Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 24
Filtrar
1.
Am J Manag Care ; 16(2): e35-42, 2010 Feb 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20148608

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of a physician-specific pay-for-performance program on quality-of-care measures in a large group practice. STUDY DESIGN: In 2007, Palo Alto Medical Clinic, a multispecialty physician group practice, changed from group-focused to physician-specific pay-for-performance incentives. Primary care physicians received incentive payments based on their quarterly assessed performance. METHODS: We examined 9 reported and incentivized clinical outcome and process measures. Five reported and nonincentivized measures were used for comparison purposes. The quality score of each physician for each measure was the main dependent variable and was calculated as follows: Quality Score = (Patients Meeting Target / Eligible Patients) x 100. Differences in scores between 2006 and 2007 were compared with differences in scores between 2005 and 2006. We also compared the performance of Palo Alto Medical Clinic with that of 2 other affiliated physician groups implementing group-level incentives. RESULTS: Eight of 9 reported and incentivized measures showed significant improvement in 2007 compared with 2006. Three measures showed an improvement trend significantly better than the previous year's trend. A similar improvement trend was observed in 1 related measure that was reported but was nonincentivized. However, the improvement trend of Palo Alto Medical Clinic was not consistently different from that of the other 2 physician groups. CONCLUSIONS: Small financial incentives (maximum, $5000/year) based on individual physicians' performance may have led to continued or enhanced improvement in well-established ambulatory care measures. Compared with other quality improvement programs having alternative foci for incentives (eg, increasing support for staff hours), the effect of physician-specific incentives was not evident.


Assuntos
Prática de Grupo , Médicos/economia , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Reembolso de Incentivo/organização & administração , California , Humanos , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde
2.
JAMA ; 298(9): 1023-37, 2007 Sep 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17785647

RESUMO

CONTEXT: Accreditation requirements mandate teaching quality improvement (QI) concepts to medical trainees, yet little is known about the effectiveness of teaching QI. OBJECTIVES: To perform a systematic review of the effectiveness of published QI curricula for clinicians and to determine whether teaching methods influence the effectiveness of such curricula. DATA SOURCES: The electronic literature databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and ERIC were searched for English-language articles published between January 1, 1980, and April 30, 2007. Experts in the field of QI were queried about relevant studies. STUDY SELECTION: Two independent reviewers selected studies for inclusion if the curriculum taught QI principles to clinicians and the evaluation used a comparative study design. DATA EXTRACTION: Information about the features of each curriculum, its use of 9 principles of adult learning, and the type of educational and clinical outcomes were extracted. The relationship between the outcomes and the number of educational principles used was assessed. RESULTS: Of 39 studies that met eligibility criteria, 31 described team-based projects; 37 combined didactic instruction with experiential learning. The median number of adult learning principles used was 7 (range, 2-8). Evaluations included 22 controlled trials (8 randomized and 14 nonrandomized) and 17 pre/post or time series studies. Fourteen studies described educational outcomes (attitudes, knowledge, or skills or behaviors) and 28 studies described clinical process or patient outcomes. Nine of the 10 studies that evaluated knowledge reported only positive effects but only 2 of these described a validated assessment tool. The 6 assessments of attitudes found mixed results. Four of the 6 studies on skill or behavior outcomes reported only positive effects. Eight of the 28 studies of clinical outcomes reported only beneficial effects. Controlled studies were more likely than other studies to report mixed or null effects. Only 4 studies evaluated both educational and clinical outcomes, providing limited evidence that educational outcomes influence the clinical effectiveness of the interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Most published QI curricula apply sound adult learning principles and demonstrate improvement in learners' knowledge or confidence to perform QI. Additional studies are needed to determine whether educational methods have meaningful clinical benefits.


