Permanent stoma rates after anterior resection for rectal cancer: risk prediction scoring using preoperative variables.

BACKGROUND: A permanent stoma after anterior resection for rectal cancer is common. Preoperative counselling could be improved by providing individualized accurate prediction modelling. METHODS: Patients who underwent anterior resection between 2007 and 2015 were identified from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. National Patient Registry data were added to determine presence of a stoma 2 years after surgery. A training set based on the years 2007-2013 was employed in an ensemble of prediction models. Judged by the area under the receiving operating characteristic curve (AUROC), data from the years 2014-2015 were used to evaluate the predictive ability of all models. The best performing model was subsequently implemented in typical clinical scenarios and in an online calculator to predict the permanent stoma risk. RESULTS: Patients in the training set (n = 3512) and the test set (n = 1136) had similar permanent stoma rates (13.6 and 15.2 per cent). The logistic regression model with a forward/backward procedure was the most parsimonious among several similarly performing models (AUROC 0.67, 95 per cent c.i. 0.63 to 0.72). Key predictors included co-morbidity, local tumour category, presence of metastasis, neoadjuvant therapy, defunctioning stoma use, tumour height, and hospital volume; the interaction between age and metastasis was also predictive. CONCLUSION: Using routinely available preoperative data, the stoma outcome at 2 years after anterior resection for rectal cancer can be predicted fairly accurately.

Usually, the goal of rectal cancer surgery is to remove the tumour and construct a bowel join. Sometimes, it is necessary to construct a stoma, which may become permanent. Swedish registry data were used to develop and test a statistical model to forecast the risk of a stoma 2 years after surgery. In addition, an online calculator was developed. The model performed reasonably well, and can be used to inform the patient and surgeon before surgery of the risk of a permanent stoma.

Chronic pain after open inguinal hernia repair: expertise-based randomized clinical trial of heavyweight or lightweight mesh.

BACKGROUND: There is a shortage of high-quality studies regarding choice of mesh in open anterior inguinal hernia repair in relation to long-term chronic pain. The authors hypothesized that heavyweight compared with lightweight mesh causes increased postoperative pain. METHODS: An RCT was undertaken between 2007 and 2009 at two sites in Sweden. Men aged 25 years or older with an inguinal hernia evaluated in the outpatient clinic were randomized in an unblinded fashion to heavyweight or lightweight mesh for open anterior inguinal hernia repair. Data on pain affecting daily activities, as measured by the Short-Form Inguinal Pain Questionnaire 9-12 years after surgery, were collected as the primary outcome. Differences between groups were evaluated by generalized odds and numbers needed to treat. RESULTS: A total of 412 patients were randomized; 363 were analysed with 320 questionnaires sent out. A total of 271 questionnaires (84.7 per cent) were returned; of these, 121 and 150 patients were in the heavyweight and lightweight mesh groups respectively. Pain affecting daily activities was more pronounced in patients randomized to heavyweight versus lightweight mesh (generalized odds 1.33, 95 per cent c.i. 1.10 to 1.61). This translated into a number needed to treat of 7.06 (95 per cent c.i. 4.28 to 21.44). Two reoperations for recurrence were noted in the heavyweight mesh group, and one in the lightweight mesh group. CONCLUSION: A large-pore lightweight mesh causes significantly less pain affecting daily activities a decade after open anterior inguinal hernia repair. Registration number: NCT00451893 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Postoperative non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use and oncological outcomes of rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are known to suppress the inflammatory response after surgery and are often used for pain control. This study aimed to investigate NSAID use after radical surgical resection for rectal cancer and long-term oncological outcomes. METHODS: A cohort of patients who underwent anterior resection for rectal cancer between 2007 and 2013 in 15 hospitals in Sweden was investigated retrospectively. Data were obtained from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry and medical records; follow-up was undertaken until July 2019. Patients who received NSAID treatment for at least 2 days after surgery were compared with controls who did not, and the primary outcome was recurrence-free survival. Cox regression modelling with confounder adjustment, propensity score matching, and an instrumental variables approach were used; missing data were handled by multiple imputation. RESULTS: The cohort included 1341 patients, 362 (27.0 per cent) of whom received NSAIDs after operation. In analyses using conventional regression and propensity score matching, there was no significant association between postoperative NSAID use and recurrence-free survival (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.02, 0.79 to 1.33). The instrumental variables approach, including individual hospital as the instrumental variable and clinicopathological variables as co-variables, suggested a potential improvement in the NSAID group (HR 0.61, 0.38 to 0.99). CONCLUSION: conventional modelling did not demonstrate an association between postoperative NSAID use and recurrence-free survival in patients with rectal cancer, although an instrumental variables approach suggested a potential benefit.

