Decoy oligodeoxynucleotide targeting activator protein-1 (AP-1) attenuates intestinal inflammation in murine experimental colitis.

Various therapies are used for inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), though none seem to be extremely effective. AP-1 is a major transcription factor that upregulates genes involved in immune and proinflammatory responses. We investigated decoy oligodeoxynucleotide (ODN) targeting AP-1 to prevent dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis in mice. Functional efficacies of synthetic decoy and scrambled ODNs were evaluated in vitro by a reporter gene luciferase assay and measuring flagellin-induced IL-8 expression by HCT-15 cells transfected with ODNs. Experimental colitis was induced in mice with a 2.5% DSS solution in drinking water for 7 days, and decoy or scrambled ODNs were intraperitoneally injected from days 2 to 5. Colitis was assessed by weight loss, colon length, histopathology, and detection of myeloperoxidase (MPO), IL-1beta, and TNF-alpha in colon tissue. Therapeutic effects of AP-1 and NF-kappaB decoy ODNs were compared. Transfection of AP-1 decoy ODN inhibited AP-1 transcriptional activity in reporter assays and flagellin-induced IL-8 production in vitro. In mice, AP-1 decoy ODN, but not scrambled ODN, significantly inhibited weight loss, colon shortening, and histological inflammation induced by DSS. Further, AP-1 decoy ODN decreased MPO, IL-1beta, and TNF-alpha in colonic tissue of mice with DSS-induced colitis. The AP-1 decoy therapeutic effect was comparable to that of NF-kappaB decoy ODN, which also significantly decreased intestinal inflammation. Double-strand decoy ODN targeting AP-1 effectively attenuated intestinal inflammation associated with experimental colitis in mice, indicating the potential of targeting proinflammatory transcription factors in new therapies for IBD.

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma-dependent and -independent growth inhibition of gastrointestinal tumour cells.

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) acts as a ligand-activated transcription factor. Although ligand-induced cellular differentiation and growth inhibition have been mostly studied on human cancers expressing PPARgamma, it is unclear if the transcriptional activation of PPARgamma is the main mechanism of growth inhibition. In this study, we investigated whether there is a link between growth inhibitory effect and transcriptional activation of PPARgamma in several gastrointestinal tumour cell lines. The transcriptional activation potential of PPARgamma was assessed by reporter gene assay employing a PPRE-luciferase vector, and growth inhibitory effect of PPARgamma was investigated by (3)H-thymidine incorporation assay, in the presence or absence of thiazolidinedione ligands, rosiglitazone and troglitazone. As expected, in the case of cell lines positive for the transcriptional activation potential of PPARgamma (T.Tn, MKN-45 and LoVo), both the ligands induced growth inhibition. However, in case of some other cell lines negative for the transcriptional activation potential of PPARgamma (TT, AGS and HCT-15), troglitazone still showed a growth inhibitory effect. Administration of the PPARgamma antagonist GW9662 did not reverse this growth inhibitory activity of troglitazone. The introduction of dominant negative mutants of PPARgamma did not suppress the activity either. These observations suggest that while rosiglitazone inhibits cellular growth predominantly through transcriptional activation of PPARgamma, troglitazone can induce it both in PPARgamma-dependent and -independent pathways.