Assuntos
Currículo , Educação Médica , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Competência Clínica , Avaliação Educacional , Gestão da Qualidade Total
3.
Health Care Manag (Frederick) ; 26(2): 142-6, 2007.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17464227

RESUMO

Patient discharges from the hospital often occur late in the day and are frequently clustered after 4 PM. When inpatients leave earlier in the day, quality is improved because new admissions awaiting beds are able to leave the emergency department sooner and emergency department waiting room backlog is reduced. Nursing staff, whose work patterns traditionally result in high activity of discharge and admission between 5 PM and 8 PM, benefit by spreading out their work across a longer part of the day. Discharging patients earlier in the day also has the potential to increase patient satisfaction. Despite multiple stakeholders in the discharge planning process, physicians play the most important role. Getting physician buy-in requires an ability to teach physicians about the concept of early-in-the-day discharges and their impact on the process. We defined a new physician-centered discharge planning process and introduced it to an internal medicine team with an identical control team as a comparison. Discharge time of day was analyzed for 1 month. Mean time of day of discharge was 13:39 for the intervention group versus 15:45 for the control group (P<.001). If reproduced successfully, this process could improve quality at an important transition point in patient care.


Assuntos
Eficiência Organizacional , Alta do Paciente , Papel do Médico , Baltimore , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transferência de Pacientes
4.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med ; 160(7): 707-12, 2006 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16818836

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine if infants aged 6 to 15 months with frequent parent-reported nighttime awakenings require reduced parental aid during a week of diphenhydramine hydrochloride treatment and 2 and 4 weeks after its discontinuation. DESIGN: Double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial. SETTING: The study was conducted from May 1, 2004, through May 1, 2005; patients were recruited nationally. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-four participants aged 6 to 15 months. INTERVENTIONS: Placebo or diphenhydramine was administered in infants 30 minutes before anticipated bedtime. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was dichotomous: a parental report of improvement in the number of night awakenings requiring parental assistance during the intervention week, which ended on day 14. Secondary outcomes were improved sleep during the 2 weeks before days 29 and 43, parental overall happiness with sleep, and improved sleep latency. RESULTS: On June 6, 2005, the data safety monitoring board voted unanimously to stop the trial early because of lack of effectiveness of diphenhydramine over placebo. Only 1 of 22 children receiving diphenhydramine showed improvement compared with 3 of 22 receiving placebo. To reach the a priori determined sample size and have a positive outcome (ie, rejecting the null hypothesis), the trial would have needed to enroll 16 more participants in each arm, with 15 of the 16 in the diphenhydramine group and 0 of 16 in the placebo group improving. CONCLUSION: During 1 week of therapy and at follow-up 2 and 4 weeks later, diphenhydramine was no more effective than placebo in reducing nighttime awakening or improving overall parental happiness with sleep for infants.


Assuntos
Difenidramina/farmacologia , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/farmacologia , Sono/efeitos dos fármacos , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Seguimentos , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Falha de Tratamento
5.
Adv Chronic Kidney Dis ; 12(4): 424-32, 2005 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16198283

RESUMO

This study examined whether patient education by nonmedical personnel (eg, social workers, dietitians) is associated with patient outcomes in a prospective cohort study of 1,005 incident dialysis patients treated at 79 United States clinics. Logistic and Poisson regression and Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the relationship between clinic use of nonmedical educators and patient satisfaction and self-management, hospitalization, and survival, respectively. Patients treated at clinics reporting use of nonmedical educators (84%) were more likely to be satisfied with the amount of information on dialysis modalities (odds ratio [OR]=.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08--2.58) and with the amount of information they received on dialysis (OR=1.23, 95% CI 0.90--1.67; marginally significant) than those treated at clinics without nonmedical educators (16%). These patients were also less likely to be hospitalized (incidence rate ratio [IRR]=0.91, 95% CI 0.80--1.03), but the association was of borderline statistical significance. Overall satisfaction, patient self-management, and mortality were not significantly associated with use of nonmedical educators. Use of nonmedical staff for patient education at dialysis centers has a limited but positive effect on patient satisfaction and hospitalization.


Assuntos
Educadores em Saúde , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Diálise Renal , Insuficiência Renal/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Pessoal de Saúde , Hospitalização , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodos , Satisfação do Paciente , Estudos Prospectivos , Estados Unidos , Recursos Humanos
6.
Soc Sci Med ; 61(8): 1846-53, 2005 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15919143

