simulate extension, flexion, lateral flexion and rotation. For statistical analysis, dislocation (°) was measured and compared. RESULTS: For extension and flexion, the Harati technique displayed a mean dislocation of 4.12° ± 2.36° and the Harms technique of 8.48° ± 1.49° (p < 0.01). For lateral flexion, the dislocation was 0.57° ± 0.30° for the Harati and 1.19° ± 0.25° for the Harms group (p < 0.01). The mean dislocation for rotation was 1.09° ± 0.48° for the Harati and 2.10° ± 0.31° for the Harms group (p < 0.01). No implant failure occurred. CONCLUSION: This study found a significant increase in biomechanical stability of the Harati technique when compared to the technique by Harms et al. Consequently, this novel technique can be regarded as a promising alternative for the treatment of atlanto-axial instabilities.

Does augmentation increase the pull-out force of symphyseal screws? A biomechanical cadaver study.

PURPOSE: Open reduction and internal fixation using anterior plate osteosynthesis currently represents the gold standard for the treatment of symphyseal disruptions. Since postoperative screw loosening with consequent implant failure is frequently observed, this study aims to evaluate if and to what extent augmentation can increase the pull-out force of symphyseal screws to improve the constructs stability. METHODS: Twelve human cadaveric anterior pelvic rings were separated at the symphyseal joint for bilateral testing, consequently achieving comparable sites. First, one non-augmented screw was drilled into the superior pubic ramus, whereas the contralateral side was primarily augmented. The screws were then withdrawn with a constant speed of 10 mm/min and the fixation strengths determined by the force (N) displacement (mm) curve. Finally, the primary non-augmented site was secondary augmented, representing revision surgery after initial implant failure, and the corresponding fixation strength was measured again. RESULTS: Augmentation compared to non-augmented screws displayed significantly higher pull-out forces with an increase in pull-out force by 377% for primary and 353% for secondary augmentation (p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in the pull-out force comparing primary and secondary augmentation (p = 0.74). CONCLUSIONS: Primary and secondary augmentation significantly increases the stability of symphyseal screws and, therefore, potentially decreases rates of implant failure.

Minimally invasive screw fixation is as stable as anterior plating in acetabular T-Type fractures - a biomechanical study.

INTRODUCTION: Operative treatments of T-type acetabular fractures are challenging surgical procedures. Open reduction and internal fixation is the standard method for the operative management of these fractures, however this is associated with high blood loss, long hospital stay and longer rehabilitation. Anterior subcutaneous pelvic fixation (internal fixation=INFIX) and retrograde pubic screw fixation have shown promising results in minimally invasive treatment of pelvic ring fractures. For T-type acetabular fractures, however, minimally invasive treatment concepts are still rare. Therefore we performed a mechanical in vitro study to: - investigate the potential favorability of minimally invasive treatment options over the already established open anterior locking plate osteosynthesis of acetabular T-fractures regarding biomechanical stability and post-surgical stiffness; - explore the biomechanical feasibility of the INFIX; - assess its potential ability to reduce the anterior acetabular column. HYPOTHESIS: A minimally invasive treatment of acetabular T-type fractures is biomechanically equivalent to an open anterior plate osteosynthesis. METHODS: Twenty-four synthetic hemipelvis specimens with a T-type acetabular fracture were divided in four groups. A posterior column screw was placed in every pelvis of every group. The anterior column was fixed with: - anterior column screw; - anterior column screw incl. INFIX; - INFIX alone; - 14-hole angular stable locking plate (standard fixation method). Displacement of the anterior column was reduced in group 2+3 using the INFIX. All specimens were cyclically loaded with 200N until a maximum of 600N. Movement/displacement of the fracture fragments were detected with a 3D-ultrasound measuring system. Displacement (mm) and Stiffness (N/mm) of the construction were analyzed. RESULTS: Statistical assessment showed no significant differences between the four fixation types (p>0.05). The 14-whole locking plate (group 4) displayed the overall highest stability with a displacement of 1.3±0.04mm and stiffness of 76.3±2.4N/mm. Anterior screw fixation (group 1) proved to be the minimally invasive fixation method with the least displacement and highest stiffness (1.5±0.2mm, 68.3±6.8N/mm). The combination of an INFIX and an anterior column screw (group 2), showed a mean stiffness of 62.1±6.0N/mm and a mean displacement of 1.7±0.2mm. INFIX only (group 3) presented a displacement of 1.6±0.1mm and a stiffness of 64.5±4.5N/mm. DISCUSSION: Minimally invasive fixation techniques for T-type acetabular fractures show promising biomechanical stability in non- or slightly displaced fractures. Furthermore, INFIX could be a feasible tool for the reduction of the anterior acetabular column. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, case control prospective experimental study.