What is the risk of permanent stoma beyond 5 years after low anterior resection for rectal cancer? A 15-year follow-up of a randomized trial.

AIM: Low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer (LAR) entails a risk of symptomatic anastomotic leakage as well as impaired anorectal function, both of which may eventually result in the need for a permanent stoma (PS). The aim was to investigate the incidence of and risk factors for PS beyond 5 years following LAR. METHODS: Patients undergoing LAR and included in a multicentre trial with randomization to defunctioning stoma or not were followed for a median of 15 years. The reasons for a PS up to 5 years (PS ≤ 5 years) and beyond 5 years (PS > 5 years) were identified and compared. Risk factors for PS were analysed. RESULTS: Of all patients, 25% (57/232) had a PS. PS ≤ 5 years occurred in 19% (44/232) at a median of 12.5 months and PS > 5 years in 6% (13/232) at a median of 118 months following LAR. The main reason for PS ≤ 5 years was impaired anorectal function in 55% (24/44) and the main reason for PS > 5 years was pelvic sepsis related to the colorectal anastomosis in 46% (6/13). The major risk factor for PS was symptomatic anastomotic leakage, which occurred in 56% (32/57) of patients with PS and 10% (17/175) of patients without PS (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: One-fourth of the patients who ended up with a PS had it fashioned beyond 5 years at a median of 10 years following LAR. Symptomatic anastomotic leakage was the major risk factor for PS, and impaired anorectal function was the main overall reason for a PS.

A nationwide study on the incidence of mesenteric ischaemia after surgery for rectal cancer demonstrates an association with high arterial ligation.

AIM: The incidence of mesenteric ischaemia after resection for rectal cancer has not been investigated in a population-based setting. The use of high ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery might cause such ischaemia, as the bowel left in situ depends on collateral blood supply after a high tie. METHOD: The Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry was used to identify all patients subjected to an abdominal resection for rectal cancer during the years 2007-2017 inclusive. Mesenteric ischaemia within the first 30 postoperative days was recorded, classified as either stoma necrosis or colonic necrosis. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for mesenteric ischaemia in relation to high tie, with adjustment for confounding. RESULTS: Some 14 657 patients were included, of whom 59 (0.40%) had a reoperation for any type of mesenteric ischaemia, divided into 34 and 25 cases of stoma necrosis and colonic necrosis, respectively. Compared with patients who did not require reoperation for mesenteric ischaemia following rectal cancer surgery, the proportion having high tie was greater (54.2% vs 38.5%; P = 0.032). The adjusted OR for reoperation due to any mesenteric ischaemia with high tie was 2.26 (95% CI 1.34-3.79), while the corresponding estimates for stoma and colonic necrosis, respectively, were 1.60 (95% CI 0.81-3.17) and 3.69 (95% CI 1.57-8.66). CONCLUSION: The incidence of reoperation for mesenteric ischaemia after abdominal resection for rectal cancer is low, but the use of a high tie might increase the risk of colonic necrosis demanding surgery.

Population-based cohort study of the impact on postoperative mortality of anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Background: Anastomotic leakage following anterior resection for rectal cancer may result in death. The aim of this study was to yield an updated, population-based estimate of postoperative mortality and evaluate possible interacting factors. Methods: This was a retrospective national cohort study of patients who underwent anterior resection between 2007 and 2016. Data were retrieved from a prospectively developed database. Anastomotic leakage constituted exposure, whereas outcome was defined as death within 90 days of surgery. Logistic regression analyses, using directed acyclic graphs to evaluate possible confounders, were performed, including interaction analyses. Results: Of 6948 patients, 693 (10·0 per cent) experienced anastomotic leakage and 294 (4·2 per cent) underwent reintervention due to leakage. The mortality rate was 1·5 per cent in patients without leakage and 3·9 per cent in those with leakage. In multivariable analysis, leakage was associated with increased mortality only when a reintervention was performed (odds ratio (OR) 5·57, 95 per cent c.i. 3·29 to 9·44). Leaks not necessitating reintervention did not result in increased mortality (OR 0·70, 0·25 to 1·96). There was evidence of interaction between leakage and age on a multiplicative scale (P = 0·007), leading to a substantial mortality increase in elderly patients with leakage. Conclusion: Anastomotic leakage, in particular severe leakage, led to a significant increase in 90-day mortality, with a more pronounced risk of death in the elderly.