RESUMO

Interhospital transfers comprise a significant and increasing proportion of admissions to tertiary care centers. Patient dissatisfaction with the quality of hospital care may play an important role in these trends. The objective of this study was to describe why and how patients and surrogates request transfers to tertiary care. We interviewed 32 patients transferred to the Johns Hopkins Hospital, a US tertiary care center, or their surrogate decision-makers using a semi-structured, open-ended, iterative protocol. We used ethnographic decision modeling to develop an influence diagram of the decision. We contrasted subjects' perceptions of situations where patients did and did not request transfer to describe the threshold for requesting transfer. Subjects reported three major influences on the request to transfer to tertiary care: the quality of care at the community hospital compared to the tertiary center; the severity and potential consequences of the current illness; and their relationship with community hospitals, physicians, and tertiary care. Subjects' perceptions of the quality differential between community hospitals and tertiary centers focused on communication and medical errors rather than specialized care, hospital volume, or teaching status. Thresholds for when patients requested transfers were influenced by relationships with community hospitals and physicians and previous experience with tertiary care. This model provides a framework for understanding requests to transfer to tertiary care. Further investigation into the elements we have described might provide insights into improvements in the quality of care at community hospitals that might reduce the rates of requests for transfer. Our results also highlight the importance of including patient or surrogate perspectives in evaluations of the appropriateness of care.


Assuntos
Família , Satisfação do Paciente , Transporte de Pacientes , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Baltimore , Tomada de Decisões , Feminino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pesquisa Qualitativa
7.
Eur J Heart Fail ; 7(3): 333-41, 2005 Mar 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15718173

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether a hierarchy of effectiveness exists with respect to complexity of published protocols of heart failure (HF) disease management (DM) incorporating specialist nurse-led HF clinics. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION: We searched MEDLINE (1966-November 2004), the Cochrane Library, article bibliographies, and contacted experts. Inclusion criteria were random allocation of at least 100 patients, specialist HF nurses, HF clinics, and readmission as an outcome measure. DATA EXTRACTION: Paired reviewers conducted quality assessment, deconstructed and categorized protocols by complexity, and extracted results for readmission, mortality, the combined endpoint of mortality and hospitalization, HF readmission, and hospital days utilized. DATA SYNTHESIS: Six trials were selected (N=949, mean age 73 years [range 62-79], men 58%, LVEF 34% [27-41], and average follow-up of 8.5 months [3-12]). Compared with usual care, the overall relative risk [95% confidence interval] for readmission with this strategy was 0.91 [0.72, 1.16], mortality was 0.80 [0.57, 1.06], and the combined endpoint of mortality and hospitalization was 0.88 [0.74, 1.04]. We observed better outcomes for programs with versus programs without hospital discharge planning and immediate post-discharge follow-up; readmission 0.30 [0.04, 2.60] vs. 1.00 [0.86, 1.17], mortality 0.96 [0.63, 1.47] vs. 0.75 [0.55, 1.03], the combined endpoint of mortality and hospitalization 0.61 [0.18, 2.02] vs. 0.91 [0.80, 1.03], HF readmission 0.09 [0.10, 0.65] vs. 0.65 [0.43, 1.00], and hospitalized days utilized per patient -0.26 [-0.49,-0.02] vs. 0.09 [-1.17, 1.34]. CONCLUSIONS: HF DM with specialist nurse-led HF clinics is a promising strategy or effective alternative whose benefit may be optimized by programs with a homogeneous structure and components that are delivered with consistency.


Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Idoso , Protocolos Clínicos , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Feminino , Insuficiência Cardíaca/mortalidade , Insuficiência Cardíaca/enfermagem , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Enfermeiros Clínicos , Qualidade de Vida , Análise de Regressão
8.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr ; 38(1): 96-103, 2005 Jan 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15608532