[Diagnostic and Treatment Strategies in Morel-Lavallee Lesions in the Spinal Column and Pelvis]. / Diagnostik und Behandlungsstrategien bei Morel-Lavallée-Läsionen im Wirbelsäulen- und Beckenbereich.

BACKGROUND: The Morel-Lavallée lesion is one of the concomitant soft tissue lesions of pelvic fractures. Its role in spine fractures and its treatment in combination with osteosynthesis of pelvic or spine fractures have not yet been determined. The aim of this study was to analyse the best diagnostic and treatment options of both spine and pelvic fractures combined with Morel-Lavallée lesions (MLL). METHODS: An analysis of the literature was performed via PubMed and Medline. This revealed a total of 197 studies and case reports. After analysing the literature, 19 studies/case reports met our inclusion criteria. RESULTS: There are several diagnostic options for MLL, including ultrasound, computed tomography or MRI. In spinal and pelvic lesions, ultrasound is capable of detecting MLL. Some authors tend to perform open debridement of the MLL, whereas others recommend percutanous treatment. Open debridement and vacuum-assisted closure are recommended in late diagnosed MLL, where primary suture of the soft tissue is impossible. Fracture fixation should be performed simultaneously to treatment of the MLL. Broad-spectrum cephalosporins combined with an aminoglycoside or piperacilline/tazobactam should be initiated. CONCLUSION: Radical debridement and drainage are recommended, especially when MLL is diagnosed late. Repeated ultrasound examinations should be performed of the surrounding soft tissue of the fracture. When MLL is diagnosed within 2 days, percutanous fracture and MLL treatment should be performed. After more than 2 days, both fracture and MLL should be treated with open debridement, open fracture fixation and primary suture if possible.

Reduction and fixation of displaced U-shaped sacral fractures using lumbopelvic fixation: technical recommendations.

PURPOSE: U-shaped sacral fractures are extremely rare injuries that usually occur as a result of falls from considerable heights. Almost all treatment methods described to date aim solely at stabilizing the fracture but do not contribute to supporting the reduction of such fractures. Using existing implants the purpose of this study is to present a surgical technique that facilitates both the reduction and the stabilization of these injuries. The presented technique was evaluated in a series of three cases. METHODS: Polyaxial pedicle screws were placed through vertebral bodies L4 and L5. Two long pedicle screws were implanted in the posterior iliac spine. The lumbar pedicle screws were held with two longitudinal rods, and the pelvic screws with one transverse connecting rod. The lumbar longitudinal and pelvic transverse rods were connected via two hinge-like connecting elements. First, distraction was performed between lumbar pedicle screws L5 and the sacral transverse rod. Lordosis was then restored via the hinge joint, thereby eliminating kyphosis. After tightening all moving elements, the fracture was reduced and stabilized. RESULTS: Computed tomography documented anatomical reduction and fracture healing was achieved in all cases. Two of three patients could be fully mobilized immediately; mobilization of the third patient was delayed due to multiple injuries. Two patients showed neurological symptoms. In one case, complete remission was achieved within 3 weeks, while in the other patient a clear improvement was observed. In all cases, the implant was removed after 8-12 months. There were no post-operative complications, such as infections, wound-healing disorders, neurological deterioration, implant failure, or premature loosening. CONCLUSIONS: The surgical procedure was successful, since it considerably facilitated reduction, thereby shortening surgery time. The stabilization was sufficient to fully mobilize the patients. The procedure is based on existing implant components and is thus routinely available.

CT-guided sacroiliac percutaneous screw placement in unstable posterior pelvic ring injuries: accuracy of screw position, injury reduction and complications in 71 patients with 136 screws.

BACKGROUND: Sacroiliac-percutaneous-screw-placement (SPSP) for unstable-posterior-pelvic-ring-injuries (UPPRI) might be associated with severe neurovascular complications because of screw-mal-position. The aim of the present study was to analysis the effectivity of computer-tomography-guided (CTG)-SPSP including accuracy of screw-placement, quality of injury-reduction and documentation of perioperative-complications. Additionally, procedure-dependent radiation-dose and outcome should be analysed. METHODS: A consecutive cohort of 71 patients with UPPRI was operated by CTG-SPSP at a single trauma level 1 hospital. 136 sacroiliac screws were inserted to S1 and S2. Postoperatively, by the use of a computerised-radiologic-work-station all screws were visualised three-dimensionally. Their distancesmin to the sacral-borders in anterior-posterior and cranio-caudal direction as well as to the neuroforamen S1/S2 were determined. After CTG-SPSP, injury-dislocation in anterior-posterior and cranio-caudal direction was quantified. Local and general complications were documented during the 30-day-period. In 55 patients (77.5%) a follow-up-investigation (29.1±19.1 months) was performed. RESULTS: 132 screws (97.1%) were placed completely intraosseous, 3 screws (2.2%) perforated up to 1.0 mm (n(S1)=one screw; n(S2)=two screws), and one screw (0.7%) extended 2.2 mm into the S2-neuroforamen without contact to neural structures. Postoperative dislocationanterior-posterior was 1.3±0.9 mm and dislocationcranio-caudal 1.5±0.9 mm. No procedure-associated-complication was observed. Operation time showed a significant "learning curve" during the six-year study period (initially: 88.6±60.3 min; finally: 44.3±24.6 min). Perioperative effective-radiation-dose for patientsmale was 5.9±3.1 mSv and for patientsfemale 8.7±4.5 mSv. All injuries healed and 33 patients (46.5%) had metal removal after 11.0 (±4.9) months. Only two (5.0%) out of 40 patients complained persistent UPPRI-related pain so they were not able to restart work. CONCLUSIONS: The CTG-SPSP is a safe procedure for UPPRI-stabilisation especially in S1 but also in S2. Injury reduction was excellent and no procedure associated complications were observed.

