Conversion of a gene-specific repressor to a regional silencer.

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, gene silencing at the HMR and HML loci is normally dependent on Sir2p, Sir3p, and Sir4p, which are structural components of silenced chromatin. Sir2p is a NAD+-dependent histone deacetylase required for silencing. Silencing can be restored in cells lacking Sir proteins by a dominant mutation in SUM1, which normally acts as a mitotic repressor of meiotic genes. This study found that mutant Sum1-1p, but not wild-type Sum1p, associated directly with HM loci. The origin recognition complex (ORC) was required for Sum1-1p-mediated silencing, and mutations in ORC genes reduced association of Sum1-1p with the HM loci. Sum1-1p-mediated silencing also depended on HST1, a paralog of SIR2. Both Sum1-1p and wild-type Sum1p interacted with Hst1p in coimmunoprecipitation experiments. Therefore, the SUM1-1 mutation did not change the affinity of Sum1p for Hst1p, but rather relocalized Sum1p to the HM loci. Sum1-1-Hst1p action led to hypoacetylation of the nucleosomes at HM loci. Thus, Sum1-1p and Hst1p could substitute for Sir proteins to achieve silencing through formation of a compositionally distinct type of heterochromatin.

The two RNA ligases of the Trypanosoma brucei RNA editing complex: cloning the essential band IV gene and identifying the band V gene.

Kinetoplastid RNA editing is a posttranscriptional insertion and deletion of U residues in mitochondrial transcripts that involves RNA ligase. A complex of seven different polypeptides purified from Trypanosoma brucei mitochondria that catalyzes accurate RNA editing contains RNA ligases of approximately 57 kDa (band IV) and approximately 50 kDa (band V). From a partial amino acid sequence, cDNA and genomic clones of band IV were isolated, making it the first cloned component of the minimal RNA editing complex. It is indeed an RNA ligase, for when expressed in Escherichia coli, the protein autoadenylylates and catalyzes RNA joining. Overexpression studies revealed that T. brucei can regulate of total band IV protein at the level of translation or protein stability, even upon massively increased mRNA levels. The protein's mitochondrial targeting was confirmed by its location, size when expressed in T. brucei and E. coli, and N-terminal sequence. Importantly, genetic knockout studies demonstrated that the gene for band IV is essential in procyclic trypanosomes. The band IV and band V RNA ligases of the RNA editing complex therefore serve different functions. We also identified the gene for band V RNA ligase, a protein much more homologous to band IV than to other known ligases.

Trypanosome RNA editing: simple guide RNA features enhance U deletion 100-fold.

Trypanosome RNA editing is a massive processing of mRNA by U deletion and U insertion, directed by trans-acting guide RNAs (gRNAs). A U deletion cycle and a U insertion cycle have been reproduced in vitro using synthetic ATPase (A6) pre-mRNA and gRNA. Here we examine which gRNA features are important for this U deletion. We find that, foremost, this editing depends critically on the single-stranded character of a few gRNA and a few mRNA residues abutting the anchor duplex, a feature not previously appreciated. That plus any base-pairing sequence to tether the upstream mRNA are all the gRNA needs to direct unexpectedly efficient in vitro U deletion, using either the purified editing complex or whole extract. In fact, our optimized gRNA constructs support faithful U deletion up to 100 times more efficiently than the natural gRNA, and they can edit the majority of mRNA molecules. This is a marked improvement of in vitro U deletion, in which previous artificial gRNAs were no more active than natural gRNA and the editing efficiencies were at most a few percent. Furthermore, this editing is not stimulated by most other previously noted gRNA features, including its potential ligation bridge, 3' OH moiety, any U residues in the tether, the conserved structure of the central region, or proteins that normally bind these regions. Our data also have implications about evolutionary forces active in RNA editing.

Trypanosoma brucei U insertion and U deletion activities co-purify with an enzymatic editing complex but are differentially optimized.