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: National data from the mid-1990s demonstrated that many eligible patients did not receive highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) and that racial and gender disparities existed in HAART receipt. We examined whether demographic disparities in the use of HAART persist in 2001 and if outpatient care is associated with HAART utilization. METHODS: Demographic, clinical, and pharmacy utilization data were collected from 10 US HIV primary care sites in the HIV Research Network (HIVRN). Using multivariate logistic regression, we examined demographic and clinical differences associated with receipt of HAART and the association of outpatient utilization with HAART. RESULTS: In our cohort in 2001, 84% of patients received HAART and 66% had 4 or more outpatient visits during calendar year (CY) 2001. Of those with 2 or more CD4 counts below 350 cells/mm in 2001, 91% received HAART; 82% of those with 1 CD4 test result below 350 cells/mm received HAART; and 77% of those with no CD4 counts below 350 cells/mm received HAART. Adjusting for care site in multivariate analyses, age >40 years (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.13), male gender (AOR = 1.23), Medicaid coverage (AOR = 1.16), Medicare coverage (AOR = 1.73), having 1 or more CD4 counts less than 350 cells/mm (AOR = 1.33), and having 4 or more outpatient visits in a year (OR = 1.34) were significantly associated with an increased likelihood of HAART. African Americans (odds ratio [OR] = 0.84) and those with an injection drug use risk factor (OR = 0.86) were less likely to receive HAART. CONCLUSIONS: Although the overall prevalence of HAART has increased since the mid-1990s, demographic disparities in HAART receipt persist. Our results support attempts to increase access to care and frequency of outpatient visits for underutilizing groups as well as increased efforts to reduce persistent disparities in women, African Americans, and injection drug users (IDUs).


Assuntos
Terapia Antirretroviral de Alta Atividade/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Assistência Ambulatorial , Terapia Antirretroviral de Alta Atividade/tendências , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Infecções por HIV/transmissão , Hispânico ou Latino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Fatores de Risco , Estudos de Amostragem , Caracteres Sexuais , Estados Unidos , População Branca
9.
Crit Care Med ; 32(10): 2014-20, 2004 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15483409

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a multifaceted systems intervention would eliminate catheter-related bloodstream infections (CR-BSIs). DESIGN: Prospective cohort study in a surgical intensive care unit (ICU) with a concurrent control ICU. SETTING: The Johns Hopkins Hospital. PATIENTS: All patients with a central venous catheter in the ICU. INTERVENTION: To eliminate CR-BSIs, a quality improvement team implemented five interventions: educating the staff; creating a catheter insertion cart; asking providers daily whether catheters could be removed; implementing a checklist to ensure adherence to evidence-based guidelines for preventing CR-BSIs; and empowering nurses to stop the catheter insertion procedure if a violation of the guidelines was observed. MEASUREMENT: The primary outcome variable was the rate of CR-BSIs per 1,000 catheter days from January 1, 1998, through December 31, 2002. Secondary outcome variables included adherence to evidence-based infection control guidelines during catheter insertion. MAIN RESULTS: Before the intervention, we found that physicians followed infection control guidelines during 62% of the procedures. During the intervention time period, the CR-BSI rate in the study ICU decreased from 11.3/1,000 catheter days in the first quarter of 1998 to 0/1,000 catheter days in the fourth quarter of 2002. The CR-BSI rate in the control ICU was 5.7/1,000 catheter days in the first quarter of 1998 and 1.6/1,000 catheter days in the fourth quarter of 2002 (p = .56). We estimate that these interventions may have prevented 43 CR-BSIs, eight deaths, and 1,945,922 dollars in additional costs per year in the study ICU. CONCLUSIONS: Multifaceted interventions that helped to ensure adherence with evidence-based infection control guidelines nearly eliminated CR-BSIs in our surgical ICU.


Assuntos
Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Cateteres de Demora/efeitos adversos , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/normas , Sepse/prevenção & controle , Estudos de Coortes , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Estudos Prospectivos , Controle de Qualidade
10.
J Gen Intern Med ; 19(3): 266-8, 2004 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15009782

RESUMO

After treatment in an emergency department (ED), patients often wait several hours for hospital admission, resulting in dissatisfaction and increased wait times for both admitted and other ED patients. We implemented a new direct admission system based on telephone consultation between ED physicians and in-house hospitalists. We studied this system, measuring admission times, length of stay, and mortality. Postintervention, admission times averaged 18 minutes for transfer to the ward compared to 2.5 hours preintervention, while pre- and postintervention length of stay and mortality rates remained similar.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/organização & administração , Médicos Hospitalares , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Admissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Baltimore , Estudos de Coortes , Humanos , Transferência de Pacientes , Fatores de Tempo
11.
JAMA ; 291(11): 1358-67, 2004 Mar 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15026403