Hydroxyapatite-coated pins versus titanium alloy pins in external fixation at the wrist: a controlled cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to analyze whether the prevalence of pin-related complications can be reduced by the use of hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated pins in external fixators applied for unstable wrist fractures. METHODS: Forty patients (160 pins) were randomized for standard uniplanar fixator treatment with the use of identically designed pins either composed of titanium-alloy (Ti6Al4V) (n = 20) or coated by HA (n = 20). Each pin site was clinically evaluated with regard to erythema, drainage, pain value, and radiologically assessed concerning loosening at T1 (mean, 9 days), T2 (mean, 43 days), and T3 (mean, 56 days). In case of pin-track complication, the patient was followed continuously. The need for antibiotics or additional surgery was documented. Bone mineral density was analyzed by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry. At fixator removal (T2), the pin-extraction strength was measured by the use of a digital-torque-wrench. RESULTS: Two minor pin-track infections requiring oral antibiotics occurred in the HA-pin group (2.7%) (p > 0.05). The vast majority of clinical pin-site parameters were comparable in both groups. At the end of the fixator therapy, there were 16 loose pins (n(Ti6AL4V-group) = 10; n(HA-group) = 6). The rate of loose pins was correlated to patient's age (p < 0.05) but not to bone mineral density values or the occurrence of pin-site infection. Finally, no significant difference between the two groups was detected with regard to the prevalence of clinical relevant pin-site complications (p = 0.80). CONCLUSIONS: In external fixation of the wrist, the use of HA-coated pins yields no clinical advantages: there is a trend toward a superior pin-bone anchorage, but a tendency of increased susceptibility for minor pin-track infections.

Autologous bone graft versus demineralized bone matrix in internal fixation of ununited long bones.

BACKGROUND: Non-unions are severe complications in orthopaedic trauma care and occur in 10% of all fractures. The golden standard for the treatment of ununited fractures includes open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) as well as augmentation with autologous-bone-grafting. However, there is morbidity associated with the bone-graft donor site and some patients offer limited quantity or quality of autologous-bone graft material. Since allogene bone-grafts are introduced on the market, this comparative study aims to evaluate healing characteristics of ununited bones treated with ORIF combined with either iliac-crest-autologous-bone-grafting (ICABG) or demineralized-bone-matrix (DBM). METHODS AND RESULTS: From 2000 to 2006 out of sixty-two consecutive patients with non-unions presenting at our Level I Trauma Center, twenty patients had ununited diaphyseal fractures of long bones and were treated by ORIF combined either by ICABG- (n = 10) or DBM-augmentation (n = 10). At the time of index-operation, patients of the DBM-group had a higher level of comorbidity (ASA-value: p = 0.014). Mean duration of follow-up was 56.6 months (ICABG-group) and 41.2 months (DBM-group). All patients were clinically and radiographically assessed and adverse effects related to bone grafting were documented. The results showed that two non-unions augmented with ICABG failed osseous healing (20%) whereas all non-unions grafted by DBM showed successful consolidation during the first year after the index operation (p = 0.146). No early complications were documented in both groups but two patients of the ICABG-group suffered long-term problems at the donor site (20%) (p = 0.146). Pain intensity were comparable in both groups (p = 0.326). However, patients treated with DBM were more satisfied with the surgical procedure (p = 0.031). CONCLUSION: With the use of DBM, the costs for augmentation of the non-union-site are more expensive compared to ICABG (calculated difference: 160 euro/case). Nevertheless, this study demonstrated that the application of DBM compared to ICABG led to an advanced outcome in the treatment of non-unions and simultaneously to a decreased quantity of adverse effects. Therefore we conclude that DBM should be offered as an alternative to ICABG, in particular to patients with elevated comorbidity and those with limited availability or reduced quality of autologous-bone graft material.