Identification of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Diabetes.

Importance: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer care; however, accompanying immune-related adverse events (irAEs) confer substantial morbidity and occasional mortality. Life-threatening irAEs may require permanent cessation of ICI, even in patients with positive tumor response. Therefore, it is imperative to comprehensively define the spectrum of irAEs to aid individualized decision-making around the initiation of ICI therapy. Objective: To define incidence, risk factors, and clinical spectrum of an irreversible and life-threatening irAE: ICI-induced diabetes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study, conducted at an academic integrated health care system examined 14 328 adult patients treated with ICIs, including 64 patients who developed ICI-induced diabetes, from July 2010 to January 2022. The data were analyzed from 2022 to 2023. Cases of ICI-induced diabetes were manually confirmed; detailed clinical phenotyping was performed at diagnosis and 1-year follow-up. For 862 patients, genotyping data were available, and polygenic risk for type 1 diabetes was determined. Main Outcomes and Measures: For ICI-induced diabetes cases and controls, demographic characteristics, comorbidities, tumor category, and ICI category were compared. Among ICI-induced diabetes cases, markers of glycemic physiology were examined at diagnosis and 1-year follow-up. For patients with available genotyping, a published type 1 diabetes polygenic score (T1D GRS2) was calculated. Results: Of 14 328 participants, 6571 (45.9%) were women, and the median (range) age was 66 (8-106) years. The prevalence of ICI-induced diabetes among ICI-treated patients was 0.45% (64 of 14 328), with an incidence of 124.8 per 100 000 person-years. Preexisting type 2 diabetes (odds ratio [OR], 5.91; 95% CI, 3.34-10.45) and treatment with combination ICI (OR, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.44-4.59) were significant clinical risk factors of ICI-induced diabetes. T1D GRS2 was associated with ICI-induced diabetes risk, with an OR of 4.4 (95% CI, 1.8-10.5) for patients in the top decile of T1D GRS2, demonstrating a genetic association between spontaneous autoimmunity and irAEs. Patients with ICI-induced diabetes were in 3 distinct phenotypic categories based on autoantibodies and residual pancreatic function, with varying severity of initial presentation. Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this analysis of 14 328 ICI-treated patients followed up from ICI initiation determined the incidence, risk factors and clinical spectrum of ICI-induced diabetes. Widespread implementation of this approach across organ-specific irAEs may enhance diagnosis and management of these conditions, and this becomes especially pertinent as ICI treatment rapidly expands to treat a wide spectrum of cancers and is used at earlier stages of treatment.

Disparities in osteoporosis care among postmenopausal women in the United States.

Osteoporosis and fragility fractures result in significant morbidity and mortality and contribute to substantial healthcare costs. Despite being a treatable disease, osteoporosis remains both underdiagnosed and undertreated in the US general population, with significant disparities in care between non-White and White women. These disparities are evident from screening to post-fracture treatment. Non-White women are less likely to be screened for osteoporosis, to be prescribed pharmacotherapy, or to receive treatment post-fracture; furthermore, the mortality rate after fracture is higher in non-White women. Given existing diagnostic and treatment disparities, additional studies and interventions are needed to optimize the bone health of Asian, Black, Hispanic, and Native American women, and to reduce morbidity and mortality from osteoporosis and fragility fractures.

Detection of KIT D816V in peripheral blood of children with manifestations of cutaneous mastocytosis suggests systemic disease.

The use of allele-specific quantitative polymerase chain reaction to identify KIT D816V in the peripheral blood of adults with mastocytosis has been reported to have value in the diagnosis, assessment of disease burden and management of this disease. To examine the value of this assay in children with cutaneous manifestations of mastocytosis, we assessed data on 65 patients with all variants of paediatric-onset mastocytosis, including those known to have systemic disease, to correlate KIT mutation status with clinical findings, serum tryptase levels and bone marrow histopathology. We found that KIT D816V was not identified in the peripheral blood of children known to have only cutaneous disease (specificity 100%) but was found in those known to have both cutaneous and systemic/probable systemic disease (sensitivity of 85·2%). These findings were the basis of the development of an algorithm to assist in the decision for when to perform a bone marrow biopsy in children presenting with cutaneous manifestations of mastocytosis.

A distinct biomolecular profile identifies monoclonal mast cell disorders in patients with idiopathic anaphylaxis.

BACKGROUND: Clonal mast cell disorders are known to occur in a subset of patients with systemic reactions to Hymenoptera stings. This observation has prompted the question of whether clonal mast cell disorders also occur in patients with idiopathic anaphylaxis (IA). OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the prevalence of clonal mast cell disorders among patients with IA, criteria to identify those patients who require a bone marrow biopsy, and whether the pathogenesis of IA involves a hyperresponsive mast cell compartment. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled patients with IA (≥3 episodes/y) who then underwent a medical evaluation that included a serum tryptase determination, allele-specific quantitative PCR (ASqPCR) for the KIT D816V mutation, and a bone marrow examination. Mast cells were cultured from peripheral blood CD34+ cells and examined for releasability after FcεRI aggregation. RESULTS: Clonal mast cell disease was diagnosed in 14% of patients referred with IA. ASqPCR for the KIT D816V mutation was a useful adjunct in helping identify those with systemic mastocytosis but not monoclonal mast cell activation syndrome. A modified overall clonal prediction model was developed by using clinical findings, a serum tryptase determination, and ASqPCR. There was no evidence of a hyperresponsive mast cell phenotype in patients with IA. CONCLUSION: Patients with clonal mast cell disease can present as having IA. Distinct clinical and laboratory features can be used to select those patients more likely to have an underlying clonal mast cell disorder (monoclonal mast cell activation syndrome or systemic mastocytosis) and thus candidates for a bone marrow biopsy.