RESUMO

CONTEXT: Comprehensive discharge planning plus postdischarge support may reduce readmission rates for older patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of comprehensive discharge planning plus postdischarge support on the rate of readmission in patients with CHF, all-cause mortality, length of stay (LOS), quality of life (QOL), and medical costs. DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE (1966 to October 2003), the Cochrane Clinical Trials Register (all years), Social Science Citation Index (1992 to October 2003), and other databases for studies that described such an intervention and evaluated its effect in patients with CHF. Where possible we also contacted lead investigators and experts in the field. STUDY SELECTION: We selected English-language publications of randomized clinical trials that described interventions to modify hospital discharge for older patients with CHF (mean age > or =55 years), delineated clearly defined inpatient and outpatient components, compared efficacy with usual care, and reported readmission as the primary outcome. DATA EXTRACTION: Two authors independently reviewed each report, assigned quality scores, and extracted data for primary and secondary outcomes in an unblinded standardized manner. DATA SYNTHESIS: Eighteen studies representing data from 8 countries randomized 3304 older inpatients with CHF to comprehensive discharge planning plus postdischarge support or usual care. During a pooled mean observation period of 8 months (range, 3-12 months), fewer intervention patients were readmitted compared with controls (555/1590 vs 741/1714, number needed to treat = 12; relative risk [RR], 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64-0.88). Analysis of studies reporting secondary outcomes found a trend toward lower all-cause mortality for patients assigned to an intervention compared with usual care (RR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.73-1.03; n = 14 studies), similar initial LOS (mean [SE]: 8.4 [2.5] vs 8.5 [2.2] days, P =.60; n = 10), greater percentage improvement in QOL scores compared with baseline scores (25.7% [95% CI, 11.0%-40.4%] vs 13.5% [95% CI, 5.1%-22.0%]; n = 6, P =.01), and similar or lower charges for medical care per patient per month for the initial hospital stay, administering the intervention, outpatient care, and readmission (-359 dollars [95% CI, -763 dollars to 45 dollars]; n = 4, P =.10 for non-US trials and -536 dollars [95% CI, -956 dollars to -115 dollars]; n = 4, P =.03, for US trials). CONCLUSION: Comprehensive discharge planning plus postdischarge support for older patients with CHF significantly reduced readmission rates and may improve health outcomes such as survival and QOL without increasing costs.


Assuntos
Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Alta do Paciente , Idoso , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Insuficiência Cardíaca/mortalidade , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Readmissão do Paciente , Qualidade de Vida
12.
JAMA ; 291(6): 697-703, 2004 Feb 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14871912

RESUMO

CONTEXT: In light of conflicting evidence of differential effects of dialysis modality on survival, patient experience becomes a more important consideration in choosing between hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. OBJECTIVE: To compare patient satisfaction with hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis in a cohort of patients who have recently begun dialysis. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional survey at enrollment in a prospective inception cohort study of patients who recently started dialysis at 37 dialysis centers participating in the Choices for Healthy Outcomes in Caring for End-stage Renal Disease (CHOICE) study, a national multicenter study of dialysis outcomes, from October 1995 to June 1998. PATIENTS: Of 736 enrolled incident dialysis patients, 656 (89%) returned a satisfaction questionnaire after an average of 7 weeks of dialysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Data collected from a patient-administered questionnaire including 3 overall ratings and 20 items rating specific aspects of dialysis care. RESULTS: Patients receiving peritoneal dialysis were much more likely than those receiving hemodialysis to give excellent ratings of dialysis care overall (85% vs 56%, respectively; relative probability, 1.46 [95% confidence interval, 1.31-1.57]) and significantly more likely to give excellent ratings for each specific aspect of care rated. The 3 items with the greatest differences were in the domain of information provided (average of information items: peritoneal dialysis [69% excellent] vs hemodialysis [30% excellent]). The smallest differences were in ratings of accuracy of information from the nephrologist, response to pain, amount of fluid removed, and staff availability in an emergency. Adjustment for patient age, race, education, health status, marital status, employment status, distance from the center, and time since starting dialysis did not reduce the differences between peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis patients. CONCLUSIONS: After several weeks of initiating dialysis, patients receiving peritoneal dialysis rated their care higher than those receiving hemodialysis. These findings indicate that clinicians should give patients more information about the option of peritoneal dialysis.


