Epidural plus general anesthesia vs general anesthesia alone for elective aortic surgery: effects on gastric electrical activity and serum gastrin secretion.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate differences in electrogastrographic activity and serum gastrin secretion in patients subjected to general anesthesia (GA) vs blended anesthesia (BA = GA plus epidural analgesia) for abdominal aortic surgery. METHODS: Thirty-four patients (all males: 28 with abdominal aorta aneurysm, 6 with obstructive aorto-iliac disease; mean age: 68+/-7 years) were randomly assigned either to GA (N.=17) or to BA (N.=17) for abdominal aortic surgery. Each patient was evaluated for serum gastrin secretion at the time of electrogastrography (EGG) 24 h before and after surgery, using ambulatory equipment. Gastrin levels were tested under fasting conditions and after a standard meal. EGG shows gastric electrical activity that parallels gastric motor activity. RESULTS: Before surgery, no significant difference was found for any of the EGG parameters or the serum gastrin integrated value (area under the curve [AUC]) between the two groups of patients. After surgery, an increased frequency of electrical waves (tachygastria) was observed in 22% of those undergoing GA and in 5% of patients undergoing BA. The power ratio (postprandial/fasting total power) was exceedingly high (>4) in 53% of the GA patients and in 11% of the BA patients (P<0.05). The gastrin AUC was 263+/-58 pg/mL in the GA group and 179+/-92 pg/mL in the BA group (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: An excess of EGG activity and serum gastrin secretion was observed in patients undergoing GA vs those submitted to BA. Thus, the latter procedure seems to affect gastric function less than GA alone.

Multiple sampling 13C-urea breath test: improvement of diagnosis in postgastrectomy patients.

AIM: Partial gastrectomy and Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection are considered 2 risk factors for gastric cancer development. False negative urea breath test (UBT) results have been described in patients with gastric surgery, due to rapid gastric emptying of urea solution from the stomach. On the other hand, a rapid 10-minute 14C-UBT proved to be highly reliable for diagnosis of H. pylori infection when delaying test meal was omitted. Aim of this study was to improve the diagnostic accuracy of 13C-UBT in patients with gastric resection. METHODS: UBT was performed in 100 gastrectomised patients with breath collection at 0, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 minutes (multi-UBT) after 100 mg 13C urea ingestion and 100 ml of marketed fruit juice. In 28 cases contemporary histological data from biopsy specimens (within 1 month, in absence of treatment) were also available. RESULTS: Multi-UBT was persistently negative or positive in all the samplings in 34% and 25% of cases, respectively. Positivity only at 30 minutes was found in 10% of cases, while 19% of subjects were positive at 15-25 minutes but not at 30 minutes. In 12% of cases the test was positive only at 10 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: Multi-UBT offers a not negligible diagnostic improvement over the standard UBT: at least 19%, and up to 31% if positivity at ''10-minute only'' is taken into account. This method can be useful when accurate diagnosis of H. pylori infection is required in gastrectomised patients.