Results of the national registry of patients diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease candidates for bariatric surgery (ReNacEIBar).

BACKGROUND: Our aim is to carry out a national registry of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who underwent bariatric surgery, as well as evaluate the results and management of this type of patients in the usual clinical practice. METHODS: National multicentric observational retrospective study, including patients, previously diagnosed with IBD who underwent bariatric surgery from January 2000 to December 2022. RESULTS: Forty-one patients have been included: 43,9% previously diagnosed with ulcerative colitis, 57,3% Crohn's disease, and an indeterminate colitis (2,4%). The preoperative BMI was 45.8 ± 6,1 kg/m2. Among the bariatric surgeries, 31 (75,6%) sleeve gastrectomy, 1 (2,4%) gastric bypass and 9 (22%) one anastomosis gastric have been carried out. During the postoperative period, 9.8% complications have been recorded. BMI was 29,5 ± 4,7 kg/m2 and percent total weight lost was 33,9 ± 9,1% at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Bariatric surgery in patients with inflammatory bowel disease can be considered safe and effective.

Robotic Revisional Experience. Single Centre Prospective Cohort Study and Review of the Literature.

Background: Robotic bariatric surgery (RBS) has increased in recent years. Many doubts continue to exist regarding its utility in terms of postoperative complications, costs and technical aspects. RBS has increased its number and shows a more technical challenge associated with more post-operative complications compared to primary bariatric surgery. We herein present a single institution experience and review to describe its utility in revisional surgery. Methods: A retrospective review of our experience and a review of the literature has been conducted to evaluate the impact of robotic revisional surgery in the bariatric field. Results: A total of 17 patients (5 female and 12 male) were operated on. Most frequent surgery was conversion of sleeve gastrectomy to gastric bypass (n=9). No leaks were found nor severe complications. A systematic review showed similar results including a decreased number for complications when performing robotic revisional surgery. Conclusions: Revisional robotic surgery shows better results compared to standard laparoscopic revisional bariatric surgery in terms of efficacy, safety and hospital stay. No differences were seen in rates of mortality, morbidity and reintervention between both approaches. We encourage surgeons to learn to perform the robotic technique as part of the process of democratization and standardization of bariatric surgery.

Live surgery courses: retrospective safety analysis after 11 editions.

INTRODUCTION: Live surgery is a topic of interest at every meeting or course in the field of surgery. The potential of laparoscopy for live broadcasting makes it an excellent tool in continuing medical education. Surgeons who participate in live surgeries are usually experienced, but several conditions may influence the results and safety of a procedure. OBJECTIVES: To analyze safety and outcomes in a series of patients who underwent surgery in the last 10 years in a live surgery course at our institution. SETTING: University public hospital in Spain. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients who underwent surgery during these courses from 2006 to 2016. Morbidity, mortality, and long-term results were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 107 patients, 74 (68.5%) were women, and 38 (35.2%) had revision surgery. Five had surgery during previous editions. The most performed procedures were Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (38.9%), sleeve gastrectomy (16.7%), and duodenal switch (14%). Ten cases were endoscopic procedures. Morbidity was 13% (14 cases), and 6 required early postoperative revision (5.6%). Most of the complications were Clavien types III and I. Bleeding was the most common (72.4%). There was no anastomotic leak, but 1 duodenal stump leak occurred. During follow-up, 6 patients had a surgical complication and 5 required revision surgery. There was no mortality. DISCUSSION: We found higher morbidity and reoperation rates. The conversion rate in long-term follow-up was higher. Despite the educational benefits, we should take into consideration the higher risk to our patients for future editions.