Assuntos
Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Satisfação do Paciente , Diálise Peritoneal , Diálise Renal , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Inquéritos e Questionários
13.
J Am Soc Nephrol ; 15(1): 210-8, 2004 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14694175

RESUMO

There is little evidence supporting the widespread belief that regular patient-physician contact in chronic disease management leads to better patient outcomes. The objective of this study was to examine the relationship of the frequency of patient-physician contact with several patient outcomes in a prospective cohort study begun in 1995 of incident hemodialysis patients treated at 75 US dialysis clinics. Average frequency of patient-physician contact at each clinic was determined by clinic survey (low, monthly or less frequent; intermediate, between monthly and weekly; high, more than weekly). The authors used logistic, Poisson, and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses to assess the relationship between contact and satisfaction, quality of life, patient adherence, hospitalizations, and mortality. Of 735 hemodialysis patients, 14.3% were treated at clinics with high frequency of contact, 65.2% intermediate, and 20.5% low. Patients treated at clinics reporting less frequent physician contact had lower odds of rating the frequency at which they saw a nephrologist excellent (low: adjusted OR = 0.39, 95% CI, 0.23-0.67; intermediate: adjusted OR = 0.57, 95% CI, 0.37-0.87; reference, high) and greater odds of nonadherence (low: adjusted OR = 2.89, 95% CI, 1.01-8.29; intermediate: adjusted OR = 1.58, 95% CI, 0.78-3.19). However, patient survival did not vary by frequency of physician contact (low: adjusted RH = 0.87, 95% CI, 0.53-1.44; intermediate: adjusted RH = 1.33, 95% CI, 0.82-2.13), nor did patients' overall ratings of care, hospitalization rates, or quality of life measures. Although less frequent patient-physician contact was associated with lower patient satisfaction with that contact and patient nonadherence, it was not associated with several other outcomes of care. Future studies are needed to assess the individual frequency and nature of physician contact over time, including total time spent with the patient and quality of the interaction, to guide the provision of patient-centered and cost-effective care.


Assuntos
Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Relações Médico-Paciente , Diálise Renal , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/mortalidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Satisfação do Paciente , Qualidade de Vida , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do Tratamento
14.
Arthritis Rheum ; 49(6): 819-25, 2003 Dec 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14673969

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine aspects of quality of life (QOL) important to people with giant cell arteritis (GCA). METHODS: We explored the domains of QOL affected by GCA in audiotaped focus groups. We then created an Importance Rating Questionnaire (IRQ) by constructing questions related to the domains most frequently mentioned. Of 214 GCA patients to whom the IRQ was sent, 145 (68%) responded. We calculated frequencies of responses and then ranked items by the proportion selecting the top category of importance and also according to a mean item rank. We compared the domains of QOL covered by the IRQ with those in the Short Form 12 (SF-12). RESULTS: The highest rated QOL item was "losing sight in both eyes permanently." Of the top 20 items, 12 were in domains not covered directly by the SF-12. CONCLUSION: We have identified aspects of QOL important to GCA patients. Assessment of QOL in GCA should include vision and other domains that are not included in standard QOL questionnaires.


Assuntos
Arterite de Células Gigantes/fisiopatologia , Nível de Saúde , Qualidade de Vida , Atividades Cotidianas , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Arterite de Células Gigantes/complicações , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos e Questionários , Transtornos da Visão/etiologia
15.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 51(7): 917-22, 2003 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12834510

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether patient age is associated with differences in flexible bronchoscopy technique and tolerance. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: University hospital system. PARTICIPANTS: One thousand three hundred fifty-eight adults, including 219 (16.1%) aged 70 and older, undergoing bronchoscopy. MEASUREMENTS: Indications, sampling procedures, medication doses, patient reports of pain, willingness to return, and adverse events associated with bronchoscopy. RESULTS: Indications for bronchoscopy varied with age, with solitary pulmonary nodule (P <.001), mass (P <.001), or lymphadenopathy (P <.001) being more common in older patients. Invasive sampling methods were used more often with increasing age, but variation in disease processes between age groups accounted for the difference in sampling method performed. Mean doses of midazolam and fentanyl given for sedation decreased with increasing age (P <.001). There was no significant difference between older and younger patients in reported very good to excellent pain control (50% of patients >/=70 vs 64% of patients <40; P =.56) or in willingness to return for repeat bronchoscopy (98% vs 92%, respectively; P =.324). Overall risk for an adverse event increased with increasing patient age (P <.01), but adverse events were uncommon and generally not severe. Hypotension and pneumothorax were rare but occurred more often in older persons (1.9% and 3.4% in patients >/=70 vs 0.5% and 0.7% in patients <40, respectively). CONCLUSION: Despite more-invasive sampling methods and less sedation during bronchoscopy, elderly patients tolerate bronchoscopy as well as younger patients. There is increased risk for adverse events with increasing age, but the absolute frequency is low, suggesting that chronological age should not be a contraindication for bronchoscopy in older persons.