RNA editing, the processing that generates functional mRNAs in trypanosome mitochondria, involves cycles of protein catalyzed reactions that specifically insert or delete U residues. We recently reported purification from Trypanosoma brucei mitochondria of a complex showing seven major polypeptides which exhibits the enzymatic activities inferred in editing and that a pool of fractions of the complex catalyzed U deletion, the minor form of RNA editing in vivo . We now show that U insertion activity, the major form of RNA editing in vivo , chromatographically co-purifies with both U deletion activity and the protein complex. Furthermore, these editing activities co-sediment at approximately 20 S. U insertion does not require a larger, less characterized complex, as has been suggested and could have implied that the editing machinery would not function in a processive manner. We also show that U insertion is optimized at rather different and more exacting reaction conditions than U deletion. By markedly reducing ATP and carrier RNA and increasing UTP and carrier protein relative to standard editing conditions, U insertion activity of the purified fraction is enhanced approximately 100-fold.

T. brucei RNA editing: adenosine nucleotides inversely affect U-deletion and U-insertion reactions at mRNA cleavage.

In the currently envisioned mechanism of trypanosome mitochondrial RNA editing, U-insertion and U-deletion cycles begin with a common kind of gRNA-directed cleavage. However, natural, altered, and mutationally interconverted editing sites reveal that U-deletional cleavage is inefficient without and activated by ATP and ADP, while U-insertional cleavage shows completely reverse nucleotide effects. The adenosine nucleotides' effects appear to be allosteric and determined solely by sequences immediately adjacent to the anchor duplex. Both U-deletional and U-insertional cleavages are reasonably active at physiological mitochondrial ATP concentration. Notably, ATP and ADP markedly stimulate complete U-deletion and inhibit U-insertion reactions, reflecting their effects on cleavage. These plus previous results suggest that U deletion and U insertion are remarkably distinct.

Unexpected electrophoretic migration of RNA with different 3' termini causes a RNA sizing ambiguity that can be resolved using nuclease P1-generated sequencing ladders.

It has been widely believed that the electrophoretic migration difference of otherwise identical RNAs with a P versus OH terminus would be the same as occurs for DNA, a fairly reproducible approximately 1/2 nucleotide (nt) offset. RNA with a 5'-OH indeed migrates

Purification of a functional enzymatic editing complex from Trypanosoma brucei mitochondria.

Kinetoplastid mitochondrial RNA editing, the insertion and deletion of U residues, is catalyzed by sequential cleavage, U addition or removal, and ligation reactions and is directed by complementary guide RNAs. We have purified a approximately 20S enzymatic complex from Trypanosoma brucei mitochondria that catalyzes a complete editing reaction in vitro. This complex possesses all four activities predicted to catalyze RNA editing: gRNA-directed endonuclease, terminal uridylyl transferase, 3' U-specific exonuclease, and RNA ligase. However, it does not contain other putative editing complex components: gRNA-independent endonuclease, RNA helicase, endogenous gRNAs or pre-mRNAs, or a 25 kDa gRNA-binding protein. The complex is composed of eight major polypeptides, three of which represent RNA ligase. These findings identify polypeptides representing catalytic editing factors, reveal the nature of this approximately 20S editing complex, and suggest a new model of editosome assembly.

Resolution of the RNA editing gRNA-directed endonuclease from two other endonucleases of Trypanosoma brucei mitochondria.

RNA editing in kinetoplastids, the specific insertion and deletion of U residues, requires endonuclease cleavage of the pre-mRNA at each cycle of insertion/deletion. We have resolved three endoribonuclease activities from Trypanosoma brucei mitochondrial extracts that cleave CYb pre-mRNA specifically. One of these, which sediments at approximately 20S and is not affected substantially by DTT, has all the features of the editing endonuclease. It cleaves CYb pre-edited or partially edited mRNA only when annealed to the anchor region of a cognate guide RNA (gRNA), and it cleaves accurately just 5' of the duplex region. Its specificity is for the 5' end of extended duplex RNA regions, and this prevents cleavage of the gRNA or other positions in the mRNA. This gRNA-directed nuclease is evidently the same activity that functions in A6 pre-mRNA editing. However, it is distinct and separable from a previously observed DTT-requiring endonuclease that sediments similarly under certain conditions, but does not cleave precisely at the first editing site in either the presence or absence of a gRNA. The editing nuclease is also distinct from a DTT-inhibited endonuclease that cleaves numerous free pre-mRNAs at a common structure in the region of the first editing site.

Trypanosoma brucei RNA editing. A full round of uridylate insertional editing in vitro mediated by endonuclease and RNA ligase.