Chronic pain, discomfort, quality of life and impact on sex life after open inguinal hernia mesh repair: an expertise-based randomized clinical trial comparing lightweight and heavyweight mesh.

PURPOSE: There is a paucity of high-quality evidence concerning mesh choice in open inguinal hernia repair. Using an expertise-based randomized clinical trial design, we aimed to evaluate the postoperative impact of two different mesh types on pain and discomfort, quality of life and sex life. METHODS: In two regional hospitals, male patients with primary inguinal hernia were randomized to one of two groups of surgeons that performed the Lichtenstein operation. One group of surgeons used a heavyweight polypropylene mesh (90 g/m2, Bard™ Flatmesh, Davol) while the second group employed a lightweight mesh (28 g/m2, ULTRAPRO™, Ethicon). Follow-up data were collected by questionnaires and outpatient visits in the range of 1-3 years after surgery. RESULTS: Some 412 patients were randomized and 363 patients were analysed. There was no difference in pain between groups after surgery but a statistically significant difference concerning awareness of a groin lump and groin discomfort, favouring the lightweight group 1 year after surgery. No differences in quality of life between groups could be detected but both groups had a substantially better quality of life postoperatively, as compared to before surgery. In the analysis of impact on sex life, no differences between mesh groups were found. CONCLUSION: The Lichtenstein operation performed for primary inguinal hernia improves quality of life for most of the male patients, independently of the type of mesh used. The lightweight mesh group experienced less awareness of a groin lump and groin discomfort 1 year postoperatively. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00451893.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the risk of anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been widely used in colorectal surgery due to their opioid-sparing effect. However, several studies have indicated an increased risk of anastomotic leakage following NSAID treatment, although conflicting results exist. The primary goal of this study was to further examine whether postoperative NSAIDs are independently associated with anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer. METHODS: Patients who underwent anterior resection for rectal cancer during 2007-2013 in 15 different hospitals in three healthcare regions in Sweden were included in the study. Registry data and information from patient records were retrieved. The association between NSAID treatment (for at least two days in the first postoperative week) and symptomatic anastomotic leakage (within 90 days) was evaluated with multiple logistic regression, with adjustment for pertinent confounding factors. RESULTS: Some 1495 patients were included in the study. Of these, 27% received postoperative NSAIDs for at least two days in the first postoperative week. Symptomatic anastomotic leakage occurred in 11% and 14% in the NSAID and non-NSAID group, respectively. With adjustment for confounders, the odds ratio for leakage among patients who received NSAIDs compared with those who did not was 0.88 (95% CI 0.65-1.20). No differences were seen between non-selective and COX-2-selective NSAIDs. CONCLUSION: Postoperative NSAID treatment does not seem to increase the risk of symptomatic anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer. NSAID use appears to be safe, but a well-powered randomized clinical trial is warranted.

High stoma prevalence and stoma reversal complications following anterior resection for rectal cancer: a population-based multicentre study.

AIM: Fashioning a defunctioning stoma is common when performing an anterior resection for rectal cancer in order to avoid and mitigate the consequences of an anastomotic leakage. We investigated the permanent stoma prevalence, factors influencing stoma outcome and complication rates following stoma reversal surgery. METHOD: Patients who had undergone an anterior resection for rectal cancer between 2007 and 2013 in the northern healthcare region were identified using the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry and were followed until the end of 2014 regarding stoma outcome. Data were retrieved by a review of medical records. Multiple logistic regression was used to evaluate predefined risk factors for stoma permanence. Risk factors for non-reversal of a defunctioning stoma were also analysed, using Cox proportional-hazards regression. RESULTS: A total of 316 patients who underwent anterior resection were included, of whom 274 (87%) were defunctioned primarily. At the end of the follow-up period 24% had a permanent stoma, and 9% of patients who underwent reversal of a stoma experienced major complications requiring a return to theatre, need for intensive care or mortality. Anastomotic leakage and tumour Stage IV were significant risk factors for stoma permanence. In this series, partial mesorectal excision correlated with a stoma-free outcome. Non-reversal was considerably more prevalent among patients with leakage and Stage IV; Stage III patients at first had a decreased reversal rate, which increased after the initial year of surgery. CONCLUSION: Stoma permanence is common after anterior resection, while anastomotic leakage and advanced tumour stage decrease the chances of a stoma-free outcome. Stoma reversal surgery entails a significant risk of major complications.