Assuntos
Broncoscopia/efeitos adversos , Pneumopatias/patologia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Satisfação do Paciente , Estudos Prospectivos
16.
Med Care ; 41(5): 637-48, 2003 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12719688

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Many hospitals use critical pathways to attempt to reduce postoperative length of stay (PLOS) for diverse conditions and procedures. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether critical pathways were associated with reductions in postoperative PLOS after accounting for prepathway trends in PLOS. RESEARCH DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study, from 1988 to 1998. SETTING: Academic medical center department of surgery. SUBJECTS: A total of 10,960 admissions eligible for 1 of 26 critical pathways implemented from 1990 to 1996, from 2 years before to 2 years after each pathway implementation date. Coding definitions were developed and validated to identify admissions eligible for each pathway, and data were abstracted from the hospital's discharge database. MEASURE: A pathway was considered effective if, after its implementation, there was a statistically significant decrease in the prepathway trend for PLOS. RESULTS: Median number of annual eligible admissions per pathway was 59 (range, 18-706). Median PLOS for the prepathway periods was 8 days (interquartile range, 5-10 days). For 16 (62%) pathways, PLOS was already declining in the prepathway period. After adjusting for demographics, comorbidity, admission characteristics, and prepathway time trends in PLOS, 7 (27%) pathways were associated with a significant postimplementation decrease in the rate of change in PLOS (range among the 7 pathways, 5-45% decrease) and none with a significant increase from the prepathway trend for PLOS. CONCLUSION: Critical pathways may decrease postoperative stay for some, but not all, surgeries. Trends toward decreasing length of stay over time may reduce the impact of critical pathways on this outcome.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Clínicos , Tempo de Internação/tendências , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/normas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/normas , Adulto , Baltimore , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Hospitais Universitários/normas , Hospitais Universitários/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Estudos Retrospectivos , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/classificação , Estados Unidos
17.
Chest ; 123(3): 941-8, 2003 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12628899

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine whether distraction therapy with nature sights and sounds during flexible bronchoscopy (FB) reduces pain and anxiety. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Teaching hospital in Baltimore, MD. PATIENTS: Consecutive adult patients (n = 80) undergoing FB with conscious sedation. INTERVENTION: Nature scene murals were placed at the bedside, and patients were provided a tape of nature sounds to listen to before, during, and after the procedure. Patients assigned to the control group were not offered either the nature scene or the sounds. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: The primary outcomes were patient ratings of pain control (a 5-point scale ranging from poor to excellent) and anxiety. In a multivariate ordinal logistic regression model, the odds of better pain control were greater in the intervention patients than in the control patients (odds ratio [OR], 4.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.35 to 16.7), after adjustment for age, gender, race, education, health status, and dose of narcotic medication. Older patients and patients with better health status reported significantly less pain. There was no difference in patient-reported anxiety between the two groups (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.39 to 1.96). CONCLUSIONS: Distraction therapy with nature sights and sounds significantly reduces pain in patients undergoing FB. Although the precise mechanism of this beneficial effect requires further investigation, clinicians should consider this nonintrusive strategy in addition to standard analgesic medications in patients undergoing painful, invasive procedures.


Assuntos
Ansiedade/prevenção & controle , Broncoscopia/métodos , Imagens, Psicoterapia , Terapias Mente-Corpo , Dor/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Satisfação do Paciente
18.
J Med Internet Res ; 5(4): e29, 2003 Nov 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14713657

