RESUMO
Purpose: Poorer health outcomes for transgender and gender diverse (TGD) individuals have been associated with lack of health care provider knowledge and personal bias. Training at all levels of medical education has been positioned as one strategy to combat these inequities. This study sought to characterize preclinical medical student attitude, skill, and knowledge pre- and post-teaching with TGD community volunteers. Methods: This matched pre- and post-test study was conducted from July 2020 to August 2021 capturing two preclinical medical student cohorts exposed to the same teaching intervention. Students completed the Transgender Attitudes and Beliefs Scale (TABS) and the Transgender Development of Clinical Skills Scale (T-DOCSS) at baseline, 1 week, and 1 month after the clinical skills session. Tutors' attitudes to TGD health were measured before facilitating teaching, using the Attitudes Toward Transgender Patients and Beliefs and Knowledge about Treating Transgender Patients scales. Results: Fifty-nine students completed questionnaires at three time points and were included in this study. Total TABS and T-DOCCS scores increased from preintervention to 1-week follow-up, maintained at 1 month, with significant changes in Interpersonal Comfort and Sex and Gender Beliefs subscales. Scores on the Human Value subscale did not change, remaining consistently high. Postintervention knowledge-question scores were high. Nine of 13 tutors completed surveys, demonstrating overall positive attitudes toward gender diversity and TGD health. Conclusion: This study demonstrates improvement in preclinical medical student attitudes and self-reported skill toward gender health care sustained at 1 month after small-group teaching with TGD community volunteers.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Transgender and gender diverse (TGD) people face many obstacles in accessing health care, including discrimination, institutional bias, and clinician knowledge deficits. We developed a clinical skills and education module on gender-affirming care for pre-clinical medical students, in collaboration with a TGD-led civil society organisation. The module consisted of an educational session followed by preceptor-facilitated small group tutorials, led by TGD patient-educators (n = 22) who used their lived experience to explore medical history-taking and broader issues related to TGD healthcare with students (n = 199). This study aimed to explore the views of students and TGD patient-educators on the structure, delivery and impact of the module. METHODS: Analysis of responses of TGD patient-educators and students to the module (2020 and 2021), in post-intervention surveys using open-ended questions for TGD patient-educators (18 responses from 22 educators) and free text comments as part of a quantitative survey for medical students (89 responses). RESULTS: Responses from students and patient-educators to the session were highly positive. Students and patient-educators emphasised that the teaching session succeeded through elevating the centrality of shared experience and creating a safe space for learning and teaching. Safety was experienced by patient-educators through the recognition of their own expertise in a medical environment, while students reported a non-judgemental teaching space which allowed them to explore and redress recognised limitations in knowledge and skill. Patient-educators described their motivation to teach as being driven by a sense of responsibility to their community. Preceptor attitudes may function as a barrier to the effectiveness of this teaching, and further attention should be paid to supporting the education of clinical facilitators in TGD health. CONCLUSION: The experiences of TGD patient-educators and medical students in this study suggest that this model of teaching could serve as a transferable template for TGD health and the inclusion of other historically marginalised groups in medical education.