Level of vascular tie and its effect on functional outcome 2 years after anterior resection for rectal cancer.

AIM: Previous research indicates that high tie of the inferior mesenteric artery during anterior resection for rectal cancer might be associated with an increased risk of postoperative functional disturbances. The goal of this population-based retrospective cohort study was to further investigate that association. METHOD: Patients who underwent anterior resection for rectal cancer from April 2011 to September 2012 were identified through the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. Bowel and urogenital function were assessed by a postal questionnaire 2 years after surgery. Information on the level of mesenteric tie and clinical variables was retrieved from the registry. The outcome was defined as any defaecatory, urinary or sexual dysfunction as reported by the patient. The association between high tie and the outcome was evaluated with multivariable logistic and linear regression with adjustment for confounders, such as sex, body mass index, comorbidity and preoperative radiation. RESULTS: With a response rate of 86%, 805 patients were included in the study. Of these, 46% were operated with high tie. After adjustment for confounders, high tie did not affect the risk of faecal incontinence (OR 0.85; 95% CI 0.59-1.22), urinary incontinence (OR 0.94; 95% CI 0.63-1.41) or various aspects of sexual dysfunction (erectile dysfunction, anejaculation, dyspareunia and coital vaginal dryness). However, an association between high tie and defaecation at night was detected (OR 1.44; 95% CI 1.02-2.03). CONCLUSION: This study does not support that the level of vascular tie influences the risk of major defaecatory, urinary or sexual disturbances 2 years after anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Efficiency of Colorectal Cancer Surveillance in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis: 38 Years' Experience in a Patient Cohort from a Defined Population Area.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Ulcerative colitis increases the risk of developing colorectal cancer. Colonoscopic surveillance is recommended although there are no randomized trials evaluating the efficacy of such a strategy. This study is an update of earlier studies from an ongoing colonoscopic surveillance program. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients with ulcerative colitis were invited to the surveillance program that started in 1977 at Örnsköldsvik Hospital, located in the northern part of Sweden. Five principal endoscopists performed the colonoscopies and harvested mucosal sampling for histopathological evaluation. Some 323 patients from the defined catchment area were studied from 1977 to 2014. At the end of the study period, 130 patients, including those operated on, had had total colitis for more than 10 years. RESULTS: In total, 1481 colonoscopies were performed on 323 patients during the study period without any major complications. In all, 10 cases of colorectal cancer were diagnosed in 9 patients, of whom 1 died from colorectal cancer. The cumulative incidence of colorectal cancer was 1.4% at 10 years, 2.0% at 20 years, 3.0% at 30 years, and 9.4% at 40 years of disease duration, respectively. The standardized colorectal cancer incidence ratio was 3.01 (95% confidence interval: 1.42-5.91). Major surgery was performed on 65 patients; for 20 of these, the indication for surgery was dysplasia or colorectal cancer. Panproctocolectomy was performed in 43 patients. CONCLUSION: This study supports that colonoscopic surveillance is a safe and effective long-term measure to detect dysplasia and progression to cancer. The low numbers of colorectal cancer-related deaths in our study suggest that early detection of neoplasia and adequate surgical intervention within a surveillance program may reduce colorectal cancer mortality in ulcerative colitis patients.

Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer and Visceral Blood Flow: An Explorative Study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Impaired blood perfusion may be implicated in anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer. We investigated whether high ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery or total mesorectal excision compromises visceral blood flow in the colonic limb and the rectal stump, respectively. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted in a university hospital setting. We used Laser Doppler flowmetry to evaluate the impact of level of tie on colonic limb perfusion and the extent of the mesorectal excision on the rectal blood flow. In the rectum, different quadrants were also assessed. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare mean blood flow ratios between groups. RESULTS: Some 23 patients were recruited in a convenience sample during a period in 2012-2013. The mean blood flow ratio was not decreased after high tie compared to low tie surgery (1.71 vs 1.19; p = 0.28). Total mesorectal excision reduced the mean blood flow ratio in the rectum, as compared with partial mesorectal excision (0.76 vs 1.28; p = 0.14). This was especially pronounced in the posterior aspect of the rectum (0.66 vs 1.68; p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: High tie ligation did not seem to decrease colonic limb perfusion, while total mesorectal excision may decrease rectal blood flow. The posterior quadrant of the rectum might be particularly vulnerable to the dissection involved in total mesorectal excision.

High arterial ligation and risk of anastomotic leakage in anterior resection for rectal cancer in patients with increased cardiovascular risk.

AIM: Controversy still exists as to whether division of the inferior mesenteric artery close to the aorta influences the risk of anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer. This population-based study was carried out to evaluate the independent association between high arterial ligation and anastomotic leakage in patients with increased cardiovascular risk. METHOD: All 2673 cases of registered anterior resection for rectal cancer from 2007 to 2010 were identified from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry and cross-referenced with the Prescribed Drugs Registry, rendering a cohort of all patients with increased cardiovascular risk. Operative charts and registered data were reviewed for 722 patients. The association between high tie and anastomotic leakage, as quantified by ORs and 95% CIs, was evaluated in a logistic regression model, with adjustment for confounding, including assessment of interaction. RESULTS: Symptomatic anastomotic leakage occurred in 12.3% (41/334) of patients in the high tie group and in 10.6% (41/388) in the low tie group. The use of high tie was not independently associated with a higher risk of anastomotic leakage (OR = 1.05; 95% CI: 0.61-1.84). In a post-hoc analysis, patients with a history of manifest cardiovascular disease and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score III-IV seemed to be at greater risk (OR = 3.66; 95% CI: 1.04-12.85). CONCLUSION: In the present population-based, observational setting, high tie was not independently associated with an increased risk of symptomatic anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer. However, this conclusion may not hold for patients with severe cardiovascular disease.

Early postoperative mortality after surgery for rectal cancer in Sweden, 2000-2011.

AIM: Postoperative mortality has traditionally been defined as death within 30 days of surgery. Such mortality after rectal cancer resection has declined significantly during the last decades. However, it is possible that this decline can be explained merely by a shift towards an increase in 90-day mortality. METHOD: A nationwide cohort study was based on data from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry and the Swedish Patient Registry concerning patients who had undergone surgical resection for rectal cancer in 2000-2011. Unconditional logistic regression was used to calculate ORs with 95% CIs regarding mortality in different calendar periods (2000-2003, 2004-2007 and 2008-2011) in two different postoperative time periods (0-30 days and 31-90 days). RESULTS: Some 15,437 patients were included in this surgical cohort. Mortality within 30 days of surgery decreased from 2.1% in 2000-2003 to 1.6% in 2008-2011, whilst the corresponding mortality within the 31- to 90-day time window decreased from 2.1% to 1.4%. The adjusted risk of 30-day mortality in 2008-2011 was statistically significantly decreased compared with that in 2000-2003 (OR = 0.67; 95% CI: 0.48-0.93) and mortality in the 31- to 90-day time window was also reduced for 2008-2011 compared with 2000-2003 (OR = 0.71; 95% CI: 0.51-0.99). CONCLUSION: This population-based, nationwide Swedish study indicates that postoperative mortality, as measured within 30 days and 31-90 days after surgery, has decreased with time. However, no relevant shift from earlier to later postoperative mortality was discerned.

Surgical complications and long-term survival after esophagectomy for cancer in a nationwide Swedish cohort study.

AIMS: Acute surgical complications after esophageal resection for cancer may decrease the long-term survival. Previous results on this topic are conflicting and no population-based studies are available. METHODS: A prospective, nationwide Swedish study was conducted in 2001-2010. Eligible patients comprised those afflicted by esophageal or cardia cancer and underwent surgical resection in Sweden in 2001-2005. Details concerning patient and tumor characteristics, surgical procedures, and postoperative surgical complications were collected prospectively. Follow-up for mortality, starting from 90 days after the surgery, was done until May 2010. Cox proportional-hazards regression was performed to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusted for age, tumor stage, sex, histology, comorbidity, surgical approach and surgical radicality. RESULTS: Among 567 included patients who survived at least 90 days postoperatively, 130 (22.9%) sustained a predefined surgical complication within 30 days of surgery. The adjusted HR of mortality was increased in patients who sustained surgical complications, compared to patients without such complications (HR 1.29, 95% CI 1.02-1.63). CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence of surgical complications might be an independent predictor for poorer long-term survival in patients resected for esophageal cancer, even in patients who survived the postoperative period.