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Most existing tools for measuring the quality of Internet health information focus almost exclusively on structural criteria or other proxies for quality of information, rather than evaluating information accuracy and comprehensiveness. OBJECTIVE: This research sought to build a conceptual framework that could lay the groundwork for a robust performance-measurement system for evaluating the quality of Internet health information. METHODS: Application of the quality-of-care measurement paradigm to developing a conceptual framework for defining and evaluating the quality of diabetes consumer-information Web sites. RESULTS: Performance measures related to accuracy and comprehensiveness of information can be added to structural criteria to provide a more-robust approach to Web site evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: The development and implementation of a reliable and valid method for evaluating the quality of Internet health sites could provide lay people with a tool to identify useful content more easily and distinguish between beneficial and misleading information.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus , Serviços de Informação/tendências , Internet/tendências , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde/tendências , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/tendências , Guias como Assunto/normas , Humanos , Serviços de Informação/normas , Internet/normas , Modelos Organizacionais , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodos , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/normas , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde/normas , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/normas
19.
J Med Internet Res ; 5(4): e30, 2003 Nov 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14713658

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Most existing tools for measuring the quality of Internet health information focus almost exclusively on structural criteria or other proxies for quality information rather than evaluating actual accuracy and comprehensiveness. OBJECTIVE: This research sought to develop a new performance-measurement tool for evaluating the quality of Internet health information, test the validity and reliability of the tool, and assess the variability in diabetes Web site quality. METHODS: An objective, systematic tool was developed to evaluate Internet diabetes information based on a quality-of-care measurement framework. The principal investigator developed an abstraction tool and trained an external reviewer on its use. The tool included 7 structural measures and 34 performance measures created by using evidence-based practice guidelines and experts' judgments of accuracy and comprehensiveness. RESULTS: Substantial variation existed in all categories, with overall scores following a normal distribution and ranging from 15% to 95% (mean was 50% and median was 51%). Lin's concordance correlation coefficient to assess agreement between raters produced a rho of 0.761 (Pearson's r of 0.769), suggesting moderate to high agreement. The average agreement between raters for the performance measures was 0.80. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes Web site quality varies widely. Alpha testing of this new tool suggests that it could become a reliable and valid method for evaluating the quality of Internet health sites. Such an instrument could help lay people distinguish between beneficial and misleading information.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus , Serviços de Informação , Internet , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Estudos de Viabilidade , Guias como Assunto/normas , Humanos , Serviços de Informação/normas , Serviços de Informação/estatística & dados numéricos , Internet/normas , Internet/estatística & dados numéricos , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodos , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/normas , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde/métodos , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Controle de Qualidade , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/normas , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos
20.
Med Care ; 40(11): 1090-100, 2002 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12409854

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Risk stratification for comparison of outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) typically includes only clinical measures of risk. Patient-reported health status may be an important independent predictor of short-term health outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether patient-reported health status, as measured by the Physical and Mental Component Summary scores of the SF-36, predicts in-hospital mortality and prolonged length of stay after CABG, after controlling for other clinical predictors of those outcomes. RESEARCH DESIGN: Prospective cohort study conducted from September 1993 to November 1995. SUBJECTS: One thousand seven hundred seventy-eight adults who underwent isolated CABG for myocardial ischemia. MEASURES: In-hospital mortality and prolonged length of stay (> 14 days). RESULTS: There were 27 deaths and 223 patients with prolonged length of stay in the study sample. A 10-point decrease in the Physical Component Summary (PCS) score increased the odds of in-hospital mortality by 61% (OR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.04-2.49), independent of established clinical risk factors. Similarly, a 10-point decrease in the PCS score increased the odds of prolonged length of stay by 33% (OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.13-1.57). A 10-point decrease in the Mental Component Summary score (MCS) decreased the odds of mortality by 36% (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.43-0.95). CONCLUSIONS: The PCS score is independently and significantly associated with in-hospital mortality and prolonged length of stay, after controlling for clinical risk factors. The MCS score is independently and significantly associated only with mortality, though the direction of the effect is unexpected. The result likely reflects a property of the scoring of the MCS and not a finding of clinical substance. Although caution must be taken when interpreting the summary scores, the SF-36 yields information not otherwise captured by clinical data and may be useful in risk stratification for in-hospital mortality and prolonged length of stay after CABG.


Assuntos
Ponte de Artéria Coronária/mortalidade , Nível de Saúde , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Tempo de Internação , Isquemia Miocárdica/cirurgia , Estudos de Coortes , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Estudos Prospectivos , Medição de Risco/métodos , Autorrevelação , Estatística como Assunto
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...