RNA editing in kinetoplastids is the post-transcriptional insertion and deletion of uridylate residues in mitochondrial transcripts, directed by base pairing with guide RNAs. Models for editing propose transesterification or endonuclease plus RNA ligase reactions and may involve a guide RNA-mRNA chimeric intermediate. We have assessed the feasibility of the enzymatic pathway involving chimeras in vitro. Cytochrome b chimeras generated with mitochondrial extract were first found to have junctions primarily at the major endonuclease cleavage sites, supporting the role of endonuclease in chimera formation. Such cytochrome b chimeras are then specifically cleaved by extract endonuclease within the oligo(U) tract at the editing site, and the mRNA cleavage products are then joined by RNA ligase to generate partially edited mRNAs with uridylate residues transferred to an editing site. These in vitro generated partially edited mRNAs mimic partially edited mRNAs generated in vivo. Specific endonuclease cleavage in the editing region of the partially edited RNA demonstrates the potential for further in vitro editing. Finally, sensitivity to various ATP analogs suggests that all editing-like activities reported thus far utilize a mechanism involving RNA ligase.

Guide RNA-mRNA chimeras, which are potential RNA editing intermediates, are formed by endonuclease and RNA ligase in a trypanosome mitochondrial extract.

RNA editing in kinetoplast mitochondrial transcripts involves the insertion and/or deletion of uridine residues and is directed by guide RNAs (gRNAs). It is thought to occur through a chimeric intermediate in which the 3' oligo(U) tail of the gRNA is covalently joined to the 3' portion of the mRNA at the site being edited. Chimeras have been proposed to be formed by a transesterification reaction but could also be formed by the known mitochondrial site-specific nuclease and RNA ligase. To distinguish between these models, we studied chimera formation in vitro directed by a trypanosome mitochondrial extract. This reaction was found to occur in two steps. First, the mRNA is cleaved in the 3' portion of the editing domain, and then the 3' fragment derived from this cleavage is ligated to the gRNA. The isolated mRNA 3' cleavage product is a more efficient substrate for chimera formation than is the intact mRNA, inconsistent with a transesterification mechanism but supporting a nuclease-ligase mechanism. Also, when normal mRNA cleavage is inhibited by the presence of a phosphorothioate, normal chimera formation no longer occurs. Rather, this phosphorothioate induces both cleavage and chimera formation at a novel site within the editing domain. Finally, levels of chimera-forming activity correlate with levels of mitochondrial RNA ligase activity when reactions are conducted under conditions which inhibit the ligase, including the lack of ATP containing a cleavable alpha-beta bond. These data show that chimera formation in the mitochondrial extract occurs by a nuclease-ligase mechanism rather than by transesterification.

Editing domains of Trypanosoma brucei mitochondrial RNAs identified by secondary structure.

The posttranscriptional insertion and deletion of U residues in trypanosome mitochondrial transcripts called RNA editing initiates at the 3' end of precisely defined editing domains that can be identified independently of the cognate guide RNA. The regions where editing initiates in Trypanosoma brucei cytochrome b and cytochrome oxidase subunit II preedited mRNAs are specifically cleaved by a trypanosome mitochondrial endonuclease that acts like mung bean nuclease and therefore is single strand specific. The regions where editing initiates in virtually all examined preedited mRNAs are predicted to form loop structures, suggesting that editing domains could generally be recognized as prominent single-stranded loops. In contrast to preedited mRNA, edited mRNA can be either resistant or sensitive to cleavage by trypanosome mitochondrial endonuclease, depending on the reaction conditions. This selectivity appears dependent on the availability of extract RNAs, and in model reactions, edited mRNA becomes resistant to cleavage upon base pairing with its guide RNA. Natural partially edited mRNAs are also specifically cleaved with a sensitivity like preedited and unlike edited mRNAs, consistent with their being intermediates in editing. These results suggest that in vivo, the structure of editing domains could initially be recognized by the mitochondrial endonuclease, which could target its associated RNA ligase and terminal U transferase to begin cycles of enzymatic editing modifications.

Trypanosoma brucei mitochondrial guide RNA-mRNA chimera-forming activity cofractionates with an editing-domain-specific endonuclease and RNA ligase and is mimicked by heterologous nuclease and RNA ligase.