High tie in anterior resection for rectal cancer confers no increased risk of anastomotic leakage.

BACKGROUND: It is controversial whether division of the inferior mesenteric artery close to the aorta influences the risk of anastomotic leakage, especially in the elderly and unfit. This population-based study was carried out to evaluate the independent association between a high arterial ligation and anastomotic leakage in anterior resection for rectal cancer. METHODS: All patients who had anterior resection for rectal cancer from 2007 to 2009 inclusive were identified in the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. The association between high tie and anastomotic leakage was evaluated in a logistic regression model, with adjustment for confounders. Stratification was performed for co-morbidity as judged by the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification. RESULTS: Symptomatic anastomotic leakage occurred in 81 (9·9 per cent) of 818 patients with a high tie and 108 (9·8 per cent) of 1101 without. Overall, the use of a high tie was not associated with a higher risk of anastomotic leakage (odds ratio (OR) 1·00, 95 per cent confidence interval 0·72 to 1·39). There was no increased risk in patients classifed as ASA grade I or II (OR 0·97, 0·69 to 1·35), or in those graded ASA III or IV (OR 1·26, 0·58 to 2·75). CONCLUSION: In the present population-based setting, use of a high tie was not associated with an increased rate of symptomatic anastomotic leakage.

Sex-specific exposure prevalence of established risk factors for oesophageal adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: There is an unexplained male predominance in the incidence of oesophageal adenocarcinoma, and the sex-specific distribution of its risk factors in the general population is not known. METHODS: A random sample of Swedish citizens aged 40-79 years completed a questionnaire for assessment of the prevalence of five risk factors for oesophageal adenocarcinoma: reflux symptoms, body mass index, tobacco smoking habits, socioeconomic status, and use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to evaluate the association of these risk factors, separately and combined, with male sex, with women as reference. RESULTS: Among 6969 invited people, 4906 (70.4%) completed the questionnaire. Adjusted prevalence estimates showed a negative association with male sex with regard to reflux disease (OR=0.70, 95% CI=0.58-0.84), whereas overweight (OR=1.98, 95% CI=1.72-2.27) and obesity (OR=1.22, 95% CI=1.01-1.47), previous smoking (OR=1.50, 95% CI=1.30-1.72), and no NSAID use (OR=1.35, 95% CI=1.15-1.49) were positively associated. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to some but not all established risk factors for oesophageal adenocarcinoma seems to be more common in men than in women, but the differences are small and unlikely to explain the male predominance of this tumour.

Population-based study of surgical factors in relation to health-related quality of life after oesophageal cancer resection.

BACKGROUND: Oesophagectomy for cancer has a negative impact on health-related quality of life (HRQL), but factors influencing postoperative HRQL have been sparsely studied. This study explored how selected surgical factors affected HRQL 6 months after operation. METHODS: This population-based study was based on a Swedish network of physicians with almost complete nationwide coverage and data on oesophageal cancer surgery collected prospectively between 2001 and 2005. Patients completed validated HRQL questionnaires 6 months after operation. Mean scores with 95 per cent confidence intervals were calculated and clinically relevant differences between groups were analysed in a linear regression model, adjusted for potential confounders. RESULTS: Some 355 patients were included in the analysis (participation rate 79.6 per cent). Extensive surgery, as indicated by a transthoracic approach, more extensive lymphadenectomy, wider resection margins and a longer duration of operation, was not associated with worse HRQL measures than less extensive operations. Dysphagia was similar in patients who had handsewn and stapled anastomoses. Technical surgical complications had significant deleterious effects on several aspects of HRQL. CONCLUSION: This study provides no evidence to suggest that less extensive surgery for oesophageal cancer should be recommended from the perspective of HRQL. It is essential, however, that attention be paid to minimizing technical surgical complications.