RNA editing in trypanosomes has been proposed to occur through transesterification or endonuclease cleavage and RNA ligation reactions. Both models involve a chimeric intermediate in which a guide RNA (gRNA) is joined through its 3' oligo(U) tail to an editing site of the corresponding mRNA. Velocity centrifugation of Trypanosoma brucei mitochondrial extracts had been reported to completely separate the gRNA-mRNA chimera-forming activity from endonuclease activity (V. W. Pollard, M. E. Harris, and S. L. Hajduk, EMBO J. 11:4429-4438, 1992), appearing to rule out the endonuclease-RNA ligase mechanism. However, we show that an editing-domain-specific endonuclease activity does cosediment with the chimera-forming activity, as does the RNA ligase activity, but detection of the specific endonuclease requires reducing assay conditions. This report further demonstrates that the T. brucei chimera-forming activity is mimicked by mung bean nuclease and T4 RNA ligase. Using cytochrome b (CYb) preedited mRNA and a model CYb gRNA, we found that these heterologous enzymes specifically generate CYb gRNA-mRNA chimeras analogous to those formed in the mitochondrial extract. These combined results provide support for the endonuclease-RNA ligase mechanism of chimera formation.

Concerted evolution of the tandem array encoding primate U2 snRNA occurs in situ, without changing the cytological context of the RNU2 locus.

In primates, the tandemly repeated genes encoding U2 small nuclear RNA evolve concertedly, i.e. the sequence of the U2 repeat unit is essentially homogeneous within each species but differs somewhat between species. Using chromosome painting and the NGFR gene as an outside marker, we show that the U2 tandem array (RNU2) has remained at the same chromosomal locus (equivalent to human 17q21) through multiple speciation events over > 35 million years leading to the Old World monkey and hominoid lineages. The data suggest that the U2 tandem repeat, once established in the primate lineage, contained sequence elements favoring perpetuation and concerted evolution of the array in situ, despite a pericentric inversion in chimpanzee, a reciprocal translocation in gorilla and a paracentric inversion in orang utan. Comparison of the 11 kb U2 repeat unit found in baboon and other Old World monkeys with the 6 kb U2 repeat unit in humans and other hominids revealed that an ancestral U2 repeat unit was expanded by insertion of a 5 kb retrovirus bearing 1 kb long terminal repeats (LTRs). Subsequent excision of the provirus by homologous recombination between the LTRs generated a 6 kb U2 repeat unit containing a solo LTR. Remarkably, both junctions between the human U2 tandem array and flanking chromosomal DNA at 17q21 fall within the solo LTR sequence, suggesting a role for the LTR in the origin or maintenance of the primate U2 array.

Coupling of poly(A) site selection and trans-splicing in Leishmania.

Intergenic regions of polycistronic pre-mRNAs of trypanosomatid protozoans are the sites of two processing reactions: polyadenylation of the upstream gene and trans-splicing of the capped miniexon to the downstream gene. Their close proximity and the lack of consensus motifs at poly(A) sites led us to test whether poly(A) site selection is governed by the location of the downstream splice acceptor in the DHFR-TS locus of Leishmania major. Whenever the position of the downstream splice site was altered, the poly(A) site was shifted 400-500 nucleotides upstream of the new splice site. In contrast, when the wild-type poly(A) site was eliminated, the downstream splice site was unaffected, and polyadenylation was maintained 200-500 nucleotides upstream of the splice site. In a second set of experiments, T7 RNA polymerase expressed in Leishmania was used to direct the synthesis of artificial pre-RNAs in vivo whose expression was found to require the presence of a downstream splice acceptor. We conclude that poly(A) site selection in Leishmania is specified by the position of the downstream splice acceptor and propose a scanning model for poly(A) site selection after splice site recognition.

Anagram solving: does effort have an effect?

The purpose of these studies was to explore the role of effort in remembering anagrams and their solutions. In Experiment 1, we compared the effects on memory of copying words, typing them as solutions for easy anagrams, or typing them as solutions for difficult anagrams. Solving anagrams involved more effort than did simply typing words, as indexed by response time. However, this effort facilitated recall for solutions to easy anagrams but not for solutions to difficult anagrams. In Experiment 2, we compared memory for anagrams and their solutions using a frequency-judgment task. Memory for solutions was better than memory for anagrams, and this difference was not affected by anagram difficulty. The results of these studies have implications for our understanding of the role of effort in remembering.